Officials issue warning after discovering first-of-its-kind infestation at mine site: 'Significant and devastating'
For the first time, fire ants have appeared in Queensland, Australia.
What's happening?
ABC Capricornia reported that fire ants were detected at a mine site in central Queensland. The National Fire Ant Eradication Program confirmed the discovery, and officers from the program quickly destroyed the nests at the site.
The Invasive Species Council warned that a significant amount of Australia was at risk for fire ant infestation if the country's fire ant program wasn't soon reviewed.
Jack Gough, chief executive of the council, told ABC Capricornia: "It reflects something that we've been telling governments for two years would happen. … The whole of Australia is at risk of fire ants getting out and the costs are significant and devastating."
Gough noted that the spread of fire ants throughout the country could have an economic impact of $2 billion. He also estimated that suppressing the fire ants would require approximately $24 million.
Why are invasive species concerning?
Invasive species are concerning for numerous reasons.
In this case, the spread of fire ants in Australia could cause environmental and economic damage. The ants also pose a significant health risk to the country's residents and can cause harm to livestock and native animals.
Invasive species tend to spread quickly. As they do, they destroy native species by outcompeting them for food and other resources and introducing new diseases. Because these fire ants also have a painful sting and a tendency to be aggressive, they can harm not only native species but also people and pets.
Protecting and prioritizing native species while working to eradicate invasive ones can help ensure the conservation of natural resources, safeguard food supplies, prevent disease spread, and keep communities safe.
What's being done about the fire ants in Australia?
The mine where officials discovered the fire ants will continue working with the National Fire Ant Eradication Program, which is utilizing genetic tracing and testing to determine how this invasive species arrived at the mine.
Do you worry about companies drilling too deep into the ground?
Definitely
Depends on what it's for
Only if it's near my home
Not really
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Meanwhile, eradication efforts will continue in the area, along with increased surveillance to ensure officials can detect and eliminate any further fire ants.
The director of the program, Michael Homden, explained to ABC Capricornia, "This detection is a strong reminder that community and industry vigilance can, and does, stop the spread of fire ants."
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
New Zealand sends Australia details of $66,000 trial as killer virus looms
A major vaccine advancement could protect some of the world's rarest creatures from a deadly disease that's killed hundreds of millions of birds and animals. Australia and New Zealand are the last major destinations where a highly virulent strain of avian influenza, HPAI, has not spread, and both countries are preparing for its inevitable arrival. Because the two countries' ecosystems evolved in isolation, their wildlife is believed to have little immunity to the virus, and experts have warned it could cause extinctions. New Zealand has the highest proportion of threatened species in the world, and it has been leading the way in protecting its birdlife with a vaccine trial. The Department of Conservation (DOC) announced this week it has completed a year-long intensive trial on five captive species, the first time this has been done in the world. All of the participating species have populations that are worryingly low and threatened with extinction. They included the kākāpō, takahē, kakī, tūturuatu and kākāriki, and up to 10 birds from each species were vaccinated. Because of the vulnerability of the remaining orange-fronted kākāriki, only red-crowned kākāriki could be used in the trial. The trial was completed for a modest $66,000, but its results are priceless, because officials concede that once the virus arrives in New Zealand, eradication will be limited, and management options will be "limited'. DOC senior science advisor Kate McInnes said trials had been conducted overseas but it was not known how New Zealand's unique species would respond. 'It won't be possible to vaccinate all our endangered birds, but we can focus on species in captivity where the full two doses of the vaccine can be given,' she said. Related: Three virus changes trigger concern as odds of new human pandemic rise Key vaccination research shared with Australia Australia and New Zealand are understood to have worked closely on their preparations to respond to the virus. DOC's vital research has now been shared with Australia, as that country's wildlife experts and politicians decide how to proceed in protecting birdlife when HPAI arrives. Whether Australia will also turn to vaccinations is unknown. A Commonwealth government spokesperson told Yahoo News via email it is 'considering' vaccination of priority threatened species in captivity, noting the intention would be to 'build on' biosecurity measures already in place. The country's Department of Agriculture published a policy in February advising vaccination was not an alternative to 'effective biosecurity'. 'If rare and valuable birds are already housed in biosecure units, vaccination may not significantly increase their protection,' it advised. 🚨 Five 'high-priority' pathogens discovered entering Australia via airplane toilets 🦠 Shoppers urged to change expectations as new potato disease breaches Australia's biosecurity 💰 Mutant invasive snails linked to $170 million damage bill in Australia Ongoing habitat destruction, an inability to control invasive species, and failed threatened species laws have led to a growing number of bird species facing extinction in Australia. Earlier in August, environment minister Murray Watt announced a component of the government's plan to protect its birdlife from HPAI, by investing in zoos to improve quarantine populations of species like the plains-wanderer and the Regent honeyeater. "Of course, what we want to do as Australians is make sure that we have these populations of threatened species for the future," Watt said at the time. The response will include a $2.8 million investment from the Albanese government to be shared between 23 captive-breeding facilities and support 20 threatened species. Last October, it announced that $35.9 million had been earmarked to help protect native fauna from HPAI, which was welcomed by conservation groups. The New Zealand vaccine trial was completed with technical expertise donated by PacificVet, and most of the laboratory testing was donated by BioPacifica Laboratories. The $66,000 figure does not include staff time. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.


Medscape
32 minutes ago
- Medscape
Aspirin Confers No Long-Term Heart Benefits in Older Adults
TOPLINE: Healthy older adults who received aspirin experienced no significant long-term benefits against major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); the rates of major hemorrhage were higher among users of aspirin than among users of placebo. METHODOLOGY: Guidelines advise against routine initiation of aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in older adults, yet many continue to use it. The long-term effects of using aspirin in this population remain uncertain. Researchers analyzed data from 15,668 older adults from Australia and the US who took part in the ASPREE trial (median age at the end of the trial, 79 years; 43.1% men) to assess the post-trial and long-term effects of aspirin on cardiovascular events. At enrollment, the participants had no history of cardiovascular events, dementia, or any physical disability that limited their independence. The participants were randomly assigned to receive daily low-dose aspirin (100 mg) or a matching placebo and were followed for a median of 4.7 years during the trial. The occurrences of incident MACE and major hemorrhage were tracked for an additional median follow-up of 4.3 years after the trial. The combined median follow-up, including the in-trial and post-trial periods, was 8.3 years. TAKEAWAY: Over the combined follow-up period, participants who received aspirin experienced no significant benefit for MACE compared with those who received placebo. However, during the post-trial period, the use of aspirin was linked to an 18% higher rate of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37) and a 25% higher rate of myocardial infarction (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54) than the use of placebo. Over the combined follow-up period, users of aspirin experienced a 24% higher rate of major hemorrhage than users of placebo (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10-1.39). Aspirin users also had higher rates of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and bleeding at another site. IN PRACTICE: 'Other research suggests that certain subgroups might benefit from aspirin for primary prevention. However, established bleeding risks and also the possible absence of long-term MACE benefit need to be considered in clinical decision-making,' the researchers reported. SOURCE: This study was led by Rory Wolfe, PhD, of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. It was published online on August 12, 2025, in the European Heart Journal. LIMITATIONS: The researchers could only ascertain the use of aspirin at the annual visits, which prevented precise tracking of changes between visits. The post-trial comparison was not randomized, which may have influenced the assessment of risks. DISCLOSURES: This study received grants from the National Institute on Aging and National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health in the USA, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Monash University, and the Victorian Cancer Agency. Aspirin and placebo were provided by Bayer AG. Several authors reported receiving research support or honoraria and having other financial ties with various sources, including Bayer. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Deadliest Animal in Australia Revealed, And It's a Big Surprise
If Australia is renowned for one thing, it's the proportion of highly dangerous animals that populate the continent. The three most venomous snakes in the world are from Australia (with a few others in the top 10). It has some of the most venomous spiders, with the Sydney funnel-web (Atrax robustus) most infamous for its deadly toxin. Aggressive saltwater crocodiles, tiny octopuses patterned with iridescent blue rings, sharks that swim the sea by which the land is girt. Related: 'World's Most Dangerous Bird' Seen Emerging From The Ocean in Australia But the deadliest non-human animal in Australia is none of these. It's not even a native Australian animal at all. The animal involved in the most deaths in Australia is: the humble horse, according to a report from the National Coronial Information System. The report, which is designed to support the work of death investigators and researchers, catalogs 713 animal-related deaths recorded between 2001 and 2021, with an average of 34 animal-related deaths per year. Nearly a third of those deaths – 31.1 percent, or 222 fatalities – involved horses, and most of those horse-related deaths involved a fall from a horse. Surely, you're thinking, the second-most common cause of animal-related death in Australia is a native species. Nope. Accounting for 92 deaths, or 12.9 percent of the sample, were cattle, just under half of which were involved in a road traffic accident. After that, it's dogs, coming in at 11.5 percent, with 82 deaths. Most of those were bites – but just under half were from falls. You have to get to fourth place to finally find a native Australian animal. Kangaroos were involved in 53 human deaths between 2001 and 2021 – and every single one of them was a traffic accident. All the way down in fifth place we get to snakes with 50 deaths, followed by bees (45 deaths, all from anaphylaxis, and probably not native bees), sharks (39 deaths), and crocodiles (25 deaths). Not a single death from a spider bite was recorded in the timeframe the report covers – actually, no one has died from a funnel-web bite since 1981, when the antivenom was introduced. So how does that stack up against the US? Well, a new report of animal-related fatalities in the US documents an average of 267 deaths per year. That's reasonably comparable, given the relative sizes of the current populations – 340 million for the US, and 27.4 million for Australia. However, the biggest proportion of the animal deaths in the US – 31 percent – were from hornets, wasps, and bees. "Other mammals" – a group that includes horses, cattle, other livestock, and raccoons – makes up 28.6 percent, and dogs come in third at 26.2 percent. So there you have it. The animals with which we spend the most time – or to which we are most allergic – are most likely to be the ones that kill us. You can read the full report from Australia here, and find out more about animal-related deaths in the US here. Related News A Mysterious Glow in The Ocean Turns Out to Be Billions of Tiny Creatures Giant Dinosaurs Would Have Chomped You Up in Very Different Ways Your Dog Has a Unique Ability to Read Your Mind. Here's Why. Solve the daily Crossword