Why Gen Z and millennials are ditching management roles: the rise of 'conscious unbossing'
Image: MART PRODUCTION /pexels
We spend a huge part of our lives at work, which is already a little depressing when you think about it.
Right now, stress is sky-high, workplace bullying still happens in too many offices, salaries aren't keeping up with the cost of living, and yet the pressure to 'perform' never lets up.
And just when you think it couldn't get more complicated, a quiet workplace revolution is bubbling up, one that might just change how we work and protect our wellbeing in the long run.
The new generation of workers, particularly Gen Z, is challenging the old "command-and-control" approach - where decisions flow from the top and employees follow orders - but leadership isn't something they're eager to chase.
This conscious choice not to climb the ladder is what experts are calling Conscious Unbossing.
What is conscious unbossing?
In simple terms, it's a new wave of young professionals choosing freedom and flexibility over fancy job titles and corner offices. It's not about being lazy; it's about questioning if the personal cost of leadership is worth it anymore.
According to the Global Leadership Forecast 2025 by DDI, a respected leadership consultancy, 80% of HR professionals admit they don't trust their pipeline of future leaders. CEOs are so worried that they list it in their top four business risks.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
According to Robert Walters' research, more than half of Gen Z employees 52% are disinterested in middle management roles, with 16% refusing to accept positions requiring direct line reporting.
This hesitation is caused by a number of crucial factors, including perceived stagnant earnings and an alarming stress-to-reward ratio. Approximately 69% of Generation Z workers agree that middle management is "too high stress, low reward."
Why Gen Z is saying 'no thanks' to management
It isn't that this new generation lacks ambition. Instead, it's a values-driven decision built around three main reasons: They crave freedom and flexibility: Remote and hybrid work models gave young professionals a taste of autonomy. Many started their careers without ever working 9-to-5 in an office. Now, being forced back into rigid corporate structures feels unnecessary. As long as the work gets done, why should it matter where or how?
Remote and hybrid work models gave young professionals a taste of autonomy. Many started their careers without ever working 9-to-5 in an office. Now, being forced back into rigid corporate structures feels unnecessary. As long as the work gets done, why should it matter where or how? They want better work-life balance: Leadership stress is real. The report claims 71% of managers feel more stressed now than when they started, and just 30% believe they have enough time to do their jobs properly. Gen Z sees these struggles and thinks: 'Why sign up for that?'
Leadership stress is real. The report claims 71% of managers feel more stressed now than when they started, and just 30% believe they have enough time to do their jobs properly. Gen Z sees these struggles and thinks: 'Why sign up for that?' They see less investment in 'growth: When companies cut training budgets and still expect loyalty, it sends a message: employees aren't a priority. As Forbes found, 52% of Gen Z professionals are deliberately avoiding management positions, and 69% view middle management as high-stress with minimal reward. Why emotionally invest in a system that doesn't invest back?
Does this mean middle managers are doomed? Not quite. As leadership expert Jon Bisset told "Forbes": 'Middle managers still play a crucial role, especially in large organisations, where coordination and oversight are essential.'
In fact, 89% of employers still see middle management as critical. But what's changing is how these roles look: Flatter structures instead of rigid hierarchies.
Focus on collaboration and expertise rather than just authority.
Emphasis on skills development over title-chasing.
Gen Z isn't anti-growth – they're pro-growth on their own terms. Research shows 72% of Gen Z prefer to advance by deepening their expertise, not by managing people.
However, this trend of 'conscious unbossing' comes with various challenges. One of them is balancing freedom with accountability, as some teams may struggle with self-management.
Here are a few more of them: Productivity issues: Some team members may find it difficult to take the initiative without clear direction, and not all team members are equally skilled at managing their freedom. Productivity may suffer in the absence of clearly defined expectations and responsibilities, particularly for those used to more rigid management approaches.
Some team members may find it difficult to take the initiative without clear direction, and not all team members are equally skilled at managing their freedom. Productivity may suffer in the absence of clearly defined expectations and responsibilities, particularly for those used to more rigid management approaches. Lack of clear direction: Teams may experience a lack of clarity regarding duties and expectations in a less organised setting, which could result in inefficiency or a misalignment of objectives. Maintaining clarity and focus while embracing flexibility can be difficult.
Teams may experience a lack of clarity regarding duties and expectations in a less organised setting, which could result in inefficiency or a misalignment of objectives. Maintaining clarity and focus while embracing flexibility can be difficult. Resistance to letting go of control: Managers used to traditional control may find it challenging to move into a job that involves facilitation. It takes a big mental adjustment and a readiness to trust workers with more responsibility and give up hierarchical power.
Why this shift matters for mental well-being
Work stress is a known risk for anxiety, depression and even physical illness. The World Health Organisation lists workplace stress among the top global health threats.
So in some ways, Gen Z's conscious unbossing isn't laziness – it might be a protective strategy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Why big businesses need to rethink their relationship with SMMEs
Matsie Mpshe, Founder and Managing Director at The Transformation Firm and Founder of the SMME Empowerment Summit Image: Supplied South Africa has over 2.5 million small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs), employing nearly 10 million people. Yet, many of these businesses are still viewed by corporates through the narrow lens of CSI or supplier development compliance. What if we have it backwards? What if it is big business that can no longer afford to underestimate the value and innovation of small business? The truth is, without meaningful partnerships with the SMME ecosystem, especially in underrepresented and township communities, large companies risk stagnation. It is time to reframe the conversation around small businesses. SMMEs are not charity cases. They are central to our country's economic resilience and recovery. These entrepreneurs are resourceful, driven and deeply connected to the needs of the communities they serve. They move with agility, often doing more with less, and their solutions are often more local, inclusive and relevant. They understand culture and context, and they are embedded in their markets. This is something many large corporations struggle to achieve, even with deep budgets and broad reach. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading When we discuss true transformation, particularly in supply chains, we need to begin viewing SMMEs as strategic partners, rather than merely as tick-box initiatives. Too often, enterprise development is still treated as an isolated function, divorced from actual procurement or supply chain opportunities. This kind of support is well-meaning but short-sighted. The real opportunity lies in collaboration that is sustainable and commercially driven. That means designing long-term interventions that build capacity, open procurement pipelines, and develop solutions together. It is not about doing SMMEs a favour but rather about recognising that the future of big business is intertwined with the success of small business. Supporting SMMEs should not be the sole responsibility of one division or a social impact mandate. It should be a priority for operations, procurement, and product teams across the business. One of the most impactful shifts a company can make is to pay small businesses on time. It seems basic, but it makes a significant difference to a small business's ability to manage cash flow and grow sustainably. Equally important is including them early in the design and development process. Why not co-create new product lines with small-scale manufacturers or service providers? Why not bring them into pilot projects or innovation labs? Transformation is not only about representation. It is about inclusion in meaningful, income-generating opportunities. And inclusion does not start with access to funding. It starts with access to networks, to decision-makers, to industry information, and to market opportunities. This is where large corporations can unlock real value. Not by building parallel programmes, but by finding points of synergy within their own ecosystems and supply chains. Big business does not operate in a vacuum. Our success is intertwined with the communities around us and the businesses that serve them. If we want to see sustainable growth, we need to start building ecosystems that are inclusive, practical and long-term. That means opening supply chains, not just talking about transformation. It means building relationships, not just writing cheques. As we enter Women's Month, there is also an opportunity to elevate women-led SMMEs beyond the once-a-year panels and campaigns. Women entrepreneurs bring invaluable insights, leadership and resilience to the economy. But they need consistent opportunities to grow and to lead. Corporate South Africa has a powerful role to play in making that happen, not as a favour, but as a business imperative.

IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
The absence of SA's ambassador not to blame for US 30% tariff hike, says Lamola
Minister Ronald Lamola says South Africa's absence of an ambassador in Washington is not the reason for the 30% US import tariffs. Image: AFP International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola said he does not believe South Africa's current lack of an ambassador in Washington has affected the country's ability to negotiate an agreement following the United States' decision to impose steep 30% tariffs on imports. Speaking at a joint media briefing on Monday at the Germiston Civic Centre in Ekurhuleni, alongside Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau, Lamola addressed the diplomatic fallout after former South African ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool was expelled in March. 'We had an ambassador in the US and that ambassador was expelled,' said Lamola. 'President (Cyril) Ramaphosa has always prioritised the US in terms of ambassadorial responsibility.' Lamola said the expulsion has complicated the process of appointing a new ambassador. 'The fact that our ambassador was expelled means that the new process to appoint the ambassador will not be as easy as it would have been when an ambassador had not been expelled,' he said. 'We have to take all careful consideration, all due diligence, and I can confirm that that process is at an advanced stage. The President, at the right time, will announce who will become the ambassador of South Africa to the US.' Lamola said that the appointment would be made solely by the president, in accordance with the Constitution. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The 30% tariffs, introduced by the administration of US President Donald Trump, are set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on August 8. While other African countries, such as Lesotho and Zimbabw,e will face a 15% tariff, South Africa has been singled out for a significantly steeper duty. Lamola, however, dismissed suggestions that the absence of an ambassador had weakened South Africa's negotiating position. 'Ambassadors do not negotiate any trade deals,' he said. 'The trade deal is being negotiated under the leadership of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC), with coordination and support from the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO).' Lamola confirmed that South Africa currently has a chargé d'affaires (a diplomat) in Washington who engages with key stakeholders but does not lead negotiations. 'There are countries that do have ambassadors in Washington. They don't have a trade deal. So, the trade deal is negotiated by the relevant line function department. In this instance, it is the DTIC, which we are supporting, including our chargé d'affaires in the US, who does from time to time point to the relevant people,' he said. He further rejected claims that the absence of an ambassador directly caused South Africa's failure to secure a tariff exemption. 'If that were the case, all countries with ambassadors in Washington wouldn't be having the same challenges we're facing,' said Lamola. 'This is a global phenomenon, not a South African problem.' Rasool, who previously served as ambassador to the US from 2010 to 2015 during the Barack Obama administration, was reappointed in January 2025 under the Joe Biden and later Trump administrations. Rasool was dismissed in March after the remarks he made during a webinar hosted by the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection (Mistra), under the theme 'Implications of Changes in US Administrations for SA and Africa'. During the event, Rasool urged South Africans to familiarise themselves with the country's national interest framework, calling it a critical guide amid shifting global dynamics.

IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Oil and Gas in the Global South
Petropiar: Company in Venezuela, Latin America. Image: Sputnik In 2024, BRICS expanded its membership to include Iran, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Egypt, Ethiopia, and others, transforming from an emerging-market coalition into a significant force in global energy. This enlarged group, now known as BRICS+, comprises some of the world's leading oil and gas producers. It now accounts for over 40% of global oil output and more than 30% of gas production. This expansion signifies a pivotal change in global energy dynamics, especially for the Global South. The Major BRICS+ Oil and Gas Producers Numerous BRICS+ nations hold significant influence in the global hydrocarbon sector: Russia Russia, a key player in the global energy market, produced around 10.8 million barrels of oil per day (bpd) in 2024 and ranks among the top three global natural gas producers. Even with Western sanctions, Russia has strengthened energy ties across Eurasia by increasing exports to China and India. Brazil South America's leading oil producer, Brazil, has experienced significant offshore expansion. Its production hit 3.5 million barrels per day in 2024, largely due to pre-salt fields such as Búzios. Brazil's formal entry into OPEC+ in 2023 has further strengthened its position in global supply negotiations. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Iran As a founding member of OPEC and a BRICS+ country, Iran possesses the world's second-largest natural gas reserves and fourth-largest oil reserves. Despite sanctions, its production of approximately 3 million barrels per day remains robust. Iran's entry into BRICS has further bolstered the bloc's influence in the Gulf region. United Arab Emirates The United Arab Emirates (UAE), led by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC), currently produces approximately 3.2 million barrels of oil per day (bpd) and aims to increase this to 5 million bpd by 2027. The UAE also boasts substantial natural gas production, particularly from the Shah gas field, solidifying its role as a vital energy contributor within BRICS+. Saudi Arabia (Unofficial Member) Saudi Arabia, the world's largest crude oil exporter with a production exceeding 10 million barrels per day, demonstrates a clear strategic alignment with BRICS, even as its formal accession is still pending. Its cooperation within OPEC+ supports the energy interests of BRICS+, particularly in price stabilisation and counteracting Western financial influence. Why This Matters for the Global South Energy Access and Affordability Energy access continues to hinder development in many Global South nations, especially in Africa and South Asia. However, BRICS+ oil producers, notably Russia and Iran, have offered discounted crude to countries like India, China, and Brazil. This has lowered import costs and helped control inflation, creating new energy alignments that provide alternatives to Western markets where prices are pegged to the dollar. Redefining Global Pricing and Trade The global oil trade is being transformed by BRICS+'s increasing efforts to settle oil transactions in local currencies, including the yuan, rupee, and dirham. India has already acquired Russian oil using rupees, and discussions are underway for a BRICS clearing mechanism that would circumvent the U.S. dollar. This shift offers Global South economies reduced currency risk and greater financial autonomy. South-South Energy Financing The New Development Bank (NDB), the financial arm of BRICS, has started financing infrastructure projects in member states. These projects, including pipelines, refineries, and gas terminals, are aimed at fostering value-added industrial development. This initiative supports energy independence and local job creation, going beyond mere resource extraction. Strategic Implications for BRICS and Global Energy Geopolitical Leverage The multi-polar energy order is now represented by BRICS+, which challenges the petrodollar system and the dominance of Western oil majors. BRICS countries wield influence over OPEC+ and emerging consumer markets, enabling them to stabilise prices, shape production levels, and advocate for more equitable market access globally. Energy Transition Pressure BRICS+ unity faces a significant challenge due to the global push for decarbonisation. Although fossil fuels are still widely used, some BRICS+ members, such as the UAE and Brazil, are making substantial investments in green hydrogen and biofuels, respectively. A key challenge remains how to achieve a just energy transition that fosters growth in the Global South without simply mirroring Western approaches. The BRICS+ Oil Pivot For BRICS+, oil and gas have transcended their status as mere commodities, evolving into strategic instruments. The integration of key hydrocarbon nations such as Iran and the UAE positions the bloc as a pivotal energy provider for the Global South, simultaneously establishing it as a formidable counterbalance to Western-controlled energy organisations. In a fragmented global order, the future of resource control extends beyond mere ownership to the establishment of new global standards in pricing, currency, financing, and sustainable development. This shift, driven by BRICS+ oil and gas diplomacy, signifies an evolving world where the Global South gains increased agency, expanded options, and a stronger voice. Written By: Sesona Mdlokovana Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group African Specialist