Ireland's online safety code can continue but further legal challenges likely over regulation
High Court's
rejection of a challenge by
tech company X
against Ireland's online safety code will come as a relief to the Government and the regulator
Coimisiún na Meán
.
The code is viewed in
Government
as crucial in protecting children from dangers in the digital world.
But regulation of the tech industry, particularly from Europe, is facing strong opposition in Washington where some politicians argue it could curtail the free speech of Americans.
And while Elon Musk's X did not succeed on Tuesday, experts believe it is inevitable there will be more litigation in the future over online regulation.
READ MORE
The online safety code was introduced last year with the then Minister for Media
Catherine Martin
arguing that it represented 'a big step forward in online safety' that would 'make all of us, but particularly our children, safer online'.
Last September then Taoiseach
Simon Harris
told the tech industry that the world of self-regulation was changing.
But in the intervening period, there has been strong pushback from some quarters internationally about the regulation of the tech sector.
In a Washington controlled by Donald Trump such regulation in some cases is characterised as censorship.
[
What are the new online safety regulations that Big Tech is unhappy about – and will they work?
Opens in new window
]
Ireland's online safety code brought the State in line with the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Photograph: Getty Images
In June US secretary of state
Marco Rubio
warned of visa bans on foreign nationals deemed to be censoring Americans.
He suggested the new policy could target officials regulating US tech companies.
Last week the US House of Representatives judiciary committee issued an interim report that saw the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) as a 'foreign censorship threat'.
'European regulators define political speech, humour, and other First Amendment-protected content as disinformation and hate speech, and then require platforms to change their global content moderation policies to censor it.'
Ireland's online safety code brought the State in line with the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD).
Ms Martin said new rules would introduce 'real accountability' for online video-sharing platforms and require them 'to take action to protect those that use their platforms, including by having robust complaints-handling procedures and introducing effective age-verification'.
The code meant platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, would be obliged to comply or face fines of up to €20 million, or 10 per cent of annual turnover, whichever was greater.
However, X, in its legal challenge, contended the code impermissibly went further than the AVMSD. It said it covered areas within the scope of another set of rules – the EU's DSA, which aims to prevent illegal and harmful activities online and the spread of disinformation.
Coimisiún na Meán welcomed the ruling and said it would study it in detail before making further comment.
Dr TJ McIntyre, associate professor in the Sutherland School of Law at
UCD
, said the High Court ruling was important in the narrow sense that provisions of the code related to age assurance obligations could continue for the time being.
He said there has now been two separate court cases but there was likely to more litigation in the future over online regulation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
20 minutes ago
- Extra.ie
Scheme to house Ukrainians 'is hindering the rental market'
The scheme to help house Ukrainians is having a 'negative impact' on the rental market, the Cabinet has been told. Ministers this week decided any property registered with the Residential Tenancies Board since 2022 will be exempt from the Accommodation Recognition Payment (ARP) that helps house Ukrainians. This is due to concerns it was 'impacting on the rental market'. Sources indicated that councils had noted situations where landlords had evicted tenants and then offered accommodation through the ARP scheme instead. The scheme to help house Ukrainians is having a 'negative impact' on the rental market, the Cabinet has been told. Pic: Getty Images Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan and Housing Minister James Browne got approval this week for proposals to limit the eligibility of some properties for the ARP. The ARP is a tax-free, €600-a-month payment given to those providing accommodation pledged to Beneficiaries of Temporary Protection (BOTPs) from Ukraine. The changes mean any property registered with the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB) at any time since January 1, 2022 will be ineligible for a new application for the ARP. Existing claimants are unaffected. It is expected that a memo will be submitted in the autumn seeking the Government's approval of the publication of the Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, which will contain the legal changes for this amendment. Senior Government sources said the goal of the change is to 'limit further exits of properties' from the rental market to house Ukrainians. There are around 20,000 homes using the scheme. Sources said that of these, just over 3,000 homes that had been on the RTB register were removed, while still being used as part of the ARP scheme, to accommodate Ukrainians instead. Around 5,700 homes were added to the RTB by other owners of properties who were using the ARP scheme. Senior Government sources said the goal of the change is to 'limit further exits of properties' from the rental market to house Ukrainians. Pic: Getty Images The remaining 11,000 or so homes are not on the register and are likely to have Ukrainians living in them. The ARP scheme is also not governed by Rent Pressure Zones. Some landlords were taking properties off the rental market and renting them out under the ARP scheme, with the intention to put them back on the market at market rent, instead of being governed by the annual 2% rule. There is now a fear some landlords may evict Ukrainians on March 1 next year when they will be able to reset the rates to market levels under the rules introduced by Minister Browne this year. Government sources said there were problems in the system and the latest measure were designed to deal with them. They stressed that the proposals were not retrospective and would apply to properties not used to house Ukrainians. One Cabinet minister said: 'It's to stop the movement of units out of the private rental sector, into this sector. That's been a trend that is of concern to the Department of Housing. So, it was to put that extra layer of conditionality on how it works.' There is a concern that if the Government reduces the €600 fee even further it could have a 'spillover' back into the private rental market. Sources indicated that councils had noted situations where landlords had evicted tenants and then offered accommodation through the ARP scheme instead. Pic: Shutterstock The minister added: 'I mean, in some instances it could be holiday homes or homes that wouldn't otherwise be put on the private rental side. But in the overall scheme of things, it's trying to mitigate that risk.' Sinn Féin has been calling for a full review of the system. Its justice and home affairs spokesman, Matt Carthy, said the move by the Government did not go 'far enough'. He said figures obtained via parliamentary questions showed a 17% rise in properties getting payment under the scheme since the start of 2025. He said the scheme was 'deeply unfair' as it gives access to non-means-tested housing support to one group of people but not to others, even where those others may be on lower wages.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
X wants to appeal High Court dismissal of case challenging Online Safety Code, court told
Elon Musk's X wants to appeal a High Court ruling dismissing its action against Ireland's broadcasting and online media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, over its online safety code. X International Unlimited Company, which operates X, formerly known as Twitter, had alleged that the media regulator engaged in 'regulatory overreach' in its approach to restrictions on certain video content. Coimisiún na Meán's online safety code, which was adopted last October and came into effect earlier this month, sets out legally binding rules for video-sharing platforms. It is aimed at protecting the public, and especially children, from harmful online content. The social media giant had sought a High Court order compelling the commission to quash its decision to adopt certain sections of the code. It also sought the court to overturn the commission's decision to apply the code to its platform. In a judgment, Mr Justice Conleth Bradley this week refused reliefs sought by X. The judge dismissed several arguments made by the platform in the proceedings, including that the code was out of step with European legislation. At the High Court on Thursday, senior counsel Declan McGrath, for X and appearing with barrister Emma Synnott, said he was instructed to seek permission to appeal the court's judgment. In some High Court cases permission must be granted by the court to appeal a judgment. Noting the judge's provisional view that the costs of the High Court action be awarded to the commission, Mr McGrath said he would not be making any submissions on the matter. Mr Justice Bradley set a date in October for the hearing of X's application for permission to appeal.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Why did the EU sign a tariff deal overwhelmingly favourable to the US?
So the EU and US have agreed a deal on tariffs. What is in it? The EU has struck a deal with US president Donald Trump that will place a 15 per cent tariff on practically all goods sold from EU countries to the US. US goods will not be charged similar tariffs when they are imported into the EU. The deal saw off the prospect of much higher tariffs Trump had threatened to put on future EU trade. It also includes a commitment that the EU will buy large amounts of liquefied natural gas and other energy from the US. What is a tariff? A tariff is basically a tax paid on goods imported from one country to another. The tariff is paid by the importer, but part of the cost will be borne by companies selling to the US, and part will be passed on to US consumers, raising the price. All in that means EU businesses will probably sell fewer goods in the US market, or make less profit doing so. Is this a good deal? It is overwhelmingly favourable to Trump and the US. The EU made many concessions as the price of avoiding a fight that could have spun into a devastating trade war. READ MORE The European Commission, the EU's executive arm that led the negotiations, has argued president Ursula von der Leyen got the best deal she could. From Ireland's perspective, the 15 per cent tariffs on transatlantic trade represents a blow. But the Government was keen for the EU to cut a quick deal that (hopefully) ends months of uncertainty. [ Trump's tariffs: What the world got wrong about US president's trade policy Opens in new window ] We've heard a lot about tariffs on pharmaceutical products. What is happening there? One of the big questions during the EU-US talks centred on the fate of pharmaceutical products. The industry accounts for a big chunk of Ireland's trade with the US, due to the manufacturing plants of Pfizer, Eli Lilly and other pharma giants in the Republic. Trump has frequently talked about using tariffs to bring pharma manufacturing and jobs back to the US. The sector has avoided US import taxes to date, but they are coming. This deal will cap those future tariffs at the 15 per cent rate. Is the EU getting anything in return for all of this? Not much. Higher tariffs of 27.5 per cent charged on EU-made cars will be brought down to that blanket 15 per cent. The deal does include some exemptions to US tariffs for aircraft parts, which is welcome for Ireland's aviation sector. Negotiations are ongoing to expand those exemptions to other industries and products, such as whiskey and wine.
