Louisiana bill proposes SNAP soda ban, part of broader nutrition push
Senate Bill 14, authored by Sen. Patrick McMath (R-Covington), would require the state Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) to submit a waiver to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The waiver would seek permission for Louisiana to prohibit SNAP recipients from purchasing soft drinks, defined in the bill as beverages containing added sweeteners—including sodas, sports drinks, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Exceptions include drinks with milk, milk substitutes, or more than 50% vegetable or fruit juice.
The bill would also require DCFS to resubmit the waiver request annually if it is initially denied, and to notify the legislature within 30 days of any denial. If approved, restrictions would need to be implemented within six months.
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, more than 847,000 Louisiana residents currently receive SNAP benefits. The program provides financial assistance for low-income households to purchase food.
The legislation is part of a broader public health push that also includes restrictions on ultra-processed foods in schools and new labeling requirements for products containing certain additives. It is one of several health-focused proposals pre-filed ahead of Louisiana's 2025 regular legislative session, which begins April 14.
Gov. Jeff Landry has publicly supported the bill and connected it to a broader national health initiative known as Make America Healthy Again (MAHA). The campaign, organized by a political action committee of the same name, promotes public policies aimed at improving food quality, reducing chronic disease, and limiting exposure to harmful substances.
MAHA was co-founded by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and encourages states to take legislative action on public health issues. In a March 28 post on X, Landry said Louisiana would help lead the movement. Kennedy responded, saying the governor had supported the effort 'from when it took pure courage.'
RFK Jr. is targeting ultraprocessed foods: What are they, and are they bad?
National Weather Service no longer translating products for non-English speakers
Baton Rouge man who killed his neighbor, shot at deputies sentenced to life
Louisiana bill proposes SNAP soda ban, part of broader nutrition push
Trump to host El Salvador's president amid US deportation efforts
Aguilar says Democrats won't participate in 'vote pairing' after Johnson kills proxy effort
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New SNAP Restrictions Will Limit Soda and Candy Purchases in These 6 States
Six states have now banned soda from SNAP purchases. Six more states are changing the rules around what foods you can and can't purchase using the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed this week. According to the announcement, SNAP waivers for West Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas were signed on August 3, amending the "statutory definition of food for purchase" and ending the "subsidization of popular types of junk food beginning in 2026." These states join six others that signed waivers enacting SNAP reform earlier this year. Here's what these changes mean for the millions of Americans that rely on this vital program for food purchases. What is SNAP? SNAP is a federally funded program that acts similarly to cash for those who need assistance with purchasing food. As Feeding America explains, "SNAP provides monthly funds to buy groceries. It is the largest anti-hunger program in America, helping over 41 million people in 2022." That number equates to about 12.5% of the United States population. The program, run by the USDA Food and Nutrition Service, provides people with a card they can swipe or tap like a credit card to pay for food. "You can use it at local stores or farmers' markets for groceries. The amount depends on your income and family size," Feeding America adds. Who is eligible for the program is determined on a state-by-state basis. However, the USDA notes that in most cases, your household must meet both the gross and net income limits it sets for each household size, with gross monthly income falling at or below 130% of the poverty line and 100% of net income at or below the poverty line. Related: The FDA Just Axed 52 Food Standards – Here's What It Means for Your Groceries If a household is eligible, it will receive an "allotment" of total food benefits each month. The USDA details, "Because SNAP households are expected to spend about 30% of their own resources on food, your allotment is calculated by multiplying your household's net monthly income by 0.3 and subtracting the result from the maximum monthly allotment for your household size." Historically, waivers have also been used for supporting participants and expanding eligibility during times of low employment in the U.S., the Center for Science in the Public Interest explains. That included during the pandemic, as waivers gave "states flexibility to adapt the program and deliver services virtually." Which foods are being banned? The new waivers, which go into effect in 2026, mean families will no longer be able to purchase products like soda or candy using their SNAP benefits. Some argue that this means families can no longer buy goods that may be used in celebrations like birthday parties or gatherings. However, the reforms differ state by state. Newsweek reported that in Texas, the changes will ban soda, energy drinks, candy, and prepared desserts from SNAP benefits, while in Colorado and West Virginia, only soft drinks will be off the table. Nevertheless, the changes align with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Make America Healthy Again movement. 'For years, SNAP has used taxpayer dollars to fund soda and candy — products that fuel America's diabetes and chronic disease epidemics,' Kennedy shared in the announcement. 'These waivers help put real food back at the center of the program and empower states to lead the charge in protecting public health. I thank these governors who have stepped up to request waivers, and I encourage others to follow their lead. This is how we Make America Healthy Again.' Related: Experts Warn of Public Health Risks as the Trump Administration Eliminates 2 Critical Food Safety Committees Unfortunately, this interpretation of how households use SNAP is likely an oversimplification of how many Americans access food. "The issue isn't about individuals misusing their benefits but their limited choices. In many rural areas and food deserts, convenience stores and fast-food chains are often the only available options," Kavelle Christie, a health policy and advocacy expert and director at the Center for Regulatory Policy and Health Innovation, told Newsweek. "For many families, fresh produce and healthy meals are luxuries that are unattainable, not because they do not want these foods, but because they are unavailable or too expensive." Related: Can the Government Tell SNAP Users What to Eat? The Center for Science in the Public Interest notes that while there are no results available from previous waivers restricting specific purchases — as this is the first time restrictive waivers have been allowed in practice — systematic models and reviews indicate that restrictions could lead to a decrease in purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB). It explains, "Modeling studies find that restrictions could reduce consumption among children and could reduce diet-related chronic disease prevalence among adults. But randomized controlled trials conducted in 2016 and 2024 found no significant differences in diet quality among study participants who received an SSB restriction versus the control group." It also cites the USDA's study, which showed that SNAP participants struggle with healthy eating not because they lack an understanding of what is healthy, but rather because healthy food is simply unaffordable, an issue that is only worsening in the U.S. Have other states passed SNAP waivers? SNAP restriction waivers for Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Arkansas, Idaho, and Utah were signed in early 2025, though government officials say they are hoping more states will follow suit. Although the precise restrictions may vary from state to state, all of them have banned soda or soft drinks, and several have banned candy. 'I hope to see all 50 states join this bold common sense approach. For too long, the root cause of our chronic disease epidemic has been addressed with lip service only. It's time for powerful changes to our nation's SNAP program,' FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary noted in the HHS's announcement. 'The goal is simple — reduce mass suffering from diabetes, obesity, and other long-term medical conditions. I applaud the leadership of Secretaries Rollins and Kennedy and President Trump in going bold.' Read the original article on Food & Wine Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Mexico expands SNAP benefits for residents impacted by disaster
NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – New Mexico has temporarily expanded SNAP benefits for residents impacted by disaster to allow them to purchase hot and ready-to-eat foods from deli departments. The temporary change applies to customers in Lincoln, Chaves, De Baca, Guadalupe, Otero, Sierra, Socorro, and Torrance counties and will remain in effect through Aug. 30. Four people dead in medical transport plane crash near New Mexico, Arizona border 'When disaster happens, families shouldn't have to worry about how they're going to put a hot meal on the table,' Kyra Ochoa, deputy secretary for the Health Care Authority, said in a news release. 'The ability to buy ready-to-eat, warm meals for themselves and their families can make a significant difference as they navigate tough circumstances.' The waiver applies only to deli departments at EBT-authorized retailers and does not include restaurants or non-EBT-authorized retailers. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
14 hours ago
- Boston Globe
As Washington axes aid for the most vulnerable, legislation in Mass. would tackle inequities
It's vital work, and many of its recommendations are worth enacting. Advertisement This proposed legislation comes at a time when the Trump administration is seeking to limit diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and racial preferences. The work of the Health Equity Compact is not that. It's about finding practical solutions to address the health needs of places like Brockton, where the according to the Atrius Health Equity Foundation. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up One of the Compact's specific proposals, for which this editorial board Advertisement In general, anything the state can do to advance career ladders for health care workers is valuable. For example, UMass Chan Medical School just The health equity bill allows the public health commissioner to have a role in creating 'stackable' credentials for health care workers, where one credential can be added to the next, creating a career path. Another intriguing idea in the proposed bill is the creation of a trust fund to give grants to 'health equity zones,' specific communities with poor health outcomes. This is a model The In particular, at least for now, lawmakers should resist the temptation to pass new health insurance mandates. Advertisement The bill would require insurance coverage for interpreters, community health workers, and patient navigators. It is important for hospitals and health centers to be able to employ staff who help patients, including non-English speakers, navigate a complex health care system. These positions are typically funded through grants and, in some cases, by insurance under negotiated agreements or payment models. But a wide-ranging insurance mandate like the one in this bill would increase premiums for all payers — including those who can least afford them. In 2023, the Division of Insurance The bill would also require insurers to reimburse equally for telehealth and in-person care for primary care and chronic disease visits. There is ongoing debate over reimbursement rates for telehealth, which exploded in popularity during the pandemic. It's worth studying the costs and benefits of telehealth in specific specialties before mandating payment parity because ideally, telehealth would provide opportunities for cost savings. Those quibbles aside, the proposed health equity bill would move the state in the right direction. At a time when the federal government is cutting health care spending and eliminating benefits that help the poorest citizens, it would be a strong statement if Massachusetts were to take the lead in passing a bill to improve the health of people in communities that today suffer the most. Advertisement Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
