Voting Rights and Capital
In conformity with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, we hereby notify the market of the following:
Shell plc's capital as at July 31, 2025, consists of 5,876,351,658 ordinary shares of €0.07 each. Shell plc holds no shares in Treasury.
The figure, 5,876,351,658, may be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculation by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, Shell plc under the FCA's Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules.
Note: This announcement is made pursuant to Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 5.6.1 and as such, the above figure includes shares purchased by Shell plc as part of its share buy-back programme but not yet cancelled.
Enquiries
Shell Media Relations
International +44 (0)207 934 5550; U.S. and Canada:
Contact form
LEI number of Shell plc: 21380068P1DRHMJ8KU70
Classification: Total number of voting rights and capital
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crypto Carnage Continues Even as Gold, Bonds Surge on Soft U.S. Jobs Data
Soft U.S. July jobs numbers released Friday morning combined with shocking revisions lower to June and May prints to produce the weakest three-month period of employment growth since the Covid shutdowns of 2020. The data seems likely to put an end to the wait-and-see approach of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and set the central bank on a path to restarting rate cuts at its next meeting in September. That's sent the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond plunging 14 basis points to 4.22% and the price of gold pumping 1.5% to $3,400 per ounce and back within sight of its record high. Whither two other interest-rate sensitive assets: bitcoin and stocks? Not so much. With about 90 minutes to go in the U.S. trading session, both are at session lows, with the Nasdaq plunging 2.5% and bitcoin down more than 3% to $113,800. And bitcoin's an outperformer. Ether (ETH), solana (SOL) BNB (BNB), and dogecoin (DOGE) are all down about 6%. Notably holding its own is XRP (XPR), off just 2.9%. "Jerome 'Too Late' Powell is a disaster," said President Trump on Truth Social shortly after the jobs report. "DROP THE RATE." Minutes ago, the president again took to his social media platform to call for the firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commission of Labor Statstics (the group overseeing the jobs data), accusing her of cooking the books to boost Biden/Harris last year and make things look worse under his administration. As for crypto-related stocks, don't ask. Coinbase (COIN) has plunged nearly 18% as the day's risk-off mood combined with a punk earnings report Thursday evening. Tradfi-related peer Robinhood (HOOD) is lower by only 3.1%. Also reporting last night was bitcoin miner Riot Platforms (RIOT) and it's tumbling 17%. Peer MARA Holdings (MARA) is down 3%. High-flying stablecoin issuer Circle (CRCL) is off 7.5%, as is bitcoin treasury leader Strategy (MSTR). Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should I refinance my mortgage in 2025?
If you got your mortgage in the past couple of years, chances are you want to refinance to a lower rate. But whether you should refinance depends on more than just rates. Let's look at where mortgage rates could be headed and what you should consider when thinking about refinancing in 2025 and beyond. Will mortgage rates go down further in 2025? After record lows, hikes to the Federal funds rate drove mortgage rates higher beginning in 2022. In October 2023, mortgage rates peaked above 8 percent, but they have since drifted downward, with economic data sending rates under 7 percent in recent months. Rates sit just below 7 percent on average at the beginning of August 2025. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Fixed-rate mortgages — the most popular type of home loan — fluctuate with the 10-year Treasury yield. This figure is influenced by many factors, including Fed policy. But since the COVID-19 pandemic, the spread between the 10-year Treasury yield and the 30-year mortgage rate has widened, from an average of 1.7 percentage points pre-pandemic to around 3 percentage points a year ago. This spread has since decreased. Odeta Kushi, deputy chief economist at First American Financial Corp., expects mortgage rates to decline modestly by the end of 2025. 'The decline will be in part driven by some narrowing of mortgage rate spread as the Fed's policy outlook becomes clearer,' she says. However, inflation and the uncertainty around President Trump's tariffs, deportations and tax cuts could also help keep rates up, says Melissa Cohn, regional vice president at William Raveis Mortgage. Learn more: How are mortgage rates determined? Ready to refinance? Compare mortgage lenders and rates on Bankrate for the best deal on a refinance. Explore refinance rates Will the 'serial refinancer' make a comeback? Many borrowers in recent years have settled for a higher mortgage rate, hoping to refinance in the future. If rates trend lower, some might look to refinance more than once. 'A lot of homeowners with 7.5 percent to 8 percent mortgage rates now may become serial refinancers if mortgage rates continue to drop over an extended period of time,' says Greg McBride, chief financial analyst for Bankrate. A refi-and-repeat strategy could work for you, but keep in mind: You'll pay closing costs every time you refinance, and you can only do it after a 'seasoning' period, typically at least six months from the time you closed the original loan. The state where you live can impact whether you want to refinance more than once, Cohn says. That's because states levy different fees and taxes when refinancing. 'In states where the costs are high, such as New York state, borrowers are less likely to repeatedly refinance,' Cohn says. When will refinancing save you money? Our mortgage refinance break-even calculator can help you estimate exactly when you'll recoup the costs of refinancing. Here's an example, assuming a borrower with a 30-year fixed-rate loan who decides to do a 30-year refinance after five years. This example also assumes $7,000 in closing costs. Original loan amount $350,000 Current mortgage rate 7.85% Current payment $2,532 Rate after refinancing 6.75% New payment $2,155 Break-even point 19 months Monthly savings $377 Note: These monthly payments include loan principal and interest payments, not taxes, insurance or other fees. Note that closing costs can vary considerably according to your location, your loan amount and the lender you choose. Lower interest rates may translate to higher fees and vice versa. Always compare multiple offers, examining rates and fees, to make sure you get the best deal. Is it ever OK to refinance to a higher rate? The main objective of refinancing is to obtain a lower interest rate and save money. That doesn't mean you can't refinance in times of higher interest rates, however. Some borrowers refinance due to circumstances such as divorce or unexpected bills. For example, if you have a significant amount of equity in your home, you could do a cash-out refinance, which replaces your current mortgage with a new, bigger one. You receive the difference between your previous mortgage balance and your new one as cash, which you can use to pay for medical bills, home repairs and other expenses. A cash-out refinance often costs more than a typical refinance, but they're typically cheaper than other forms of financing, like a credit card or home improvement loan. Another reason to refinance might be to take a lower-cost loan. For instance, Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans are a good option for buyers with sub-700 credit scores or little money for down payments, but they come with high fees for mortgage insurance. If you find you now qualify for a conventional loan, it might make sense to refinance for the lower costs. Should you refinance in 2025? Most Americans have mortgage rates below 5 percent, and for them, refinancing holds little appeal right now. But if you can save on your monthly payment or need to pull cash out of equity, you may want to consider refinancing in 2025. However, as rates are expected to continue to fall, you might also consider waiting for a more favorable rate. 'There are so many more factors that you have to take into consideration other than just, 'What's the difference between my rate and what the new rate is?'' Cohn says. Whether you're considering refinancing now or waiting to see how far rates drop, here are resources to help you prepare: Mortgage refinance calculator Best mortgage refinance lenders in 2025 How a cash-out refinance works — and when to do it Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Top economist Brad DeLong to recent college grads: Don't blame AI for job struggles—blame the sputtering economy
As recent college graduates face one of the toughest job markets in years, Berkeley economist and voluble Substacker Brad DeLong has a message for those struggling to land their first full-time gig: Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are not to blame. Larger forces are at work. DeLong, a professor at UC Berkeley and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, argued in a recent essay that the challenges confronting young job-seekers today are primarily driven by widespread policy uncertainty and a sluggish economy—not by the rapid rise of AI tools like ChatGPT or data-crunching robots. DeLong offered his analysis on July 23, roughly 10 days before the July jobs report stunned markets, revealing that the economy has been much weaker than previously thought for several months. Prominent business leaders had also flagged troubling signs in the economy before the July jobs report dropped. IBM Vice Chair and former Trump advisor Gary Cohn went on CNBC a day before the jobs data, noting 'warning signs below the surface.' Cohn said he pays close attention to the quits rate in the monthly JOLTS data, arguing that 150,000 fewer quits was an ominous sign of poor economic health. DeLong sounded a prophetic note, writing that 'policy uncertainty' over trade, immigration, inflation, and technology has 'paralyzed business planning,' leading to a self-reinforcing cycle of hiring freezes. New entrants to the job market are bearing the brunt of the retreat to risk aversion. In other words, the college graduate class of 2025 is really unlucky. The economist argued that the uncertainty causes companies to delay major decisions—including hiring—in the face of an unpredictable policy environment. 'This risk aversion is particularly damaging for those at the start of their careers, who rely on a steady flow of entry-level openings to get a foot in the door,' he wrote. DeLong has sounded similar warnings of a slowdown for years. He talked to Fortune in 2022 about his theory of the economy starting to sputter from his book Slouching Towards Utopia. In 2025, he wrote, the big story in the jobs market is not actually AI, but something different. Policy paralysis So, what's really keeping freshly minted graduates from clinching that all-important first job? DeLong cited Bloomberg BusinessWeek's Amanda Mull and her theory about 'stochastic uncertainty'—a cocktail of unpredictability around government policies, trade, immigration, and inflation. Companies aren't firing; instead, they're just waiting. And many are delaying new hires in anticipation of possible sudden shifts in tariffs, inflation rates, and regulatory environments. The result is a wait-and-see climate where employers, worried about future economic shocks, have selected caution over expansion. The holding pattern hits new entrants to the workforce especially hard. While overall unemployment in the U.S. remains low, the situation is uniquely difficult for new graduates relative to the rest of the workforce. Citing economists including Paul Krugman, DeLong noted that while the absolute unemployment rate for college graduates isn't alarming, the gap between graduate unemployment and general unemployment rates is at record highs. In the past, higher education reliably led to lower unemployment, but now recent grads are struggling 'by a large margin' compared to previous generations. As previously reported by Fortune Intelligence, Goldman Sachs has argued that the college degree 'safety premium' is mostly gone. The team, led by Goldman's chief economist Jan Hatzius, wrote: 'Recent data suggests that the labor market for recent college graduates has weakened at a time when the broader labor market has appeared healthy.' It also found that since 1997, young workers without a college degree have become much less likely to even look for work, with their participation rate dropping by seven percentage points. Mull cited an analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York which found that tech and design fields, including computer science, computer engineering, and graphic design, are seeing unemployment rates above 7% for new graduates. Why the AI hype misses the mark Although the tech sector is buzzing about AI's potential to replace junior analysts or automate entry-level tasks, DeLong urged caution in assigning blame. In his typical style, he noted, 'there is still [no] hard and not even a semi-convincing soft narrative that 'AI is to blame' for entry-level job scarcity.' Hiring slowdowns, he pointed out, are driven by broader economic forces: uncertainty, risk aversion, and changes in how companies invest. Here again, DeLong's analysis rhymes and aligns with recent research from Goldman's Hatzius. The bank's quarterly 'AI Adoption Tracker,' issued in July, found that the unemployment rate for AI-exposed occupations had reconciled with the wider economy, which contradicts fears of mass displacement. They also noted there have been no recent layoff announcements explicitly citing AI as the cause, underscoring that it's contained to disruption of specific functions, not entire industries. Crucially, he argued, rather than hiring people, companies in the tech sector are splurging on 'the hardware that powers artificial intelligence'—notably Nvidia's high-performance chips—fueling a boom in capital investment while sidelining junior hires. 'For firms, the calculus is straightforward: Investing in AI infrastructure is seen as a ticket to future competitiveness, while hiring junior staff is a cost that can be postponed.' Underpinning these trends is a shift away from any and all risk. Employers prefer to hire for specific short-term needs and are less willing to invest in developing new talent—leaving young applicants caught in a cycle where 'just getting your foot in the door' is more difficult than ever. Incumbent workers, worried about job market uncertainty, are less likely to change jobs, leading to fewer openings and greater stagnation. DeLong's analysis harmonized with Goldman Sachs' findings about the declining premium attached with a college degree: 'For the longer-run, the rise in the college wage premium is over, and a decline has (probably) begun.' For decades, he continued, a college degree was a ticket to higher earnings, and the labor market rewarded those with advanced skills and credentials. In recent years, though, 'this has plateaued and may even be falling.' The causes are complex, he added, but the takeaway: While degrees remain valuable, they are no longer the ever-ascending ticket to prosperity they once were. These comments confirm the gloomy remarks of University of Connecticut professor emeritus Peter Turchin, who recently talked with Fortune about the declining status of the upper middle class in 21st century America. When asked where else he sees this manifesting in modern life, Turchin said, 'It's actually everywhere you look. 'Look at the overproduction of university degrees,' he said, arguing that the decreasing premium that Goldman and DeLong write about shows up in declining rates of college enrollment and high rates of recent graduate unemployment. 'There is overproduction of university degrees and the value of a university degree actually declines.' DeLong's bottom line for recent grads: Blame a risk-averse business climate, not technology, for today's job woes. And now that we know the economy may have been much more risk-averse in 2025 than previously, DeLong's warnings are worth revisiting. DeLong did not respond to a request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
