Audience with late Queen more nerve-racking than FMQs, recalls Sturgeon
However she said that following her death in 2022, she believed the 'absurdities' surrounding the monarchy could 'start to come to the fore much more without the Queen to keep it going'.
The former Scottish first minister stressed she is 'not a monarchist', describing herself as being a 'republican by instinct'.
But speaking on BBC Breakfast, she said the late Queen was a 'remarkable woman'.
The former SNP leader said: 'I am a republican, but I have such incredible respect for the Queen, and incredible woman.
'The Queen was an amazing woman. There are few people in life I had a greater respect for.
'When I was a wee girl growing up in Ayrshire, the idea that one day I would sit in a room alone with the Queen would have been beyond my comprehension.
'To sit in a room with her, it was like a window on to 20th century history, she would talk about chatting to Winston Churchill and Nelson Mandela and all the big figures from her reign.
'Going for an audience with the Queen was more nerve-racking than doing First Minister's Questions, she was so well informed about everything, from the local to the national, to the global.'
She said there was a 'mystique' about Queen Elizabeth II, saying: 'If you were in a room and the Queen walked in, even if you weren't looking at her you could feel her presence.'
While she stressed her 'respect' for the rest of the royal family, she said given this 'mystique' is no longer present, 'perhaps the absurdities of the monarchy will start to come to the fore much more'.
When Queen Elizabeth II died at the Balmoral estate in Aberdeenshire, Ms Sturgeon, who was first minister at the time, described it as a 'profoundly sad moment', adding that her life had been one of 'extraordinary dedication and service'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
24 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Trump's Washington takeover begins as National Guard troops arrive
It comes after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce crime in what the president called — without substantiation — a lawless city. The influx came the morning after Mr Trump announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the department. He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The president holds the legal right to make such moves for at least a month. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Mr Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances — right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. The tone was a shift from the day before, when Ms Bowser said Mr Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply did not match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in US states, and Ms Bowser said her administration's ability to push back was limited. Meanwhile, attorney general Pam Bondi called the Tuesday morning meeting productive in a social media post and said the justice department would 'work closely with the DC city government' to 'make Washington, DC, safe again.' While Mr Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back', Ms Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. Ms Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Mr Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Mr Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Ms Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasising common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Mr Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives has evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Mr Trump has followed through on months of what many DC officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Ms Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her long-time critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' Clinique Chapman, chief executive of the DC Justice Lab, said. A frequent critic of Ms Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Ms Chapman said Mr Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer DC. It's just about power'. Ms Bowser contends that all the power resides with Mr Trump and that her administration can do little other than comply and make the best of it. For Mr Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. 'Let me be crystal clear,' attorney general Pam Bondi said during Mr Trump's announcement news conference. 'Crime in DC is ending and ending today.' Mr Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office: He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out.
South Wales Guardian
24 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trump's Washington takeover begins as National Guard troops arrive
It comes after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce crime in what the president called — without substantiation — a lawless city. The influx came the morning after Mr Trump announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the department. He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The president holds the legal right to make such moves for at least a month. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Mr Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances — right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. The tone was a shift from the day before, when Ms Bowser said Mr Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply did not match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in US states, and Ms Bowser said her administration's ability to push back was limited. Meanwhile, attorney general Pam Bondi called the Tuesday morning meeting productive in a social media post and said the justice department would 'work closely with the DC city government' to 'make Washington, DC, safe again.' While Mr Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back', Ms Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. Ms Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Mr Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Mr Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Ms Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasising common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Mr Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives has evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Mr Trump has followed through on months of what many DC officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Ms Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her long-time critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' Clinique Chapman, chief executive of the DC Justice Lab, said. A frequent critic of Ms Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Ms Chapman said Mr Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer DC. It's just about power'. Ms Bowser contends that all the power resides with Mr Trump and that her administration can do little other than comply and make the best of it. For Mr Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. 'Let me be crystal clear,' attorney general Pam Bondi said during Mr Trump's announcement news conference. 'Crime in DC is ending and ending today.' Mr Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office: He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out.
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Teachers have the right to ask pupils to call them Mx, instead of Mr, Miss, Mrs, says Bridget Phillipson
Teachers have the right to ask pupils to call them 'Mx' instead of Mr, Mrs or Miss, Bridget Phillipson has said. The Education Secretary said teachers can 'request' that children call them by the gender-neutral honorific instead of traditional titles. Women's rights groups criticised Ms Phillipson for bringing a 'contested ideology' into classrooms and said children should only be taught the fact of biological sex. On whether teachers be referred to as Mx - a gender-neutral honorific used by people who do not identify as either male or female - Ms Phillipson said they 'can make that request'. She told LBC: 'But of course, what we'll be looking at is making sure that people are able to exercise their views on this topic too. 'This has been the subject of various legal cases as well about people's rights in terms of how they approach questions of gender identity. 'We'll consider all areas of the practical guidance that schools need and responding to the challenges that they tell us they've faced.' Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at human rights charity Sex Matters, said that schools should not being telling children that teachers can be neither male nor female and pupils 'should be taught the facts about biological sex'. She added: 'School heads and teachers urgently need joined up and sensible guidance that safeguards every child, with the wellbeing of all pupils at its heart, whether they identify as trans or not. 'What is the Education Secretary's priority? A teacher's personal sense of identity, or the education and wellbeing of children?' Ms Phillipson was also unable to say when the long-awaited transgender guidance for schools would be shared with teachers - more than a year after the election. Draft guidance published by the Tories in late 2023 urged caution when children ask to 'socially transition' to the opposite gender and said that parents should not be kept in the dark. It also forbids schools from teaching 'gender identity' views as fact. But when the Tories lost the election last year, Labour placed it under 'review', leaving schools in limbo ever since despite renewed pressure after the Supreme Court said trans women aren't legally female. On when the guidance might be released, Ms Phillipson told LBC yesterday [TUES]: 'So the last government were consulting on this at the point of the election. 'That consultation concluded, and we had to look at all of those responses. But also what happened subsequently was Dr Hilary Cass published her final review around gender questioning children. 'So I think it is important, given the sensitivity of this area, that we make sure that the guidance we publish is aligned fully with Dr Cass's recommendations. And I do think it's important we take the time to get this right... She added: 'This is an important area. This is about children's wellbeing. It's about making sure they've got the support they need and schools have got the clarity of the guidance too.' A Department for Education spokesman said: 'While teachers can make such requests, the Education Secretary was clear it's not something that they can insist on. 'Teachers and pupils should be treated with respect.'
