
Syria's Druze Community, Bombed By Israel, Has A Curious 'India' Link
The massacre of the Druze minority by Islamist and government forces provided Israel with an excuse to again start bombing Damascus. This time, Israel may have the overt consent of many countries, both in the region and beyond.
What is the cause of this round of violence in the ever-restive region? The immediate reason has been the protection of the Druze community in Southern Syria, in areas bordering Israel, and along the zone that Israel occupied more recently inside Syria as the regime of former president Bashar Al Assad was being toppled in December last year.
But who are the Druze, and why is Israel concerned about the Druze in Syria, the citizens of a country that has been its arch-enemy throughout its modern history?
The Druze are an ancient pre-Islamic Arab community, who are followers of Jethro, the father-in-law of the Jewish Prophet Moses. Like most ancient communities in the Middle East, reincarnation is central to their religious belief. In fact, so intense is this belief that in the event of any death, a family immediately waits for a birth to occur, signifying the return of the soul to the family it knew. It would then seem that the belief in reincarnation connects the Druze in a way to India and Indic beliefs. But, there is more. According to some Druze tradition, the community has a number of scriptures, some of which are lost. According to that tradition, it's believed that the day these lost scriptures are found and all the Druze holy books come together, it would be the time that would herald the Judgement Day. Many Druze believe that these lost books are to be found in India.
Strangely, though, most Druze are not very knowledgeable about their religion. The lay people are denied esoteric knowledge, which is strictly restricted to the clergy. This practice, it is said, was adopted to preserve the Druze religion and to prevent its dilution with other newer traditions. The Druze do not believe in conversions; one has to be born a Druze to be one. The community does not claim any temporal power. They owe their allegiance to whichever state they are citizens of. As such, the Druze are mainly to be found in Syria, Lebanon, and Israel.
The Druze are concentrated in southern Syria, in the Golan Heights, which Israel conquered during the 1967 Arab-Israel war and which is claimed by Syria as well as northern Israel. In Israel, members of the Druze community have reached high positions in government (a number of Israeli diplomats who have served in India have been Druze). Though part of the Arabic-speaking population in Israel, the Druze are not involved in the Palestinian movement, seeing themselves as separate from Palestinians.
In Syria, the Druze community was one of the pillars of support for the minority Alawite-dominated government. After the fall of the Assad government in December, its new ruler, Ahmed Al Shara (formerly Golani), has presided over two major massacres.
Starting on March 6 and over several following days, Syria saw wide sectarian bloodshed largely in the Alawite coastal heartland. The Alawites, often regarded as heretics by Sunni Muslims, are the community that Assad belongs to; many had even feared a reprisal after he was overthrown. They are mostly concentrated in the coastal regions of the Latakia province.
The violence sent more than 21,000 fleeing to neighbouring Lebanon, according to the UN, with thousands more seeking refuge at a Russian air base on the Mediterranean coast. The United Nations Human Rights Office said that "perpetrators raided houses, asking residents whether they were Alawite or Sunni before proceeding to either kill or spare them accordingly", with men shot dead in front of their families in many cases.
Probably to save face, al-Sharaa hastily put in place a largely Islamist-dominated government, with token positions given to women, Christians, and Alawites for "inclusivity".
More recently, a second set of massacres - this time against the Druze minorities - unfolded in the community's stronghold of Suweida and neighbouring regions. After a ceasefire was called, fresh clashes broke out between the Druze and local government-backed Bedouin tribes, killing over a thousand and displacing more than 1.28 lakh people, according to UN estimates.
Israel, which had continued to intermittently bomb Syria during Assad's time, in a proxy war it had fought with Iran, continued these attacks as Al Sharaa took over. For the Jewish state, both Iran and the Sunni Islamists now in charge in Syria constitute an identical threat. Israel had pushed into Southern Syria using ground troops and expanded its presence around the Golan Heights, destroying its weapons cache. It called this act an expansion of a "buffer zone", saying the presence was required to protect the Druze minority there. In March, according to Israeli media, it struck three air bases in Syria - the T4 and Palmyra air bases in the Homs province and the main airport in the Hama province, where, it is widely believed, Turkiye was hoping to station its troops. Israel is also reported to be lobbying with the US to prevent the sale of F-35 jets to Ankara and also allow Russian bases to remain in Syria.
Turkiye, along with Qatar, are in the driver's seat in Syria. The Tahrir Hayat Al-Sham, like other rebel groups, were actively supported and sustained by them. While Qatar bankrolled them, Turkey helped them with military training, arms, logistics, transit, ideology, etc. Ankara is positioning itself to play a major role in the new Syria, filling a vacuum left by Iran. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has visited Syria, while its Defence Minister Yaşar Güler has already offered Damascus support in building up its military. Turkish companies are also looking forward to profiting from Syria's reconstruction, which is estimated at almost USD 500 billion. All these things point to Turkey's long-term plans to remain engaged with Damascus. Al-Shara has already made two official visits to Ankara since assuming power.
Israel sees Turkey's expanding presence in Syria as an existential threat. Both Qatar and Turkey have supported and aided Hamas. While the October 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel have forced Qatar to roll back its support to the group, Turkey has continued to support the group. It is also the most (or only) vocal critic of Israel's retaliatory actions in Gaza, and now has the upper hand in Syria. For Turkey, Syria is important not only for its ambitious goal of being the regional energy hub but is also critical for neutralising Turkey's Kurdish threat. Since 2016, Turkey has occupied north-western Syria and has consistently been expanding its presence there.
With Arab governments now hedging against the Islamists by befriending Al-Sharaa, and with US President Donald Trump's promise to remove sanctions against Syria, the Syrian threat to Israel is renewed. The Druze factor has played right into the hands of Israel, even though it was able to use the Syrian airspace to strike Iran in its recent 12-day war.
Turkey has for long been calling upon Israel to withdraw from southern Syria and has consistently defended Syria's territorial integrity. The dismemberment of the country would be detrimental to Turkey's own stranglehold on its Kurdish population and the just-concluded peace deal with the 'PKK', or the Kurdistan Workers' Party, which had waged a long and brutal insurgency against the Turkish government.
As news broke on June 13 about Israeli strikes on Iran, a Turkish colleague told me that it was actually Turkey that Israel was targeting. At the time of writing this, sources in the Turkish National Defence Ministry said that the Syrian government has requested official support from Turkey to strengthen its defence capacity and combat terror groups. President Erdoğan has also warned that Turkey would be forced to intervene if Israel did not stop its intervention in Syria. We do not know if Israel is done with Iran yet. But a new proxy war may just be unfolding in the volatile region - between Israel and Turkey this time. And Israel may have more covert support this time, not just from the Arab world but also from its arch-rival, Iran, which has been elbowed out from Syria, thanks to the Qatar-Turkey duo.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Israel must hold itself to account
ON MAY 14TH 1948, in its Declaration of Independence, Israel embraced universal human rights 'irrespective of religion, race or sex'. This belief in individual human dignity is also enshrined in the Geneva Conventions, submitted to governments that same month. Today the founding vision of Israel and the laws of war are under attack in Gaza. In its bombed and barren landscape the fate of both lies in the balance. From the beginning, the world has struggled to live up to the high ideals of 1948. Israel was born in violence and ever since it has wrestled with the tension between upholding universal rights and being the home of a people in a contested land. The cold war was a stand-off between two systems that too often treated humanitarian law as inconvenient. Even so, the decades after the fall of the Soviet Union gave rise to aspirations that law-breaking leaders could be held to account. Gaza shows how this vision is failing. The laws of war are being broken and the system for upholding them is not working. However, that failure does not exonerate Israel from having to answer for its actions in Gaza, including war crimes and crimes against humanity. Indeed, its foundations as a liberal democracy demand that it must. Something has gone very wrong in Gaza. Israel's just war against the terrorists who massacred its people on October 7th 2023 has turned into death and destruction on a biblical scale. Most of Gaza lies in ruins, millions of civilians are displaced and tens of thousands have been killed. And still, Israel's prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, cannot stop himself. This week it emerged that he wants to occupy all of Gaza. But Hamas is no longer a military threat, so the war no longer has a strategy and fighting on is no longer just. Worse, Israel's government, despite its duties as an occupying power, has used the distribution of food to civilians as a weapon against Hamas. It continued even when, as predicted, that led to starvation and the death of desperate people queuing for survival rations. By corralling civilians in pockets as it systematically bulldozes their homes, Israel is also practising ethnic cleansing. Gaza is not alone. Civilians are being slaughtered and driven from their homes in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, Sudan, Ukraine and pretty much every other warzone today. Hamas, don't forget, started the current Gaza conflict 22 months ago with an orgy of hostage-taking and crimes against humanity. Instead of seeking peace, it has gorged on the misery of its own people. It recently described the recognition of a Palestinian state promised by Britain, Canada and France as the 'fruits' of October 7th. Yet Hamas's crimes do not excuse Israel. The Jewish state is a democracy. It should hold itself to higher standards than terrorists, warlords and dictators. At the same time as the laws of war are being broken, the system that enshrines them is failing. The Geneva Conventions sought to spare civilians. However, they were drawn up for wars between states. Most conflicts today involve at least one militia, which makes separating fighters from civilians hard. Under Geneva's code, the high ratio of civilian to military casualties in Gaza is not proof of crimes. Israel has loosened its rules of engagement, but the strip is crowded; Hamas knowingly shelters among civilians. In such circumstances many civilians die, as America once learned in the Iraqi cities of Mosul and Fallujah. The International Criminal Court is becoming activist, issuing warrants for the arrest of Mr Netanyahu and his then defence minister before the Israeli system had time to act. The courts have also become tools in ongoing 'lawfare'. South Africa accused Israel of genocide at the International Court of Justice just 12 weeks after October 7th, allowing activists to bolster their campaigns demanding boycotts of Israel by the West long before a judgment is reached. Activists dream that the courts will impose their notion of virtue on a world that does not share their values. They are doomed to fail. The big powers, including America and China, do not recognise the courts. International law takes a long time to issue final judgments. It has limited powers of enforcement. A case brought today may one day be a deterrent, but it is a poor tool for stopping war crimes as they unfold. That sounds like a counsel of despair, but it is not. And the reason goes back to 1948. The laws of war were not just a cudgel with which to beat militarists and Nazis. They were also the latest example in a long history of some belligerents imposing restraints on themselves. The question therefore is whether Israel, founded as a democratic, universalist state, still cleaves to that tradition. In the past Israel has managed to investigate wars and hold some political and military leaders responsible. It is comparable to other countries at investigating atrocities by soldiers, albeit slowly and with a focus on the lower ranks—as with a lethal strike on the staff from the World Central Kitchen in 2024. However, as we report, higher-level accountability is lacking. The Supreme Court and the attorney-general are caught up in a domestic power struggle with Mr Netanyahu. When it comes to criticising the government over Gaza they have been missing in action. Tried and tested It is not too late. The urgent test is whether Israel floods Gaza with food and medicine in order to stop the incipient famine. It should also agree on a ceasefire, which will enable it to recover its hostages. The second, longer-term test will be whether it sets up a truly independent commission of inquiry after the war ends, probably under a new prime minister. The outside world and especially the United States have a role in making this happen. No American president in recent times has been less likely to respect international law than Donald Trump. But peace in Gaza would help him stabilise a volatile region and reset relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia. America has repeatedly intervened to stop Israel's wars in the past. This week roughly 600 former Israeli security officials urged Mr Trump to act again today. Those officials understand that Israel has an interest in the law, too. Some Israelis calculate that they can do what they like now and patch up relations with the West later. But views of Israel are bleak in Europe and are changing in America among Democrats and the MAGA right. If Israel becomes an ethno-nationalist state that annexes the West Bank and crushes its people, the violence will not cease. You might argue that, after suffering the worst attack in its history, Israel will have no appetite for prosecuting its own leaders. However, the penetrating insight which emerges from the Geneva Conventions is that countries which break the laws of war without shame or recourse do not just harm their victims: they also harm themselves. Israel has an existential interest in seeing justice done. If instead it glorifies those who orchestrate famine and ethnic cleansing in Gaza, its politics and society will lurch towards demagoguery and authoritarianism. The young, idealistic country that was born in May 1948 will have been eclipsed. For subscribers only: to see how we design each week's cover, sign up to our weekly Cover Story newsletter.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Trump's tariffs to India's oil bets: Decoding sanctions on Russia
Facing sanctions from multiple countries since the Ukraine conflict in 2022, including the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), Russia has become one of the most heavily sanctioned nations globally. Over the years, the EU has announced 18 sanction packages against Russia. Sanctions on Moscow are now trickling down to India, with refiners like Nayara Energy struggling to keep operations running and Indian traders staring at a 50 per cent US tariff. Here's a look at the various sanctions and trade bans imposed on Moscow over the years and how they translate for the country's economy. The pre-Ukraine picture Even before the Russia-Ukraine conflict began in February 2022, starting one of the largest and deadliest wars in Europe since World War II, Moscow was still under sanctions. In March 2014, Russia annexed the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. This was seen as a violation of the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Shortly after this, the US and EU imposed multiple sanctions against Russian banks and energy firms. According to the European Union External Action, here are some of the bans that were placed on Russia: Fresh sanctions under Trump's first presidency While it seemed like Russian President Putin and the newly appointed American President Donald Trump would get along well, Trump gave a green light to multiple sanction packages against Russia despite maintaining a friendly stance in public. During Trump's first tenure as the US president (2017-2021), here are some of the bans imposed on Russia: According to the US State government data, Washington imposed sanctions against eight Russian companies in connection with the Iran, North Korea, Syria Nonproliferation Act in March 2017. In April 2017, CNN reported that the Trump administration denied a request from ExxonMobil to allow it to resume oil drilling in Russia. Trump imposed fresh sanctions in 2018 on 13 Russian government hackers and front organisations that had been indicted by Mueller's investigation, according to Business Insider. Sanctions under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), targeting defence deals with Russia, were also expanded. After the Ukraine war: Full throttle The invasion of Ukraine triggered a rapid escalation, prompting sanctions from countries that were not participating earlier, including South Korea and Taiwan. Several sectors, including oil, energy, and banking, were placed under heavy sanctions from multiple countries. The EU launched its 11th sanctions package against Russia in 2023, barring trade and transport. This was followed by several other packages, including the most recent 18th package. The bans targeted oligarchs, defence firms, tech sectors, and entire industries. According to the BBC, 70 per cent of the assets of Russian banks were frozen, and some were excluded from SWIFT, a high-speed messaging service for financial institutions. Hundreds of major companies, such as Heineken, McDonald's, Starbucks, and Coca-Cola, stopped selling and producing goods in Russia. According to an NYT report, US President Joe Biden (2021-25) placed over 170 new sanctions on Russian entities between 2022 and 2024. The targets included oil and weapons production, tech procurement and banking. Biden vs Trump: Who did what? After a slew of sweeping tariffs by the Biden administration, Trump has not imposed any fresh sanctions on Russia since he returned to office in January, NYT reported in July. Numbers game 13,500: Total sanctions placed on Russia since February 2022, according to 2.1%: Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) contracted in 2022, according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates. However, it rebounded in 2023 due to energy exports. IMF projects Russia's real GDP growth for 2025 at 1.5 per cent. 1.9 mbd: Russian oil was exported to India in 2024, up from 0.1 million barrels per day (mbd) in 2021, according to the International Energy Agency. India and China were the major importers in 2024, with New Delhi accounting for 1.9 mbd and Beijing at 2.4 mbd 41.4%: Russian news agency TASS stated that Russia's trade turnover with BRICS nations stood at $294 billion in 2023 (41.4 per cent of total foreign trade) and grew 2.4-fold compared with 2019-2020. Russian oil exports What does it mean for India? Maintaining its neutral stance, India continued to buy oil from Russia at discounted rates since 2022. However, the recent 25 per cent tariff, along with a 25 per cent penalty for buying Russian oil, imposed on India by Trump, may have long-lasting repercussions. Here are some ways in which tariffs can hurt imports from Russia: If geopolitical tensions escalate, Brent prices could spike, wiping out part of India's discount advantage. Washington could tighten enforcement on intermediaries, making it harder for Indian refiners to use non-dollar payment systems or insurers. Indian banks may become more cautious in processing Russia-linked trade, potentially delaying shipments or raising transaction costs. What's next Russia has long courted sanctions, but the ripple effects are now reaching India with the imposition of a 50 per cent tariff. Still, Prime Minister Narendra Modi says he is ready for the fight. As reported earlier by Business Standard, Modi on Thursday said that India would not compromise on the interests of its farmers, fishermen or dairy farmers, even if it meant him "paying a heavy price".
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
JD Vance to meet UK Foreign Secretary amid amid policy clashes and global crises
The visit to the United Kingdom comes amid heightened transatlantic tensions, domestic political shifts in both countries and increased attention on Vance's foreign policy views as he emerges as a key figure in President Donald Trump's administration read more US Vice President JD Vance begins a trip to the United Kingdom with a meeting with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy on Friday, which will draw further attention to Vance's harsh criticism of Britain and its ruling Labour Party. Vance, his wife Usha, and their three young children are set to arrive in London to begin a journey that will include a visit with Lammy at Chevening, the foreign minister's country house. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD They will then remain in the Cotswolds, a picturesque area of English countryside that is a famous hideaway for affluent and prominent persons ranging from sportsmen and film stars to media and political elites. The visit to the United Kingdom comes amid heightened transatlantic tensions, domestic political shifts in both countries and increased attention on Vance's foreign policy views as he emerges as a key figure in President Donald Trump's administration. A source familiar with the planning described the trip as a working visit that will include several official engagements, meetings and visits to cultural sites. Vance is also expected to meet with US troops. Vance has championed an America First foreign policy and once said last year's election victory for the centre-left Labour Party meant Britain was 'maybe' the first 'truly Islamist' country with a nuclear weapon. He also attacked the United Kingdom for undermining freedom of speech and placing the 'basic liberties of religious Britons in the crosshairs." Lammy once called Trump a 'far right extremist' and a 'neo-Nazi' but since coming to power has brushed off his remarks as 'old news." Despite their differences, the pair has developed a warm friendship, bonding over their difficult childhoods and shared Christian faith, according to two officials familiar with the relationship. Lammy attended Mass at the vice president's Washington residence during a visit in March, and the two leaders met again in Rome in May for Pope Leo XIV's inaugural Mass, the officials said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The bilateral meeting on Friday lacks a formal agenda, officials said, but is likely to touch on the Ukraine and Gaza crises, along with trade issues. The United Kingdom has been pushing Trump to support Ukraine in its war with Russia and to accelerate efforts to bring a humanitarian crisis in Gaza to an end. But Lammy is unlikely to press aggressively, said Bronwen Maddox, a director at the think tank Chatham House. 'It's a chance to get UK perspective in there, but they're not looking for conflict,' Maddox said, adding that British officials are content with the trade deal they struck with Trump. 'I don't mean this is any cynical way, but the UK is glad of relationships where it can get them with the Trump administration,' she added. Vance's visit comes shortly after Trump traveled to Scotland for a private visit that included meetings with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who struck a framework trade agreement with the US imposing a 15% import tariff on most European Union goods. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump is also scheduled for a full state visit to the United Kingdom in September, making him the first elected political leader in modern times to be hosted for two state visits by a British monarch. Vance's winter vacation earlier this year in Vermont was disturbed by throngs of protestors angered by the administration's anti-immigration policies and handling of the Ukraine crisis. A coalition of trade unions, pro-Palestinian demonstrators and climate activists are reportedly warning that Vance will face similar backlash in Britain in the coming days.