Northwest Side hospital owes construction firms millions of dollars
CHICAGO (WGN) — For months, the bills have gone unpaid. Local construction firms helped build an on-site behavioral treatment center at Community First Medical Center in Chicago's Belmont-Cragin neighborhood.
But they claim they're still waiting on their money, even though the center has received state funding.
The allegations come as small hospitals nationwide struggle to stay afloat, amid the rising cost of care and issues with Medicaid reimbursements.
'Safety net hospitals, almost by definition because they are taking care of [the] Medicaid population, have always had a tougher time making ends meet,' said Dr. Ngozi Ezike, CEO of Sinai Chicago.
WGN Investigates: Investigating public corruption, crime & fraud
Dr. Ezike isn't affiliated with Community First or aware of any issues at the center. But she does know the challenges that small hospital face.
'When the reimbursement doesn't cover the cost of care – you're losing more,' she said.
In a statement, the CEO of Community First said he hopes to have a resolution soon, adding that 'many of the safety net hospitals in Illinois are dealing with rising costs, slower payments from the managed care organizations, and the possibility of decreased funding.'
Meanwhile, the construction firms said they're owed a total of more than $3 million. Frustrated and fearful of going out of business, they contacted WGN Investigates for help.
'I don't know if I'm ever going to get paid,' said Louis Ochoa, of Ochoa Mechanical,
State records obtained by WGN Investigates indicate show Community First received $6.9 million from the state of Illinois in October. How those dollars were used remains unclear.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proposal would charge boaters a fee for docking at the Flats East Bank
CLEVELAND (WJW) – A proposal that would charge boaters a fee to dock at the East Bank of the Flats was on the minds of many mariners out for a Friday night cruise on the Cuyahoga River. The dock fee would be based on the length of the boat and how long it's docked: $1 per foot for every hour. Longtime boater Ed Neugebauer, who owns a 30-foot speedboat, said with the docking meter running all night, the proposed fee would force him and others to reconsider the East Bank as a destination. 'You have boaters that can't afford it,' he said. 'I mean, I'll pay $40, whatever it costs to park over here in a parking lot, but I'm not going to pay over $200 to dock here for the night and then spend $200, $300 at the clubs and restaurants. It's just too much money.' Local families head to DC to fight Medicaid cuts The proposed docking fee would help fund a nonprofit organization called Argonaut that would manage and maintain the East Bank docks and promote safe travel on the river. The fee would also allow boaters to reserve a spot on the docks. 'You don't have to show up in a 50-foot yacht and see a kayak and two jet skis taking up 60 feet of dockage. It's about managing it properly,' said Argonaut CEO Captain Drew Ferguson. The goal of the Argonaut program is to train young Clevelanders for jobs in the maritime and aerospace industries. Among other things, an Argonaut crew operates a marine safety boat called the Phastar 2543, which guides lake freighters up and down the 'Crooked River.' The program also provides hands-on education for younger students who will maintain the East Bank boardwalk, dock the boats and make sure they are secured. 'You know, obviously when you talk about a fee up front, people are like, 'oh my God, I have to pay a fee,' but our hope is people will come down here and they'll see the difference. There's a welcoming face. There's a young person that says, 'hey, welcome to the Flats,'' Ferguson said. Big Fun novelty shop owner selling his collection at Cleveland Heights garage sale The docking fee would support young students like 14-year-old Odis Rhone, who is a student at Cleveland's Davis Aerospace and Maritime High School. On Friday night, Odis was learning how to tie nautical knots so that he can work on the East Bank docks. His goal is to someday get his captain's license. 'The average 14-year-old doesn't really get this experience very often, so I think it's pretty cool that I'm able to have this job,' he said. Currently, just 300 feet of docking space is permitted along the East Bank, but the Argonaut program is asking the U.S. Coast Guard to increase the dockage to 900 feet when permitted by traffic on the river. 'It's all about maximizing the use of the space,' said Ferguson. While some boaters said they admire the goals of the Argonaut program, they are now weighing merits of the noble cause against the additional cost of the dock fee. 'Another added cost that now you have to really think about when you come down here. Whereas I think they made and built this up to be able to come down here and relax and have leisure,' said T.J. Carrie, who is a relatively new boater. In response to the criticism from the boating community, Ferguson said, 'you know, if you have a boat, if you have all the stuff, you're not on hard times.' Ferguson concedes that the status of the docking fee is what he calls, 'a very fluid situation.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'It's absolutely deceptive' Farmers markets see trend of new stands not locally grown
TYLER, Texas (KETK)– One farmers market manager is bringing awareness to the negative impacts nonlocal sellers are having on East Texas businesses and customers. House budget proposal cuts SNAP, Medicaid in major rollback Since the pandemic, farmers markets have seen an increase in customers, but market managers said the threat to their businesses are by produce being sold from other areas. 'It's absolutely deceptive. Anyone who goes to anything called a farmer's market, you naturally assume that the person behind the table is who made it, baked it or grew it,' Athens Farmers Market manager, DJ Warren said. Most markets' mission is to offer a farm to fork service, but now their livelihood is negatively impacted. 'It takes money out of the farmers market pockets. They're already struggling. They already face a myriad of challenges every single day that we don't have to experience,' Warren said. This is a challenge, farmer Crystal Branch faces especially when she first began selling micro-greens and chicken in 2019. 'We actually had the market director come up to us and be like, you charge way too much for your vegetables. We're like, if we charge less, we wouldn't make anything. The reason is because he was going and picking up large boxes of stuff that he didn't grow, and he resold it,' co- owner of Branch Growing Farm, Crystal Branch said. House budget proposal cuts SNAP, Medicaid in major rollback People selling produce from other areas can customers confusion when two of the same products look vastly different or typical out of season produce are sold. 'Right now, the amount of rain that we got all across East Texas is going to cause some of those tomatoes to split. They're fine, they taste great. Buy them support that farmer. They need your support in that moment more than any time,' Warren said. Branch said they have enough competition with big box stores. 'Brookshires get' local tomatoes.' It's the same tomatoes is what these resellers would get, so you're paying farmers market prices for grocery store product,' Warren said. To make sure the products purchased are locally grown, Warren and Branch advice people to ask the seller questions. 'You'll figure out right away that whether or not they're lying to you because they'll have a hard time answering questions. I think the vast majority are pretty honest,' Branch said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca sues Utah Attorney General over discount medication law
SALT LAKE CITY () — The pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca has filed a federal lawsuit against Utah Attorney General Derek Brown and Utah Insurance Commissioner Jon Pike over a recent law that is intended to allow more pharmacies to have access to drug discount programs. In a lawsuit filed May 23, AstraZeneca alleges that Utah SB 69 is unconstitutional. The law was introduced and passed in the 2025 General Assembly, and it went into effect on May 7. The law prohibits drug manufacturers from restricting pharmacies from working with 340B entities, which help pharmacies and patients access medications at a discounted price. Senator Lee responds to the Trump-Musk feud The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a that 'enables covered entities to stretch scarce federal resources as far as possible, reaching more eligible patients and providing more comprehensive services,' according to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) website. It means that drug manufacturers participating in Medicaid agree to provide 'outpatient drugs to covered entities at significantly reduced prices.' All organizations need to be registered and enrolled in the 340B program in order to purchase discounted medications. The law that established the 340B Program, Section 340B(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act, specified certain types of for the program, such as medical centers that serve rural and other underserved communities and clinics that specialize in particular diseases like HIV/AIDS. SB 69 expands the scope, requiring drug manufacturers to provide the discounts to third-party pharmacies that are contracting with 340B entities, and this is what AstraZeneca is claiming is unconstitutional in its lawsuit. Utah House Republicans elect new leadership members The lawsuit states that because price controls 'disincentivize innovation and destabilize markets,' Congress chose to specifically limit the types of organizations that are eligible in Section 340B. The suit notes that for-profit pharmacies like Walgreens or CVS were not included as eligible, and there have already been several federal court cases ruling that block efforts to require drug manufacturers to provide discounts to contracted pharmacies. AstraZeneca claims in its suit that SB 69 'requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to offer 340B-discounted pricing for sales at an unlimited number of contract pharmacies,' expanding 340B discounts to 'an entirely new category of transactions not covered by Section 340B itself.' The suit alleges that SB 69 directly conflicts with federal law requirements, and therefore, it cannot be enforced against Astrazeneca or other drug manufacturers. AstraZeneca is asking the court to declare SB 69 unconstitutional and to order that Utah AG Derek Brown and Insurance Commissioner Jon Pike not enforce the law against AstraZeneca. Musk floats 'The American Party' after Trump tiff Myths VS Facts: What health officials want you to know about the MMR vaccine Good4Utah Road Tour: Willard Bay State Park Lori Vallow Daybell back in court, charged with conspiracy to murder ex nephew-in-law Man charged with assault for allegedly attacking and strangling neighbor Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
