
Jasmine Crockett can bring the Democratic Party back from the brink
It's hard to walk a mile in America's political-media industrial complex these days without someone asking me about Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett. Whenever I write about the future of the Democratic Party (often), my inbox inevitably fills with enthusiastic Democrats urging me to watch compilations of Crockett's most viral comments, some of which boast view counts in the millions.
The TV-ready former public defender exploded onto the national scene this year as one of Democrats' rawest and most watchable communicators. Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg went so far as to declare her the future of the Democratic Party. On Sunday, Fox News anchor Trey Gowdy devoted an entire segment to denouncing her rise to prominence. At a moment when voters are increasingly tuning out politicians, Crockett is still breaking through.
Democrats are about to blow millions of dollars on an almost certainly futile effort to build a 'liberal Joe Rogan' when they should be studying how Crockett's unlikely path to Washington shaped her hugely popular message. As one of the few party figures who can speak with authenticity to the millions of voters who lost faith in the Democratic Party after 2024, Crockett should be playing a lead role in reshaping the party's 2026 message. Do Democrats see what they have?
Crockett's brashness may strike some Beltway stiffs as rude or disrespectful, but it's actually a powerful reflection of the alienation millions of Democratic voters feel, including the 7 percent of Black men and nearly 10 percent of nonwhite young people who gave up on the party after the last election. To those voters, Crockett's passion doesn't look disrespectful — it looks appropriate to a moment where most Americans are paying more for everything from groceries to medicine while Donald Trump's Department of Justice tears away civil rights protections root and branch.
'We have transitioned into a space where authenticity is valued so much more than people being proper or polite,' Crockett told Roll Call in January. 'If my raw emotions get the better of me, most people take it just as that, and are happy to know there's somebody who's here because she is very passionate about the work and really believes in it.'
One reason institutional Democrats struggle to understand Crockett is because she came to politics not through political triangulation but by channeling the party's simmering grassroots discontent. Instead of traditional party channels, Crockett partnered with candidate recruitment organization Run for Something for her first state political campaign in 2020. That her campaign evolved outside the Texas Democratic Party's political ecosystem still rankles some Texas Democrats. When I tweeted about working on this article, two state party insiders reached out to share their concerns about Crockett's effectiveness.
If recent candidate recruitment data from Run for Something is any indication, rank-and-file Democrats don't share those insiders' concerns. Amanda Litman, founder and president of Run For Something, tells me that 'Crockett's name has come up organically in conversation with candidates and potential candidates,' adding that Crockett's 'energy for the work' has played a role in convincing more political novices to run for office in their communities.
Now, after months honing her populist message, the political moment appears to have caught Crockett at the ideal moment. A new Demand Progress survey found that nearly six in 10 Democrats preferred populist economic arguments over more traditional centrist proposals. That's obvious enough on the ground, where over 30,000 Coloradans packed a populist rally earlier this year hosted by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Even moderate Democrats are trying out their own economic populist talking points.
Crockett's fluency in the language of populist frustration allows her voice to carry in spaces and among communities where conventional Democratic talking points are normally filtered out. For Litman, the perfect candidate for our modern political era is one who isn't so concerned about being perfect.
'Voters are no longer looking for candidates who embody the perfect politician or those who play with the same old political playbook — they want someone who understands the stakes through lived experience,' Litman said. 'Crockett embodies all of this. She clearly knows who she is and what she believes.'
Now Crockett and the Democrats who have rallied around her have an even more challenging goal: reminding go-along, get-along Democrats that they used to believe in things, too. Crockett has built a powerful national brand by telling Democrats that it's OK to pick a fight when that fight is worth having. Millions of voters agree.
Max Burns is a veteran Democratic strategist and founder of Third Degree Strategies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
43 minutes ago
- The Hill
Homan warns California officials can be arrested if they disrupt ICE raids
Border czar Tom Homan on Sunday warned California officials could face arrest and prosecution if they 'cross the line' following President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles to quell ongoing immigration protests. Trump ordered at least 2,000 National Guard members to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents after two days of clashes with demonstrators, despite state and city leaders saying they had not asked for assistance. Homan said Trump's order was not only to protect law enforcement officers but also to 'protect this community.' 'The rhetoric is so high against ICE officers in this city that it's a matter of time before someone gets seriously hurt,' Homan told NBC News's Jacob Soboroff in an interview slated for broadcast Sunday night. 'We've got help coming, and we're going to do our job, and we're going to continue doing that job.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, have criticized Trump's decision to call in the National Guard, warning it only risks escalating tensions. Both also pointed out on Sunday that Trump had posted about the National Guard's 'great job' before any troops had arrived in L.A. When Soboroff asked if Homan's past threats to arrest anyone who stood in the way of Trump's enforcement operations were directed at Newsom and Bass, Homan clarified he would 'say that about anybody.' 'It's a felony to knowingly conceal and harbor an illegal alien,' Homan said. 'It's a felony to impede law enforcement from doing their job.' Homan said he didn't think Bass had 'crossed the line yet,' but added 'we will ask DOJ to prosecute' if needed. 'What we're saying is we're not going to tolerate people attacking our officers,' he added. On Sunday morning, Newsom, in a post on X, claimed the federal government is 'taking over the California National Guard' because 'they want a spectacle.' 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully,' he added. In the NBC News interview, Homan bashed Newsom's comments and called him 'an embarrassment for the state.' 'I have absolutely no respect for this governor,' Homan said. 'Criminal aliens are walking in this state every day because of his government policy. I don't care what the governor thinks of me. I'm not running a popularity contest.'


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's National Guard deployment in L.A. is a move last seen in Civil Rights era
The last time a president deployed the National Guard without a request from a governor was an entirely different era in American history. President Donald Trump's order of 2,000 National Guard troops to quell what his administration described as 'insurrectionists' in Los Angeles drew strenuous objections from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'It's very much outside our constitutional norms and traditions for the military to be deployed under federal control in the United States,' said Laura Dickinson, a George Washington University Law School professor who specializes in armed conflict. 'It's particularly rare when a governor objects.' Sixty years ago, President Lyndon Johnson deployed the Alabama National Guard to protect a march led by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. from Selma to Montgomery, the state's capital, after George Wallace, Alabama's segregationist governor, declined to provide Guard protection. The march followed 'Bloody Sunday' — March 7, 1965 — when Alabama state troopers brutally attacked marchers attempting to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma. They used clubs and gas canisters to force marchers, who had planned to walk to Montgomery, back to Selma. The marchers had been galvanized by the slaying of a young Black man from Alabama, Jimmie Lee Jackson, who had been shot as he attempted to prevent his mother from being further beaten by police. The civil rights era also saw numerous other instances of the federalization of the National Guard — to protect Black students integrating Southern schools and to quell unrest. On Sunday, the California National Guard began to arrive in Los Angeles after protests over wide-scale arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in recent days. Dickinson noted that what the federalized Guard will be doing is 'unclear': Will the troops be doing direct law enforcement, or will they be in a supportive role? What are their rules of engagement, and will they use force? It's also unclear how much training they have received, she noted. 'If they were to use force, this really could risk politicizing the military, which historically has enjoyed broad bipartisan support,' Dickinson said. It could also, she said, bring liability concerns. Newsom has called for calm, and, indeed, reports from Los Angeles suggested that the streets were quiet Sunday morning. 'Trump is sending 2,000 National Guard troops into LA County — not to meet an unmet need, but to manufacture a crisis,' Newsom wrote on social media. 'He's hoping for chaos so he can justify more crackdowns, more fear, more control. Stay calm. Never use violence. Stay peaceful.'


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
DNC chair, almost crying, claims David Hogg is making it impossible to lead party: ‘No one knows who the hell I am'
DNC Chair Ken Martin vented about party Vice Chairman and Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg to the point of near tears in a recent call with top Dem brass, saying, 'No one knows who the hell I am. 'I'll be very honest with you: For the first time in my 100 days on this job, the other night I said to myself for the first time, 'I don't know if I wanna do this anymore,' ' Martin bluntly admitted in leaked audio of the May 15 Zoom meeting, which was obtained by Politico, Martin, who was elected boss of the Democratic National Committee in February, bemoaned the shadow that Hogg cast over him by igniting a firestorm within the party over his plans to fund primary challenges against incumbent Dems. Advertisement 'No one knows who the hell I am, right?' Martin said during the call, in which he singled out Hogg, who was in the meeting. 'I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to put ourselves in a position to win,' the chairman said. 'I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to,' he said, directly addressing Hogg. 'So it's really frustrating.' Advertisement 3 Ken Martin didn't mince words about his frustrations with DNC Vice Chair David Hogg in leaked audio. AP 3 Hogg has been working to fund Democratic primaries against safe DEM incumbents despite his role as a party's vice chair. Getty Images for Fast Company Toward the end of the leaked audio, Martin's voice grew softer, and he paused at least twice, appearing to be on the verge of choking up. The DNC boss told Hogg, 'I deeply respect you' and 'was looking forward to working with you' while griping about the dilemma that the 25-year-old school mass-shooting survivor created. Advertisement Martin, referring to the state of the DNC, said, 'It has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again.' About 10 people were reportedly on the call. The Post reached out to the DNC and Hogg for comment. Hogg later posted text messages with the Politico reporter who broke the story as evidence that he didn't leak the audio. Advertisement Martin was meanwhile adamant that 'I'm not going anywhere' after the leaked audio surfaced. 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' he said in a statement obtained by Politico. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. 'That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Hogg announced in April that his 'Leaders We Deserve' group would shell out about $20 million to meddle in Democratic primaries located in safe districts to edge out what it considers complacent incumbents in favor of ones who are more feisty. 3 Hogg has argued that the party needs to become more combative. Getty Images Last month, Hogg's group made its first endorsement, backing Illinois state Sen. Robert Peters (D) for the seat held by US Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), in Illinois' 2nd Congressional District. Kelly is running to replace retiring Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) in 2026. Many Democrats are incensed that Hogg is attempting to retain his role as a vice chair at the DNC and intervene in primaries at the same time. Hogg is one of three vice chairs. As with the Republican National Committee, the DNC provides candidates with resources and strategic assistance and is generally expected to be neutral in party primaries. Advertisement 'Our job is to be neutral arbiters,' Martin previously said in another leaked April call. 'We can't be both the referee and also the player at the same time.' Martin had pressured Hogg to either sign a neutrality pledge or step down from his highly coveted perch. Last month, around the time of the leaked Martin Zoom call, the DNC Credentials Committee heard complaints that Hogg and fellow Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta were improperly elected to their positions in February. The complaint was furnished by Oklahoma DNC member Kalyn Free, who pointed to committee rules calling for the party to have as close to gender parity as possible. She argued that the election of Hogg and Kenyatta flouted those rules. Advertisement The DNC subpanel recommended that the party hold new elections for the vice chair positions to rectify that issue. All of that controversy has clouded the DNC's efforts to go on the offensive against Republicans and President Trump amid deep soul-searching within the party over what went awry during the 2024 presidential election.