Are Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ:TXN) Investors Paying Above The Intrinsic Value?
The projected fair value for Texas Instruments is US$151 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity
Texas Instruments is estimated to be 25% overvalued based on current share price of US$189
The US$179 analyst price target for TXN is 18% more than our estimate of fair value
In this article we are going to estimate the intrinsic value of Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ:TXN) by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today's value. We will take advantage of the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model for this purpose. Models like these may appear beyond the comprehension of a lay person, but they're fairly easy to follow.
Companies can be valued in a lot of ways, so we would point out that a DCF is not perfect for every situation. If you still have some burning questions about this type of valuation, take a look at the Simply Wall St analysis model.
AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.
We're using the 2-stage growth model, which simply means we take in account two stages of company's growth. In the initial period the company may have a higher growth rate and the second stage is usually assumed to have a stable growth rate. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.
A DCF is all about the idea that a dollar in the future is less valuable than a dollar today, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Levered FCF ($, Millions)
US$2.19b
US$6.24b
US$8.80b
US$10.1b
US$10.7b
US$11.1b
US$11.6b
US$12.0b
US$12.4b
US$12.7b
Growth Rate Estimate Source
Analyst x10
Analyst x11
Analyst x5
Analyst x2
Analyst x1
Est @ 4.35%
Est @ 3.87%
Est @ 3.53%
Est @ 3.30%
Est @ 3.13%
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 9.4%
US$2.0k
US$5.2k
US$6.7k
US$7.0k
US$6.8k
US$6.5k
US$6.2k
US$5.8k
US$5.5k
US$5.2k
("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$57b
After calculating the present value of future cash flows in the initial 10-year period, we need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all future cash flows beyond the first stage. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (2.8%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 9.4%.
Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2034 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$13b× (1 + 2.8%) ÷ (9.4%– 2.8%) = US$197b
Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$197b÷ ( 1 + 9.4%)10= US$80b
The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$137b. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$189, the company appears slightly overvalued at the time of writing. Remember though, that this is just an approximate valuation, and like any complex formula - garbage in, garbage out.
Now the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate, and of course, the actual cash flows. If you don't agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Texas Instruments as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 9.4%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.537. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.
See our latest analysis for Texas Instruments
Strength
Debt is well covered by earnings and cashflows.
Weakness
Earnings declined over the past year.
Dividend is low compared to the top 25% of dividend payers in the Semiconductor market.
Expensive based on P/E ratio and estimated fair value.
Opportunity
Annual revenue is forecast to grow faster than the American market.
Threat
Dividends are not covered by earnings and cashflows.
Annual earnings are forecast to grow slower than the American market.
Although the valuation of a company is important, it is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Instead the best use for a DCF model is to test certain assumptions and theories to see if they would lead to the company being undervalued or overvalued. For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. What is the reason for the share price exceeding the intrinsic value? For Texas Instruments, there are three essential elements you should further examine:
Risks: For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Texas Instruments (1 is a bit concerning) you should be aware of.
Future Earnings: How does TXN's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered!
PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every American stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA (NasdaqGS:NVDA) Collaborates With Accenture And AdaCore For AI And Automotive Innovation
NVIDIA has gained attention with its recent expansion in AI startups and introduction of new programming languages for the automotive market, coinciding with a 28% share price increase in the last quarter. These developments align with the broader market's modest upward trend, as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq both marked winning streaks, lifted by renewed economic optimism and progress in trade talks with China. NVIDIA's collaboration with Accenture, AdaCore, and various industry leaders adds weight to its momentum, complementing its focus on AI and autonomous technology, which have remained key drivers of interest amid robust market conditions. We've spotted 1 possible red flag for NVIDIA you should be aware of. We've found 19 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. The recent developments at NVIDIA, particularly its expansion into AI startups and new programming languages for the automotive market, could significantly influence its long-term growth narrative. The partnerships with industry giants Toyota and Uber aim to cement NVIDIA's presence in the autonomous vehicles sector, potentially boosting revenue streams and market share. These collaborations align with NVIDIA's focus on AI and autonomous technology, potentially enhancing its data center and AI workloads, which in turn might improve earnings and margin potential. Analysts have projected NVIDIA's earnings to grow substantially, assuming it capitalizes on these burgeoning opportunities. However, regulatory challenges and export controls could impact these forecasts, as uncertainty remains a persistent risk. Over the past five years, NVIDIA's total return, including share price appreciation and dividends, has been very large, reflecting significant long-term value creation. In comparison to its one-year performance, NVIDIA surpassed the US Semiconductor industry, which posted a 10.3% gain, suggesting strong relative performance. This longer-term gain is a testament to NVIDIA's rapid growth trajectory, bolstered by innovation and strategic sector expansions. Despite the impressive gains, NVIDIA's current share price of US$113.54 is significantly lower than the consensus analyst price target of US$163.12, indicating potential room for growth. As the company continues to navigate AI and automotive sectors, these market moves can be pivotal in driving future revenue and earnings. Investors may need to assess if the growth potential justifies the price target, considering the associated risks and market dynamics. The ongoing scaling of the Blackwell architecture and its implications for operational efficiency and cost management will be central to NVIDIA meeting or exceeding analyst expectations. Assess NVIDIA's future earnings estimates with our detailed growth reports. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:NVDA. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
76% of workers have seen senior colleagues resist new tech
This story was originally published on To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily newsletter. If you're looking for cues as to how your employees will adapt to new technology tools, consider the age profile of the organization's workforce. In a survey of 500 U.S. professionals across various industries conducted by Yooz, a provider of purchase-to-pay automation, more than three-quarters (76%) of all workers witnessed senior colleagues push back against new technology. Furthermore, 55% of millennials (those born 1981 to 1996) said they're 'excited and eager' to try new tools, while only 22% of baby boomers (those born 1946 and 1964) said the same. More than a third (35%) of the baby boomers said they feel cautious or annoyed, or prefer sticking to the old system, when new technology is plugged in. Not a single Gen Z survey participant (those born 1997 and 2012) selected that response. At the same time, about a quarter of Gen Z employees have refused to use a new workplace tool, more than any of the other generations, which Yooz characterized as Gen Z not being 'afraid to say no.' About AI specifically, 35% of Gen Z workers said they 'love' new tools, versus 13% of Boomers. Still, 40% of employees overall said they find AI helpful but unreliable. 'The takeaway: skepticism is still widespread, but younger employees see clear value,' Yooz wrote in its survey report. The report said organizations 'need to manage rollouts carefully: leverage the enthusiasm of younger adopters to build momentum, but also address the concerns of veteran staff who may need more reassurance to get on board.' The key to winning over anyone reluctant to embrace AI is building trust through real-world use cases and support, showcasing quick wins such as an AI tool that saves everyone time on a tedious task, Yooz wrote. Among employees, the most commonly cited need with regard to new technologies is better training on AI tools. More than half (52%) of those polled said their company takes a 'learn-as-you-go' approach, providing only some basic training or documentation. Relatively few employees said their employer provides 'a lot' of training on new tools. This embedded content is not available in your region. And, almost half (48%) of the employees said better training for all would be among the most effective ways to help a company adopt new technology more effectively. The research also delved into the question of who should drive decisions to implement new workplace technology. While younger employees are craving clear direction from the C-suite, at the same time, there is 'a call for more bottom-up input in tech decisions,' according to the survey report. More than a third (35%) of Gen Z respondents said new workplace tools should be chosen by leadership with input from younger employees. Additionally, more than a quarter of Millennial and Gen Z respondents said adoption would improve if leadership embraced change faster and more visibly. A sizable minority (28%) of Gen Z employees said they feel older employees are actively holding back innovation at their company. Yooz advised a collaborative approach to the issue, pairing 'tech-savvy younger employees with veteran staff to share knowledge and encourage cross-generational support during rollouts.' Yooz partnered on the research with Pollfish, a third-party survey platform, and it was conducted in February 2025. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
10 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Vista CEO expects AI Could Replace 60% of Bankers
Get a jump start on the US trading day with Matt Miller, Katie Greifeld and Sonali Basak on "Bloomberg Open Interest." President Trump and China's Xi Jinping spoke by phone says they cleared up disputes surrounding rare earth exports. Meanwhile, the payrolls report also looms as job cuts pile up around the world... and billionaire Robert Smith sounds the alarm about AI's impact on the workforce. And Dan Mendelson the CEO of Morgan Health joins Bloomberg Open Interest to talk about Trump's order to lower drug prices. (Source: Bloomberg)