Malegaon Case Verdict On Thursday: A Blast From The Past That Saw 17 Years Of Legal Twists & Turns
Seventeen years after a devastating explosion tore through the communally sensitive town of Malegaon in Maharashtra, a special court of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in Mumbai is set to deliver its verdict on Thursday.
This judgment represents a pivotal moment in one of India's most lengthy and politically contentious terror cases, marked by numerous twists, including changes in investigative bodies, allegations of fabricated evidence, and witnesses turning hostile.
The Explosion and Its Consequences
On September 29, 2008, an explosive device attached to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon, resulting in the deaths of six people and injuring over 100 others. The timing of the blast was particularly sensitive, occurring on the eve of the Hindu festival of Navratri and during the holy month of Ramzan, sparking immediate fears of communal unrest.
The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) initially led the investigation, quickly tracing the motorcycle's ownership and making several arrests, alleging the involvement of Hindu right-wing extremist groups.
Among those who stood trial are former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Army officer Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit. Other accused include Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, and Sameer Kulkarni. The ATS, in its initial probe, invoked the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), accusing the group linked to Abhinav Bharat of conspiring to establish a 'Hindu Rashtra" and incite communal tensions.
However, the case took a significant turn when the National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over the probe in 2011. In a 2016 supplementary chargesheet, the NIA dropped MCOCA charges, citing questionable application of the law by the ATS and alleging procedural irregularities and coercive tactics during the initial investigation.
Although the NIA exonerated some accused, the special court, on December 27, 2017, decided that Sadhvi Pragya and six others would face trial under various sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including criminal conspiracy, murder, and promoting enmity between religious groups.
The Extended Trial
The trial began formally in 2018. Over the years, the prosecution presented 323 witnesses, but faced significant challenges as 37 of them turned hostile, weakening crucial aspects of the case.
Both prosecution and defence presented their final arguments, with the NIA advocating for severe punishment for the accused, arguing that the blast was intended to terrorise the Muslim community and disrupt internal security. Conversely, the accused have maintained their innocence, with Pragya Thakur alleging evidence manipulation and Purohit claiming a lack of material evidence linking him to the offence and alleging a flawed investigation.
Much-anticipated Verdict
The verdict on July 31 is highly anticipated for several reasons.
Legal Implications: The judgment will decide the fate of the seven accused, who could face severe punishment, including life imprisonment under UAPA, or acquittal if the prosecution fails to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Regardless of the outcome, appeals to higher courts are likely, indicating that the legal saga may not end here.
Political Ramifications: Given Sadhvi Pragya Thakur's status, the verdict carries significant political weight. A conviction could impact her political career and the BJP, while an acquittal would likely be seen as vindication by her supporters. The case has long been politicised, with both sides accusing each other of bias and manipulation.
Credibility of Investigating Agencies: The verdict will also reflect on the investigations conducted by both the ATS and the NIA, especially given the NIA's claims of flaws in the initial ATS probe and the high number of hostile witnesses. It will test the Indian judiciary's ability to deliver justice in complex, politically sensitive cases that have spanned nearly two decades.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Court clears ex-officer who resisted RSS chief's arrest in another case
Former Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) officer Mehboob Mujawar, who had earlier claimed he was instructed by senior officers to arrest RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat in connection with the 2008 Malegaon blast but refused due to lack of evidence, has been acquitted in a separate criminal along with his wife Nilofar and associate Uttam Navgire, was facing charges of criminal intimidation, unlawful assembly and trespassing. The case was registered in April 2009, about six months after the Malegaon has consistently maintained that the case was filed in retaliation for his refusal to carry out what he called an "illegal order." The complaint was filed by Nazeer A. Hanif Karigar, who alleged that on April 14, 2009, Mujawar and others entered his shop in Solapur, threatened him and claimed ownership of the prosecution stated that Mujawar, identifying himself as an ATS officer, allegedly pointed a revolver at a witness, used abusive language and said he could 'do an encounter' on anyone. The accused reportedly refused to vacate the property, asserting it had been purchased for Rs 80 case dragged on for over a decade. In 2016, Mujawar filed an application seeking speedy trial, stating that the ongoing proceedings had caused him to miss out on a promotion to Deputy Superintendent of Police in 2012 and that further delays would impact his retirement his application, he also linked the case to high-profile individuals named in the Malegaon blast investigation, including Sandeep Dange, Ramji Kalsangra, Col. Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya, and referenced the alleged involvement of 600 kg of a sworn statement to the court, Mujawar reiterated that he had been asked to arrest Mohan Bhagwat, a claim that was later cited by an accused in the Malegaon case in a Mumbai court to support allegations of a wider conspiracy and custodial torture by investigating the Solapur Magistrate court did not consider these submissions in deciding the case against Mujawar. Chief Judicial Magistrate K.P. Jain-Desarda acquitted all three accused, citing lack of court noted that the complainant had since moved to Canada and could not be examined despite being summoned. Other prosecution witnesses failed to support the allegations or lacked witness, Gulam Hussain Kasimsaheb Shaikh, testified that Mujawar had pointed a gun and issued threats, but the court found his testimony insufficient on its weapon was recovered during the investigation, and key documentary evidence, such as a police commissioner's prohibition order, was excluded due to lack of proper certification.'In the absence of the complainant's testimony and supporting evidence, the benefit of doubt must go to the accused,' the court observed. All three accused were acquitted on January 27, 2020.- Ends
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Cardinal Baselios expresses trust in court after nuns get bail in Chhattisgarh
Raipur: Hours after the NIA court in Chhattisgarh granted conditional bail to two nuns arrested on charges of human trafficking and religious conversion, the president of Kerala Catholic Bishops Council, Cardinal Baselios Cleemis Catholicos, told TOI over a phone call, "With the bail granted, the first chapter of the circumstance has come to a conclusion, but we don't think the issue is closed. The judicial process now begins and we wish the nuns to be declared innocent after the legal process." Speaking as the spokesman of the Church, Baselios said, "We all believe is that they are innocent and were trying to help the young girls. The girls are mature and not minors, they can a decision for themselves. Let the court take its act of justice and we have all confidence in the court." "We believe that the accusations against nuns have to be proved, while my apprehension is that once a crowd dictates what is right and not, things in democracy and judiciary will be in trouble. Let the court alone make the sincere investigation and find the truth," he added. "The nuns are from Kerala and we are with them on different levels as we have emotional attachment with them. They are not two simple sisters, the issue is of serious concern for us. It shouldn't happen again anywhere in the country. Else, anyone could accuse anyone and put them in jail, who will prove them innocent," Cardinal Baselios said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Taylor Swift Goes Natural, Here's How She Really Looks The Noodle Box Undo Cardinal Baselios Cleemis is a former President of Catholic Bishops Conference of India twice, and is present consultant to Pope Leo XIV in the dicastery of inter-religious dialogue. Additionally, he is serving as head of the Syro Malankara Catholic Church in Kerala. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
CM takes aim at cultural dissent while announcing rural development initiatives
Edited 188 Udaipur/Jaipur: In a politically charged address at Banswara, Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma sparked controversy Saturday by criticising unnamed individuals who allegedly question post-1947 freedom and traditional Hindu customs, particularly the wearing of mangalsutras by married women. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sharma's barbs were a veiled reference to the debates on tribal identity, and statements by Banswara MP Rajkumar Roat about tribal communities' distinct cultural practices from Hindu traditions. "They say they are not free yet. I don't understand their mentality. They are trying to lead society in a different direction. They say mothers and sisters should not wear mangalsutras, a symbol of marital status. Do not listen to them. Be cautious of such people," Sharma said, at an event to celebrate PM Kisan Utsav Day, where over 76 lakh farmers across Rajasthan received the 20th installment of the PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi. Sharma also laid out plans to distribute Rs 25,000 crore in interest-free crop loans this year while highlighting the construction of 17.4 lakh permanent houses under the PM Awas Yojana-Gramin. "We are working for the development of farmers. In the future, farmers will become energy providers," he said.
