Spirit of Tasmania ferry scandal threatens to sink government
In a startling mirror-image of Scotland's own ferry fiasco, costs to build the both the dual-fuel ferries and their berths have ballooned since the plan was laid down – and now the ports are not expected to be ready till next year at the earliest.
Since December, one of the ferries – Spirit of Tasmania IV – has languished at the Port of Leith in Edinburgh, at a cost of £22,000 per week to the Tasmanian taxpayer.
And this week the bill came due for the state's Liberal premier Jeremy Rockliff, who faced the collapse of his 'rainbow coalition' and lost a no confidence vote, with the ferries one of several reasons he had lost the faith of parliament.
In October, the scandal cost the frontbench position of the government's Treasurer and Deputy Premier Tasmanian Liberal Michael Ferguson.
Tasmania's ferry fiasco is not too dissimilar to Scotland's woes (Image: Jane Barlow) Now the state stands poised to head to the polls if a new deal cannot be worked out and a replacement for Mr Rockcliff be found.
Meanwhile, it has emerged that the Spirit of Tasmania in Scotland isn't going anywhere soon.
While Spirit IV was docked at Leith, its state-owned operator, TT-Line, searched for an someone to lease it until the port was completed in Tasmania. But negotiations collapsed in early March.
The state government told TT-Line to bring Spirit IV back to Tasmania and it was due to depart on 26 May, before being delayed by poor weather.
During that time, engineers found technical problems with the ship's liquefied natural gas systems.
'The government is awaiting further details in relation to a new expected departure date, but it is understood that this work will take some time,' the state's transport minister, Eric Abetz, said last week.
READ MORE: Huge fiasco ship mothballed in Scotland at a cost of £23k a week 'Farcical': Newly-built ferry to be mothballed in Edinburgh 'for two years'
When questioned about the delays in parliament, Abetz accused the Labor opposition of 'talking [the ferry] down all the time'.
'I say thank goodness for the weather, because she might have been well into the deep oceans and then suffer a mechanical issue, the full extent of which I am not appraised of,' Abetz said.
'We want to make sure the ship is safe and, even more importantly, the crew is safe. We will do whatever is necessary to ensure the protection of the crew.'
However, the ship has become something of a tourist attraction in Edinburgh, despite its status as a national embarrassment Down Under.
Ian Stirling, who founded a whisky distillery right next to where the Spirit of Tasmania is docked, told the Guardian his long-term nautical neighbour has delivered patrons, with a side of political drama.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
Rising food prices mean hefty obesity costs
Stung by the price of olive oil? Burnt by the cost of your coffee? You are not alone. The cost of food and drink is increasing fast, faster than prices in general. This is a bigger problem, politically, socially and economically, than any politician has yet noticed. The government in particular should be paying attention to food bills, and taking action. The Office for National Statistics this week put the annual inflation rate at 3.8 per cent, but also showed that food and drink prices are rising at 4.9 per cent. The average household spends a bit more than £5,000 annually on food, so those numbers add up to about £250 a year. ONS tracking of public opinion shows that the cost of living remains the number one concern for the public, with more than 90 per cent of people citing rising food bills as a reason — well above the share who cite energy bills as an inflationary worry. Being reminded that things are getting more expensive — meaning that you feel poorer — every time you fill your shopping basket is not a happy experience. Food prices rising faster than the cost of other purchases has been a dismally common feature of the UK economy since 2022, for several reasons: war in Ukraine; too much rain; not enough rain; higher energy costs; not enough migrant workers to pick fruit and veg; higher taxes. The public's daily dismay at food prices, I'd bet, is a bigger reason for Britain feeling generally dissatisfied than noisier issues like immigration or crime. Yet it gets curiously little political attention, given how much it matters to voters' lives and outlook. Labour's spin team should give more thought to finding someone else to blame for rising food bills, not least because the problem is going to get worse. The Bank of England reckons food inflation will hit 5.5 per cent by the end of the year, while the British Retail Consortium says 6 per cent. Get ready for a winter of headlines about the painful cost of your Christmas lunch. Looking further ahead, the problem is even worse, reaching beyond simple political unease into questions of fairness, public health and economic performance. Rising food prices affect some groups more than others, with the poorest facing both the greatest financial pain but also the worst long-term consequences. The worst of these is rising obesity levels. Perhaps that will surprise some readers. How do rising food prices make poor people fat? Surely if it's getting harder to buy food, people will eat less of it and get thinner? In fact, a wealth of evidence shows that when low-income households face rising food prices, they trade quality for quantity, buying more cheap foods that are high in calories but low in nutrients. Social scientists grandly call this the 'food insecurity obesity paradox' but it's arguably just the human version of a common animal instinct to put on fat when times are tough and a hard winter is coming. • From peanuts to pomegranates — the 19 foods that will keep you young Almost a third of UK adults are obese, with rates highest among the poorest. There are many links between obesity and poverty but raw economics is a significant factor. According to the Food Foundation, a campaigning charity founded by former Tory MP Laura Sandys, recent years of inflation have made it almost impossible for poorer people to eat healthily. The foundation reckons that the poorest households would need to spend almost half of their disposable income on food to afford a healthy diet high in fruit and veg with limited sugars and fats. For poor parents, a healthy grocery shop could cost 70 per cent of disposable income. Healthier foods are just more expensive per calorie than stuff that's full of sugar and fat. Government calculations show that cauliflower and broccoli might cost almost 2p per calorie; for cheap biscuits it's less than half as much. Obesity means more sickness — diabetes and heart disease, in particular — and shorter lives. It means misery for individuals and mounting costs to taxpayers. My back-of-an-envelope calculations suggest that just a one percentage point increase in the obesity rate (roughly 550,000 more people getting too fat) costs the state more than £3 billion over ten years in higher NHS and care costs. We must make good food cheaper for poorer people, but that's far easier said than done. Continuing education to overcome ignorance about nutrition helps but new ideas are needed. What about Nutrition Impact Bonds? Building on NHS 'social prescribing' models, public and private investors could pay upfront for subsidised or even free healthy food for poorer households, then be paid back from the savings the state makes from lower obesity spending. The causes of higher food prices are big, complicated and long-term. Likewise the public health challenge of obesity and poor diets. It follows that fixing them will be a long-term project, the sort of job that no government, especially an unpopular one worrying about its next election, rushes to tackle. • Eating home-cooked food 'helps you lose twice as much weight' But Labour should lift food prices and obesity up its agenda, because they interact with the government's emerging economic focus. Ministers are planning an autumn drive on productivity, correctly identifying Britain's basic economic effectiveness — how much stuff do we generate from each hour of work we do? — as a national priority. Helping business to finance and deploy technology and training to make workers more effective is a key part of productivity, but so too is ensuring the availability of a healthy workforce. And our fatter, sicker population is emerging as a drag on productivity, as more and more people go off sick or leave work outright. Last month a paper by Nesta, a think tank, and Frontier Economics put the cost of productivity lost to obesity at £31 billion a year. The study shows that obesity doesn't just drag on the economy by taking people out of the workforce through sickness. Boldly, it says that obese people just aren't as effective at work as healthy colleagues and cost the economy almost £10 billion a year, it estimates. The government rightly wants to increase productivity but the fact is that Britain is simply too fat and ill to be fully productive. And in large part that's because of bad and increasingly expensive diets. Sadly, the cost of food is even higher than you think. James Kirkup is a senior fellow of the Social Market Foundation
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Farming Today 20/08/2025 Funding for rural councils, spinach, bioethanol
County councils say major changes to the way the government calculates funding for local authorities will penalise rural areas. The government says the new system will mean fairer funding and more stability which will help deliver better public services. However the County Councils Network says rural council tax payers will 'shoulder the burden' of redistributing hundreds of millions of pounds to urban areas and warn some councils will face deep cuts to their services. Growing spinach in the soaring heat - a seasonal look at producing salad. The Vivergo bioethanol plant on the Humber near Hull has now stopped production and started laying off staff after the government said it wouldn't provide support for the plant. The future of the business had been in doubt since tariffs were removed on bioethanol imports from the US in the recent trade agreement with Donald Trump. The company, owned by Associated British Foods, bought in locally grown wheat, around a million tonnes a year, and distilled it into bioethanol which is added to petrol to reduce emissions, and also produced large quantities of cattle feed. It's one of two plants in the UK. We speak to a renewable energy expert Dr Michael Short from the University of Surrey. Presenter = Caz Graham Producer = Rebecca Rooney
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
FTSE ends above 9,300 for first time amid brighter PMI print
The FTSE 100 closed above 9,300 for the first time on Thursday, outperforming European peers and taking heart from better-than-hoped borrowing and economic activity data. The FTSE 100 index closed up 21.06 points, 0.2%, at 9,309.20. The FTSE 250 ended down 68.04 points, 0.3%, at 21,817.84 and the AIM All-Share finished 0.88 of a point lower, 0.1%, at 758.86. Trading received a lift but some better economic data after a run of downbeat news. UK public sector borrowing was better than expected last month, although the data is unlikely to end talk of tax rises in the autumn budget. Net borrowing, the difference between total public sector spending and income and excluding public sector banks, was £1.05 billion in July, well below the £22.56 billion in June, and the £3.37 billion 12 months earlier. It was also better than the £2.0 billion market consensus. The Office for National Statistics, which reported the data, said it was the smallest July borrowing figure for three years. June's net borrowing figure was upwardly revised from £20.68 billion. However, Pantheon Macroeconomics analyst Elliott Jordan-Doak said: 'The chancellor will still have to raise taxes in October.' 'The big picture remains that the public finances are in chronically weak condition. The chancellor faces surging gilt yields and a likely productivity downgrade from the (Office for Budget Responsibility) in the October forecast round. 'The public finances are unsustainable in the long-run and delaying action now increases the risks of needing to make sharper adjustments in the future, which would be more disruptive for economic activity.' One area believed to be under consideration by Rachel Reeves is the taxation of UK residential property. Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Liberum, said this should 'surprise no-one as the UK public sector finances are in a perilous state, UK residential property is worth £9 trillion, and UK property taxation is currently a messy blend of both regressive and inefficient levies.' He sees the net economic impact of tax reform as 'potentially positive, but with considerable transition and political risk'. Mr French expects there will be 'many, many more such stories before the Red Box gets brandished'. In better news for the chancellor, economic activity in the UK was better than expected in August although an ongoing fall in employment continued to be a weak spot. The S&P Global flash UK purchasing managers' composite output index rose to 53.0 points in August, a 12-month high, from 51.5 in July, easily beating the FXStreet-cited consensus of 51.6 in August. Chris Williamson, chief business economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence said: 'The flash UK PMI survey for August indicated that the pace of economic growth has continued to accelerate over the summer after a sluggish spring, the rate of expansion now at a one-year high. The services sector has led the expansion, but manufacturing also showed further signs of stabilising.' Matthew Ryan, head of market strategy at Ebury, said Britain's economy is 'riding a wave of unexpected vigour', although he is 'very sceptical that this solid performance will last'. 'A hotter than usual summer is likely to be buoying the services sector, notably helping to prop up retail, tourism and hospitality activity. This will likely prove to be no more than a temporary sugar rush, however, rather than a sustained boom. We expect growth to moderate during the rest of the year,' he added. The pound eased to 1.3426 dollars late on Thursday afternoon in London, compared to 1.3468 dollars at the equities close on Wednesday. The euro fell to 1.1619 dollars, lower against 1.1661 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar was trading higher at 148.21 yen compared to 147.15 yen. In Europe, the CAC 40 in Paris ended down 0.4%, while the DAX 40 in Frankfurt closed up 0.1%. In New York, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.2%, as was the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite. The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was at 4.34%, widened from 4.29%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was 4.94%, stretched from 4.90%. Across the pond, figures showed US business activity grew at the fastest rate recorded in the year so far during August. According to a flash estimate from S&P Global, the composite purchasing managers' output index rose to an eight-month high of 55.4 points for August from 55.1 in July. In addition, investors are eyeing a speech on Friday by Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell at the Jackson Hole economic policy symposium. Goldman Sachs does not expect Mr Powell to 'decisively' signal a September rate cut, but believes the speech 'should make it clear to markets that he is likely to support one'. In London, shares in WH Smith plunged 42% after an accounting error forced the travel retail firm to slash profit guidance for its North American business. The Swindon-based company now expects headline trading profit from the North America division to be around £25 million for the financial year ending August 31, down from previous expectations of around £55 million. In financial 2024, headline trading profit in the North American business was £54 million. AJ Bell investment analyst Dan Coatsworth said the update is 'nothing short of a disaster'. 'The North American business is crucial to the company's growth ambitions and the loose thread of an accounting error in this part of the group will create concern about a potential greater unravelling to come,' he said. Hays fell 1.7% as it reported a plunge in annual profit, confirming the bad news the company gave to the market in a profit warning back in June. The London-based recruiter had said it expected annual profit to be below market consensus, as it grappled with challenging market conditions, amid 'low levels of client and candidate confidence'. Hays said operating profit before exceptional items was £45.6 million in the financial year to June, down 57% from £105.1 million. This was in line with the guidance the company provided back in June. Elsewhere, Renishaw jumped 6.9% as it forecast annual adjusted pre-tax profit will be towards the top of expectations. The Gloucestershire-based provider of manufacturing technologies, analytical instruments, and medical devices expects full-year adjusted pre-tax profit to be towards the top of the £109 million to £127 million market range and revenue around the middle of the £700 million to £720 million range. In addition, Renishaw said Allen Roberts will step down as group finance director after more than 46 years at the firm. A barrel of Brent traded at 67.13 dollars late on Thursday afternoon, up from 66.70 dollars on Wednesday. Gold edged up to 3,343.46 dollars an ounce against 3,341.46 dollars. The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Endeavour Mining, up 58.0 pence at 2,550.0p, BAE Systems, up 32.5p at 1,759.5p, Babcock International, up 17.0p at 996.5p, NatWest, up 9.0p at 562.6p and Prudential, up 15.0p at 1,007.0p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were Legal & General, down 6.2 pence at 254.4p, Schroders, down 7.4p at 390.6p, Persimmon, down 20.5p at 1,103.0p, Croda International, down 46.0p at 2,512.0p and Barratt Redrow, down 6.7p at 371.1p. The global economic calendar on Friday has retail sales data in Canada, UK consumer confidence figures and a German GDP report. There are no significant events scheduled in Friday's local corporate calendar.
