logo
‘We were Britain's first heat pump owners. This is what we wish we'd known'

‘We were Britain's first heat pump owners. This is what we wish we'd known'

Yahoo29-03-2025

Peter and Anne Watts made headlines when they became one of around four British households to have an air-source heat pump fitted in 2008.
That Mr and Mrs Watts, 88 and 82 respectively, had installed a heat pump a decade before the likes of Boris Johnson seized upon them as the future of home heating was highly unusual.
'We had a reporter up from the local paper asking us about our solar panels and our heat pump,' recalls Mr Watts. 'In the days afterwards, we got a call from the BBC – I thought it was a prank call from the neighbours.'
Yet 17 years on, the pump is nearing the end of its lifespan – and the price tag for a replacement is £17,000, around £10,000 more than they paid for their original.
Mr and Mrs Watts are in a highly unique quandary – one that shines a light on the shortcomings of the Government's heat pump drive.
Households currently benefit from a £7,500 grant to install a new pump, thanks to the generous Boiler Upgrade Scheme run by the energy department. But no such generosity exists for early adopters whose systems are now nearing their end.
It begs the question: how do households – who relied on low prices or government grants to get their heat pump fitted the first time around – afford its replacement?
Returning to a gas boiler won't work as Mr and Mrs Watts's home has never been connected to the gas grid. Fitting a heat pump required a full-scale renovation of the house, including new fibre insulation and double glazing, which was itself a novelty at the time.
The couple, who ran a business selling animal feed and now live off a private pension, cannot afford a new heat pump. They have already stripped back on holidays since electricity prices first rose.
It is a problem that the pair, who live in a four-bedroom detached house in Buckinghamshire, did not foresee when they became one of the first British households to have an air-source heat pump installed.
According to the Microgeneration Certification Scheme, the industry standards body, just four air-source heat pumps were installed in 2008, before which there was no data at all. The chart below shows how installation numbers have increased since then.
Indeed, the Watts's heat pump landed them in the pages of The Telegraph 17 years ago, where they boasted of the heightened efficiency of their 'eco home,' which also featured solar panels. The panels set them back £10,500, and the pump cost £7,700 – roughly £29,000 in today's money that Mr Watts regarded as a sound investment.
'I was beginning to worry about how we were going to cope in the future,' Mr Watts then told the paper, noting that his bills were rising each month. 'I've worked out that even if fuel prices stay the same, the heat pump will have paid for itself in five years and the panels in under 10. It's too early to see how much money we're making from them, but on a sunny day our electricity meter goes backwards. It's a wonderful sight.'
Almost two decades later, Mr Watts is doubtful the switch saved him much money, because in more recent years, so-called all-electric houses like his have been hamstrung by high electricity rates. 'We don't save a lot relative to oil and gas, but I would still recommend any house with a heat pump also gets solar panels,' he says.
Even so, households like Mr and Mrs Watts, who bet on green technology early, laughed all the way to the bank when the cost of living crisis yanked expensive home improvements out of reach for many. Generous tariffs for early adopters of solar panel owners meant that a savvy few even turned their energy bills into a profit.
These payment schemes, which allow households to sell power back to the Grid at times of high demand, are noticeably less generous than they were for new adopters, and Mr Watts is lucky in that his contract was fixed for 25 years. The retiree says exporting power back to the Grid shaves around £900 a year off his energy bill.
'We'd be on a river cruise talking about how our heat pump worked, and people looked at us in utter amazement,' Mr Watts says. 'They thought we'd gone round the twist.'
Even today, the couple remains an oddity in their village, where most households continue to rely on heating oil – a pollutant fuel type that previous governments have been keen to phase out.
The Government wants 600,000 heat pumps installed every year as part of its drive to reach net zero by 2050. Households can apply through an MCS-accredited installer for a £7,500 grant, via the Boiler Upgrade Scheme (BUS), towards a heat pump, but the technology remains expensive to buy and install.
Like any heating system, a heat pump requires replacement. 'We're getting on in years and there's always the possibility of it suddenly breaking down,' Mrs Watts says. 'We wanted to make sure we wouldn't suffer if we couldn't get it replaced quickly.'
However, the BUS grant only applies to households installing a heat pump for the first time, so Mr and Mrs Watts, who never benefited from such funding, will have to pay full price to replace theirs. So far, installers have quoted the couple up to £17,000 for the job.
Mike Foster, of the Energy Utilities Alliance trade body, told The Telegraph that installers were likely 'trying their luck with an older couple', noting that 'most of the upfront costs would have been incurred when the original heat pump was fitted.'
However, Mr Foster also warned that 'a heat pump's lifespan is the same as a gas boiler – about 15 years.' He added: 'Early adopters will soon start to replace their heat pumps, and it will be more expensive than a straight boiler-to-boiler replacement.'
Labour is desperate to bring down the cost of installing a heat pump, but stubborn inflation has meant the cost has crept up despite generous grants. A Telegraph investigation found that even after factoring in inflation, the cost of installing a heat pump has still risen by £700 in six years – despite promises from successive governments it would fall in real terms.
For early adopters like Mr and Mrs Watts, who invested in the technology believing it to be better for the environment and their own finances, the failure to bring down these costs bites especially hard.
'They're giving out thousands of pounds to people just starting out with heat pumps and we don't qualify,' Mr Watts says. 'Being old age pensioners, we can't afford to pay £17,000 for a new system.'
'We considered ourselves pioneers, and it would be very kind if anyone who had a heat pump pre-2010 could get a grant to replace it,' Mr Watts says.
Mr Watts hopes that Daikin, the manufacturer who provided their current heat pump, may repay the loyalty the couple has shown over the years – and indeed the publicity they've brought the industry – by offering them a discount.
After being approached by The Telegraph, a spokesman for the company said: 'We value Mr Watts' loyalty and appreciate his contribution to promoting heat pumps. If Mr Watts wishes to upgrade his system, Daikin has offered to supply a discounted heat pump.'
A government spokesman said: 'Heat pumps are three times more efficient than gas boilers, enabling families to save around £100 a year by using a smart tariff.
'There is zero VAT on heat pumps until March 2027. Overall installation costs are coming down and will continue to do so for all consumers as the market develops. We are also exploring private finance options, such as loans, to support homeowners with the upfront costs of heat pumps.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ministers to unveil 10-year plan to overhaul infrastructure
Ministers to unveil 10-year plan to overhaul infrastructure

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ministers to unveil 10-year plan to overhaul infrastructure

Ministers are to unveil their plan to overhaul infrastructure over the next decade as Rachel Reeves said the country's schools and hospitals have been 'left to crumble'. The Treasury has promised hundreds of billions over the next decade for projects such as roads, railways and homes. According to the Treasury, the document will lay out Government plans on prioritised policy areas such as upgrading transport networks, building new homes, modernising public services such as hospitals, and assisting the transition to green energy. Ministers are pledging that at least £725 billion will be spent on infrastructure over the next 10 years. Ms Reeves said: 'The British people voted for change – and this is how we deliver it. For too long, our infrastructure – our schools and hospitals, or our roads and bridges – have been left to crumble, holding back communities and stunting economic growth. 'This was a dereliction of duty by previous governments overseeing an era of managed decline, but it ends with this one. 'We are investing in Britain's future, brick by brick, road by road and track by track. 'The strategy will rebuild people's pride in their homes, while growing the economy and putting more money in people's pockets as we deliver our Plan for Change.' The Chancellor outlined a raft of infrastructure investment as part of last week's spending review. According to Wednesday's announcement, there will be £39 billion over the next 10 years to build affordable and social housing, and spending is due to reach £4 billion a year in 2029/30. There was also a £30 billion commitment to nuclear power, including £14.2 billion to build the Sizewell C plant in Suffolk and £2.5 billion in small modular reactors, as well as £15 billion for public transport projects in England's city regions and a four-year settlement for Transport for London worth £2.2 billion. Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said that the Chancellor is 'desperately trying to paper over the damage she's done to the public finances'. Sir Mel added: 'With inflation up, growth down, and unemployment rising, the economy is heading in one direction and that is backwards.'

Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI
Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI

Meta's big investment in Scale AI may be giving some of the startup's customers pause. Reuters reports that Google had planned to pay Scale $200 million this year but is now having conversations with its competitors and planning to cut ties with the startup. Microsoft is also reportedly looking to pull back, and OpenAI supposedly made a similar decision months ago, although its CFO said the company will continue working with Scale as one of many vendors. Scale's customers include self-driving car companies and the U.S. government, but Reuters says its biggest clients are generative AI companies seeking access to workers with specialized knowledge who can annotate data for training models. A Scale spokesperson declined to comment on the company's relationship with Google, but he told TechCrunch that Scale's business remains strong, and that it will continue to operate as an independent company that safeguards its customers' data. Earlier reports suggest that Meta invested $14.3 billion in Scale for a 49% stake in the company, with Scale CEO Alexandr Wang joining Meta to lead the company's efforts to develop 'superintelligence.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store