logo
Spoilers: Here's how 'Squid Game' ends (with a huge cameo) after three seasons of death

Spoilers: Here's how 'Squid Game' ends (with a huge cameo) after three seasons of death

USA Today4 hours ago

Spoiler alert! This story contains details about the series finale of "Squid Game."
"Squid Game" is over, but it seems the Games will never end.
That's the haunting message we're left with in the final moments of Netflix's juggernaut South Korean horror drama, which wrapped up its third and last season with six episodes released June 27. Like the first two seasons, the episodes were unrelentingly bloody and bleak. And they wrapped up with an ending that might be a new beginning.
Season 3 of the Netflix's most-watched show of all time was a macabre and depressing affair, a sort of half-story that seemed to indicate Seasons 2 and 3 were really just one story arbitrarily cut in half. The new episodes have all the flaws of the misguided Season 2, including that the show's core anticapitalist message has been swept aside in favor of more action set pieces and ceaseless barbarity. Any overarching point the series has been trying to make is lost in the chaos of men fighting with knives and threatening to kill a newborn baby to save their own skin.
Even the quiet, eyebrow-raising final moments, which suggest that the struggle for economic justice and equality might be utterly pointless, feel less like a philosophy and more like a real-life capitalist desire for more, more, more.
Season 1 of "Squid Game" remains one of the most arresting, shocking and thought-provoking TV shows ever made, so much that it became a surprise worldwide hit on the strength of word-of-mouth alone. Seasons 2 and 3 are hollow echoes of that achievement. They don't negate what that first season did, but merely dampen its effect. It's hard to remain awed when you've had two seasons worth of just, "ah."
Does Gi-hun survive the final game?
When the finale episode begins, our hero Gi-hun (Lee Jung-jae) is stuck in the last game with the late Jun-hee's newborn baby, who has become Player 222, and the baby's somewhat-of-a-dirtbag father Myung-gi (Yim Si-wan). The two men have seriously erred by killing all the other contestants before the final round of the game, because each round requires at least one person to die. In a brutal fight in which Myung-gi more than once endangers his newborn daughter (sometimes on purpose), Myung-gi ends up falling off the tall platform before the final round officially begins, meaning now either Gi-hun or the baby has to die or they will both be shot by the game workers.
The wealthy VIPs watching with their gilded opera glasses are waiting for Gi-hun to kill the baby, and Gi-hun's mortal enemy the Front Man/In-ho (Lee Byung-hun) expects him to do the same. But in one final act of rebellion against the games, Gi-hun kills himself to save the child, declaring he is not a horse to be bet on but a human with a life. Player 456 is eliminated.
What happens with Jun-ho and No-eul as the final game ends?
Gi-hun's struggle was not the only one as the final game played out. In-ho's brother Jun-ho (Wi Ha-jun) finally makes it to the island he's been searching for these last two seasons. He arrives in time to see his brother take away the baby and set a self-destruct timer on the island.
No-eul (Park Gyu-young), the games worker who has been trying to save a man with a sick daughter out of guilt for leaving her own daughter behind in North Korea, helps him escape from the island, and stays behind to burn records and feel sorry for herself. After witnessing Gi-hun's sacrifice, however, she decides not to let herself die, and evacuates the island with the rest of the workers. The VIPs make it out unscathed too, of course. They will never suffer any kind of consequence for their inhumanity.
'Squid Game': Where are they now
Six months pass after the explosive end to Gi-hun's final games, and our remaining (living) characters have all moved on with their lives, or so they think. Jun-ho's loan-shark ally Mr. Choi (Jeon Seok-ho), is released from prison. Jun-ho has given up his quest and his career, but don't worry, his brother delivers him Jun-hee's baby and her 45.6 billion-won prize. One can only wonder with horror who has been taking care of that baby for her first half year.
No-eul checks to make sure the father she rescued from the Games is still alive and thriving with his daughter. And she even gets good news of her own: The broker who helped her escape from North Korea has a lead on her own daughter's whereabouts. That same broker also brings us a blast from Season 1 past, reuniting the younger brother of Sae-byeok (the North Korean escapee who competed in the Season 1 games and finished third) with his mother.
The Front Man remembers another family member who needs to be taken care of: Gi-hun's daughter Ga-yeong (Jo Ah-in), now living with her mother and stepfather in Los Angeles. In-ho shows up at her door with a box containing the personal effects of her father, and tells her he's dead. Inside is Gi-hun's blood-stained track suit and the debit card to his account, which In-ho has seemingly restocked with the billions of won that disappeared from Gi-hun's hotel headquarters. It's the same kind of quiet, unsatisfactory ending we saw in Season 1. That is, until the last few moments.
Is 'Squid Game' getting an American spinoff?
As In-ho drives away from Ga-yeong's house, his SUV stops at a traffic light across from a dirty L.A. alley, where he hears a loud slapping noise. Could it be? Yes, it is: A suited games recruiter and an American man are playing ddakji. And that recruiter isn't just anyone, it's freaking Cate Blanchett, who gives In-ho a knowing look before she goes back to slapping her prey.
Then the credits roll. This A-lister cameo and revelation of an American version of the games can be interpreted in a few ways: Maybe it's just a coda that points out the true pointlessness and hopelessness of Gi-hun's rebellion. The games − and therefore wealth inequality, injustice and deep human cruelty − persist everywhere. One island off the coast of South Korea may have blown up, but no one will stop the wealthy from oppressing and crushing the poor.
Or, if you are thinking about real-life capitalism, this may be a way for Netflix to introduce a U.S. spinoff. Whether that's a good idea, storytelling-wise, doesn't really matter in the great content machine that is Netflix (and, to be fair, all the other streamers, too).
We'll just have to wait and see if a new show with a bloody version of Red Rover eventually hits our Netflix queues. Netflix has announced no plans for a spinoff; USA TODAY has reached out for further comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A New Threads Feature Saves You From Seeing and Posting Spoilers: Here's How It Works
A New Threads Feature Saves You From Seeing and Posting Spoilers: Here's How It Works

CNET

time14 minutes ago

  • CNET

A New Threads Feature Saves You From Seeing and Posting Spoilers: Here's How It Works

Social media can accidentally spoil a streaming movie or show for those who haven't yet watched it. Threads, the popular social media platform from Meta, now has a new feature that could save you from spoiling your next watch. The new feature allows users to mark media and text posts as spoilers. If it's a photo, the spoiler will then appear blurred in feeds, and text will be grayed out. Clicking on both types makes the spoiler visible. Netflix and Marvel are the first major studios to use the feature on their posts. Meta says the feature is rolling out globally, but we saw it available on Friday. Speaking of spoilers, you may want to stop reading now if you're not logged in to Threads, the embedded plot-spoiling posts in this story may not be blurred. Netflix posted a photo from one of the last scenes of Squid Game's third and final season, with the caption "do not tap until you've finished Squid Game 3." Marvel teased the villain in the new Ironheart series in a post. You won't meet the villain until the last episode. You can stream Ironheart on Disney Plus. We Were Liars on Prime also added a post that uses the new Threads spoiler text feature. We've seen several other updates from Threads this year, including the ability to copy images, thus replacing the need to screenshot. Threads also only recently started testing direct messaging, despite the app being out for around two years. How to use the spoiler feature on Threads Anyone can use the spoiler feature on their posts. All you have to do is highlight what you want to hide, tap and select "mark spoiler." That will blur the text or image you selected for others. This feature doesn't mean you won't see posts about your favorite pop culture and entertainment topics. It lets you choose when you're ready to know more. All it takes is a tap. However, it's worth pointing out that it's up to those who make the post to decide if they mark something as a spoiler. So spoilers could abound until most people adopt the feature. Even still, it's good to see a feature that allows you to stay in the loop without spoiling major plot points along the way.

WWE SmackDown Faces Massive Technical Issues in Saudi Arabia
WWE SmackDown Faces Massive Technical Issues in Saudi Arabia

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

WWE SmackDown Faces Massive Technical Issues in Saudi Arabia

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. WWE faced massive technical issues on their episode of Friday Night SmackDown before Night of Champions. More Pro Wrestling: GUNTHER May Not Be Goldberg's Final WWE Opponent While the show was streaming live for international audiences, the feed suddenly cut out while Randy Orton and Cody Rhodes were having a segment building up their King of the Ring finals match. Netflix and WWE having Technical Difficulties #SmackDown — Zachary Peralez (@PeralezZachary) June 27, 2025 However, the issue doesn't lie with Netflix. There was a blackout in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia that caused power to go out. This not only affected the livestream, but power at the arena as well. 🚨 FEED HAS CUT IN THE ARENA TOO — Zashy 🇵🇸 (@Zashy120) June 27, 2025 "To our international audiences watching [SmackDown]," WWE said on social media. "We apologize for any technical difficulties and should be back up and running shortly." SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 17: Nia Jax and Bianca Belair in action during Smackdown at Pechanga Arena on January 17, 2025 in San Diego, California. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 17: Nia Jax and Bianca Belair in action during Smackdown at Pechanga Arena on January 17, 2025 in San Diego, California. WWE/Getty Images Fortunately, the scene was resolved within half an hour after WWE released the statement. #SmackDown on Netflix is back up and running, and you'll see it in its entirety! — WWE (@WWE) June 27, 2025 According to a report from Fightful Select, SmackDown will air as normal in the United States. More Pro Wrestling: 'Street Fighter' Adaptation Officially Casts 50 Cent, Jason Momoa, More For more WWE and professional wrestling news, head on over to Newsweek Sports. This story is currently being updated...

Bobby Berk Says His ‘Queer Eye' Salary Was 'Basically Nothing'
Bobby Berk Says His ‘Queer Eye' Salary Was 'Basically Nothing'

Cosmopolitan

timean hour ago

  • Cosmopolitan

Bobby Berk Says His ‘Queer Eye' Salary Was 'Basically Nothing'

Reality TV stardom is not for the weak. Just ask Bobby Berk, who recently revealed that Queer Eye paid 'basically nothing' for the first two seasons. In fact, he was making so little off the Netflix show, it actually hurt him financially. 'The first two seasons, I definitely lost money being on the show,' said the interior design expert during a recent appearance on Networth and Chill with Your Rich BFF podcast. 'Because, I mean, they were paying us basically nothing.' Bobby's assessment is tough, but fair when you consider the entertainment landscape. When the Fab Five—Bobby, Antoni Porowski, Tan France, Karamo Brown, and Jonathan Van Ness—they weren't paid like the stars they would become. In 2018, Variety reported that they were each paid $7,500 per episode for the first two seasons, which evens out to $60,000 per season—a far cry from the riches paid to stars of scripted series. But it wasn't so much the pay that was the problem, but the time commitment that cost Bobby money. 'The amount of money that I was losing from not running my company and being gone because we had to move away' also affected his bottom line, he said. 'We were gone for five months, and so half the year we were gone, and then we were on just constant press tours.' Queer Eye, of course, became an instant hit, and the stars were able to renegotiate for seasons 3 and 4, which is when Bobby says he probably 'broke even.' But even in the later seasons, Bobby said, the Fab 5 still weren't making that much money. 'To be frank, they never really paid us well. You know, compared to what they pay scripted stars, we made single digit percentage,' he said. 'Obviously, what it did, though, was open doors for working with brands, working with companies.' Bobby left Queer Eye after eight seasons, and while it sounds like he wishes they had been paid more, he's still grateful for the success of the show and the exposure it granted him and his business. Overall, he called the experience 'absolutely' worth it. 'It was tough the first few seasons, but the doors that it has opened for other things—absolutely,' he said. 'You can't pay for that type of exposure.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store