World now in ‘crunch time' to avoid higher levels of warming, UN scientists warn
UN scientists have warned that the world is in 'crunch time' to avoid higher levels of warming beyond the key threshold of 1.5C but that drivers of climate change are 'all moving in the wrong direction'.
In their annual report, a team of more than 60 international scientists have put together a comprehensive picture of the current state of the climate and calculated the human-driven factors behind the changes the world is experiencing.
It comes as part of efforts to provide regular updates between landmark UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, the last of which was published in 2021 and the next of which is expected in 2028.
The group examined the amount of planet-heating carbon dioxide (CO2) the world can release into the atmosphere in the coming years while limiting warming to the UN target of 1.5C.
The report estimates that the remaining 'carbon budget' for 1.5C is emitting 130 billion tonnes of C02 from the beginning of 2025, if the world is to have a 50% chance to stay within the threshold.
However, this budget will be exhausted in little more than three years at current levels of CO2 emissions, according to the findings published on Wednesday night in the journal Earth System Science Data.
This means that without drastic cuts to emissions, the world will be unable to prevent warming from surpassing the dangerous threshold, which will lead to a rise in extreme weather events, climate-related disasters and increase the risk of triggering irreversible changes.
The report also warned the carbon budget for 1.6C or 1.7C could also be exceeded within nine years, which will significantly intensify these impacts.
The scientists' long-term estimates show current average global temperatures to be 1.24C higher than in pre-industrial times.
Professor Joeri Rogelj, research director at the Grantham Institute, said: 'Under any course of action, there is a very high chance that we will reach and even exceed 1.5C and even higher levels of warming.
'1.5C is an iconic level but we are currently already in crunch time… to avoid higher levels of warming with a decent likelihood or a prudent likelihood as well and that is true for 1.7C, but equally so for 1.8C if we want to have a high probability there.'
But Prof Rogelj added that reductions in emissions over the next decade can still 'critically change' the rate of warming and limit the magnitude and the extent by which the world exceeds 1.5C.
'It's really the difference between just cruising through 1.5C towards much higher levels of 2C or trying to limit warming somewhere in the range of 1.5,' he said.
Piers Forster, professor of Climate Physics at the University of Leeds, who has helped author IPCC reports, said the report highlights how climate policies and pace of climate action 'are not keeping up with what's needed to address the ever-growing impacts'.
'I certainly tend to be an optimistic person but if you do look at this year's annual update, things are all moving in the wrong direction,' he said.
'They're not only moving in the wrong direction, we're seeing some unprecedented changes.'
Reflecting on the IPCC reports, he said: 'What we had hope to see by this time is these emissions beginning to turn a corner and unfortunately that hasn't occurred.'
Instead emissions have increased year on year since the 2021 report, remaining at all-time highs, he said.
This year's update covers key climate system indicators such as greenhouse gas emissions and concentrations, Earth energy imbalance, human-induced climate change, remaining carbon budgets and maximum land surface temperatures.
But for the first time, the annual update also included sea-level rise and global land precipitation.
In 2024, the best estimate of observed global surface temperature rise was 1.52C, of which 1.36C can be attributed to human activity, caused by global greenhouse gas emissions, the scientists said.
The report said last year's high temperatures are 'alarmingly unexceptional' as the combination of human-driven climate change and the El Nino weather phenomenon push global heat to record levels.
While global average temperatures exceeded 1.5C for the first time, this does not mean the world has breached landmark UN agreement, which would require average global temperatures to exceed the threshold over multiple decades.
When analysing longer-term temperature change, the scientists' best estimates show that between 2015 and 2024 average global temperatures were 1.24C higher than in pre-industrial times, with 1.22C caused by human activities.
Elsewhere, the report found that human activities were found to be affecting the Earth's energy balance, with the oceans storing about 91% of the excess heat, driving detrimental changes in every component of the climate system, including sea level rise, ocean warming, ice loss, and permafrost thawing.
Between 2019 and 2024, global mean sea level also increased by around 26mm, more than doubling the long-term rate of 1.8mm per year seen since the turn of the twentieth century.
Dr Aimee Slangen, research leader at the NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, said the rise is already having an 'outsized impact' on low-lying coastal areas, causing more damaging storm surges and coastal erosion.
'The concerning part is that we know that sea-level rise in response to climate change is relatively slow, which means that we have already locked in further increases in the coming years and decades,' she said.
IPCC's last assessment of the climate system, published in 2021, highlighted how climate change was leading to widespread adverse impacts on nature and people.
Professor Rogelj said: 'Every small increase in warming matters, leading to more frequent, more intense weather extremes.
'Emissions over the next decade will determine how soon and how fast 1.5C of warming is reached. They need to be swiftly reduced to meet the climate goals of the Paris Agreement.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
an hour ago
- E&E News
How Trump's assault on science is blinding America to climate change
President Donald Trump long ago decided climate change was a 'hoax.' Now his administration is trying to silence government research that proves him wrong. Since Trump returned to the White House in January, his administration has fired or let go hundreds of climate and weather scientists — and cut ties to hundreds more who work in academia or the private sector. His team has eliminated major climate programs, frozen or cut grants for climate research and moved to shutter EPA's greenhouse gas reporting program. The Trump administration has slow-walked climate-related contracts — including one for the upkeep of two polar weather satellites. And it's begun to wall off the United States from international climate cooperation. Advertisement That's not all. Trump's blitzkrieg on federal climate work is only a start — as his budget strategy calls for even deeper cuts in the months and years ahead. That includes billions of dollars in cuts to climate and weather research at NOAA and NASA, widely considered two of the world's top science agencies. All told, it's an unprecedented assault on humanity's understanding of how global warming is transforming the planet, scientists say. And they warn that Trump's actions will blind the United States and the world to the ways people are rapidly heating the planet by burning fossil fuels. 'They certainly are trying to create lasting damage,' said Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University. The White House has framed the moves as cost-cutting measures designed to shrink the size of government. Trump officials have said too that a retreat from climate science is necessary, as the research underpins regulations that could hinder U.S. production of fossil fuels — a top goal of the administration. 'Climate alarmism has had a terrible impact on human lives and freedom,' Energy Secretary Chris Wright wrote Thursday on the social media site X. 'It belongs in the ash heap of history.' Wright, who led a fracking services company before joining the administration, added, 'Hydrocarbons are and will continue to be essential to improving the wealth, health, and lives of all human beings.' The White House echoed that sentiment in response to questions that POLITICO's E&E News sent to NOAA, NASA and the Office of Management and Budget. 'The last Administration wasted billions on 'research' and fake science in Green New Scam and culturally Marxist programs,' OMB spokesperson Rachel Cauley said. 'Under President Trump, our science agencies are actually doing science again,' she added. But scientists say the Trump team is doing just the opposite by jettisoning climate scientists and abandoning respected climate programs. Among the actions taken so far by administration: Dismissing hundreds of scientists who were working on the next version of the National Climate Assessment, a congressionally mandated report that is used to prepare U.S. communities for extreme weather and sea-level rise. Dismantling the U.S. Global Change Research Program, a 35-year-old effort to track global climate change that was established by Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. Eliminating the State Department's Office of Global Change, which oversees climate negotiations. For U.S. climate science, each week of the Trump administration seems to bring new losses, by design. The National Science Foundation's funding for climate research at universities has now evaporated after severe Trump administration cuts. Spacecraft in orbit that have cost billions of dollars to launch — and a fraction of the cost to maintain — will be mothballed if they monitor climate change, under Trump's budget proposal. NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, one of the world's leading space and climate research labs, was kicked out of its longtime building. The scientists who work there now face an uncertain future under a proposed NASA budget that cuts science research nearly in half. 'It's humiliating and it debilitates our standing in the world community,' said Michael Mann, a climate scientist at the University of Pennsylvania and director of its Penn Center for Science, Sustainability and the Media. Climate science at EPA, the CDC, and the Interior, Agriculture and Energy departments has been proposed for elimination. That includes research that monitors human harms from pollution, climatic conditions that can devastate farmers' crops and the health risks of intense heat waves. Yet Russ Vought — who leads the White House OMB — wants more. Vought is attempting to strip away Congress' budget authority and its ability to block some of the proposed cuts to climate science. Agencies such as NOAA and NASA have been ordered by the White House to freeze billions of dollars in funding — including money that goes toward climate research — before Congress has a chance to act. And that's just a small sample of the first wave of Trump climate attacks. 'Despite the claims to the contrary, this isn't being done to cut costs,' Mann said. 'It's being done because climate science — and simply measuring our climate — has proven inconvenient to certain special interests who hold sway today in Washington.' 'There will be a lot to rebuild' Climate denialists, including conservative politicians, foundations and think tanks that oppose regulations, long have pined for a day when the U.S. government stops providing clear evidence that global warming poses a threat to America's economy, national security and way of life. With Trump, their wishes are on the way to being granted. It's the culmination of decades of funding from the oil, gas and coal industry to tear down climate science. Weakening scientific research and creating long-term damage is the goal, said Steve Milloy, who was part of Trump's EPA transition team in his first term and has spent decades trying to shatter federal climate science and regulations. 'If Democrats ever get back in power, there will be a lot to rebuild,' he said. That reconstruction likely will include pillars of the nation's climate research infrastructure. Take, for example, the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. Last month, it measured the highest level of atmospheric carbon dioxide recorded in modern human history, at 430.2 parts per million. For scientists, it's a troubling benchmark. For the Trump administration, it may identify the observatory as another target for cuts — the facility is being considered for closure, and its lease may be canceled. Other data streams are in danger too. More than a dozen spacecraft or space-based instruments that capture climate data are proposed to be shut down in the White House spending plan. The Trump administration justifies cost-cutting measures such as these by saying they're intended to stop waste, fraud and abuse. But eliminating the functions of satellites already in orbit — which represent decades of work and billions of dollars in sunk-cost spending — makes neither financial nor scientific sense, said Rick Spinrad, who served as NOAA chief during the Biden administration. 'So many of the observations that are made in support of understanding climate are also being made to support the more immediate weather and ocean applications,' he said. 'To say 'there's the word climate, shut that down' means the same satellite isn't available to give you an improved four to five day forecast on hurricane landfall.' And it's not just that valuable data would be lost — whatever federal research remains will be sidelined and blocked from informing government policy and procedure. Last month, Trump issued an executive order on a new 'gold standard' for scientific research that effectively blocks much of the science on greenhouse gas emissions, human health harms from pollution and environmental degradation from being used by federal agencies. As part of that process, political appointees would effectively determine which scientific research can be used by the federal government. In effect, the moves would blind the country to the consequences of the administration's actions to cut pollution regulations and increase the country's reliance on fossil fuels while making it harder to build out clean energy, Texas A&M's Dessler said. 'They hate science because it leads to regulation, so they want to do everything they can to stop science from being used to regulate,' he said. The plan to eradicate climate science throughout the government is reminiscent of the way Trump and his officials attacked Covid data collection, which clearly showed cases and death rates rising in his first term, said Spinrad, the former NOAA administrator. 'The Trump administration said we can reduce the number of cases by not testing anymore,' Spinrad said. 'That's what is going on here. 'We can reduce the impact of climate change by not monitoring anymore.' That's what they're saying, which is just totally incomprehensible.'


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Space, Tech, And AI: What Astronaut Tim Peake Can Teach Us About The Future Of Humanity
From space-based solar power to AI-guided decision-making, astronaut Tim Peake shares powerful ... More insights into the technologies shaping our world and beyond. When you've spent 6 months orbiting Earth in the International Space Station, your perspective on the planet and its problems is likely to change forever. Few people understand this more intimately than Tim Peake, the British astronaut, test pilot, and ambassador for STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education, who joined me for a fascinating conversation about space, AI, and the future of life on Earth. What struck me most in our conversation was how clearly Tim connects the dots between space exploration and the challenges we face on Earth, drawing on his remarkable experience and expertise. Whether it's the climate crisis, the energy transition, or the role of AI in decision-making, space is not some distant frontier. It is deeply entangled with our present and our future. Peake vividly describes the emotional and intellectual impact of seeing our planet from above. 'It gives you a fresh appreciation of how isolated and remote the planet is,' he told me. 'A lot of people say fragile. I caution against using that word because I think the Earth's pretty robust. But in terms of being remote and isolated, it makes you realize that this small rock is perfectly designed to support the life that has evolved on it.' And while the view from orbit can feel peaceful and serene, it's also a powerful reminder of just how interconnected and dynamic our ecosystems really are. From wildfires in one region to dust storms in another, the visible signs of global interdependence are unmistakable from space. Peake explained, 'You see wildfires and the smoke spreading across continents. You see sandstorms in the Sahara drifting across Northern Europe. That's because the atmosphere is so thin, so tiny, and you see that very clearly from space.' Beyond the view, Peake is just as excited about what space can do for us back on Earth. Advances in manufacturing, communications, and energy are all being accelerated by what's happening in orbit. One of the most compelling developments he pointed to is space-based manufacturing. In the absence of gravity, new kinds of structures can be created with unprecedented purity and precision. 'For example, we can grow very large protein crystals in space that you can't grow on Earth,' he said. 'That can help pharmaceutical companies create better drugs with fewer side effects and lower dosages. Or if you're trying to print out a human heart, doing that on Earth needs some sort of scaffolding. In space, gravity is not distorting the cellular structure.' He also believes that space-based solar power is not just science fiction. It could soon become a meaningful contributor to our global energy mix. "If we can make two-kilometer square solar arrays that beam energy back to Earth using microwaves, we can reduce the pressure on our grid and use space to help solve the energy crisis,' Peake explained. The falling cost of getting into orbit is a key enabler. As heavy-lift launch costs continue to drop, opportunities that once sounded fantastical, like factories in space or orbital data centers, suddenly look commercially viable. Naturally, we also discussed artificial intelligence. Peake believes that AI has a crucial role to play in helping humanity manage the deluge of data coming from satellites, sensors, and scientific instruments. 'AI can analyze vast amounts of data and make good assumptions from it,' he said. 'If a government is introducing a carbon emission policy in a city, AI can help measure the impact, evaluate the policy, and improve it based on outcomes.' But Peake also emphasized the continued need for human oversight. When it comes to critical decisions, especially in high-stakes environments like space missions or healthcare, humans must remain in the loop. 'If you're screening for breast cancer, for example, AI can assist doctors. But you still want the diagnosis coming from a person,' he said. 'As humans, we like that reassurance. We want someone to put their intelligence on top of the AI's assessment.' In other words, AI is not a replacement for human decision-making but a powerful augmentor, especially in environments where timely action matters. Throughout our conversation, one theme kept coming up: the importance of inspiring the next generation, especially around STEM. For Peake, this is not a side mission; it's central to why he does what he does. 'I try to encourage kids to get involved in STEM, even if they don't see themselves taking it to higher education,' he said. 'The more you know about science and tech today, the more doors it opens for your future.' One initiative doing an outstanding job of sparking that curiosity is the Future Lab at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, where Peake serves as an ambassador. Curated by Lucy Johnston, the Future Lab showcases cutting-edge innovations from across the globe, from robotic rescue dogs and deep-sea exploration tools to mind-blowing space tech like the James Webb Space Telescope. 'It's hands-on, inspiring, and brilliantly curated,' Peake said. 'You see people of all ages walking around in awe, and that's exactly the kind of experience that can ignite a lifelong passion for science and technology.' Having taken my own son to Future Lab, I can say with certainty that it works. There's something magical about seeing kids light up as they touch, feel, and interact with the technology that's shaping tomorrow. Another eye-opener in our chat was just how much space already affects daily life. 'On average, everyone touches about 42 satellites a day,' Peake said. Whether it's making an online purchase, using navigation, or checking the weather, you're using space infrastructure. And that footprint is only growing. Companies are already working on putting data centers in orbit to reduce energy consumption and cooling requirements on Earth. Communications, navigation, Earth observation, and climate monitoring are all becoming more dependent on space-based assets. But with growth comes risk. Peake is also an ambassador for The Astra Carta, an initiative supported by King Charles aimed at ensuring space is used sustainably. Space debris, orbital traffic, and light pollution are becoming serious issues. 'We need rules of the road for space,' he said. 'If we want to keep using it safely, we need to manage how we operate up there.' As we wrapped up our conversation, I asked Tim the big one: Does he believe there's intelligent life out there? "I absolutely do," he said without hesitation. "Statistically, the odds are too strong. When you're in space, and you see 200 billion stars in our galaxy alone, and then remember there are hundreds of billions of galaxies, it's hard to believe we're alone." He also believes that space exploration will help answer some of the biggest questions humanity has ever asked about life, existence, and our place in the universe. But even if we don't find extraterrestrials any time soon, the journey itself has value. Space inspires. It informs. And, increasingly, it enables. That, I think, is what makes Peake's perspective so valuable. He's lived at the intersection of science, technology, and wonder. And he reminds us that the frontier of space is not just about what lies out there but about what it can help us achieve here on Earth.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Our Galaxy's Monster Black Hole Is Spinning Almost as Fast as Physics Allows
The colossal black hole lurking at the center of the Milky Way galaxy is spinning almost as fast as its maximum rotation rate. That's just one thing astrophysicists have discovered after developing and applying a new method to tease apart the secrets still hidden in supermassive black hole observations collected by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT). The unprecedented global collaboration spent years working to give us the first direct images of the shadows of black holes, first with M87* in a galaxy 55 million light-years away, then with Sgr A*, the supermassive black hole at the heart of our own galaxy. These images are incredible – but also difficult to interpret. So, to figure out what we're looking at, scientists turn to simulations. They build a bunch of virtual characteristics, and figure out which of them most resemble the observational data. This technique has been used a lot with the EHT images, but now it's been kicked up a notch. A team led by astronomer Michael Janssen of Radboud University in the Netherlands and the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Germany used high-throughput computing to develop millions of simulated black holes. Then, they used that data to train a neural network to extract as much information as possible from the data, and identify the properties of the black holes. Their results show, among other things, that Sgr A* is not only spinning at close to its maximum speed, but that its rotational axis is pointed in Earth's direction, and that the glow around it is generated by hot electrons. Perhaps the most interesting thing is that the magnetic field in the material around Sgr A* doesn't appear to be behaving in a way that's predicted by theory. M87*, they discovered, is also rotating rapidly, although not as fast as Sgr A*. However, it is rotating in the opposite direction to the material swirling in a disk around it – possibly because of a past merger with another supermassive black hole. "That we are defying the prevailing theory is of course exciting," Janssen says. "However, I see our AI and machine learning approach primarily as a first step. Next, we will improve and extend the associated models and simulations. And when the Africa Millimetre Telescope, which is under construction, joins in with data collection, we will get even better information to validate the general theory of relativity for supermassive compact objects with a high precision." The team has detailed their methodology and findings in three papers published in Astronomy & Astrophysics. They can be found here, here, and here. Did a Passing Star Cause Earth to Warm 56 Million Years Ago? A Game-Changing Telescope Is About to Drop First Pics. Here's How to Watch. Trailblazing Satellite Mission Delivers Its First Artificial Solar Eclipse