
'I knew Norman Tebbit - one thing made him stand apart from today's MPs'
He was given the job after James Prior, an affable Suffolk farmer, was demoted for being too soft on militant labour leaders.
His briefings for journalists like me were laced with characteristic acid humour, joking that he was 'a friend of the unions'. In fact he believed it, arguing that compulsory strike ballots enfranchised rank-and-file members.
In private he was polite and courteous but waspish when he felt like it. He once promised to trap my fingers in the gate of his home in the next door street to where I lived in Berhamsted, Herts.
But in his no-nonsense autobiography of 1988, Upwardly Mobile, he described me as 'the left-wing but very straight labour correspondent of The Times'.
He also praised me for identifying his 1983 Green Paper on further curbs as a naked bid for votes that could be kept on the boil right through Thatcher's second election campaign.
As a journalist who relied on top-level contacts in the labour movement, these were back-handed compliments I could do without.
Tebbit was not the kind of man you would want to go to the pub with, but in an era of milk-and-water politicians, I have to concede that this slightly-built, nattily-dressed man was a towering figure in the turbulent years of the 1980s.
His cutting grasp of language, almost the equal of Michael Foot, who called him 'a semi-house-trained polecat' would have made him the journalist he always wanted to be.
And he showed he could make use of the jest, by putting a winged polecat on his coat of arms when he was ennobled in 1992. Which of today's politicians would do that?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
4 hours ago
- Spectator
Border lands, 200 years of British railways & who are the GOATs?
First: how Merkel killed the European dream 'Ten years ago,' Lisa Haseldine says, 'Angela Merkel told the German press what she was going to do about the swell of Syrian refugees heading to Europe': 'Wir schaffen das' – we can handle it. With these words, 'she ushered in a new era of uncontrolled mass migration'. 'In retrospect,' explains one senior British diplomat, 'it was pretty much the most disastrous government policy of this century anywhere in Europe.' The surge of immigrants helped swing Brexit, 'emboldened' people-traffickers and 'destabilised politics' across Europe. Ten years on, a third of the EU's member states within the Schengen area have now imposed border controls. Can freedom of movement survive in its current form? Lisa joined the podcast alongside Oliver Moody, Berlin correspondent for The Times. Next: the cultural impact of the railways It's been 200 years since the world's first public train travelled from Shildon to Stockton – across County Durham. Richard Bratby argues that this marked the start of a new era for Britain and the world: 'no invention between the printing press and the internet has had as profound a cultural impact as the railways'. How can we explain the romantic appeal of the railways? Richard joined the podcast to discuss, alongside Christian Wolmar, author of over twenty books about the railways including The Liberation Line. And finally: who is the Greatest Of All Time? What do Lionel Messi, Roger Federer and Tom Brady have in common? Their acolytes would argue that they are the GOAT of their sport – the Greatest Of All Time. Why are fans so obsessed with the GOAT label? Are pundits guilty of recency bias? And does it really matter anyway? Journalist Patrick Kidd joined the podcast to discuss, alongside the Spectator's Sam McPhail. Plus: Madeline Grant asks why not show J.D. Vance the real Britain? Hosted by William Moore and Gus Carter. Produced by Patrick Gibbons.


Spectator
10 hours ago
- Spectator
Who still supports Keir Starmer?
Successful political leaders hold in their minds some idea of what Mrs Thatcher called 'Our People'. In this context, I do not mean the whole population of the country they seek to lead, or the core of the party they belong to. I mean that group of people with whose aspirations they most wish to identify. In making that identification, they combine direct self-interest – getting their floating vote – with a wider view about who are most important for the nation's future prosperity and good order. In the Thatcher era, such people were the famous C2s, first-generation home-buyers, millions who could expect not only to earn but also to own. In Tony Blair's time, the group was not so different, but a bit softer, as one expects when growth has seemed secure for many years. David Cameron made a mistake, I think, in eschewing the Our People idea in favour of a vaguer One Nation view. Obviously leaders must care about the whole nation, but if they do not advance any particular interest strongly, their support may be quite wide but never deep. In winning the election, Sir Keir Starmer tried to identify with 'working people', but then crushed the hopes of many of them with national insurance rises and attacks on farms and small businesses. Who are Sir Keir's people today? Public-sector workers, you might think, but they seem rebellious, despite above-inflation pay rises. Not Muslims, because of Israel/Gaza; not Jews, for the same thing the other way round; not police, armed services, Border Force; not Welsh or Scots; not oil and gas workers or car workers, but not net-zero fans either; not the young; not the old (even though Rachel Reeves reinstated the winter fuel allowance she had herself cut); not feminists, but not trans fans; not the Red Wall. Perhaps not even academia, as foreign students fall away and even the great liberal-lawyer blob has its doubts because of Labour's Faragiste noises about immigration. Successful prime ministers have periods – Thatcher from 1982-88; Blair from 1997-2003; Boris (much more briefly) between Brexit and mid-Covid – when they seem to chime with the way the country wants to go. Despite his vast majority, Sir Keir never chimes. Some may still think: 'Well, we could do worse' but almost no one thinks, 'Ah, yes, he understands what I and my family want.' Anas al-Sharif, the Al Jazeera reporter whom Israel blew up, intentionally, last Sunday, left what he described as 'my will and final message' to be published on Twitter once 'Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice'. Allah knows, says Anas, that 'I gave… all my strength to be a support and a voice for my people' since he was born in the Jabaliya refugee camp. Allah will also 'bear witness against those… whose hearts are unmoved by the scattered remains of our children and women'. (Anas was less moved by the scattered remains of children and women on 7 October 2023, when he sent out an exultant post on Telegram: '9 hours and the heroes are still roaming the country killing and capturing… Great God, how great you are.' Being in close contact with the Hamas Nukhba brigade that day, he could post a picture of a Hamas terrorist placing his foot on a dead Israeli's head and comment 'All you feel is just high spirits. Remember, we hit them right on their heads in the midst of their military positions.') His testament continues: 'I entrust you with Palestine – the jewel in the Crown of the Muslim world, the heartbeat of every free person in the world.' Don't let 'borders restrain you. Be bridges towards the liberation of the land and its people'. 'O Allah,' he prays, 'accept me among the martyrs…and make my blood a light that illustrates the pathway for my people… I kept my promise and never changed or betrayed it.' The IDF says Anas was a Hamas operative and have produced evidence. I am not in a position to judge the exact truth. But he clearly loved Hamas, worked with Hamas, propagandised for Hamas, and was seemingly unacquainted, as Al Jazeera also seems to be, with clause I. iv of our own dear Editors' Code of Practice, which says reporters 'must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact'. His bias was all-consuming and his desire was martyrdom, not scoops. He was a jihadist, not a journalist. In the past three weeks, I have been sent 26 emails from the Tucker Carlson Network telling me my request has been received 'and is being reviewed by our support staff'. I have never sent a request to the Tucker Carlson Network. This assiduity in reply, absence of content in the reply and response to a request never made (or never made by the recipient of the replies) is a uniquely 21st-century form of customer service. British waters are 0.2 per cent hotter than in 1980, says a BBC analysis of Met Office data. This causes some species (cod, whelks) to flee and others (octopus, bluefin tuna) to burgeon. Obviously, this creates some problems ('Swarm of jellyfish shuts French nuclear power plant' was a good headline from Reuters), but there are benefits from the slightly higher temperatures. When my wife began keeping records of moths in our Sussex garden about 25 years ago, few beautiful southern species were to be found. Today, the exotic arrivals have increased, including Zelleria oleastrella – which traditionally inhabits olive groves – borne across the sea on the warmer air currents. The Jersey Tiger, admired for its orange hindwings and black and cream forewings, was excitingly rare then. Today, it has given up tax exile in the Channel Islands and is well ensconced with us. Its range is extending north. Nicola Sturgeon says she is moving to London because she 'can't breathe freely in Scotland'. That is how a great many of her fellow countrymen and women feel. Her party, the SNP, has now been in government in Scotland since 2007. Could these two phenomena be related?


Scottish Sun
18 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Trump and Putin ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks
Russia would have military and economic control over Ukraine under the plans PEACE PLOT Trump and Putin 'plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RUSSIA and the US are considering a West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine to secure a truce, according to reports. The superpowers have discussed using Israel's occupation of the West Bank as a model for ending the war in Ukraine, sources said. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 President Vladimir Putin welcomes US envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting Credit: Reuters 2 Trump and Putin will sit down for what the White House calls a 'listening exercise' Credit: Reuters This would give Russia military and economic control of occupied Ukraine, which would run its own governing body, reports The Times. The idea was first raised weeks ago in discussions between US envoy Steve Witkoff and his Russian counterparts, a source close to the US national security council told the paper. Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz says European leaders and Zelensky had a "constructive" meeting with Trump about Ukraine. Zelensky insisted there must be a meeting between all the three leaders of Ukraine, Russia and the US after he was snubbed from Trump and Putin's head-to-head on Friday. He said hopes a ceasefire will be the main topic of discussion in Alaska - and Merz reassured that Trump will make that his "priority". Ursula von der Leyden, European Commission President, said they had a "very good" call with Trump. She said: "Today Europe, the US and NATO have strengthened the common ground for Ukraine. "We will remain in close coordination. Nobody wants peace more than us, a just and lasting peace." More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun