logo
Famous chimpanzee sanctuary faces existential threat from illegal land grab

Famous chimpanzee sanctuary faces existential threat from illegal land grab

Sky News2 days ago

There is a distinct moment when the tranquillity of the Tacugama Chimpanzee Sanctuary envelops our car as we drive higher up the mountain.
The buzz of Freetown gives way to the hushed calm of this pocket of pristine rainforest reserved for critically endangered western chimpanzees rescued from across Sierra Leone.
The quiet is necessary. These bright primates - closest related to humans in the animal kingdom - are easily disturbed and the ones living in Tacugama are particularly sensitive.
The more than 120 chimpanzees brought here are traumatised survivors of mistreatment, hunting and violent separation from their families in the wild.
They are now facing another existential threat. Illegal encroachment is eating away at the edges of the conservation area. Despite wildlife laws, forest has been cleared to make way for houses being constructed closer and closer to chimp enclosures.
"We've been issuing several warnings over the last year," says Tacugama founder Bala Amarasekaran. "Four months ago - again - we gave a warning. Then we had presidential intervention say that some of this encroachment will be stopped. It started very well for the first month then everything stopped again and we are back at square one. So, we are very tired and very stressed."
Thirty years ago, Mr Amarasekaran appealed to the government to donate land and partner with him to create a sanctuary for the protection of the abused orphaned chimps he was finding across Freetown. Today, land in the Western Area Forest Reserve is being grabbed right under the government's nose.
"The government has been very good in terms of helping us in every way - however we expect the leadership to be more firm," says Mr Amarasekaran.
"When we talk to them, they are all with us. They all want to help. But when it comes to action it looks like some of the departments that have the mandate to institute certain laws and take the necessary law enforcement action are not acting."
Sanctuary closes its doors to focus on conservation, rehabilitation and research
Tacugama has grown to become Sierra Leone's most popular tourist attraction over the last three decades. But in a stand against the fast-approaching illegal encroachment, the sanctuary has closed its doors to visitors to focus on conservation, rehabilitation and research.
"It is not a tourist attraction - we made it become a tourist attraction. It is supposed to be an orphanage for rescued chimpanzees," Mr Amarasekaran says.
"They are used to us and some visitors but they will start to see strangers come and that is where the problems start. They are not comfortable with strangers - don't forget it is the stranger who killed their mother. It is the stranger that wiped out their group."
'A complex problem'
We asked Sierra Leone's government spokesperson and minister of information and civic education, Chernor Bah, about the illegal encroachment.
"It is a complex problem. You have a city that is growing. People need places to stay and we have not done the best job in terms of enforcing all these limitations," he replied. "Some of our agents seem to have been complicit in allocating and giving people land in places they are not supposed to stay. So, I don't think I can sit here and say we have done enough - there is much more we can do.
"[Tacugama] is probably our most cherished and significant wildlife asset in the country."
A national symbol for tourism
In 2019, the government designated the western chimpanzee as the national animal and national symbol for tourism. The image of a chimp is now etched in Sierra Leonean passports, a result of Tacugama's advocacy Mr Amarasekaran and his team hope will entrench a love and respect for chimps that will curb the need for intervention.
"We wanted something more - that is how the national animal bill came through," says Mr Amarasekaran.
"We thought if the agencies that are mandated to do all the law enforcement are not active and effective, then maybe we need to create a synergy between the people and the animals."
Chimpanzees hunted for bushmeat
But chimpanzees are still being hunted as bushmeat for food across Sierra Leone and baby chimps are being torn from their families to be kept as illegal pets. Tacugama's latest rescue is only eight months old.
Baby Asana is frail with thinning hair and is being nursed back to health by his chimp mum, Mama P, when we meet him. He was rescued after an informant sent a video of Asana wearing human clothes and being mistreated as an illegal pet in Bo, Sierra Leone's second largest city.
"For me as the founder of the sanctuary, I feel defeated," says Mr Amarasekaran with Asana being cared for behind him.
"These chimps shouldn't be arriving here if we have done enough work outside - there shouldn't be any killings, there shouldn't be any rescues. That is the time when I can say that I achieved something."
Research from the Jane Goodall Institute identified that between five and 10 chimpanzees die for every surviving rescued chimpanzee. And with the sanctuary closed, much-needed public advocacy work will take a hard hit.
'Until I came to the sanctuary, I didn't see a chimpanzee'
"I'm really concerned because I only even started to experience chimpanzees when I started working here. I knew that we had chimps here. But until I came to the sanctuary, I didn't see a chimpanzee," says 25-year-old Tacugama communications officer, Sidikie Bayoh.
"Now, we are at a situation where we are closed indefinitely but what if this becomes something wherein we can never open the sanctuary again for people to visit? Then you will have all these young Sierra Leoneans never fully understanding what their national animal is."
The closure also means there will be no revenue from visitors at a time when USAID funding has been halted.
"In the absence of funding from - at the moment - the US government, it is going to be difficult for us to turn around quickly," says Mr Amarasekaran.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cosmeston: New water park will have 'no impact' on wildlife
Cosmeston: New water park will have 'no impact' on wildlife

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Cosmeston: New water park will have 'no impact' on wildlife

The owners of water park company who plan to open in a country park have said it will have "no impact to the local wildlife". Aqua Park is set to open the water park at Cosmeston Lakes Country Park, near Penarth, Vale of Glamorgan on 5 July. But residents have raised concerns about water quality and the impact it will have on the local wildlife. The country park opened to the public in 1978 and has been an official nature reserve since 2013. The park is a haven for local wildlife and some areas have been designated a site of special scientific interest (SSSI). The attraction has been based in Cardiff Bay for the last five years and includes an inflatable assault course with slides and climbing frames. Earlier this year, the owners said it was unable to operate in the area due to poor water quality. Cardiff Harbour Authority said water quality in Cardiff Bay was "routinely" checked, but increased rainfall and higher river flows in recent summers had increased the number of failed Mott from Aqua Park Group said they have worked with local ecologists who have said the firm was able to operate with no impact to the local wildlife, including the water voles and nesting birds. "That's because we're operating on the eastern lake which is already deemed safe for leisure activities and is already a vibrant hub of activity with regular park runs."On a lovely day like today there are dogs running into the lake going swimming, there's lots of activity already going on on the site," she said. There has been local opposition with an online petition opposing the Aqua Park gaining over four thousand Williams, from Barry, is part of an action group opposing the attraction and believed the plans had not been "thought through". "We feel Cosmeston is a natural reservoir, it has different species living here, like voles which are on the endangered species list and of course all the other creatures. "The biggest problem for wildlife in the UK at the moment is habitat loss. Certain species have been released into Cosmeston to counteract that loss of habitat, and I feel like an aquapark is going to bring disruption for those species that thrive here, in and around the lakes," she said. The Vale of Glamorgan Council described it as an opportunity for the council to generate income for improving the park's Leader Lis Burnett said that the council had made sure that everything had been checked, including gaining permission from Natural Resources Wales. "We know that the environment here is hugely important. So if we thought that there was going to be any impact on that we wouldn't have gone ahead. "People talk about the water voles that are here, they are in a different part of the park," she said. Additional reporting from Jessica Johnson

‘All the birdsong in the world in one sound': England's nightingale haven at risk from planning bill
‘All the birdsong in the world in one sound': England's nightingale haven at risk from planning bill

The Guardian

time9 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘All the birdsong in the world in one sound': England's nightingale haven at risk from planning bill

Nightingales don't sing much during the daytime. So when their clear, pure voices rang out from some brambles in Kent on a late spring morning, it felt as if they were campaigning for their home. Their music has charmed writers from Keats to Oscar Wilde. But over the decades, the little brown bird has had its habitat gradually hacked away because the thick brambles it likes to nest in have little use for humans. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ And now one of its most important strongholds is under threat from the Labour government's planning and infrastructure bill. For the best part of a decade, developers have been eying up Lodge Hill in Kent, where more than 100 singing birds are known to live. The derelict army training camp, which is mostly off-limits to the public though there is a footpath through some of the woodland, is prime brownfield, a 10-minute drive from Strood, which is on the high-speed line to London. In 2017, Medway council proposed 5,000 homes for the area, but the plan was shelved after a survey showed that there were 85 singing birds in the bushes. Since the RSPB's efforts at protecting the site, there are now more than 100. Shortly after this, however, Homes England, a government body, proposed 2,000 homes, then 500. For now, the plans are to build just a few homes on the outskirts of the reserve, rather than on it. That is thanks to a designation (granted after years of campaigning by the RSPB) as a site of special scientific interest by Natural England, meaning that the habitat cannot be destroyed. But if Labour's planning bill is passed in its current form, that protection will vanish; developers will be able to pay to create nature somewhere else in the country to gain permission to build here. And that will be a catastrophe for the nightingales. 'Developers say they can just create some more habitat elsewhere, but that really doesn't work for nightingales,' Joseph Beale, an RSPB conservation officer and nightingale expert, says: 'They won't move somewhere else, they'll just go, we will lose them. Nightingales only tend to set up home when they hear others of their species sing. So they'll fly over, and hear another nightingale sing, and know that means the area is good for nightingales. If this area falls silent, it will stop being used by them, and they won't just set up somewhere new. This is a special area – nature has chosen it – let's just protect it.' There are thought to be just 5,500 or so breeding pairs still in the UK, a dramatic decrease of more than 90% in the last 50 years. This grove is uniquely attractive to the birds because of its use by the Ministry of Defence, which means the woodland has been disturbed by heavy machinery and even explosions, leading to a variety of habitats which are heaven for songbirds. Thick brambles give way to ancient woodland and rare grassland, providing nesting and hunting sites as well as tall trees to sing from. 'They like scrub. They like thickets,' Beale says. 'Unfortunately, a lot of that seems to grow up on land that's been left a little while, like brownfield and formerly developed land, and this is exactly what developers like. So they often fall through the cracks of planning, because they live in this sort of habitat that's a little bit undervalued.' When the Guardian joined the RSPB for a walk around the site, the air was thick with birdsong; immediately identifiable were chiffchaffs, blackcaps, woodpeckers, chaffinches and scores of baby blue tits. In the long tunnel of trees and hedges, walking down the footpath felt like being in a high-rise city of songbirds. And – amazingly – we heard four nightingales. Their complex song cuts through all the rest, their voices are so strong and unwavering. 'It's like all the birdsong in the world condensed into one sound,' says Beale. He has heard the bird hundreds of times, but is just as starstruck on each occasion. The nightingale was once common across England, before its homes were demolished. These days, its meagre population has been squeezed into south-east England, unfortunately, the area with the biggest housing pressure. If the bill is passed, the protection of being a Site of Special Scientific Interest will be meaningless. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ 'It essentially undermines that pretty fundamental environmental principle that you should try and avoid the most precious sites first,' Beale says. 'At the moment even before this law is passed, we're fighting to stand still. You know, we're not even saying, can we have more protections? We're trying to save what we already have, which is the remnants of what we used to have. So we are really worried.' Of the suggestion Keir Starmer should come and hear the nightingales, Beale says: 'It would probably do him some good.' Birdsong recorded by photographer Martin Godwin

Labour MPs poised to rebel over planning bill amid concerns for nature
Labour MPs poised to rebel over planning bill amid concerns for nature

The Guardian

time9 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Labour MPs poised to rebel over planning bill amid concerns for nature

Labour MPs are planning to rebel over the planning and infrastructure bill after constituents raised concern that it threatens protected habitats and wildlife. The Guardian understands that about two dozen Labour MPs are calling for ministers to force developers to build more than a million homes for which they already have planning permission before pushing through legislation that rolls back environmental protections for the most protected habitats in England. Ministers are understood to be drawing up amendments to the most controversial part of the bill, part three, in an apparent scramble to head off a rebellion and quell the anger of respected wildlife groups, whose membership is many millions strong. Sources close to the discussions said there were red lines that could not be crossed to make sure nature was protected. Alexa Culver, an environmental lawyer with RSK Wilding, said ministers were expected soon to present 'appeasement' amendments on part three so they could claim the legislation was not regressive. She said: 'We should assume that ministers won't have sought the advice of the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) on these amendments. I urge us all to call for a further legal opinion from the OEP so that misleading ministerial statements aren't allowed to stay in circulation for too long.' The Guardian revealed on Tuesday that three separate legal opinions – including the OEP's – say the bill rolls back environmental protections, including for more than 5,000 of the most sensitive, rare and protected habitats in England, leaving them vulnerable to destruction. Wildlife charities are calling on the government to scrap part three and redraw the bill when it returns to parliament on Monday. Beccy Speight, the chief executive of the RSPB, said: 'The government must stop portraying this planning bill as a win-win for nature and economic growth. It is not. A thriving natural world is essential to underpin both growth and a resilient future. It's not too late for the government to address the issues with part three of the bill, and put forward legislation that can actually deliver economic growth and restore nature at scale.' Property developers have yet to build 1.4m homes for which they have planning permission. In a tactic known as landbanking, developers hold land with planning permission to secure higher values, according to recent research by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR). Chris Hinchliff, the Labour MP for North East Hertfordshire, said that rather than pushing through a bill that allowed developers to pay to sidestep environmental protections, ministers should force developers to start building the homes they already had permission for. Hinchliff has submitted a number of amendments to the bill aiming to strengthen protections for nature. He said: 'This legislation strips back environmental protections and local democracy but does nothing to stop developers drip-feeding developments to inflate prices. The planning system consistently approves more homes than get built. The bottleneck isn't simply process, it's profit.' The rebel backbenchers are working with the Green party and the Liberal Democrats to form a large group that hopes to scupper part three of the bill, which they say is the most damaging, when the legislation comes to parliament next week. Part three allows developers to sidestep environmental obligations by paying into a nature restoration fund, for environmental improvements elsewhere at a later date. The planning and infrastructure bill is central to the government's growth strategy, with a target to build 1.5m homes by the end of this parliament to address the UK's housing affordability crisis and drive economic growth. Ministers announced recently that they were consulting on a range of measures to get developers building, including considering a use-it-or-lose-it policy, which was recommended by the IPPR in its report in February. IPPR research shows that planning rules have been loosened over the past two decades but building rates have decreased during that time. Hinchliff said there should a fresh approach to deal with underperforming developers. 'I've proposed financial penalties for developers who don't build as promised, and new powers for councils to block developments from firms which repeatedly land bank,' he said. Terry Jermy, the Labour MP for South West Norfolk, said: 'Ensuring that homes with planning permission get built in a timely manner is part of the solution to our housing needs. There's a housing shortage in the country, which is costing local councils and the government huge sums of money in emergency and temporary accommodation, and the dream of home ownership remains out of reach for many. Tackling landbanking needs to form part of the government's focus to bring about the change needed.' Dr Maya Singer Hobbs, a senior research fellow at IPPR, said: 'Developers are not deliberately building slowly to stymie housebuilding, but they are not going to build at a rate that will reduce house prices – it's not in their interest to do this, and indeed they have legal obligations to shareholders that would prevent this. There might be a case to explore whether giving local authorities the power to apply a 'use it or lose it' approach to planning permission would speed up delivery.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store