logo
Our local shuttered brewery tells the story of Labour's assault on small businesses

Our local shuttered brewery tells the story of Labour's assault on small businesses

Yahoo02-05-2025
With the sunlight streaming into his office, Jonathan Price is doing his best to look cheerful. It's almost 20 years since he purchased Exmoor Ale, a brewery that sat at the peak of the little town of Wiveliscombe in west Somerset, just a few rolling hills away from our home. On top of the filing cabinets and on shelves are the results of his endeavours, bottles of Gold, Stag, Beast and, my favourite, original Exmoor ale, a gloriously smooth session beer.
But today the steady wheel of the brewing cycle, the mashing, boiling, cooling and fermenting, is grinding to a halt.
'We've stopped brewing,' he tells me. 'The last beer is coming out of the tanks now and going into the casks.'
The brewery is closing and the shutters will go up on an operation that has been in Wiveliscombe since 1979. Exmoor Ale is one of the gems of our local town, a brewing firm that hones the waters off the wilds of the moorlands of west Somerset and north Devon.
I fell in love with this small town, known locally as Wivey, when we moved here some four years ago as, in spite of its small size, it held its own against the larger towns and cities of the South West maintaining a butcher's, a good pub, a restaurant, small hotel, a hardware store, a deli, a barber shop and a gun room.
But many of these small businesses have struggled, fighting to stay afloat in the wake of Covid, social change and the latest threat, a Labour Government.
The latter, specifically, raising the rate of employer National Insurance contributions, which came into effect some four weeks ago, from 13.8 to 15 per cent.
Price sent a message on Wednesday this week to his customers. 'Sadly, like many breweries, we have faced some challenging times recently due to the knock-on effects of Covid-19, inflation, market changes and most recently, tax increases. This has meant we need to restructure and close the brewery.'
I ask him about those tax increases. 'It's the final straw,' he replies.
And indeed it's been the final straw for many other British breweries this year who similarly have had to give employees their P45s and let their vast brewing vats run dry.
Recent figures from the Society of Independent Brewers and Associates (SIBA) show that there were 1,715 independent breweries at the start of 2025, compared with 1,815 in January 2024.
And, reports SIBA, the drop in overall brewery numbers over the last 12 months is much higher than in recent years. According to SIBA's chief executive Andy Slee, 'The issue for small independent breweries is lack of access to market and rising costs, making it incredibly difficult to remain profitable. Indie brewers can't sell into enough of their local pubs and make enough of a profit to remain viable.'
It doesn't help, of course, that their customers are disappearing as pubs continue to close at an average rate of more than 34 each month. It's indicative of the crisis in the hospitality industry. Businesses are in peril. Many – restaurants, cafes and pubs – are still paying off debts from Covid, managing an ongoing staffing crisis and grappling with surging costs.
And hospitality chiefs have been begging for help. Yet what was Labour's answer to their cries, their solution to assist the UK's third largest employer, responsible for the jobs of some three million people?
In last year's autumn Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves upped employer NICs and increased the national living wage.
As trade body Hospitality UK's boss Kate Nicholls put it, the policies, 'left hospitality owners with a sleepless night as they came to terms with the enormous cost they will have to bear from April onwards.' She added: 'The new cost of employing core members of staff is eye-watering – an increase of at least £2,500 [which] is far, far beyond anyone's worst case scenario.'
The Government also landed £154 million of extra annual costs on brewers with what's called EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility), basically additional packaging charges. This adds 5p per bottle, another little stinger for struggling pubs whose closure, The British Beer and Pub Association points out, 'last year equated to more than 4,500 job losses'.
Thus Labour's policies are now reaping what they sowed. Small businesses such as Exmoor Ale must sip the last drops of their kegs and lock the doors.
The Socialist robots spew out their heads-in-the-sands mantras: 'fixing foundations… championing Britain as the best place to grow a business… going further and faster to tackle barriers to investment.'
Yet their actual policies, as you would expect from Marxist huggers, swell the public sector and deter entrepreneurs.
'Existing and looming eye-watering business rates and taxes undermines growth and investment which hurts local jobs, communities, and the wider economy,' James Hawkins of the Beer and Pub Association tells me. Starmer, Reeves and Co can spout their disingenuous catchphrases but what they're actually doing is putting a sign above Britain that reads, 'Closing down soon'.
As Jonathan Price chats in his office, behind him is a map of Britain with pins indicating the locations of his many customers. He assures me that all is not lost. 'We're going to work with a brewer, Hog's Back, in Surrey. It's an innovative solution to keep the brand alive.'
Maybe, but I'm not convinced the water of Surrey is a patch on that of Exmoor. And if I'm going to have a p--s-up in a brewery, I'd rather it was in Wivey than Guildford.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lineage, Inc. Class Action: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Lineage, Inc. Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of September 30, 2025
Lineage, Inc. Class Action: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Lineage, Inc. Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of September 30, 2025

Associated Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Lineage, Inc. Class Action: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Lineage, Inc. Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of September 30, 2025

NEW YORK - August 18, 2025 ( NEWMEDIAWIRE ) - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Lineage, Inc. investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud. This lawsuit is on behalf of all purchasers of Lineage common stock in or traceable to the registration statement used in connection with the Company's July 26, 2024 initial public offering. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: LINE investors may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 363-7500. CASE DETAILS: The filed complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and/or concealed that: (a) Lineage was then experiencing sustained weakening in customer demand, as additional cold-storage supply had come on line, the Company's customers destocked a glut of excessive inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Company's customers shifted to maintaining leaner cold-storage inventories on a go-forward basis in response to changed consumer trends; (b) Lineage had implemented price increases in the lead-up to the IPO that could not be sustained in light of the weakening demand environment facing the Company; (c) Lineage was unable to effectively counteract the adverse trends listed in (a)-(b) above through the use of minimum storage guarantees or as a result of operational efficiencies, technological improvements, or its purported competitive advantages; (d) that, as a result of (a)-(c) above, rather than enjoying stable revenue growth, high occupancy rates, and steady rent escalation as represented in the registration statement, Lineage was in fact suffering from stagnant or falling revenue, occupancy rates, and rent prices; and (e) that, as a result of (a)-(d) above, Lineage's financial results, business operations, and prospects were materially impaired. WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Lineage, Inc. during the relevant time frame, you have until September 30, 2025 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To learn more about this case, subscribe to the Bulls & Betrayals podcast, which features a dedicated episode unpacking the allegations against Lineage, Inc.. Listen now and find out if you are eligible to join the lawsuit. NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. CONTACT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Esq. Ed Korsinsky, Esq. 33 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor New York, NY 10004 [email protected] Tel: (212) 363-7500 Fax: (212) 363-7171

Trump Says Executive Order Will ‘Get Rid Of Mail-In Ballots'
Trump Says Executive Order Will ‘Get Rid Of Mail-In Ballots'

Forbes

time35 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Trump Says Executive Order Will ‘Get Rid Of Mail-In Ballots'

President Donald Trump said he will launch an effort to do away with mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of next year's midterm elections, calling them a 'hoax' and a 'total disaster,' despite urging his supporters to vote early in the 2024 election. US President Donald Trump waves upon arrival at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on August 15, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Trump said Monday on Truth Social he would sign an executive order 'to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections' by getting rid of mail-in ballots and what he said were 'Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.' Alleging without evidence that Democrats use mail-in ballots and voting machines to cheat in elections, Trump said he prefers 'accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper.' Trump said the states—which are responsible for administering federal elections—are 'merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes' and they must follow the federal government's directives. Monday's statement marks another reverse course for Trump on mail-in ballots, which he supported in the 2024 election after previously alleging they contributed to widespread fraud and his 2020 election loss. Trump said Friday that Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed with him during their meeting in Alaska that mail-in ballots contribute to fraud in elections, telling Fox News that Putin 'said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting.' Trump said Putin agreed with his false narrative that he was the true winner of the 2020 election. Big Number 30%. That's the share of mail-in ballots cast in the 2024 election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, compared to 43% in the 2020 election, when the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to higher levels of absentee voting. Trump has long claimed, falsely, that he was the true winner of the 2020 election and that voter fraud, including rigged voting machines, contributed to his loss, though experts and multiple judges have found that no evidence exists to support his claims of widespread voter fraud. Trump signed an executive order in March to block mail-in ballots that arrive after election day from being counted and require proof-of-citizenship to vote, but the order was blocked in federal court. Further Reading Trump Now Says Mail-In Voting Is 'Safe And Secure' – But Only In Florida (Forbes) Trump's Mail-In Voter Fraud Claims Have No Merit, Courts Rule (Forbes) Trump Says The Election Will Be 'Rigged' By Mail-In Voting, Despite Research (Forbes)

Trump pledges effort to eliminate mail-in voting
Trump pledges effort to eliminate mail-in voting

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump pledges effort to eliminate mail-in voting

The president on Monday indicated he would sign an executive order to assist with the effort to roll back mail-in voting. He also said he would target voting machines, instead favoring watermark paper for ballots. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on what the order would entail. 'Now they need that money in order to have the Post Office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots,' the president said on Fox Business Network in a 2020 interview. 'By the way, those are just two items, but if they don't get those two items that means you can't have universal mail-in voting.' Historically, Democrats have returned more mail-in votes than Republicans, who more often vote in person. But the use of mail-in voting spiked dramatically during the 2020 election amid the Covid-19 pandemic and has remained higher in the subsequent elections. In 2024, Trump's campaign and the RNC disseminated information to help their base vote by mail despite Trump's continued efforts to sow disdain for the practice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store