logo
El Paso business leaders anxiously await details of Trump's 25% tariffs against Mexico

El Paso business leaders anxiously await details of Trump's 25% tariffs against Mexico

USA Today31-01-2025

El Paso business leaders anxiously await details of Trump's 25% tariffs against Mexico
Business leaders along the U.S.-Mexico border are anxiously holding their breath while they await details of President Donald Trump's plan to impose big tariffs on Mexican imports, which account for billions of dollars of trade in this region.
A White House official said Friday, Jan. 31, that the Trump administration's proposed 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada would be implemented Saturday, Feb. 1.
Trump has said the tariffs are sanctions against the two countries for not taking more decisive actions to halt the flow of undocumented immigrants and illicit fentanyl trafficking into the United States.
In his first term as president, Trump used tariffs as a negotiating tool. Days ago, he succeeded in getting Columbia leaders to accept deportees from the U.S. after he threatened to impose 25% tariffs on Columbian imports.
'It's uncertainty that is hurting us as a region because no one can make plans until we have clarity on what are the rules," Alan Russell, co-founder and CEO of El Paso's Tecma Group of Companies, which manages 90 maquiladoras, or factories, in Mexico for companies in the U.S., and elsewhere.
"I'm optimistic this region is going to be swinging and growing with the (continued) relationship with Mexico," Russell said.
That optimism largely stems from Russell's belief that Trump is unlikely to impose a blanket 25% on all Mexican products, many of which are auto parts and other products made by U.S. companies at factories in Mexico and shipped to the United States.
A blanket 25% tariff on all Mexican imports "sounds pretty unreasonable, therefore we probably can assume there will be categories of tariffs," with some products exempt and some as high as 25%, Russell said.
More: FBI, HSI, DEA, federal agencies begin immigration arrests throughout El Paso, Texas
Jerry Pacheco, president of the Border Industrial Association in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, an industrial logistics hub adjacent to El Paso, said he also sees company officials holding off on plans until they see what will happen with tariffs.
"A blanket tariff would be so disruptive" to the manufacturing and logistics industries in this area, he said.
"A lot of things could happen. He (Trump) may impose tariffs on a select few items, like Mexican steel or Mexican auto products, or he may impose tariffs and make them effective at a later date so more negotiations can go on," Pacheco said.
Jon Barela, chief executive officer of the Borderplex Alliance, an El Paso-based economic development organization, struck a more alarming tone.
'The Borderplex region, which thrives on cross-border commerce, stands to lose significantly from these tariffs,' Barela said in a written statement.
'Imposing these tariffs risks reversing years of progress in building a robust, integrated economy that benefits both sides of the border and creates a chilling effect on regional and national economic growth for years to come," Barela said.
Much of the manufacturing in this area is done in maquiladoras, or factories, in Juárez, run by companies from the United States and other countries. Many El Paso-area companies support the maquiladoras by making parts for the Mexican plants and operating warehouses and other logistics operations for the assembled products coming out of Mexico.
Barela urged policymakers to reconsider implementing the tariffs and continue to promote economic collaboration between the U.S. and Mexico.
Russell and Pacheco said no matter what happens with the tariffs, cross-border commerce will continue.
"Cross-border trade will still happen. But we, the consumers, are going to pay more for products," Pacheco said.
Vic Kolenc may be reached at 915-546-5421; vkolenc@elpasotimes.com; @vickolenc on Twitter, now known as X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran
Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran

Israeli ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, said the goal in the war against Iran is not to contain it but to win it, as the two countries continue to exchange strikes for a third day. During an appearance on ABC's 'This Week,' host Martha Raddatz asked Leiter how Israel would avoid escalating and attempt to contain the war. 'Martha, the objective is not to contain the war,' Leiter responded. 'The objective is to win the war.' 'Eighty years ago, we had a little man with a mustache running around Europe that nobody believed him when he said he was going to destroy the Jewish people,' he continued. 'We lost 6 million. Now we've got a crazed new Hitler running around the Middle East saying he's going to destroy us. 'We have to take him at face value… He's got a concrete plan to destroy us.' Her comments come after Israel and Iran continued to exchange airstrikes on Sunday. Another round of U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks was scheduled in Muscat, Oman, but was cancelled amid the fighting. When Raddatz mentioned that Trump did not want Israel to strike Iran because it would 'blow it,' Leiter said Trump was 'congratulatory about our strike,' noting that he had been given a 'heads-up' by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. When pushed further on whether Israel would accept a deal between Iran and Israel, Leiter said not unless Iran is willing to halt the nuclear program entirely. 'He wants the nuclear program in Iran to be halted in its entirety,' Leiter said. 'He said it very clearly: dismantle the centrifuges, dismantle the infrastructure, and stop in total the enrichment of uranium. So, if that can be achieved through negotiation, so be it. We'll be very happy. But it hasn't been.'

Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates

CNN

time18 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates

Amid ongoing waves of tit-for-tat strikes between Israel and Iran, President Donald Trump is publicly and privately making clear his desire to keep the United States out of the fray for now, wary of becoming bogged in another Middle East war and highly attuned to the changing politics of his party. Sources familiar with the matter say Israel has spoken with the US about possibly increasing its level of involvement, though one Israeli official cautioned those conversation have not yet included 'practical' discussions of the finer details. And while Trump hopes to avoid a prolonged conflict that could further destabilize the Middle East, some in the administration recognize that American military assistance may help Israel conclude its objectives more quickly, the sources said. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News on Sunday morning. The competing interests have created a complicated dynamic for a president eager to make good on his pledge to bring peace to the world's troubled regions. Since Israel launched its first attack early Friday morning, the US has offered defensive support to Israel intercepting an onslaught of Iranian reprisal strikes. But Trump has stopped well short of joining Israel's military in its attempts to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, resisting pressure from fellow Republicans to join the fight. He said in a social media post Saturday that he felt the conflict 'should end' as he continues to hold out hope for a negotiated agreement that would curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions, even after planned talks this weekend in Oman between the US and Iranian negotiating teams were called off. At stake is Trump's promise to act as a global peacemaker — or, as he told his inaugural crowd in January, to 'bring a new spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent and totally unpredictable.' That vow has already been tested by his inability to bring about an end to the Ukraine conflict and halting efforts to stop the fighting in Gaza. Now, as a new flashpoint is threatening to spiral out of control on Trump's watch, the commander-in-chief is attempting to limit US involvement. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight,' Trump wrote on Truth Social late Saturday amid a fresh round of attacks in the region. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before. However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!' The post sent the message that Trump's line for getting more directly involved in Israel's assaults would be an attack on American facilities or personnel in the region. Short of that, the US role in the conflict so far has largely been defensive. The Israeli operation against Iran is expected to take 'weeks, not days' and is moving forward with implicit US approval, according to White House and Israeli officials. The Trump administration has not critiqued the weeks-long timeframe in private discussions, an Israeli official told CNN. A White House official said the administration was aware and implicitly supportive of Israel's plans. When asked about how long the conflict could continue, the official said it depended on Iran's response. 'The Trump administration firmly believes this can be solved by continuing negotiations with the US,' the official said, adding that the US was not going to direct Israel to do anything but defend itself. American military planners have long had prepared options for joint US-Israeli actions against Iranian facilities should a US president ultimately decide to try taking out Iran's nuclear facilities, some of which are buried deep underground. There is little to indicate Trump has come close to approving such options, however, and according to an Israeli official, the possibility of offensive US support for Israel's strikes inside Iran had not been discussed on a 'practical basis.' 'We are not there, on a practical basis,' the Israeli official said. 'If at some point, the United States decides to take an offensive role, I don't think we'll be in a position to try and talk them out of it – but that's not our ask,' the official said, adding that such a move would be a sovereign decision of the US. The official explained that the endgame is to make sure that Iran is 'no longer an existential threat' to Israel, with both its nuclear and ballistic missiles program. 'If it's done in conjunction with allies, fine, but if it's not done in conjunction with allies, we have to do it ourselves,' the official said. Inside the White House, there continues to be heavy skepticism about getting involved in the conflict further, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. Trump remains concerned about getting dragged into a war he didn't start and wanted to avoid, and is acutely aware of the complicated politics at play, those officials said. Though he publicly warned Israel against launching an attack on Iran ahead of Friday's strikes, he said afterward he was supportive of the effort and well aware that it was being planned. Prev Next Trump has long promised not to engage in 'nation building' adventurism overseas, decrying his predecessors for sending American troops to die in wars that generated little benefit back home. 'For at least two decades, political leaders from both parties have dragged our military into missions it was never meant to be' a part of, said Trump told graduating cadets at West Point last month. 'They sent our warriors on nation-building crusades to nations that wanted nothing to do with us, led by leaders that didn't have a clue in distant lands,' he said, vowing to never repeat the mistake. Now, however, he is under pressure from some of his Republican allies to take a more interventionist role. 'If diplomacy fails, going all in for Israel shows that America is back as a reliable ally and a strong force against oppression. It would strengthen our hand in all corners of the world, as well as all other conflicts we face,' Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote on X last week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store