Citing NIH cuts, a top science journal stops accepting submissions

Boston Globe

30-04-2025

He declined to comment on the publication's future prospects.
'If the journal is indeed lost, it is a huge loss,' said Jonathan Levy, chair of the department of environmental health at Boston University. 'It's reducing the ability for people to have good information that can be used to make good decisions.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The news comes weeks after a federal prosecutor in Washington sent letters to several scientific journals, including The New England Journal of Medicine, with questions that suggested that they were biased against certain views and influenced by external pressures.
Advertisement
The editor of The New England Journal of Medicine described the letter as 'vaguely threatening.' On Tuesday, the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology, published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said that it had received such a letter.
Scientific journals have long been a target of top health officials in the Trump administration.
In a book published last year, Dr. Marty Makary, the new commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, accused journal editorial boards of 'gate-keeping' and publishing only information that supports a 'groupthink narrative.'
Advertisement
In an interview with the 'Dr. Hyman Show' podcast last year, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is now secretary of health and human services, said he planned to prosecute medical journals under federal anti-corruption laws.
'I'm going to find a way to sue you unless you come up with a plan right now to show how you're going to start publishing real science,' he said.
Still, the announcement regarding Environmental Health Perspectives baffled researchers, who pointed out that the funding cuts seemed to conflict with the Trump administration's stated priorities.
For instance, Kennedy has repeatedly emphasized the importance of studying the environment's role in causing chronic diseases. The new administration has also expressed interest in the transparency and public accessibility of scientific journals, an area in which Environmental Health Perspectives has been a trailblazer.
Environmental Health Perspectives was one of the first 'open-access' journals, allowing anyone to read without a subscription. And unlike many other open-access journals, which often charge researchers thousands of dollars to publish their work, Environmental Health Perspectives' federal support meant scientists from smaller universities could publish without worrying about a fee.
'There are multiple layers of irony here,' Levy said.
Environmental Health Perspectives isn't the only journal caught in the crossfire of funding cuts at the Department of Health and Human Services.
A draft budget for the department, obtained by The New York Times, proposes axing two journals published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Emerging Infectious Diseases and Preventing Chronic Disease. Both are published free of charge to authors and readers and are among the top journals in their fields.
Advertisement
Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson, said 'no final decision has been made' about the upcoming budget.
Emerging Infectious Diseases, published monthly, provides cutting-edge reports on infectious disease threats from around the world.
It has helped to shape preparedness and response to outbreaks, said Jason Kindrachuk, a virus expert at the University of Manitoba who has published research on the Marburg and mpox viruses in the journal.
The news 'is very disheartening,' he said.