As the Senate loses luster, more members run for governor. Is there a takeaway for Kamala Harris?
The path to power typically goes the opposite direction, with governors trading the statehouse for the (perceived) influence and prestige of being one of just 100 members of a club that fancies itself — not so humbly or precisely — as 'the world's greatest deliberative body.'
Wilson bucked that sentiment.
'It is a much more difficult role,' he said of being governor, and one he came to much prefer over his position on Capitol Hill.
It turns out that Wilson, a Republican who narrowly prevailed in a fierce 1990 contest against Democrat Dianne Feinstein, was onto something.
Since, then five other lawmakers have left the Senate to become their state's governor. Several more tried and failed.
Although it's still more common for a governor to run for Senate than vice versa, in 2026 as many as three sitting U.S. senators may run for governor, the most in at least 90 years, according to the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.
Clearly, the U.S. Senate has lost some of its luster.
There have always been those who found the place, with its pretentious airs, dilatory pacing and stultifying rules of order, a frustrating environment to work in, much less thrive.
The late Wendell Ford, who served a term as Kentucky governor before spending the next 24 years in the Senate, used to say 'the unhappiest members of the Senate were the former governors,' recalled Charlie Cook, founder of the eponymous political newsletter. 'They were used to getting things done.'
And that, as Cook noted, 'was when the Senate did a lot more than it does now.'
What's more, the Senate used to be a more dignified, less partisan place — especially when compared with the fractious House. An apocryphal story has George Washington breakfasting with Thomas Jefferson and referring to the Senate as a saucer intended to cool the passions of the intemperate lower chamber. (It helps to picture a teacup filled with scalding brew.)
These days, both chambers are bubbling cauldrons of animosity and partisan backbiting.
Worse, there's not a whole lot of advising going in the Senate, which reflexively consents to pretty much whatever it is that President Trump asks of the prostrated Republican majority.
'The Senate has become an employment agency where we just have vote after vote after vote to confirm nominees that are are going to pass, generally, 53 to 47, with very rare exceptions,' said Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet, a Democrat who's running to be governor of his home state.
The other announced gubernatorial hopeful is Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville, a Republican who's made no secret of his distaste for Washington after a single term. Tennessee's Marsha Blackburn, a fellow Republican fresh off reelection, is also expected to run for governor in her state.
Bennet arrived in the Senate 16 years ago and since then, he said, it's been 'really a one-way ratchet down.'
'You think about the fact that we're really down to a couple [of] bills a year,' he said this week between votes on Capitol Hill. 'One is a continuing resolution that isn't even a real appropriations bill ... it's just cementing the budget decisions that were made last year, and then the defense bill.'
Despite all that, Bennet said he's not running for governor 'because I'm worn out. It's not because I'm frustrated or bored or irritated or aggravated' with life in the Senate, 'though the Senate can be a very aggravating place to work.' Rather, working beneath the golden dome in Denver would offer a better opportunity 'to push back and to fight Trumpism,' he said, by offering voters a practical and affirmative Democratic alternative.
Try that as one of 47 straitjacketed senators.
When Wilson took office in January 1991, he succeeded the term-limited George Deukmejian, a fellow Republican.
He immediately faced a massive budget deficit, which he closed through a package of tax hikes and spending cuts facilitated by his negotiating partner, Democratic Assembly Speaker Willie Brown. Their agreement managed to antagonize Democrats and Republicans alike.
Wilson didn't much care.
After serving in the Legislature, as San Diego mayor and a U.S. senator, he often said being California governor was the best job he ever had. There are legislators to wrangle, agencies to oversee, natural disasters to address, interest groups to fend off — all while trying to stay in the good graces of millions of often cranky, impatient voters.
'Not everybody enjoys it,' Wilson said when asked about the prospect of Kamala Harris serving as governor, 'and not everyone is good at it.'
Harris, who served four years in the Senate before ascending to the vice presidency, has given herself the summer to decide whether to run for governor, try again for the White House or retire from politics altogether.
California's next governor will probably have to take some 'very painful steps,' Wilson said, given the dicey economic outlook and the likelihood of federal budget cuts and other hostile moves by the Trump administration. That will make a lot of people unhappy, including many of Harris' fellow Democrats.
How would she feel about returning to Sacramento's small stage, wrestling with intractable issues such as the budget and homelessness, and dealing with the inevitable political heat? We won't know until and unless Harris runs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
16 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
House committee launches investigation into California's high-speed rail project
A bipartisan congressional committee is investigating whether California's High-Speed Rail Authority knowingly misrepresented ridership projections and financial outlooks, as alleged by the Trump administration, to secure federal funding. In a letter sent to Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy on Tuesday, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chair James Comer (R-KY) requested a staff briefing and all communications and records about federal funding for the high-speed rail project and any analysis over the train's viability. 'The Authority's apparent repeated use of misleading ridership projections, despite longstanding warnings from experts, raises serious questions about whether funds were allocated under false pretenses,' Comer wrote. Comer's letter copied Congressman Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee who has also voiced skepticism about the project. Garcia, whose districts represent communities in Southern California, was not immediately available for comment. An authority spokesperson called the House committee's investigation 'another baseless attempt to manufacture controversy around America's largest and most complex infrastructure project,' and added that the project's chief executive Ian Choudri previously addressed the claims and called them 'cherrypicked and out-of-date, and therefore misleading.' Last month, the Trump administration pulled $4 billion in federal funding from the project meant for construction in the Central Valley. After a months-long review, prompted by calls from Republican lawmakers, the administration found 'no viable path' forward for the fast train, which is billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule. The administration also questioned whether the authority's projected ridership counts were intentionally misrepresented. California leaders called the move 'illegal' and sued the Trump administration for declaratory and injunctive relief. Gov. Gavin Newsom said it was 'a political stunt' and a 'heartless attack on the Central Valley.' The bullet train was proposed decades ago as a way to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco in less than three hours by 2020. While the entire line has cleared environmental reviews, no stretch of the route has been completed. Construction has been limited to the Central Valley, where authority leaders have said a segment between Merced and Bakersfield will open by 2033. The project is also about $100 billion over its original budget of $33 billion. Even before the White House pulled federal funding, authority leaders and advisers repeatedly raised concerns over the project's long-term financial sustainability. Roughly $13 billion has been spent so far — the bulk of which was supplied by the state, which has proposed $1 billion per year towards the project. But Choudri, who started at the authority last year, has said the project needs to find new sources of funding and has turned focus toward establishing public-private partnerships to supplement costs.
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump just offered NY kids cash for schools — will Gov. Hochul turn it down to please unions?
New federal law offers scholarship grants for kids to use at private schools — if their state's governor opts to allow it. We can't recall Gov. Kathy Hochul or any of her predecessors ever turning down free, no-strings-attached cash — but giving the thumbs-up here would risk the ire of New York's powerful teachers unions. Will she dare? Advertisement The program has two steps. First, it lets taxpayers give up to $1,700 to a scholarship-granting nonprofit, trimming their federal tax liability dollar-for-dollar. Advertisement Then, it lets the charities offer grants to help kids pay for private-school tuition, books or other educational expenses — as long as the state's governor 'or other entities/individuals designated by state law' opts in. The aid can surely help New York kids to better futures — by letting them escape low-performing public schools. A whopping 40% of New York City kids in grades 3-8 failed this spring's state tests in math and English (though city schools spend $37,000 a year per student, while the average private-school tuition in the state is about $22,000). That's why 74% of New York school parents back vouchers. And why tens of thousands of kids are on waitlists for seats at public charter schools, which are privately run. Advertisement Alas, teachers unions, which control public schools, fear losing students to schools they don't control: It means fewer union members, reduced dues collection — and ever-shrinking teacher-union power. So the unions hate the scholarship program, even pushing transparent lies that is somehow steals money away from public schools. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters In truth, not one dime would come from New York public schools or any state tax revenue at all. Advertisement If Hochul turns down the cash, as schools expert Corey DeAngelis notes, she'll be shooting New York in the foot: letting New York taxpayers' donations go to help other states' kids, while local children get bupkis. On every other front, Hochul is devoted to maximizing federal grants to New York; along with practically every elected Democrat in the state, she's been furiously denouncing Medicaid 'cuts' that mainly amount to imposing work requirements on able-bodied beneficiaries. If the gov blocks Empire State children from getting these scholarships, it'll be undeniable proof that unions matter to her more than New York's kids.
CBS News
18 minutes ago
- CBS News
Florida Rep. Maxwell Frost urges shutdown of "Alligator Alcatraz," calls it "internment camp"
Speaking before demonstrators during his second visit to the immigration detention facility dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz" since July 12, Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost delivered sharp criticism of the site, describing it as "inhumane" and calling for it to be shut down. "We have cages that are inhumane where people are being held, 32 men to a cage and cramped four to six of them in tents," said the Orlando Democrat. Frost spoke moments before taking another tour of Alligator Alcatraz, recalling what he witnessed during his first visit a month ago. "It's an internment camp," Frost said. "For immigrants, for immigrants who also look like me, who are Black and brown folks. People who are Latino and Haitian and subject to inhumane conditions under the guise of law enforcement. It is a shameful thing." "It's a place where 1,000 people live in tents under the hot Florida summer and detainees are exposed to heat, wildlife and mosquitos that carry disease," he added. State officials have said the facility, located 45 miles west of Miami, meets all required standards and is in good working order. Frost strongly disagreed. "This facility is not about security. It is about entertainment. It is about optics. It is about distraction," he said. Frost said he also came seeking information about detainees from his district. "I came with a thick burner of names, the names of people who are constituents of mine," Frost said. Two weeks ago, a federal judge placed a pause on the decision to expand "Alligator Alcatraz" and is expected to issue a ruling by tomorrow on the facility's future. "We'll hear anytime today or tomorrow from the judge, hopefully reaching a decision that shuts this place down," Frost said. "This place needs to be shut down. People are not being treated fairly and people are not getting due process yet." Frost added that he still had unfinished business from his first visit. He said he intends to check on different units, including the one used for medical purposes, after detainees complained of delays in receiving prescriptions and a lack of adequate food.
