Historic UN building in Geneva could be abandoned as Trump cuts loom
Named after former US President Woodrow Wilson, the opulent 225-room Palais Wilson in Geneva was the first headquarters of the forerunner of the UN, the League of Nations, and today is home to the UN human rights arm.
Now, with the Trump administration making cuts to foreign aid, hitting UN agencies, and also owing the UN nearly $1.5 billion in arrears and for this year, the body is trying to cut its budget by up to 20%, according to a memo.
The UN Geneva office last week made a formal proposal to vacate Palais Wilson from mid-2026, according to two sources familiar with the situation and confirmed by the United Nations.
That the UN is considering abandoning one of the most historic buildings in the annals of international cooperation underlines how the US retreat from multilateralism has shaken the body to its foundations.
In all, about 75 agencies and departments faced a June 13 deadline to propose budget cuts. Member states have the final say on the budget. Many have been supportive of financial retrenchment.
Wilson, who died in 1924, was one of the architects of the League of Nations after World War One though the United States never formally joined.
The UN in Geneva (UNOG) leases the 19th century Palais on behalf of the Office for the High Commissioner for Human Rights from a Swiss foundation under a nearly 30-year lease worth around 36 million Swiss francs ($44.25 million), UN documents show.
'As part of UNOG's revised budget submission for 2026, and in line with guidance from headquarters to reduce the costs of lease payments, UNOG is indeed proposing in its submission for revised budget estimates that the end of the lease of Palais Wilson be brought forward,' Alessandra Vellucci, director of the United Nations Information Service in Geneva, said.
The lease had been due to expire in 2027.
OHCHR spokesperson Jeremy Laurence said: 'The UN is looking at all options to decrease costs, including a proposal to rehouse our headquarters in Geneva away from Palais Wilson, the symbolic home of human rights.'
He added that the impact of the financial crisis went far beyond this one proposal and that funding cuts by the United States and others were already affecting its work.
The Trump administration has repeatedly defended the foreign aid cuts, saying they are focused on wasted funds.
Trump said in February that the United Nations had 'great potential and ... we'll continue to go along with it, but they got to get their act together'.
The UN cuts are part of a major review called 'UN80' that the body launched in March to make it more efficient.
The UN Controller will analyse proposed cuts and submit recommendations to Secretary General Antonio Guterres by early July, officials said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Jimmy Kimmel gains Italian citizenship and criticises Donald Trump's second presidential term
Jimmy Kimmel has confirmed he has obtained Italian citizenship, linking the move to concerns over Donald Trump's second term as president of the United States. Speaking on The Sarah Silverman Podcast, host Sarah Silverman mentioned that many people she knew were exploring alternative citizenship options. Kimmel responded, 'I did get Italian citizenship,' before criticising Trump's presidency. 'What's going on [with Trump] is as bad as you thought it was gonna be. It's so much worse. It's just unbelievable. I feel like it's probably even worse than he would like it to be.' Kimmel, who has often expressed opposition to Trump, said he does not criticise individuals who have changed their political stance. Referring to public figures such as Joe Rogan questioning recent policies, he said, 'The door has to stay open. If you want to change your mind, that's so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that is so hard and so rare to do. You are welcome.' Trump recently took aim at Kimmel on Truth Social after CBS announced The Late Show with Stephen Colbert would conclude at the end of the 2025–26 season. Trump claimed Kimmel would be 'next to go' in what he called the 'Late Night Sweepstakes,' describing several hosts as lacking talent. Kimmel responded by saying, 'I'm hearing you're next. Or maybe it's just another wonderful secret,' also referencing a Wall Street Journal report alleging Trump sent a 'bawdy' letter to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003 for his 50th birthday. Kimmel's comments come as public and media debate continues over the direction of Trump's second term and its impact on political and cultural discourse in the United States.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US HR report says India acts minimally
The US government noted abuses in India and Pakistan in a shortened human rights report released on Tuesday that said India "took minimal credible steps" to combat the abuses while Pakistan "rarely took credible steps". The Trump administration scaled back the annual US government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some allies and countries that have been President Donald Trump's partners. The State Department human rights documentation for India and Pakistan was also much shorter and scaled back this year. India has been an important US partner in recent years in Washington's effort to counter China's rise, although relations have been tense over Trump's imposition of a 50% tariff on goods from India. Pakistan is a non-NATO US ally. About India, the report said: "The government took minimal credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses." On Pakistan, it added: "The government rarely took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses." Indian and Pakistani embassies in Washington had no immediate comment on the report released on Tuesday, which documented instances in 2024. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch fault Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for its treatment of minorities. They point to rising hate speeches, a religion-based citizenship law the UN calls "fundamentally discriminatory," anti-conversion legislation that challenges freedom of belief, the 2019 removal of Muslim-majority Kashmir's special status, and the demolition of properties owned by Muslims. Modi denies discrimination and says his policies, such as food subsidy programs and electrification drives, benefit everyone. In Pakistan, Amnesty International says government authorities fail to protect minorities, including Christians, and use "excessive and unnecessary force" against civil society voices and protesters.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Two grandmasters meet in Alaska
I've always wondered why NATO, a Cold War relic built to contain communism, not only survived the collapse of the very empire it was created to oppose, but somehow found new purpose in expanding all the way to Russia's doorstep. A promise once made, never to move 'one inch eastward,' was quietly folded into the archives as the alliance, now more bureaucracy than shield, became the lifeblood of western arms manufacturers and eastern European hawks alike. Yet just as questions about its relevance were growing louder, Putin did exactly what the alliance needed. He invaded Ukraine. Now the spectacle moves to Alaska, a frozen irony if there ever was one. A former Russian colony sold off by a desperate tsarist regime is about to host a modern-day strongman whom many in the western press describe, with a mix of panic and admiration, as yet another desperate Russian dictator. Only this time, he's not selling land. He's allegedly buying time, legitimacy, and influence, on the same soil that Tsar Alexander II sold to Andrew Johnson's administration for two cents an acre in 1867. The press is already aflame with warnings. 'Putin's playing chess!' they scream. 'Trump will be duped again!' The ghosts of Helsinki 2018 have been summoned in full regalia. Remember that one? When Trump came out of a private meeting with Putin looking like a fanboy, casting doubt on US intelligence and prompting his own adviser to contemplate pulling the fire alarm? The stakes were high then. They're higher now. Yet the hysteria may be hiding the real twist. What if it's Trump who's playing the bigger game? This is the man who's already shattered the post-WWII trade consensus with his tariffs, bulldozed the Middle East's power map, and turned global diplomacy into a one-man reality show. His opponents and the markets have laughed at his U-turns, even coined money-making trades around them — the 'taco (Trump always chickens out) trade,' among others. But it's still his word, or even just his mood on a given day, that can and does swing entire sectors, even global markets. And so the question remains — is this all just the chaos of the moment or the method of someone building a new kind of architecture – one announcement at a time? Is it really Putin manipulating Trump, or is it Trump baiting Putin — and everyone else — into a trap they don't quite understand? What if the real game isn't just about Ukraine, but about rewriting the very structure of global power, calibrated through carefully chosen spectacle rather than traditional diplomacy? It's hard to say who's playing whom. What's clear is that the Europeans and Ukrainians aren't even in the room. While Trump and Putin sit across the chessboard, Volodymyr Zelenskyy is dialing into video calls and begging not to be cut out of the final score. His plea is simple — no land for peace, no backroom deals, and definitely no Yalta-style carve-up while Ukraine watches from the hallway. But that's exactly what this summit risks becoming, a 21st-century version of the old Great Power bargaining table, minus the courtesy of cigars and chairs for the small countries involved. Zelensky's fears aren't unfounded. Russia has advanced six to ten kilometres in Donbas just this week, and Putin enters Alaska holding 19 percent of Ukrainian territory. His demands haven't changed: full withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from contested areas, abandonment of NATO ambitions, and recognition of Russia's new 'realities' on the ground. Kyiv, of course, rejects all of it. The math of occupation is as brutal as the war itself. The EU, meanwhile, looks on in muted impotence. Publicly supportive of Trump's 'efforts,' privately panicking about what might emerge from the Alaskan tundra. European diplomats whisper about 'not being sidelined,' but their absence from the negotiating table suggests that's exactly what's happened. It raises the awkward question – if even Ukraine's strongest backers don't get a seat at the summit, where does NATO's credibility stand? Or its future's? Some say the summit is all theatre. The White House calls it a 'listening exercise,' while Trump says he's just 'feeling out' Putin. But Trump never walks into a summit without expecting to steal the headlines. Putin wants the photo too, preferably one that softens the glare of the ICC warrants still hanging over him. Neither man is there to negotiate. They're there to perform power – and test who still commands the stage. Which brings us back to the chessboard. The west loves to frame these moments as contests between intelligence and brute force, between statesmen and strongmen. But this one defies that binary. Trump isn't a diplomat, and Putin isn't just a thug. They're both something else; opportunists shaped by grievance, obsessed with legacy, and uniquely gifted at flipping chaos into leverage. And while Putin may fancy himself a grandmaster of strategic pressure, it's Trump who is reshaping the global rulebook in real time – tearing through trade structures, unsettling alliances, and redrawing the lines of engagement. But there's a third piece on this board. Russia's war economy is being propped up by China, its main backer. Without Beijing's support, the machinery grinding through Ukraine would seize up fast. With Beijing watching closely, and much of the world unsure who's steering what anymore, the board narrows back to two players – at least for now. So, as the two men sit down in Alaska, a symbolic scrap of land once discarded by Moscow, they won't just be negotiating over Ukraine. They'll be stress-testing the entire postwar architecture – not to replace it with a new one, but to show how far it's already eroded. One arrives with territorial maps, ceasefire terms, and a shrinking circle of allies. The other brings tariffs, disruption, and a record of dismantling consensus. Neither is offering a vision. They're exposing the vacuum. This may be the most consequential chess match of our time. And whether it ends in checkmate, stalemate, or the board flipping off the table entirely, one thing's certain: it will show us which of these two grandmasters still knows how to win. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
