logo
Arkansas lawmakers advance $750 million appropriation bill for prison construction

Arkansas lawmakers advance $750 million appropriation bill for prison construction

Yahoo20-03-2025

(Getty Images)
A legislative committee on Thursday approved a $750 million appropriation bill for the cost of constructing a new 3,000-bed prison in western Arkansas, three weeks after rejecting a request for approval to draft the bill.
Funds for the project won't get disbursed until formal requests are approved by the Legislature, but that didn't stop members of the Joint Budget Committee Thursday morning from venting about the Sanders administration's decision to place a new prison in rural Franklin County in an effort to alleviate overcrowding in county jails.
Searcy Republican Sen. Jonathan Dismang, committee co-chair and lead sponsor of Senate Bill 354, said he heard his colleagues' previous concerns about not having a total cost estimate for the project. Vanir Construction, the firm hired by the Department of Corrections as the project's construction manager, issued a letter with a preliminary cost estimate of $825 million on March 3, the same day Dismang filed a bill to appropriate $750 million for the project.
Arkansas officials estimate new prison cost at $825M; bill appropriating $750M filed
Lawmakers have had weeks to read the bill and ask questions, according to Dismang, who reminded his colleagues that approving SB 354 would not release any funds and was required to start a capital project.
'There are stopgaps and stopgaps and stopgaps in front of us as we discuss funding along the way and how we're going to do that,' he said. 'This is not that. This is the appropriation for a capital project to build a prison. Period. This is not the end of our responsibility. This is not the end of our discussion. This allows us to have the bigger conversation.'
Several lawmakers who've been vocal critics of the project remained unsatisfied Thursday, arguing that local residents don't want the prison in their community and that costs will be higher than estimated due to a lack of needed infrastructure as well as rising costs of construction materials and the possible effect of steel tariffs.
Lawmakers' questions were fielded by former Corrections Secretary Joe Profiri. After being fired by the Arkansas Board of Corrections last year, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders hired him as a senior aide. Sanders later appointed Lindsay Wallace his successor.
The prison could be opened in phases, according to Profiri, who said the intent is to activate at least part of the facility in late 2026 or early 2027. The goal would be to have the project finished by 2029.
Profiri also told lawmakers the ultimate cost of the project will be determined by engineers' findings, and he noted that adjustments can be made to stay within budget. Sen. Bart Hester, R-Cave Springs, said Profiri has worked on at least three prison facilities over the course of nearly 40 years in corrections and was able to keep them under budget, honoring the wishes of lawmakers who have the ultimate approval of how much is spent.
'I struggle to think, what if we don't build this prison, what is the cost to society?' Hester said. 'How do we answer to the people at home when there's no misdemeanor justice? What is the cost to not do this?'
The need for more prison space is expected to increase as the state implements 2023's Protect Arkansas Act, which requires the most serious offenders to serve the majority of their sentences. County jails currently house roughly 10% of state inmates, costing the state nearly $30 million annually, according to a corrections department spokesperson.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Sen. Jimmy Hickey, R-Texarkana, said he supports a new prison and is willing to overlook some of his fiscal responsibility because he feels the prison is needed so badly. But the state could have done more on the front end to ensure the property it bought was suitable, including making sure there was sufficient access to utilities and no environmental concerns, he said.
'So to sit here and tell me that you've got this great experience in doing this and you have basically flubbed the purchase, it's just insulting to me,' he said. '…I did an amendment to try to make it so that we'd have the money because this might be a four- or five-year project, but we don't want to listen to that or try to do that to have the money in place. We just want to talk about how we're going to do this and we can't even get the first step right.'
Hickey was referring to an amendment to SB 254 that failed in the JBC Special Language subcommittee about an hour before the Joint Budget Committee met Thursday morning. The proposal wasn't about spending money, but 'moving money and parking it in holding accounts,' he said.
One proposed account would be the $750 million mentioned in the appropriation bill, an account Hickey said is already set aside with roughly $330 million in it. The other account for $250 million would be for prison construction or contingencies.
Prison opponents voice concerns as Arkansas officials proceed with 3,000-bed project
The Legislature set aside $75 million in 2022 and $330 million in 2023 for prison expansion.
The amendment would also have allowed the interest being put into the Catastrophic Reserve Fund, which Hickey said had roughly $1.9 billion in it, to be released so it can also be used.
'What this will also do is make it so that we have enough money to park this billion dollars, and it also will free up about another hundred million dollars in funds to help with our cash flow,' Hickey said in the subcommittee.
As a member of the committee, Hickey made a do-pass motion, but it failed for lack of a second.
During the Joint Budget Committee meeting, Sen. John Payton, R-Wilburn, said the state 'had a lot of money burning a hole in our pocket.' The state's general revenue surplus was $698.4 million in fiscal year 2024, the fourth-largest surplus on record. The general revenue surplus exceeded $1 billion in the two previous years.
Everyone agreed to build a prison, but Payton said he's not sure 'we made a wise business decision' about where to put it.
'But it did destroy a lot of confidence in the people making the decision, and when we're talking about what could be a billion dollar project, we need some confidence in how the decisions are going to be made,' he said.
When the governor announced in late October the purchase of 815 acres near Charleston for $2.95 million, several Arkansas lawmakers, as well as local officials and residents, decried the decision for its lack of transparency and have continued to push back against the project.
Even if the state increases prison capacity, Payton said, staffing will be an issue, as it has been for a number of years.
'That's what concerns me most, and that's why I think we need to slow down instead of running off half-cocked and pursuing what could be a major problem in the end,' he said.
Sen. Gary Stubblefield, a Branch Republican whose family land is near the prison site, requested the committee's vote be divided by chambers. The bill advanced after garnering a 17-10 vote on the Senate side and a 16-10 vote on the House side.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP House Homeland chairman Green to retire from Congress early

timean hour ago

GOP House Homeland chairman Green to retire from Congress early

NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- The House Homeland Security Committee's chairman, Republican Rep. Mark Green of Tennessee, announced Monday that he will retire from Congress once the House votes again on the sprawling tax and budget policy bill backed by President Donald Trump. In a statement, Green said he was offered a private sector opportunity that was 'that was too exciting to pass up' so he informed House Speaker Mike Johnson on Monday of his retirement plans. The move comes more than a year after Green announced he wouldn't run again in 2024, but changed his mind when fellow Republicans implored him to stick around. Green's next election would have been in 2026. Green voted for Trump's sweeping legislation when it passed the House last month. The bill is now in the Senate's hands, and would need to return to the House for agreement on any changes. Trump wants the bill on his desk for his signature by July 4. Green's delayed departure could help with the GOP's narrow margins in the House. Republican leaders need every vote they can get on their big tax bill, which they managed to pass last month by a single vote and will have to pass again once changes are made in the Senate. They now have a 220-212 majority. 'It was the honor of a lifetime to represent the people of Tennessee in Congress," Green said. "They asked me to deliver on the conservative values and principles we all hold dear, and I did my level best to do so.' Green's seat will be decided in a special election. The timing will depend on when he leaves office. Ahead of his 2024 reelection, Green had announced that February 2024 he would not run again. The decision was revealed a day after the impeachment of then-President Joe Biden's Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. But many fellow Republicans had called on him to reconsider, and he jumped back into the running just two weeks later. He was unopposed in the Republican primary and then defeated Democrat Megan Barry — the former Nashville mayor who resigned in 2018 in scandal — by more than 21 percentage points in November 2024. Green, 60, has served since 2019 in the 7th Congressional District, which was redrawn in 2022 to include a significant portion of Nashville. The city was carved up three ways in the 2022 redistricting so Republicans could flip a Democratic district in Congress that had covered Music City, which they successfully did. Green previously served as an Army surgeon and in the state Senate and is from Montgomery County. Green flirted running for governor in 2017, but suspended his campaign after he was nominated by former President Donald Trump to become the Army secretary. He later withdrew his nomination due to criticism over his remarks about Muslims and LGBTQ+ Americans.

Trump heads to Fort Bragg while facing criticism for deploying military at Los Angeles protests

timean hour ago

Trump heads to Fort Bragg while facing criticism for deploying military at Los Angeles protests

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump plans to speak at Fort Bragg on Tuesday to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army as he deploys the military in an attempt to quiet immigration protests in Los Angeles. Fort Bragg, located near Fayetteville, North Carolina, serves as headquarters for U.S. Army Special Operations Command. Highly trained units like the Green Berets and the Rangers are based there. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll will also be at Tuesday's event, along with service members, veterans and their families. Trump has promoted the Army's anniversary as a reason to hold a military parade in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, which is also his 79th birthday. Tanks and other vehicles will roll down city streets in a reminder of how the Republican president is reshaping the armed forces after returning to the White House this year. Trump, who sees the military as a critical tool for domestic goals, has used the recent protests in Los Angeles as an opportunity to deploy the National Guard and U.S. Marines to quell disturbances that began as protests over immigration raids. Trump has authorized the deployment of 4,000 National Guard soldiers to the city over the objections of Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom. About 700 Marines were also due to formally deploy to Los Angeles. California sued Trump over the deployment, with the state attorney general arguing that the president had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. California leaders accused Trump of fanning protesters' anger, leading crowds to block off a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire. 'We're gonna have troops everywhere," Trump said over the weekend. 'We're not going to let this happen to our country.' Fort Bragg has been in the middle of a cultural tug-of-war over the military. It was named after a Confederate general, then renamed to Fort Liberty two years ago. Hegseth brought back the Bragg name, but said it was being used to honor an Army paratrooper who served in World War II.

In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles

timean hour ago

In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles

The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store