3 Mini NAS Systems Compared : Speed, Storage and Efficiency for Mini Homelabs
Jeff Geerling, puts three popular mini NAS models—GMK Techch G9, Aiffro K100, and Beelink Mi Mini—through rigorous testing to uncover their strengths and limitations. From storage expandability to thermal management and network speed, each device brings something unique to the table. Whether you're a data hoarder, a tech enthusiast, or someone looking for a quiet and reliable solution, this comparison will help you identify the best fit for your needs. As we explore these devices, you'll discover surprising trade-offs and standout features that may challenge your assumptions about what a mini NAS can deliver. Sometimes, the smallest devices carry the biggest surprises. Mini NAS Device Comparison Key Features and Performance Overview
Mini NAS devices are becoming increasingly popular for home labs due to their compact size and robust functionality. Each of the three models tested offers a distinct approach to balancing storage, network speed, and thermal management, making them suitable for different user requirements. GMK Techch G9: Powered by an Intel N100/N150 chip, this device includes 2.5 Gb Ethernet and multiple M.2 NVMe slots. However, its poor cooling system leads to performance instability, making it less reliable for sustained workloads without modifications.
Powered by an Intel N100/N150 chip, this device includes 2.5 Gb Ethernet and multiple M.2 NVMe slots. However, its leads to performance instability, making it less reliable for sustained workloads without modifications. Aiffro K100: Featuring a compact, all-metal design with improved ventilation, the K100 delivers consistent network performance and operates quietly. However, it lacks built-in eMMC storage, requiring external solutions for the operating system.
Featuring a compact, all-metal design with improved ventilation, the K100 delivers and operates quietly. However, it lacks built-in eMMC storage, requiring external solutions for the operating system. Beelink Mi Mini: With six NVMe slots, built-in eMMC storage, and an internal power supply, this model offers extensive storage options. Its central heat sink tower ensures effective cooling, though it slightly increases external surface temperatures. Storage and Expansion
Storage capacity and expandability are essential considerations when selecting a mini NAS device. Each model offers varying levels of flexibility to accommodate different storage needs. Beelink Mi Mini: Leads the group with six NVMe slots, providing maximum flexibility for storage expansion. This makes it an excellent choice for users with demanding storage requirements.
Leads the group with six NVMe slots, providing for storage expansion. This makes it an excellent choice for users with demanding storage requirements. Aiffro K100: Offers four NVMe slots, striking a balance between compactness and storage capacity. This design is ideal for users who need moderate storage without sacrificing portability.
Offers four NVMe slots, striking a balance between and storage capacity. This design is ideal for users who need moderate storage without sacrificing portability. GMK Techch G9: Includes multiple M.2 NVMe slots, but its cooling issues limit its ability to handle heavy storage loads effectively, reducing its reliability for long-term use. Mini NAS testing and comparison (mini homelab)
Watch this video on YouTube.
Here are more guides from our previous articles and guides related to NAS storage systems that you may find helpful. Network Performance
All three devices are equipped with 2.5 Gb Ethernet, allowing fast data transfers suitable for home lab environments. However, their network performance varies based on design and thermal management. Aiffro K100: Delivers the most consistent network speeds , averaging 280 MB/s. This makes it a reliable choice for users who prioritize stability and smooth data transfers.
Delivers the most , averaging 280 MB/s. This makes it a reliable choice for users who prioritize stability and smooth data transfers. Beelink Mi Mini: Achieves slightly lower speeds, averaging around 230 MB/s, due to PCIe bandwidth limitations . Despite this, it maintains strong read performance, making it suitable for most home lab setups.
Achieves slightly lower speeds, averaging around 230 MB/s, due to . Despite this, it maintains strong read performance, making it suitable for most home lab setups. GMK Techch G9: Struggles with overheating, which negatively impacts its ability to sustain reliable network speeds during prolonged use or under heavy workloads. Cooling and Thermal Management
Efficient cooling is vital for maintaining performance and preventing hardware degradation. The three models employ different strategies to manage heat, with varying levels of success. Beelink Mi Mini: Features a central heat sink tower that effectively manages internal temperatures, making sure stable performance. However, this design causes the device's external surface to feel warmer during operation.
Features a that effectively manages internal temperatures, making sure stable performance. However, this design causes the device's external surface to feel warmer during operation. Aiffro K100: Uses improved ventilation to maintain stable operation with minimal noise. This makes it an excellent choice for users who value quiet environments.
Uses improved ventilation to maintain with minimal noise. This makes it an excellent choice for users who value quiet environments. GMK Techch G9: Suffers from inadequate cooling, leading to overheating and performance instability. This significantly limits its usability in demanding scenarios without additional modifications. Design and Usability
Compactness, durability, and ease of use are essential factors for home lab setups. Each device offers unique design features that cater to different user preferences. Aiffro K100: Its all-metal construction and small footprint make it highly portable and durable. This design is ideal for users with limited space or those who frequently relocate their setups.
Its and small footprint make it highly portable and durable. This design is ideal for users with limited space or those who frequently relocate their setups. Beelink Mi Mini: Offers built-in eMMC storage and an internal power supply , reducing the need for external components. These features enhance convenience and streamline the overall setup process.
Offers built-in eMMC storage and an , reducing the need for external components. These features enhance convenience and streamline the overall setup process. GMK Techch G9: While compact, its design flaws—particularly its poor cooling system—detract from its overall usability, making it less suitable for demanding or long-term applications. Recommendations
Selecting the right mini NAS device depends on your specific requirements and priorities. Based on the testing and evaluation, here are the recommendations: Aiffro K100: Best suited for users seeking a compact, reliable device with consistent performance and low noise levels. Its higher price is justified by its balanced feature set and durable design.
Best suited for users seeking a with consistent performance and low noise levels. Its higher price is justified by its balanced feature set and durable design. Beelink Mi Mini: Ideal for users with extensive storage needs and those who value additional features like built-in eMMC storage and an internal power supply. Its effective cooling and quiet operation make it a strong contender for demanding setups.
Ideal for users with and those who value additional features like built-in eMMC storage and an internal power supply. Its effective cooling and quiet operation make it a strong contender for demanding setups. GMK Techch G9: Not recommended in its current form due to significant cooling and stability issues. A design revision is necessary to address these shortcomings before it can be considered a viable option.
Media Credit: Jeff Geerling Filed Under: Guides, Hardware
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ditch YOUR overpriced carrier! Here's how to get a whopping 50% off a full year of unlimited talk, text, and data
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more We live in an always-on, forever connected world. When you can't rely on your existing connection to make calls, send texts, or look something up when you're on the go, what good is your provider really? Mint Mobile heard the call for something both affordable and dependable, and they responded in a huge way — with an impressive 50 percent discount on its bestselling 12-month unlimited plan. That brings your total to just $15 per month, for an annual savings of $180 on all of the talk, text, and data you need without any extra charges. Mint Mobile No more sticker shock! Mint Mobile's bestselling Unlimited Plan is more accessible than ever, priced at just $15 a month for 12 months. That is an unbeatable deal that gives you unlimited talk, text, and data on the nation's largest 5G network. Whether you prefer an eSIM for instant activation or a physical SIM shipped to your door, getting started is super easy. You can keep your phone and number, too (but you can also shop new if you prefer). It's all laid out for you to make wireless access smart, simple, and affordable. Save 50% Shop The carrier is already known for its low-cost plans, which makes the prospect of getting half off its absolute best plan very appealing! What Mint Mobile does best is innovate, taking the usual wireless playbook and rewriting it in favor of something accessible and transparent. With no physical stores and zero gimmicks, Mint Mobile keeps overhead costs low so they can pass those savings on to you. But you aren't in for a world of trouble if you're attached to your current phone. Whether that's your situation or you're eyeing something new, switching is really simple. You can either carry your device and number over, or upgrade to a fresh device with your plan. Either way, you'll get unlimited talk, text, data, and hotspot, with no hard caps and no overage fees. Even at 35GB, you'll never experience a total data shutdown. Powered by the nation's largest 5G network, Mint Mobile is known for its reliable nationwide coverage. No matter where you go, you can count on it to deliver without the surprises or flimsy zones that make calling and texting impossible. Managing your account is equally simple. You'll manage everything online, with a clear view of your account, billing, and usage all at your fingertips through the company's intuitive app. You can even earn credits toward your bill, an excellent perk that Mint Mobile users particularly appreciate. 'I recently switched from Verizon and I am stunned,' said one customer. 'Great service, incredibly transparent, easy to switch and use, intuitive app that tells you how much date you use, and more. Data streaming works really well. Love it!' The bottom line is that Mint Mobile lays everything out for you without the fluff, the surprises, or the things you don't need. They're simply presenting you with a more streamlined and effortless way to go wireless. At just $15 per month for a full year of absolutely everything, it's the best deal going right now. It's hard to imagine a smarter switch if you're looking to save money!
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Hybrids vs EVs vs ICE: Which Car Actually Pollutes the Most?
How your battery's power consumption patterns could leak your location and identity View post: Your EV Battery Is Spying on You — New Research Exposes Yet More Hidden Privacy Risks You can lease a 2025 Mazda3 for $349 per month for 36 months. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a segment leader when it comes to EV charging speeds, outclassing competitors like the VW ID.4 with relative ease. Car insurance is Honda's latest new product offering, but other carmakers offer it as well. What They Don't Tell You About EVs, Hybrids, and Gas Cars If you think switching to electric is a get-out-of-jail-free card for the planet, think again. EVs are cleaner and win the race. But they're no saints. And while gas-powered cars are still the biggest climate culprits, new data shows hybrids are still far better than ICE but over-hyped for long-term environmental and health costs. From particle pollution to greenhouse gases to lifetime public health impact, the real story behind your car's emissions is more complicated than any tailpipe test. Head-to-Head: Greenhouse Gas Emissions When you stack them side by side, electric vehicles come out ahead on lifetime emissions — but not by as much as some assume. A mid-size gasoline car emits around 35.5 metric tons of CO₂ over 150,000 km. A diesel vehicle is slightly cleaner at 33 tons, due to better fuel economy. Hybrids perform better, landing at about 26.7 tons thanks to regenerative braking and smaller engines. A standard EV charged on a typical grid mix produces about 17.5 tons—less than half of an ICE car. If you charge with 100% renewable electricity, that drops to 11.5 tons. But the manufacturing and battery footprint is larger: about 8.0 tons upfront vs. 5.5 for ICE cars. Source: ICCT20 Lifecycle Comparison Tire Dust, Not Tailpipes: A New Pollution Villain Electric cars don't have tailpipes, but they still pollute. How? Tires and brakes. Non-exhaust pollution — especially PM10 and PM2.5 particles from tire and brake wear — is a growing health concern. EVs are heavier, so they wear through tires faster, emitting more rubber dust. According to UK government figures, an EV sedan generates 950g of tire dust per year, compared to 800g for a gas car. Brake dust is lower in EVs thanks to regenerative braking, but total PM emissions are still close. Source: ICCT20 Lifecycle Comparison Fuel Efficiency and Real-World Range In MPG terms, it's no contest: EVs average over 100 MPGe, compared to 40–50 MPG for hybrids and 25–30 MPG for gas cars. Range parity has improved too: most modern EVs offer 250–350 miles per charge, roughly matching gasoline tanks. But cold weather, cabin heating, and fast driving can knock EV range down by 20–30%. Charging adds a wrinkle. Unless you have home charging, DC fast charging infrastructure varies wildly. That still favors hybrids and ICE vehicles on long trips. What About Hybrid Longevity and Grid Impact? EV batteries degrade over time, but slowly. Most retain 80% capacity after 150,000 km, and battery tech keeps improving. Hybrids, however, offer a best-of-both-worlds deal: no plug-in stress, fewer emissions, and longer range. They don't need infrastructure upgrades and put less strain on aging power grids. Grid emissions matter too. In coal-heavy regions, EVs charge dirty. But in solar and wind-heavy states like California, they shine. Lifecycle emissions vary heavily by region and grid mix. Verdict: The Greenest Car Isn't Always the Newest EV EVs win on paper — but context is everything. If you're in a clean-grid state with access to home charging, they're the lowest-emission option. But hybrids – despite being over-rated in real-world compared to lab by a factor of 60% – punch above their weight, offering good emissions performance without the battery burden. And gas cars? They're toast — unless we're talking synthetic fuels, which aren't widely available yet. So, what's best for the planet? Driving less. Car sharing. Public transport. But if you're buying, the smartest bet is the one that fits your real-world routine — not just a showroom spec sheet. About the Author Brian Iselin View Profile
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
2025 Tesla Model Y vs. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5: 5 Key Differences
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a segment leader when it comes to EV charging speeds, outclassing competitors like the VW ID.4 with relative ease. Car insurance is Honda's latest new product offering, but other carmakers offer it as well. A pristine 2025 Mercedes-AMG G63 with just 2,200 miles is now for sale. This MANUFAKTUR-specced luxury SUV is a rare find, loaded with top-tier options and in immaculate condition. Battle of the electric SUV leaders The compact electric SUV segment has quickly become one of the most competitive areas in the automotive world, and two names dominate the conversation: the Tesla Model Y and the Hyundai IONIQ 5. Both models have helped define what mainstream electric crossovers should look like. Tesla's entry has been the world's best-selling EV for several years running, while Hyundai's IONIQ 5 has built a reputation as one of the most well-rounded and user-friendly electric SUVs on the market. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:10 Full screen Hyundai reveals stunning IONIQ 9 with over 330 miles of range Watch More For the 2025 model year, both vehicles remain compelling, but they cater to slightly different buyers. Tesla leans heavily into its software ecosystem, range, and minimalist design, while Hyundai focuses on charging speed, comfort, and practicality. Here are the five biggest differences between the Tesla Model Y and the Hyundai IONIQ 5. 1. Range and charging performance One of the first questions EV shoppers ask is how far they can go on a charge, and in this respect, the Tesla Model Y holds a slight edge. The Long Range all-wheel-drive version offers an EPA-estimated 327 miles of range, with real-world figures typically coming in close to that number. Charging speeds are capped at about 250 kilowatts on Tesla's Supercharger network, which translates to around 169 miles of range gained in just 15 minutes. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited — Source: Hyundai The Hyundai IONIQ 5 does not reach the same maximum range on paper, though it comes surprisingly close. Depending on trim and drivetrain, its EPA ratings span from 245 to 318 miles, and independent testing has shown the dual-motor Limited trim exceeding its official estimate, reaching 282 miles in the real world. Where Hyundai really shines is in charging. Thanks to its 800-volt electrical architecture, the IONIQ 5 can accept up to 350 kilowatts, adding as much as 178 miles of range in 15 minutes and reaching 80 percent charge in about 18 minutes under ideal conditions. The end result is a tradeoff: Tesla offers the longest single-charge driving distance, while Hyundai provides some of the fastest recharging times in the industry. 2. Interior design and technology Tesla and Hyundai take very different approaches to the cabin experience. The Model Y follows the brand's trademark minimalist style, dominated by a 15.4-inch central touchscreen that controls nearly every function in the vehicle. Physical buttons are almost entirely absent, and even the instrument cluster has been folded into the main display. Standard equipment includes dual wireless charging pads, a 16-speaker audio system, and access to Tesla's unique software ecosystem, which brings constant over-the-air updates and, for an extra cost, the brand's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) suite. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 Tesla Model Y Juniper The Hyundai IONIQ 5, on the other hand, blends futuristic design with practicality. Its cockpit features two 12.3-inch displays—one for the gauge cluster and one for infotainment—along with physical climate controls and a mix of touch and button-based inputs. Unlike Tesla, Hyundai supports both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which remain key conveniences for many drivers. Higher trims add a surround-view camera, a head-up display, and vehicle-to-load capability, which allows the car's battery to power external devices or even a small campsite. While Tesla's cabin feels cutting-edge in its simplicity, Hyundai earns points for usability and features that are more familiar to most drivers. The two philosophies highlight the brands' different priorities: Tesla wants to streamline the driving experience into its software, while Hyundai aims to balance tech with everyday convenience. 3. Cargo and utility space Utility is another area where the two EVs diverge. The Tesla Model Y stands out with its generous storage capacity, offering 29 cubic feet of space behind the rear seats and a substantial 71.4 cubic feet when the second row is folded flat. On top of that, Tesla provides a 4.1-cubic-foot front trunk, which is large enough for grocery bags or small luggage. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 Tesla Model Y Juniper The Hyundai IONIQ 5 is no slouch, but its cargo figures are more modest. Behind the second row, there is 26.3 cubic feet of space, and folding the rear seats expands it to 58.5 cubic feet. The frunk, meanwhile, is quite small and designed mostly to store the charging cable. While the IONIQ 5's cabin feels spacious and airy thanks to its flat floor and sliding center console, Tesla ultimately offers more raw volume for families who regularly haul gear. The Model Y also has an optional third-row seat in some configurations, though it remains more of an emergency-use solution than a true seven-passenger setup. Still, the added flexibility underlines Tesla's utility advantage over Hyundai. 4. Pricing, value, and incentives Pricing plays a critical role in the EV buying decision, especially as federal and state incentives come into play. For 2025, the Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD starts at $50,630, while the rear-wheel-drive Long Range version is priced at $46,630. Depending on configuration, the Model Y may qualify for up to $7,500 in federal tax credits. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N — Source: 2025 Hyundai The Hyundai IONIQ 5 comes in at a slightly lower starting point, with prices beginning around $44,200. It also qualifies for the same federal credits in certain trims, which can bring its effective cost below that of the Model Y. Beyond sticker price, Hyundai adds value with its warranty coverage. Buyers receive a five-year, 60,000-mile basic warranty and a 10-year, 100,000-mile powertrain warranty, compared with Tesla's four-year, 50,000-mile basic coverage and eight-year, 120,000-mile limited battery warranty. When looking purely at upfront cost and long-term warranty, the IONIQ 5 comes out ahead. Tesla, however, balances the scale with its more extensive standard equipment list and software-driven features that continue to evolve long after purchase. 5. Ride comfort, styling, and driving feel Finally, there is the question of how these vehicles actually drive and feel on the road. The Hyundai IONIQ 5 has earned praise for its smooth ride, quiet cabin, and comfortable suspension tuning. It favors a relaxed, family-friendly demeanor over outright sportiness. The styling follows a retro-futuristic theme, with pixel-inspired lighting and sharp lines that make it one of the more distinctive EVs on the market. Inside, the flat floor and adjustable center console further emphasize spaciousness and comfort. 2025 Tesla Model Y — Source: Tesla The Tesla Model Y, by contrast, feels more athletic. Acceleration is brisk, with the Long Range AWD model reaching 60 miles per hour in just over four seconds. Steering is sharper, and the vehicle's stance makes it feel closer to a performance crossover than a family hauler. The tradeoff comes in ride comfort, where some drivers have noted that the suspension can feel firm and the steeply raked rear hatch compromises visibility. Both approaches will appeal to different buyers. Tesla caters to those who want speed and sporty handling from their EV, while Hyundai's IONIQ 5 is better suited for drivers who prioritize comfort and a relaxed daily commute. Final thoughts The Tesla Model Y and Hyundai IONIQ 5 are two of the strongest choices in the compact electric SUV market, but they excel in different areas. Tesla continues to lead in maximum driving range, cargo versatility, and access to its unmatched Supercharger network. Hyundai counters with faster charging, lower pricing, a longer warranty, and a more comfortable ride. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 Tesla Model Y Juniper Ultimately, the decision comes down to priorities. Shoppers who want the longest range possible, cutting-edge software, and extra cargo flexibility will find the Model Y hard to beat. Those who prefer a balance of comfort, user-friendly tech, and overall value will see the IONIQ 5 as a better fit. Both vehicles represent the direction the industry is heading, and both make a strong case for being the EV to park in your driveway in 2025. About the Author Elijah Nicholson-Messmer View Profile
