logo
Climate activists miss East Bay state senator with Easter Sunday protest

Climate activists miss East Bay state senator with Easter Sunday protest

Yahoo23-04-2025
The Brief
Protesters gathered outside State Senator Jesse Arreguín's office on Easter Sunday to urge him to vote yes on the Climate Superfund Bill.
Arreguín's office was vacant for the weekend and the protesters' messages were washed away by custodial staff.
The Climate Superfund Bill, which would hold polluters accountable for greenhouse gas emissions, is expected to be heard by legislators in the near future.
OAKLAND, Calif. - Protesters marched to State Senator Jesse Arreguín's office on Sunday, demanding he vote yes on an environmentally-focused piece of legislation. Unfortunately, the senator and his staff did not receive the message.
The protest was organized by the Bay Area chapter of the Sunrise Movement, a political action organization, who wanted Arreguín to vote yes on the Climate Superfund Bill (SB684), which would force fossil fuel polluters to pay for the damage caused by greenhouse gas emissions.
Attendees of the event carried signs, left chalk drawings, and hid plastic Easter eggs containing statements about holding polluters responsible for their actions around the premises.
Arreguín's Oakland office is only staffed Monday through Friday. A staffer said they were unaware of the protest until KTVU called for comment, and added that the office's janitorial staff had reported picking up "litter" and washing away chalk drawings prior to Monday morning.
The backstory
The protesters were motivated by Arreguín abstaining from another climate-focused bill, the Affordable Insurance and Climate Recovery Act, earlier this month. That item, SB 222, only received five of the seven necessary votes at an April 8 hearing. Arreguín, who made climate action a cornerstone of his 2024 campaign for state senate, was one of five representatives who abstained from the vote.
Even if Arreguín had been present for the Easter Sunday protest, the action may have been for naught — the April 22 hearing for the Climate Superfund Bill was canceled at the request of its author, Caroline Menjivar (D-San Fernando) on April 10.
A spokesperson for Menjivar's office said the bill's hearing will be rescheduled, but a date has not yet been set.
"I am committed to supporting clean, healthy communities and proud to continue the East Bay's strong tradition of protecting our environment, parks, and public health. I appreciate the advocates' passion and look forward to meaningful conversations once this bill is formally back before us," Arreguín said in a statement to KTVU. "As an advocate for environmental causes, I was proud to vote for multiple bills this week that advance our climate action goals. I respect the right to advocate and always encourage folks to reach out to my office directly — we welcome those conversations."
Big picture view
California is one of several states that have proposed or passed Climate Superfund legislation. New York and Vermont both passed their own versions in 2024, and four other states — Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Oregon — have introduced similar bills.
The bill, which was introduced in the state assembly by Dawn Addis (D-San Luis Obispo), would require fossil fuel polluters to pay for their share of the damage caused by greenhouse gases released into the covered period, which the bill defines as between the 1990 and 2024 calendar years.
That damage is defined as stemming from the extraction, production, refinement, sale or combustion of fossil fuels or petroleum products, to help relieve the state's current and future taxpayers of the burden.
If passed, the bill would require the California Environmental Protection Agency to determine and publish, within 90 days, a list of responsible parties, which the bill defines as an entity with a major ownership interest in a business engaged in extracting or refining fossil fuels that operated in the state during the covered period. That entity would also have to be determined to be responsible for more than 1 billion metric tons of covered fossil fuel emissions.
"The Central Coast has faced the devastating impacts of climate change, from floods and wildfires to coastal erosion. This year's fires in Los Angeles serve as a stark reminder that collective inaction has catastrophic consequences for all Californians," Addis said in a press release. "We can't deny that climate change is real, and we must take action now to prepare and rebuild after these devastating events."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Pope Leo's Popularity Compares to Pope Francis After 100 Days
How Pope Leo's Popularity Compares to Pope Francis After 100 Days

Newsweek

timea day ago

  • Newsweek

How Pope Leo's Popularity Compares to Pope Francis After 100 Days

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Pope Leo XIV has enjoyed relatively strong popularity after the first 100 days of his papacy. A number of polls have shown broad early goodwill from U.S. Catholics and many Americans as August 16 marked the 100th day as leader of the Church. However, he is yet to reach the heights his predecessor Pope Francis enjoyed during his tenure. Why It Matters Pope Leo, a Chicago native, was chosen as the new leader of the Catholic Church on May 8 after a two-day conclave and held his first mass in the Sistine Chapel on May 9. He replaced Pope Francis, who died on Easter Monday. His popularity rating is useful in measuring the public's response to him and his policies as he carves out his role and differentiates himself from his predecessor. Pope Leo XIV, during Angelus prayer in front of his summer residence in Castel Gandolfo on August 16, 2025. Pope Leo XIV, during Angelus prayer in front of his summer residence in Castel Gandolfo on August 16, 2025. Photo by: Rocco Spaziani/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images What To Know An Associated Press‑NORC survey of 1,158 U.S. adults, fielded June 5–9, found that roughly two‑thirds of American Catholics said they had a "very" or "somewhat" favorable view of Pope Leo XIV. About three in 10 said they did not know enough to form an opinion, and fewer than one in 10 viewed him unfavorably. The poll found he had around the same levels of support from Democrats and Republicans and that he had more support among older than younger Americans. According to Zenit news, a poll two years into Pope Francis' papacy showed he had a 59 percent favorability rating, suggesting there is more early optimism toward Pope Leo. Pope Francis' popularity peaked at 90 percent in 2015, according to the Pew Research Center, and fell to 75 percent in April 2024. Meanwhile, a late‑July telephone survey of 1,002 adults conducted July 7–21 for Gallup showed Pope Leo with a 57 percent favorable rating, 11 percent unfavorable and 31 percent no opinion among U.S. adults, placing him above other international figures in net favorability, including U.S. President Donald Trump. What People Are Saying Pope Leo XIV, in his inaugural mass in May: "In this our time, we still see too much discord, too many wounds caused by hatred, violence, prejudice, the fear of difference, and an economic paradigm that exploits the Earth's resources and marginalizes the poorest." Terry Barber, a 50-year-old Catholic from Sacramento, California, told Associated Press: "I'm optimistic. Certainly, the first pope from the United States is significant. Since he worked under the previous pope, I'm sure he has similar ideas, but certainly some that are original, of his own. I'm looking forward to seeing what, if any changes, come about under his leadership." What Happens Next As he continues his papacy and speaks at events, the public response to Pope Leo is likely to fluctuate.

Ukraine studied drug cartels to learn how to sneak drones into Russia for its 'Operation Spiderweb' attack
Ukraine studied drug cartels to learn how to sneak drones into Russia for its 'Operation Spiderweb' attack

Business Insider

time7 days ago

  • Business Insider

Ukraine studied drug cartels to learn how to sneak drones into Russia for its 'Operation Spiderweb' attack

The architects behind Ukraine's audacious "Operation Spiderweb" attack studied drug cartels to plan how to smuggle drones into Russia, Kyiv's security service chief said. Vasyl Malyuk, head of Ukraine's internal security service and widely hailed as a driving force in the June attack, said in an interview aired on Tuesday that his team leveraged its experience battling international crime for the complex strike. "Operation Spiderweb" involved Ukraine sneaking hundreds of military quadcopters deep behind Russian lines, transporting the drones via wooden house-like structures mounted on trucks. These trucks were brought to four airbases, where the drones were then launched to wreak destruction on strategic bombers and early warning and control planes there. "Speaking of logistics," Malyuk told Ukrainian TV channel My-Ukrainia, "I should note that we drew on our experience in fighting transnational crime, when we studied in detail how international drug cartels secretly deliver various prohibited substances to different corners of the world without detection by customs and border authorities." The security service head alluded to an earlier covert attack that Ukraine carried out in October 2022, when its forces severely damaged a Russian-controlled bridge in Crimea with a truck filled with explosives. "If you read between the lines and look at it professionally, I think many have noticed certain parallels between the first strike on the Crimea bridge," Malyuk said. He said that in both situations, Ukraine didn't employ smugglers but relied on customs officials in Russia. "Who are, by their nature, very corrupt," Malyuk said. "At a certain stage, they actually played to our advantage in delivering the cabins I mentioned." A fake company with drivers in the dark Malyuk said that Ukraine, through its agents in Russia, created a logistics company that purchased five vehicles and rented warehouse space for the operation. One of these warehouses was even in the same city block as Russia's Federal Security Service headquarters in the Chelyabinsk region, the security service chief said. Malyuk added that the shell logistics company hired Russian citizens as truck drivers, sending them on multiple regular delivery jobs to avoid suspicion before springing the attack. The security service chief said these drivers were only told to deliver the cabins near the airbases, whereupon a customer was meant to arrive and pay for them. The drivers themselves were left in the dark, Malyuk added. The security chief said that when one of the drivers inadvertently saw the drones inside one cabin, Ukrainian agents told him the systems were hunting tools for observing animals. "In reality, they committed no illegal acts, and there was no intent in their actions," Malyuk said. The SBU chief also said that his team wanted to launch the attack in May but hit several delays, including the drivers getting drunk during the Easter holiday season. According to Malyuk, each truck-mounted cabin included solar panels and a battery to keep the drones charged and ready for deployment in cold weather; the quadcopters were launched in temperatures as low as 104 degrees Fahrenheit. "But at the same time, it created additional difficulties in bringing these cabins into the territory of the Russian Federation, because these types of goods simply can't be taken there, since Russia is under sanctions," Malyuk. The security service chief declined to share further details about the smuggling process, but said his team went "through seven circles of hell." He added that Ukraine had designed attack drones specifically for "Operation Spiderweb" and that each could carry a payload of 1.6 kg. Ukrainian officials have said that the attack hit about a third of Russia's strategic bomber capacity, inflicting damage on roughly $7 billion worth of equipment. Since the attack, satellite images show that Russia has begun constructing hardened shelters for its bombers. Ukraine has, in recent months, simultaneously stepped up long-range drone assaults via fixed-wing uncrewed systems.

Nancy Mace gubernatorial run rumors reach fever pitch with apparent slip-up
Nancy Mace gubernatorial run rumors reach fever pitch with apparent slip-up

New York Post

time01-08-2025

  • New York Post

Nancy Mace gubernatorial run rumors reach fever pitch with apparent slip-up

She couldn't keep it quiet. Firebrand Rep. Nancy Mace appears to have prematurely revealed the launch of her gubernatorial campaign next week while promoting her series of town halls in the Palmetto State. In a blast advertising the first stop of the 'Mother of ALL Town Halls Tour' in Myrtle Beach, the congresswoman's team tagged the event as being hosted by 'Nancy Mace for Governor.' A webpage for the event teases it as being hosted by 'Nancy Mace for…' But a screengrab of the slip-up — whether it was intentional or inadvertent — quickly gained traction on social media. It comes ahead of Mace's (R-SC) 'special announcement' next Monday. 3 Rep. Nancy Mace's 'special announcement' comes next Monday. AP When asked about the screengrab, a spokesperson for Mace told The Post, 'Will confirm on Monday!' Mace, who was first elected to the House in 2020, has long been dropping hints about her plans to jump in the race to succeed term-limited Gov. Henry McMaster (R). 'President Trump needs America First governors. South Carolina needs a fighter,' Mace declared on X Wednesday. She's also cut videos hyping up her Aug. 4 'special announcement,' which will take place at The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina. Mace graduated Citadel in 1999 and was the first woman to graduate from its Corps of Cadets program. Notably, Maxine Hudson was the first female to graduate Citadel in December 1969. The Lowcountry rep has made a name for herself as a culture warrior in Congress and for her pomposity. Late last year, for example, she crusaded to stop transgender people from utilizing the women's bathroom in reaction to the election of Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.), the first openly transgender person elected to the House. Eventually, GOP leadership opted to change the policy to require individuals to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex. Back in January, Mace joined firebrand Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Col.) in storming into a woman's bathroom in the House amid fears that a man snuck in there. 3 There is a crowded field of Republicans jockeying to succeed term-limited incumbent Gov. Henry McMaster (R). Epics After some sleuthing, they discovered that wasn't the case and quietly walked away, according to Bloomberg reporter Billy House. Mace also went viral in April on the eve of Easter for getting into a foul-mouthed shouting match with a random man wearing daisy dukes at a local store. The man, whom she accused of being an 'unhinged lunatic' and of 'harassing' her, chided Mace for not doing more town halls. She countered that she will 'do plenty more.' 'And by the way, I voted for gay marriage twice,' she noted, seemingly implying that he looked gay. The two exchanged f-bombs, and Mace later posted a video of the encounter on social media. In May, Mace displayed a 'naked photo' of herself, only showing a silhouette of her, during a congressional hearing. Sparse polling has pegged Mace as the frontrunner in the South Carolina gubernatorial contest. Should she make the run for office official next Monday, Mace will face off against Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC), state Sen. Josh Kimbrell (R), Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette (R), and South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson (R). 3 Nancy Mace is planning to barnstorm across South Carolina over the coming weeks. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Back in February, Mace publicly accused Wilson of ignoring evidence she presented, alleging sexual abuse from her ex-fiance and others. Wilson has vehemently denied that, calling it 'categorically false.' Mace is facing a defamation suit over those sexual abuse accusations. However, she made the accusations during a House floor speech, and lawmakers enjoy constitutional protections under the speech or debate clause.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store