
EXCLUSIVE — David Gower: World Test Championship is inevitably flawed
Speaking to Sportstar on the final day of the third Test at Lord's, Gower weighed in on the 'inevitably flawed' World Test Championship, praised Shubman Gill's early captaincy, and argued that for England, the challenge isn't to abandon Bazball — but to know when to rein it in.
With aggressive batting and quick results becoming the norm in Tests, how do you view this shift — and do you worry about its impact on batting craft?
The idea of batting positively isn't new. Back in 1985, during the Ashes here, we scored at over four an over in five of six Tests — which, for that time, was rapid. The Australians of the '90s did it too: they'd score quickly to give (Glenn) McGrath and (Shane) Warne time to bowl teams out — and still fit in a round of golf. So, the concept has always existed. What England have done under (Ben) Stokes and (Brendon) McCullum is take it to new heights. The (Jonny) Bairstows, the (Zak) Crawleys, and others who love their shots have recorded scoring rates that are the highest in the last three to four years. And on its day, it's thrilling to watch.
There's huge entertainment value in it, but also a slightly desperate need to prove that Test cricket can still be entertaining. We're talking on the fifth morning of this Test, and the buzz is absolutely electric. It was the same last night. This entire series has had moments that have reminded everyone what five-day cricket can offer.
For those lucky enough to be at the ground, it's a real event — something you feel. That isn't something you get with formats where you pop in for a couple of hours and leave with a result. I still believe Test cricket is the highest form of the game by some distance.
When Virat Kohli says it is, that's great PR — because 1.4 billion people hear him. But we need more people speaking up for it. What we — my generation especially — always wanted from England was a blend of flair and grit. In the Lord's Ashes Test two years ago, they collapsed in an hour of madness; only Stokes stuck it out. Since then, a few others have started to ride out the tough periods, then push on again with clear skies and fair winds. That's progress. Over the past four years, there were moments when a different approach for an hour or two might have changed the result. And now, in this series, you can see they've begun to learn from those.
The pace of the Lord's Test has been different. Batting hasn't been easy — there've been no soft 200s. That's fabulous. And you can feel it everywhere — the stands, the press box, the corporate boxes — this sense that you're watching something special.
(Smiles) I wasn't planning to come in today [final day]. But after last night, it felt like it would be a shame to miss it.
Is Bazball the way forward — or just a necessary tactic to keep Test cricket relevant in the T20 era?
If teams are capable of playing that way, then yes — it's important for Test cricket to prove it's still worth watching. In an era where white-ball formats dominate and data tells us fans love the instant thrill — balls flying to the boundary, sixes every few minutes — anything that shows how vibrant the long format can be is valid.
But not every team has the talent or depth to play that way. If you're lower down the pecking order, you've got to find the best way you can to win a Test — even if that means playing more conservatively.
Look at Australia. Sure, they have someone like Travis Head, who fits naturally into a more aggressive mould. But their overall approach has often been pragmatic. That alleged culture clash in the Ashes two years ago — England's ultra-positive style versus Australia's discipline — ended with the pragmatic side winning.
Ultimately, in iconic series like the Ashes or the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, or even the World Test Championship final, it's not about style points — it's about doing what it takes to win.
And part of keeping Test cricket relevant is showing people that drama can unfold in many ways. In that WTC final, the ball dominated for two days — low scores, not your usual white-ball fare — and then Aiden Markram played a stunning innings to snatch the game. That ebb and flow, those wild momentum shifts, are unique to this format.
I know it's a harder sell to younger fans — and nearly impossible to explain to Americans — but for those who still value Test cricket as the game's highest form, their voice still matters, even if it's a smaller group now.
Ashes reverie: David Gower, England's debonair captain, stands tall on the Oval balcony, cradling the Ashes urn — the gleaming symbol of a summer triumph. The 3-1 series win in 1985 is his crowning moment. Beside him, Allan Border embodies the stoic dignity of defeat. | Photo Credit: THE HINDU ARCHIVES
With T20 leagues on the rise and bilateral interest fading, what reforms can help safeguard Test cricket without ignoring the game's commercial realities?
Well, I never quite know the answer to that sort of question. But what's telling is how the conversation has shifted. Two years ago, influential voices were busy carving out windows for franchise cricket. Now, those same people are saying we need a dedicated window for Test cricket.
And it's complicated, isn't it? There are so many factors — money, resources, infrastructure. Lord's is an exception: 28,000 people will turn up on a Monday for Day Five of a Test if the match is set up well. India still gets good crowds, though in a 100,000-seater, 30,000 can look sparse. Australia gets healthy numbers when we tour. But in the West Indies, the stands are nearly empty. Test matches there often lose money.
In New Zealand, they've at least adapted by using smaller grounds to make things feel fuller. But for many boards, the arithmetic doesn't work. You can understand why a board like Cricket West Indies, already under pressure, might prefer eight days of white-ball cricket over 15 days of loss-making Tests. That's a hard call to argue with.
So, unless the ICC can think of — I know it wouldn't go down well in India — redistributing the funds that can help out the poorer nations, we will see Test cricket declining apart from the top three, four, five nations. (This can't be) just an odd boost every other year or in three or four years, but year by year. So I'm not the Solomon who can tell you exactly how to solve this. But one of the things I do think very strongly is that if you want Test-playing nations to still be in business, then they need help.
With Bazball's rise, England's pitches seem flatter and more batting-friendly than before. Is old-school English cricket losing its edge?
(Smiles) I suppose these flat pitches suit Stokes' desire to chase — well, sometimes.
Even this England team would agree that a better contest between bat and ball makes for a better spectacle. That's been a mantra for so many of us over the years. Watching teams pile up 600 on certain flat pitches — it gets quite dull, doesn't it?
Then there's the commercial side to consider. Take this Lord's Test: if it finishes in three days, that's potentially two days of lost revenue. But how do you weigh that against the quality of entertainment the crowd has already had?
The dream is a fair contest, something in it for both batters and bowlers.
A game that lasts at least four days, stays tight, and builds toward a tense finish, like this one. That's when Test cricket is at its best.
When Tests wrap up in just two or three days — especially in the subcontinent — does it hurt the format's appeal?
Home advantage can be abused, of course. And when the temptation is to win at almost any cost, teams sometimes go too far. That series in India last year, for example — dominated by turning tracks — you could tell it wouldn't last five days. And you could probably guess the result going in. But if you're trying to reach the World Test Championship final, you want points and wins — that's the reality.
England's tour of Pakistan last October showed both extremes. One Test was on a flat pitch — Harry Brook's triple hundred was brilliant in its own way. Then the next games, the ball spun, and we watched a side that was dominant unravel.
So yes, pitch preparation can shape a series — that's undeniable. Whether that's right or wrong is open to debate. Some dream of a unified pitch formula: 'no, no, no, no, no, no. It's only seam, flat and spin' — as if there's a dial you can turn remotely. That would be ideal. But let's be realistic — you take what you get and try to win on it.
David Gower: 'As a captain, you can just try and find a way of motivating or inspiring every man to be at his best somehow. That's all you can do.' | Photo Credit: PTI
The WTC has added context to Tests — but what changes would make the format more relevant and engaging?
The World Test Championship is inevitably flawed — whether it's the percentage system or the points lost for slow over-rates. It's a brave attempt to address the issue, but clearly not enough.
The real problem is that it's not an even contest. Not all top sides play each other, and everything depends on where, how, and who you play. No amount of maths can fix that imbalance.
That said, it does add context — especially for the teams in the top four pushing for a final spot. But if you're sitting at number nine, frankly, no one gives a flying fox what happens.
India is in a rebuilding phase under a new captain. If you had a word with Shubman Gill, what advice would you give him on bringing the best out of his players?
Building a team depends on so many things. At the start of the series, people focused on the absence of Rohit (Sharma) and Virat (Kohli). But Shubman stepped up and played beautifully in two Tests.
You don't have to be 34 to lead — you can be 24, if you've got talent, a good head, and a solid technique. That kind of player can fill the gap. If you're one or two players short of a great side, you work around it and trust others to develop.
I trust my old colleague Michael Atherton when he says India won nine of the 10 days. That's not bad for a team supposedly in transition. In Birmingham, they bowled better than us. At Lord's, England finally found something in the ball we hadn't really seen before.
Team-building often comes down to individual moments. Look at Stokes at Lord's — this is the Stokes we've missed: bowling 90 miles an hour, driving the attack forward. You want all your key players at peak performance — that's what shifts a match.
I always say, if six of your XI are playing to their potential, you're in a good position. If six are having a shocker, you're likely coming second. If all 11 hit their peak — you're unbeatable. But that rarely happens. As a captain, you can just try and find a way of motivating or inspiring every man to be at his best somehow. That's all you can do.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Steely determination of Indian batting lineup runs England ragged at Old Trafford, keeps Test series alive
This England side 'don't do draws' – indeed this is the first of the Bazball era that hasn't involved two solid days of rain – but they were forced to at Old Trafford, slowly ground into stalemate by the relentless determination of India's rearguard. read more The Indian and English teams shook hands for a draw soon as Washington Sundar brought up his maiden international hundred on the final day of the fourth Test at Old Trafford, Manchester. Reuters The great escape is complete, the series still live. From a first innings deficit of 311 India have done what was once unthinkable, that right now feels a lot more like a win. This England side 'don't do draws' – indeed this is the first of the Bazball era that hasn't involved two solid days of rain – but they were forced to at Old Trafford, slowly ground into stalemate by the relentless determination of India's rearguard. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At lunch on Day Four India were so far behind the game that to say they were dead and buried almost felt like understatement. They had conceded 669 – the most runs any side has scored in an innings at Old Trafford – and then for good measure lost two wickets inside the first over of their reply. That though was counting against the steely determination of this India batting lineup that, even shorn of Rishabh Pant, defied the odds to pull off a draw that by the end had them running England ragged. Floodgates remain shut despite Gill and Rahul's early dismissals While the groundwork was laid on Day Four – KL Rahul and Shubman Gill's monumental 174-run partnership moved the needle for the tourists from 'certain defeat' to 'in with a chance of a draw' – India still arrived on the final day with England strong favourites to seal a series-clinching win. For all that Rahul and Gill had resisted the England onslaught there was a sense that should both men be removed then the floodgates might open for a home side boosted by the assistance of a final day pitch. Rahul and Gill did both fall before lunch, an outcome England would gladly have accepted before the start of play, the proverbial floodgates however remained firmly closed. England pacer Jofra Archer celebrates as India captain Shubman Gill departs shortly after completing his century on the final day of the fourth Test in Manchester. Reuters A lot has been made of India's team selection throughout this series, they have opted in every Test to try and have it both ways, bolstering both batting and bowling departments with the deployment of all rounders, instead of perhaps committing more wholeheartedly to the strengthening of one – selecting the wicket taking talents of Kuldeep Yadav for example. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Here though, at the fourth time of asking, that strategy came good, the batting depth provided by the selection of Washington Sundar – even more so in the absence of Pant – a crucial cog in India's dramatic escape. At lunch on the final day India were 223/4, still over 100 runs behind and with only five batsmen left – or six if you included the one-legged Pant, whose participation was far from guaranteed – a large proportion of which comprised India's somewhat vertiginous tail. Jadeja and Sundar resist everything England throw at them Sundar and Jadeja were however unbowed, able to resist everything England threw at them, as well as any final day unpleasantness from the pitch, to secure a result that had seemed beyond them for most of this Test. England may look back and rue one moment in particular – Jadeja dropped first ball by Joe Root at first slip – agonisingly unable to cling on at first, second or even third attempt, as the left hander flashed at a delivery from Jofra Archer. But that chance aside England struggled to really threaten. Even with the assistance of the pitch Liam Dawson looked largely innocuous – only 11 men have bowled as many overs as him in the fourth innings of a game and conceded more runs – and Ben Stokes aside England's pacemen struggled to create any meaningful jeopardy for the visitors. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Scored a hundred, saved the Test, farmed ♾ aura! 💁♂#RavindraJadeja didn't hesitate, till the end 👀#ENGvIND 👉 5th TEST | Starts THU, 31st July, 2:30 PM | Streaming on JioHotstar! — Star Sports (@StarSportsIndia) July 27, 2025 Ultimately England were so cowed they attempted to shake hands on a draw at the earliest moment possible, but India with Sundar and Jadeja both looking to notch a Test match hundred batted on – the hosts reduced to bowling Harry Brook as the game drew to a close. Both men would make hundreds, a first in Tests for Washington Sundar, their unbroken partnership of 203 had rescued a draw for India and rendered next week's clash at The Oval all to play for. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Workload wonder Stokes stamps his class with the ball
Now, Stokes knew this so he had no other option but to start with himself. He also knew he had to preserve Jofra Archer, Chris Woakes and Brydon Carse for the new ball so Stokes the captain took the call to keep Stokes the bowler on. It made for fascinating viewing because it was being witness to an elite athlete stretching every sinew and ligament of their body to find that one per cent extra. He was very clearly in pain — the way he kept grimacing and feeling that shoulder after every delivery told its own story — but he ignored that voice in his head. A win here would give Stokes and this regime the perfect start ahead of an away Ashes. He finally broke opened the day as he got one to shoot through and catch Rahul in front. When he was finally done, after eight overs on the trot, he had also managed to hit Gill's gloves with one that reared off a length. It ricocheted onto the helmet before damaging the hardware. Physically, he was broken. Mentally and psychologically, though, he was the one landing most of the punches. When he finally made way to rest those muscles off his, the crowd, at least the ones with an England persuasion, might have breathed a sigh of relief. Because the 34-year-old, who has a history of injuries, had pushed himself to the brink.


The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
WATCH: Jadeja, Washington refuse Ben Stokes' draw offer in final-session drama at Old Trafford
Tempers flared between India and England once more in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy as Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar refused England's offer to draw the Test match in the final session of the fourth Test in Manchester on Sunday. With the possibility of a win over, England captain Ben Stokes went up to Jadeja to end the contest. The Indian batters, though, wanted the match to carry on for longer. Jadeja was batting on 90 while Washington, on 84, was on the cusp of a maiden Test century. "If you want a hundred, you should have batted like it earlier" "You're going to get a Test hundred against Harry Brook & Ben Duckett" #ENGvIND | # — Sportstar (@sportstarweb) July 27, 2025 According to rule 12.7.6 in the ICC Test playing conditions, 'On the final day, if both captains (the batters at the wicket may act for their captain) accept that there is no prospect of either side achieving a victory, they may agree to finish the match after (a) the time for the commencement of the last hour has been reached OR (b) there are a minimum of 15 overs to be bowled, whichever is the later.' Upon the Indians' insistence to carry on the contest, Stokes was heard at the stump mic saying, 'Jaddu, do you want to get a Test 100 against Brook & Duckett?' Other England players Zak Crawley, Ben Duckett and Harry Brook also exchanged words with the batters. Brook offered full tosses to Jadeja in his next over, which Jadeja hit for a six and four through the on side to complete his century. Washington, too, reached his century off Brook, hitting him inside out over covers.