Texas bill targets 'furries,' banning non-human behavior in schools
A new Texas bill, known as the FURRIES Act, would ban non-human behaviors in public schools, including the use of litter boxes and wearing animal accessories.
The bill prohibits students from presenting themselves as anything other than human, with exemptions for events like Halloween.
Students who violate the law could face suspension, expulsion, or placement in a juvenile justice education program.
Educators who fail to enforce the law could face fines, with penalties starting at $10,000.
TEXAS - A new Texas bill aims to ban non-human behaviors in public schools, commonly associated with "furries." The proposed legislation outlines a wide range of prohibited behaviors, from using a litter box to wearing animal ears and leashes.
What we know
The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES Act, prohibits students from engaging in "any non-human behavior," including presenting themselves as anything other than a human.
Dig deeper
According to the bill, examples of prohibited behaviors include:
Using a litter box to relieve oneself
Wearing non-human accessories, such as:TailsLeashesCollarsAccessories designed for petsFur (other than natural human hair or wigs)Animal-like earsItems not historically designed for humans
Tails
Leashes
Collars
Accessories designed for pets
Fur (other than natural human hair or wigs)
Animal-like ears
Items not historically designed for humans
Making animal noises such as barking, meowing, or hissing
Licking oneself for grooming
The bill states that students must present themselves as human and are also prohibited from:
Creating organizations or clubs related to non-human behavior
Promoting the belief that non-human behaviors are socially acceptable
The bill allows certain exemptions, including:
Halloween or school dress-up events related to human history (limited to five days per school year)
Theater performances
Dressing as a school mascot
Students who do not comply with the proposed law could face removal from class, suspension, or expulsion. The bill also allows for placement in a juvenile justice alternative education program.
Educators are required to report violations to the Texas attorney general. School districts that fail to enforce the law could face fines—starting at $10,000 for the first offense and increasing to $25,000 for further violations.
The act would take effect immediately if approved by two-thirds of House members. If it does not receive enough votes for immediate implementation, it would go into effect on Sept. 1, 2025.
A hearing has not yet been scheduled.
Click to open this PDF in a new window.
The backstory
According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a furry is someone who identifies with or enjoys dressing as an animal or creature. Many furries wear costumes or accessories such as animal ears and tails.
A 2020 survey found that most furries are in their late teens or early 20s.
The Source
Information in this article comes from public court documents from Texas Legislature and the Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
28 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Gerrymandering has captured the nation's attention. That's a win for Newsom
Happy Thursday. Your usual host, D.C. Bureau Chief Michael Wilner, is off today. So you're once again stuck with me, California Columnist Anita Chabria. I'm reporting from Columbus, Ohio. Although it's 2,300 miles from Sacramento, you wouldn't know it from the national news, where Gov. Gavin Newsom's push to gerrymander the Golden State's election maps is dominating the conversation, even in the Midwest. That's a huge win for Newsom's presidential aspirations. A week ago, I might have argued that Newsom's chances at the Oval Office were irrevocably tied to the success of his 'Election Rigging Response Act,' which seems likely (though not certain) to make it onto a November ballot. But it's increasingly seeming like win or lose on that initiative, the fight itself is a victory for Newsom. Let's dig into the details on where we are and why. President Trump does not like uncertainty, especially when it comes to his power. The midterm elections in 2026 are nothing but uncertainty. Republicans hold a Ozempic-thin majority in the House at 219-212, with four seats vacant. If Democrats were to take control, it would make autocracy really hard. So Trump's team reportedly called up Texas and asked them to rig their election maps to gain five GOP seats and a comfortable margin for the election. Newsom responded, unexpectedly, by pushing an if/then proposition for the same map-rigging in California: If Texas does it, then so will we. The Legislature is expected to approve that plan (and new maps that smash the state's Republicans mostly along an inland stretch against the Sierra Nevada), allowing it to go before voters in November. Because unlike Texas, California voters will have to OK the gambit for it to move forward. That seems as though it could happen. Axios reported this week that Newsom's pollster, David Binder, found that 57% of California voters were likely to back the redistricting plan once they understood two points. First, that it was temporary and the state would go back to fair maps in a few years; and second, that California will go forward only if Texas or another state gerrymanders first. Indiana, Illinois, Florida, Missouri and Ohio could also redraw maps before 2026. And it seems as if Trump is pushing these just-in-case states to at least try. Vice President JD Vance visited Indiana recently, supposedly to encourage that state to drum up support for the idea, even though Republicans hold seven of nine of the state's seats already. Florida is another place where map-rigging could happen. MAGA drummed up four additional seats after Gov. Ron DeSantis redrew maps in 2022 to give the GOP more seats. So there is little reason to believe he wouldn't push it even further. But like so many political policies these days, redistricting is likely to end up in courts. California Republicans appealed to the state Supreme Court to at least delay redistricting. They are argued that state law requires any legislation to be in print for 30 days before a vote is taken on it. The Legislature has a long-used but ethically dubious workaround to this — they take another bill, one that is already written but basically dead, and simply delete its contents and drop in whatever new measure they don't have time to pass under a fresh bill number. Voila — in print for 30 days, technically. Will the Supreme Court choose to censure that behavior now? Nope. Wednesday, the court declined to take the case. Texas might also find itself in courts with new maps it advanced on Wednesday. The UCLA Voting Rights Project released a study this week that found the new Texas maps may violate federal law that protects minority voters from being pushed into districts where their favored candidate has no chance of winning. 'Federal law prohibits purposefully drawing large minority populations of Black and Hispanic voters into districts in which their preferred candidate loses,' the report notes. 'While the map appears to add an extra Hispanic-majority district, VRP findings show it systematically places minority communities in districts where bloc-voting by white voters overrides their candidate of choice.' The report found that minority-crunching especially problematic around Dallas and San Antonio. Someone will probably sue. Which raises the interesting but as-yet unanswered question (I did ask, but no word back yet from the governor's office) on whether California would still move forward if the Texas maps are passed by the Legislature but held up in courts. That scenario might melt Republican heads — the possibility of five new Democratic seats without Texas to even them out. Whether or not Newsom manages to get his 'big beautiful maps,' as he's cheekily calling them, through voters, this is already a win for him. Trump is in public opinion trouble. A recent report from consumer-data company Resonate found that 50% of respondents were 'dissatisfied with Trump's behavior.' That aligns with a new Economist/YouGov poll showing that 56% of voters disapprove of Trump, a really high number. Meanwhile, between his social media explosion and map-rigging, Newsom is seeing a huge bump. One California poll by Politico-Citrin Center-Possibility found him significantly leading over former Vice President Kamala Harris when it comes to who state voters would back in the next presidential race. That poll found that Newsom leads Harris 25% to 19% among the state's registered no-party-preference, Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters. But it's not just California. I am seriously shocked that even here in the Midwest, folks are talking about Newsom and many — even if they don't agree with redistricting — see him in a favorable light for fighting back so aggressively on Texas and Trump. Even if Newsom loses the redistricting initiative in California, he will be able to argue that he fought harder than anyone else to curtail Trump's power, and have the receipts to back that up. So whether he gamed this out in advance or luck and timing have collided in that magical fashion, Newsom has, for the moment, captured lightning in a bottle — and certainly will ride that energy as far as it will take him. The must-read: How Georgia Went From the Vanguard of Democracy to the Front Lines of Autocracy The what happened: How Gavin Newsom trolled his way to the top of social media The L.A. Times special: How California's proposed redistricting map compares to current congressional districts Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
National poll: Majority of Democrats back California's effort to counter Texas despite claims of hating gerrymandering
The results presage a deeply partisan referendum on political power in the Trump era as the redistricting wars unfold. Democratic officials from former President Barack Obama to the party's congressional leaders have united behind California's bid to draw a map that imperils a half-dozen House GOP incumbents in next year's midterm elections, saying they must respond in kind after President Donald Trump pushed Texas to boost Republicans and maintain the House majority. As Texas Republicans move this week to craft new districts, California's Democratic-dominated Legislature is expected to vote today to put a map that would help Democrats flip House seats on a Nov. 4 special election ballot for voter approval. Newsom has advanced the plan in concert with national Democrats and party luminaries, calling it a bulwark against Trump seizing more power. Obama lauded California's gambit as a 'responsible approach' during a Tuesday fundraiser at Martha's Vineyard. On Wednesday, Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin joined Newsom, New Jersey Sen. Corey Booker and Democratic Texas Rep. Nicole Collier on a call rallying support for California's ballot measure. 'This isn't just about California,' Martin said, calling the initiative 'a national moment for Democrats to show up for all voters.' Majorities of Democratic and Republican voters consider gerrymandering generally unacceptable — but Democrats and those who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris were five times as likely as their Republican counterparts to say California Democrats should match Texas Republicans. That breakdown aligns with Newsom and allies' campaign strategy as they try to energize their base and persuade left-leaning voters in the state to suspend the work of a popular independent commission through the 2030 cycle. The campaign is already presenting the initiative as disempowered Democrats' best chance to retake the House and thwart Trump's agenda.
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Dem darling showered with Miriam Adelson-linked money
Esparza said Talarico has backed the legalization of casino gambling 'his entire career' because it 'will bring good jobs and additional tax revenue' to the state. Democrats have walked a political tightrope for years as they have campaigned against the power and influence of the super rich while also soliciting funds from moneyed donors such as Michael Bloomberg and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman. As they look to take back power in the Trump era, they are increasingly leaning into populism and bashing billionaires, opening themselves up to attacks of hypocrisy. 'It's … hard to argue that you are a person who meets the moment when you are cashing checks from the person who funded Donald Trump more than anybody but Elon Musk,' said a national Democratic operative who is not involved in the Texas Senate race and was granted anonymity to speak frankly. Talarico has been vocal about the influence of wealthy donors in Texas politics as he's been teasing a potential Senate run in recent weeks, saying that Republican billionaires 'basically control' the state government. 'Basically every single Republican state senator in Texas has taken their money. Every single one. A majority of the Republicans in the state House have taken their money,' he said on 'The Joe Rogan Experience,' referring to GOP contributors Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks, who made their fortune in oil and fracking. 'They increasingly run this whole government here in Texas.' Talarico likewise told Esquire that he has 'been outspoken about the billionaire megadonors who basically run our state government' and 'would hope to be a voice against corruption' if elected to the Senate. Talarico's team said he has one of the biggest grassroots fundraising operations in the state legislature, with 90 percent of his donors in the 2024 cycle giving him less than $100. Talarico is one of several Democrats eyeing a Senate run in Texas, where incumbent Republican Sen. John Cornyn is facing a primary challenge from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Democratic former Rep. Colin Allred, who unsuccessfully challenged Sen. Ted Cruz last year, has announced a comeback bid, and other potential Democratic contenders include former Rep. Beto O'Rourke and Rep. Joaquin Castro. Spokespeople for Adelson and the Texas Sands PAC declined to comment.
