‘Proud moment': New $2 coin unveiled
A new $2 coin has been issued to mark the 30th anniversary of the Torres Strait Islander flag's official recognition as one of Australia's national flags.
The Royal Australian Mint unveiled the coin on Thursday, prominently featuring the Torres Strait Islander flag.
The flag, created in 1992 by Bernard Namok, is a nod to the land and the sea and the Torres Strait Islander people and their culture.
The coin reflects these symbols to 'honour the meaning behind the flag's powerful symbols – land, sea, people, culture and unity', the Mint said.
Mint artist Elyssa Waterford also included artwork by Erub Island (Darnley Island) artist Lavinia Ketchell on the coin's design.
The blue on the coin symbolises the ocean, green represents the land, and black signifies the Torres Strait Islander people, the Mint explained.
Royal Australian Mint acting chief executive Emily Martin said the new $2 coin represented much more than just currency in our pockets.
'This coin is a meaningful tribute to culture, identity and resilience. It's a proud reminder of the strength and spirit of Torres Strait Islander people and a step towards greater recognition and respect in everyday life,' Ms Martin told The Nightly.
Torres Strait Island Regional Council Mayor Phillemon Mosby said the coin was a 'national acknowledgment of the cultural richness and contributions of our people'.
'To see our flag represented in such a historic and widely recognised way is a proud moment for all Torres Strait Islanders,' Mr Mosby said.
The coin will be available for purchase from July 3 at The Mint Shop in Deakin, Canberra, as well as from selected authorised distributors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Living with a tall man is no picnic - here's why
SHORT men feel short changed. A study found that shorter males are jealous of their taller counterparts, believing them more desirable and formidable as romantic partners. The research by the Australian Catholic University and published in the academic journal Evolutionary Behavioural Sciences found that there really is such a thing as 'short man syndrome' and shorter men were more likely to display envy, jealousy and competitiveness. I must admit I like tall men. While my teenage girlfriends were swooning over some boy's thick dark hair, piercing eyes or bulging biceps, I'd be checking how lofty they were. But after a succession of tall men - when I say succession that's three - as partners, including my 6ft 4in husband, I'd say height isn't all it's cracked up to be and small men don't need to fret. For a start, tall men are always banging their heads. Rarely a week goes by without my husband ranting after bashing his forehead into something. This week it was the up-and-over garage door, after which he berated me for not raising it high enough. As I'd opened it for my own 5ft 4in frame, there was no need to raise it further. Tall men disrupt sleep and it's not because they are amazing lovers, they are just too big for double beds and hog the space. We can't fit a queen or king-size bed in our bedroom, so, most nights I've got to fight for my half of the mattress. Tall men hog the mattress, making a good night's sleep difficult. Picture: Pixabay Public transport is difficult. Try travelling on a bus with a tall man. 'I can't sit there, or there,' he will say. When I first met my husband we travelled by coach from London to my parents' home near Middlesbrough. It was the first - and last - time we took a long-distance coach journey - coaches are not made for tall people. I was thankful my parents didn't live in Inverness. Trains aren't much better and thankfully we rarely fly. Then there's driving. Tall men need cars to accommodate them. With me as the main driver we have mostly owned small cars which are fine for me, but if my husband is driving he squirms around for about half an hour to 'get comfortable' then moans the entire journey about how cramped it is, how the rear-view mirror obscures his field of vision, and the head rest sits at neck level. Public transport is no better. Try travelling on a bus with a tall man. 'I can't it there, or there,' he will say. When I first met my husband we travelled by coach from London to my parents' home near Middlesbrough. It was the first - and last - time we took a long-distance coach journey - coaches are not made for tall people. I was thankful my parents didn't live in Inverness. Thankfully, we rarely fly. There are even issues with the kitchen work surfaces. 'They're too low, I've got back ache,' is common tall-man-cooking complaint. My husband's height means even trivial things are potential flashpoints: we always argue over where to hang pictures, his eyeline being totally different to mine. On the plus side the bath is too short, which works well for me, as it's now my domain, while the shower is his. He even says the bathroom sink is too low. Even buying clothes is problematic - shirt sleeves are invariably too short, while shoes in size 12 are not always in stock. I can't deny having a tall man around is useful. He can spot people in a crowd, reach things on the top shelf in the supermarket and effortlessly flick away cobwebs on the ceiling at home. But fear not short men - being tall has its drawbacks, and for us women, a tall-man relationship is certainly no bed of roses.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Disgusting find costing Aussie state $1m
A rising tide of so-called 'fatbergs' is choking Western Australia's wastewater system, costing the state more than $1m each year. Water Corporation has revealed 1329 of the blockages – large, foul-smelling clumps of fat, oil, grease, and other non-flushable waste – have been reported in the past year alone. The water supplier says the number of 'fatbergs' – also referred to as 'pipe monsters' – increased sharply from 1152 in 2022 and 918 in 2021. Costing near $1m each year to remove, most were caused by kitchen fats, oils, and grease being poured down sinks, combined with items such as wet wipes and paper towels being flushed down toilets. In one high-profile incident, a sold-out Bryan Adams concert at Perth's RAC Arena was cancelled just hours before its scheduled start in February due to a fatberg blockage in the sewer line outside the venue. Emergency crews were dispatched to clear the smelly mass of grease and rags clogging the Wellington Street system in the CBD. Water Minister Don Punch said 850 of the reported blockages were caused by fats, oils, and grease being poured down sinks. 'Another 379 were caused by non-flushable items like wet wipes, cotton buds, sanitary products and paper towels,' he said. Water Corporation head of treatment and resource recovery Rino Trolio said the removal process was time-consuming, costly, and unpleasant for workers. 'The issue is non-flushable material doesn't disintegrate properly and gets matted with fats, oils and grease mistakenly put down the sink. None of this material should be in the sewer network,' he said. 'As a reminder, only the three Ps – pee, poo and toilet paper – should go down the toilet.' In March, crews spent two days removing WA's largest recorded fatberg – a 30,000kg mass found during routine maintenance in Perth. While fatbergs are a global problem for sewer networks, Water Corporation officials said new standards in Australia and New Zealand now define what can legally be labelled as 'flushable'. 'Despite being labelled as such, not all products labelled as 'flushable' can be flushed down the loo. Most wet wipes, for example, don't disintegrate like toilet paper,' Mr Trolio said. 'Unfortunately, wastewater blockages are a reality faced by every water utility in the world but they are entirely preventable.'
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie homeowner 'frightened' to go into her garden following council's gumtree decision
Gum trees are an iconic feature on suburban streets across Australia. But while they're stunning to look at, a pair of the large native trees has 84-year-old Shirley Handke afraid to go outside. Shirley, whose home sits next to two 25-metre tall trees in the Adelaide suburb of Clearview, says she's witnessed several branches fall in front of her eyes from the council trees out front. "I was out there a few times and I just moved when they fell," Shirley told The Advertiser. "If I had been there, they would have killed me." Now she is "frightened" to enjoy her garden because of the danger posed by falling branches. The issue was reported to Port Adelaide Enfield Council by residents on the street of Melrose Avenue earlier this year, and it's understood an independent evaluation was carried out by two separate arborists. But the report found a low risk of branch failure, and the council refused to remove the trees as it did not meet its removal criteria. Shirley isn't the only resident to complain about the trees. Neighbour Vikash Patel reported earlier this year he feared for the safety of his children, describing the trees as "dangerous". In response to the decision not to remove the trees, Councillor Barbara Clayton argued that "even low risk is still a risk". At an Ordinary Council Meeting in May, Clayton said the arborist report "doesn't give these residents any assurance". She pointed out that the trees would "never" be planted on a verge in accordance with current council policy. "There is no doubt these trees provide canopy cover, however, removing these dangerous and inappropriate trees and replacing them with a more suitable variety would also contribute to our canopy cover," she argued. "We should not be exposing our community to risk — because even low risk is still a risk." Yahoo contacted the council for comment, but did not receive a response by the time of publication. It's understood council actively monitors trees on public land and takes action if deemed unsafe. 🌳 Simple solution could save tree Aussie council claims is 'serious risk to public' 🏡 Aussie man locked in $100k battle with council over front yard tree complaint 🌸 Warning to remove 'pretty but invasive' plant taking over Aussie gardens Reports of dangerous trees across the state have seen a "sharp rise" in recent years. Snap Send Solve CEO Danny Gorog told Yahoo News, "People are taking action to prevent dangerous situations before they happen". In 2024, the council reporting app saw 8,000 tree issues reported for South Australia. So far this year, reports are already at 4,700, with two more months of South Australia's winter storm season still to come. Every report plays a role in keeping streets, parks, and public spaces safe, he said. But large trees are increasingly rare in urban environments, and while many are reporting their risks and dangers, others are fighting to save our dwindling tree canopy. In the Melbourne suburb of Thornbury, local resident Rebecca Hart is working to save two twin sugar gums, estimated to be over a century old. Meanwhile, in Sydney, Randwick City Council backflipped on a controversial plan to remove a large 80-year-old weeping fig after public backlash. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
