A four-pack of Samsung SmartTag 2 Bluetooth trackers is down to $52 at Woot
A four-pack of Samsung SmartTag 2 Bluetooth trackers is available for just $52 at Woot. That's a record low price and a discount of 38 percent. This pack includes two white and two black trackers. There's a limit of two packs per customer.
This particular model made our list of the best Bluetooth trackers , and this is particularly true for those already tied into the Samsung ecosystem. We love the design. It's an oblong fob with a big hole for attaching directly to keys and the like. This is something that Apple AirTags don't offer out of the box, as you need a case for the purposes of attaching.
This is a record low price. $52 at Woot
These Samsung trackers are also louder when pinged than the AirTag or the Tile Pro. This makes it a bit easier to find something when the time comes. You can also change the tag's ringtone or double squeeze it to ring the handset, both things that aren't possible with AirTags.
Setup is simple and we came away impressed with how easy it was to locate lost items out in the wild. The companion app, SmartThings Find, offers an intuitive Google Maps-based interface. We found that alerts triggered reliably when we got around three to eight blocks away from the lost item.
These may be the best trackers for Samsung users, but they are also exclusively tied to the company's ecosystem. Don't buy these if you use an iPhone. The finding network isn't as vast as Google's Find My Device or Apple's Find My, but it gets the job done.
Follow @EngadgetDeals on X for the latest tech deals and buying advice .
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
23 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
You Asked: Your biggest Switch 2 questions, answered
On today's episode of You Asked: What's the best TV for your shiny new Switch 2 and how does the screen compare to the OLED model we loved? We break down the top TV picks, answer your biggest Switch 2 questions, and share early hands-on impressions from launch week. Best TV for the Switch 2? Jose asks: What's gonna be the TV to couple with the Switch 2? Samsung S90D? Jose, thanks for answering part of the question for me. Yes, the Samsung S90D is a great option. Its QD-OLED panel—offered at 55, 65, and 77 inches—combined with all the bright color combinations we get from the likes of Switch games will make for a beautiful gaming experience. But there are some important things to note about the Switch 2. If you're in the market for a new TV to pair with your shiny new toy, it's easy to get gassed up and potentially overspend. While the Switch 2 does support 4K gaming and some games will support faster refresh rates, it's not going to need the same hardware that's necessary to get the best out of a PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X. 4K, 60 frames per second gaming from the Switch 2 should only need HDMI 2.0 to support it. So no stressing if your TV lacks the HDMI 2.1 ports found on the top-tier models. And the higher refresh rates that the Switch 2 hits with some games will only be available at lower resolutions—again, supported by HDMI 2.0. Long story short: if you've seen us preview, review, or debate a TV on this channel, since we primarily cover the top models, it's going to be great with the Switch 2. But given how full of rich, crazy colors video games can be, yeah, a QD-OLED TV would be my top pick. Doesn't even need to be a top model. The S90D you mentioned is great and on a good sale right now. The 2025 S85F from Samsung comes with a QD-OLED panel at 55 and 65 inches as well, though it's not as bright as Samsung's OLED models higher up the line. If it's not QD-OLED and you want to save a little from the top-tier TVs, LG's C-series models are great gaming TVs that deliver when it comes to punchy colors and brightness that's improved each year. And for those of us that don't need—or have the budget for—OLED, TCL and Hisense have a number of great Mini LED options that come in right around and often under $1,000. We reviewed the TCL QM6K and were pretty blown away by what it offered for the money. Each year they're getting better and better in terms of brightness, if that's what you want out of your gaming TV. More answers to your Switch 2 questions with Giovanni We got our Switch test unit on Wednesday morning. We're still testing it and we plan to do a full review, but we don't want to rush it. There's a lot to dig into with this console, so I decided to do this video to get some pressing questions out of the way and give you our initial impressions. Before we got the console last week, we did a full-day preview event where we got hands-on with it. We went through the system settings, did game chat—all of that. So I've tested a significant amount of it so far, which puts me in a good position to answer some of the questions you've sent in. Is Joy-Con mouse control a gimmick? Corey asks: Is the mouse functionality of the Joy-Con usable, or is it more of a gimmick without a keyboard? That is a fantastic question. I want to start with that because it's kind of the most surprising thing about the console. When they announced the mouse function, I genuinely—I'll be honest—thought it seemed like one of those old Nintendo gimmicks that wouldn't go very far. I think we're all used to that by now, right? 3D on the 3DS was supposed to be huge. Motion controls, the Wii U gamepad—Nintendo developed a couple of games for it, but no other third party bites and that's kind of it. I figured that would be the case here too. Mouse controls in a game like Dragon Drive, and then they fade away. But I've spent a significant amount of time with the mouse controls, and I'll be honest—they are way better than you're probably expecting. What makes them great? First, they're pinpoint accurate. You'll be blown away when you move the little foot slide on the bottom of your Joy-Con. It moves like an actual mouse. It even works on your pants—I demoed it on my jeans and it slid smoothly. Second, they're multifunctional. You can use them to control the home screen and menus just like a computer mouse—and it works incredibly well. And it's easy to forget: you can use two at once. That opens up new kinds of experiences that aren't even possible on PC. In Bravely Default Remaster, there's a rhythm mini-game where you control a line with both Joy-Cons. In Dragon Drive, you can control two wheels on a wheelchair and use the gyroscope to shoot a basket—all in one smooth motion. That's a uniquely Nintendo thing. So, is it usable without a keyboard? Yes, because the experiences are built around the two-Joy-Con setup. You won't need a keyboard. Not every game will be compatible—especially ones originally designed for mouse and keyboard—but many are already being mapped for controller use. I even played Civilization 7 with the Joy-Cons and it worked really well. You just move the mouse and click—no keyboard necessary. So no, not just a gimmick. It's genuinely useful and could shape future Switch experiences. What might be a gimmick is the two-mouse setup. I don't expect a ton of games like Dragon Drive, but I do see potential for shooters, strategy games, and other creative uses. It's cool tech—and it works. Will games run better on Switch 2? @rmo9808 asks: Will games get a performance boost? Aside from the ones explicitly stated. Perhaps not a bump 1080p 60 fps but a 10 fps bump here and there Great question. The answer is yes, but it's on a case-by-case basis. Nintendo's Bill Tritton confirmed in April that games will get natural boosts from the new hardware. Expect faster loading times, maybe slightly better resolution and smoother frame rates. But how much improvement you'll see depends entirely on the developer. If a game has a dedicated Switch 2 version—like Pokémon Scarlet and Violet—you'll see big upgrades. We previewed that and it looks significantly better: denser environments, smoother performance, and sharper visuals. If you didn't like the art style, that won't change—but the technical side is much improved. Other games will likely see small boosts, but don't expect miracles unless they're optimized specifically for Switch 2. How does the Switch 2 screen stack up against the beloved OLED version? Corey and @FairyKid64 both asked a question I've been hearing a lot since April: how does the new screen compare to the Switch OLED display? It's a great question—because when they first announced this thing, I thought, Man, I love my Switch OLED. I love my Steam Deck OLED too. That OLED screen really ruined the original Switch for me. Once you see those vibrant colors, the original display looks washed out and dull. I'm happy to report that while the Switch 2 doesn't use OLED, its screen is still very good. It's way better than the original Switch. Why? The tech has evolved significantly since 2017. LCD tech today is miles ahead of what it was when the first Switch launched. This new display is much more capable. For starters, it supports VRR and has a 120Hz refresh rate—something the Switch OLED can't even come close to. In my testing so far, I've seen vibrant colors and strong contrast—things that the original Switch sorely lacked. Next to the OLED, that old screen has this sort of white film you can't unsee. That's not the case here. The difference isn't as drastic, but it's a meaningful upgrade. I'll need more time with side-by-side comparisons and different games, but my early impressions are positive. I think you'll be happy with it. What about USB-C and third-party accessories? Kenneth Chung asks: Comparing Switch 2 to the original; with the additional USB slot what third party accessories could we confidently use? Great question. There's still a lot of testing to do, but here's what we know. Nintendo has confirmed that certain accessories will work—like the GameCube adapter made for Super Smash Bros. Ultimate. You should be able to plug it in and go, no issues. But beyond that, things get more complicated. The USB port on the Switch 2 does support non-Nintendo devices, including webcams. If you go into the settings, you'll find an option to test connected cameras. So yes, you can plug in a USB camera, run a test, and confirm it works. That said, compatibility will vary wildly depending on the brand and type of device. Not every webcam is guaranteed to work. Nintendo hasn't confirmed much, and I certainly don't own every webcam to test. But I expect most will work fine. I also plan to test XR glasses—specifically Lenovo's Legion glasses—as a potential second screen. These already work with phones and Steam Decks, so there's no reason they shouldn't work here. But again, we need to test more. We've started some initial testing, but there's a lot more to do before the full review. So far, things are looking promising. Battery life at full performance? We've also been getting questions about battery life—especially when playing at 1080p and 120fps. That's something I can't answer definitively yet. First, I need a game that can even run at those specs, and we're not seeing many at launch. Nintendo's estimates suggest battery life could drop to 2 to 2.5 hours when pushing the system hard, especially if you've got game chat running with multiple players. That seems realistic. Once we've done more testing, I'll be able to say for sure. What accessories are worth buying on day one? Jake asks: Recommendations for screen protectors and other accessories? Great question—and yes, there are already tons of options, both first- and third-party. Let's start with the official Nintendo Pro Controller. I've used it, and I think it's fantastic. If you want a more traditional gamepad, it's the best option out there right now. The added back buttons and built-in audio jack are nice bonuses. For screen protectors, Nintendo is offering a carrying case bundle that includes one. That's probably your best bang for your buck if you're looking to grab a few essentials all at once. Now, one third-party product I can already recommend is the dbrand Kill Switch—their first official case for the Switch 2. If you know dbrand's Steam Deck case, you'll recognize the quality. It comes with a lot of stuff: A screen protector A snap-on protective case A back cover that works with the kickstand A game card holder for travel Ergonomic Joy-Con grips (with removable design) A dock adapter so you can keep the case on while docked It's a pretty full-featured kit and feels like a solid option out of the gate.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does the new Google mark the end of Search as we know it?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As the buzz around Google's momentous 2025 I/O conference begins to wind down, much of the web is taking stock of what the word 'web' will even mean soon as AI, chatbots, and search continue to converge. But though AI and chatbots have been some of the fastest-growing tech categories in the past ten years, usage for old stalwarts like traditional web search from Google and Bing remains at an all-time high. Will the 'AI revolution' really kill search, or is it just another tool in our growing online kit? At Google I/O 2025, the company unveiled its plan for the future of its Search product family. With what the company calls 'AI Mode' now included in every search bar and Chrome installation, Google sees its new Search as a conversational, back-and-forth process that happens completely within the confines of a Google product. Rather than searching for an answer, scrolling to a page to find it, and clicking through to get it, Google's AI Mode retrieves and summarizes all the necessary information in one place. This isn't unlike OpenAI's ChatGPT using search mode or how Google's chatbot, Gemini, operates. However, the difference is that, unlike those options, which are separate products that take new tabs to access, Google's AI Mode is an omnipresent addition to any Google search you're already making with the press of a button. Could this change lead to the end of search as we know it? Industry analysts aren't so sure. In a recent look at the past 24 months of available web traffic data, collected via the SEO reporting service SEMRush and relayed by OneLittleWeb, analysts have seen that while chatbot usage is growing exponentially, it's still completely dwarfed by the totality of search traffic. OpenAI's ChatGPT has exploded in users over the past two years, but overall, chatbots still trail total search volume by a factor of nearly 34x. To put this figure into context, the top 10 search engines globally generated 1.8 trillion page views between April 2024 and March 2025, while the top 10 chatbots collectively generated a comparatively moderate 55.2 billion. Now, for what it's worth, pageviews aren't as reliable a metric as they were in years past. For example, let's say you want to find a pet groomer in your town. Before chatbots and AI solutions, your first page on Google Search might be 'pet groomer', but the results are too broad. You then go back to the search bar and type 'dog groomer' to whittle things down further. Each of these individual searches counts as a pageview. Chatbots are fundamentally rewriting the way people interface with the web. Meanwhile, chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini are a one-window, one-pageview solution. You open up the interface once, and then have a conversation with the chatbot that reaches your eventual answer; somewhat similar to the multiple searches mentioned above. The difference is that these interactions are structured so that SEO services like SEMRush can only see metrics from the top of the funnel and not anything else that came after it. This is to say that we would take evaluations like this with a grain of salt. Chatbots are fundamentally rewriting the way people interface with the web. As a result, more traditional methods of evaluating traffic, popularity, and growth aren't as applicable as they used to be. Knowing this, it could be argued that the best metric to determine how much chatbots are actually growing would be time on page rather than straight pageviews. We haven't found any analysis that approaches the problem from this angle, rather than a sheer numbers game of how often users visited a search or chatbot. It remains to be seen whether chatbots will destroy search as we know it in the next decade, but LaptopMag will be keeping an eye on Google, OpenAI, and more as the landscape continues to evolve! What is Google's AI Mode, and how will it change search forever? "Google AI/O?" The Internet reacts to Google I/O 2025 Google makes a bold pitch for an all-encompassing AI: "Project Astra"
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google quietly gave Gemini a big upgrade that could change everything
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Google made it clear that AI is a big part of its business at the company's I/O event last month. Its Gemini AI model was the star of the show, and the tech giant plans to inject the AI into all of its devices and services, including its upcoming smart glasses, Google Search results, and Gmail. In the big AI race, Google is usually in second place behind OpenAI's ChatGPT, but a new update for Gemini could give it a big lead over the competition. With its latest update, Google Gemini can now act more as an AI assistant, a common goal for the different tech companies. Gemini Pro and Ultra users can now have the AI do scheduled actions by asking it to perform a task at a certain time or make a recurring action. "Now you can wake up with a summary of your calendar and unread emails, or get a creative boost by having Gemini write five ideas for your blog every Monday," Dave Citron, senior director, product management for the Gemini app, said in a blog post. "Stay informed by getting updates on your favorite sports team, or schedule a one-off task like asking Gemini to give you a summary of an award show the day after it happens. Just tell Gemini what you need and when, and it will take care of the rest." The Gemini update is already live for those with Gemini Pro and Ultra subscriptions, along with individuals using qualifying Google Workspace business and education plans. All the big tech companies are trying to get their AI model to be the The company that is still behind with its AI agent is Apple. It could be said that Siri was the first agent out of the gate when it came out in 2011, but its usefulness continues to lag behind when compared to the likes of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Apple did plan to release an overhauled Siri this year. The company announced this change last year when it revealed its Apple Intelligence feature, but turmoil within the company has been setting back the reveal of the new Siri. Apple reportedly changed leadership of the team handling the new Siri, but it's unlikely to make its debut this year. AI, in general, has been a sore spot for Apple. Although it has a partnership with OpenAI and makes use of ChatGPT for its AI services, it has been rumored that Apple won't have much AI to talk about at the upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference that starts on Monday.
