US top court lets Trump revoke legal status for 500,000 migrants
The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory Friday in his immigration crackdown, giving his administration the green light to revoke the legal status of half a million migrants from four Caribbean and Latin American countries.
The decision puts 532,000 people who came from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to the United States under a two-year humanitarian "parole" program launched by former president Joe Biden at risk of deportation.
And it marked the second time the highest US court has sided with Trump in his aggressive push to deliver on his election pledge to deport millions of non-citizens, through a series of policy announcements that have prompted a flurry of lawsuits.
But the opinion sparked a scathing dissent from two justices in the liberal minority who said the six conservatives on the bench had "plainly botched" their ruling and undervalued the "devastating consequences" to those potentially affected.
The revoked program had allowed entry into the United States for two years for up to 30,000 migrants a month from the four countries, all of which have dismal human rights records.
But as Trump takes a hard line on immigration, his administration moved to overturn those protections, winning a ruling from the Supreme Court earlier this month that allowed officials to begin deporting some 350,000 Venezuelans.
The latest case resulted from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem canceling an 18-month extension of the temporary protected status of the migrants, citing in particular the "authoritarian" nature of Nicolas Maduro's government in Venezuela.
The department gave them 30 days to leave the country unless they had legal protection under another program.
- 'Needless human suffering' -
"The court has plainly botched this assessment today," Justices Ketanji Brown Jackon and Sonia Sotomayor wrote in their dissent.
The justices said the migrants face being wrenched from family and returning to potential danger in their native countries -- or opting to stay and risking imminent removal.
"At a minimum, granting the stay would facilitate needless human suffering before the courts have reached a final judgment regarding the legal arguments at issue, while denying the government's application would not have anything close to that kind of practical impact," Jackson said.
None of the other justices gave reasons for their decision, and the court was not required to make the vote public.
The district court that barred the administration from revoking the migrants' status had argued that it was unlawfully applying a fast-track deportation procedure aimed at illegal immigrants to non-citizens protected by government programs.
At the Supreme Court, Justice Department lawyers said the "district court has nullified one of the administration's most consequential immigration policy decisions" by issuing the stay.
The high court's decision means the Trump administration can go ahead with its policy change, even as the litigation on the merits plays out in lower courts.
Trump campaigned for the White House on a pledge to deport millions of undocumented migrants, evoking an "invasion" of the United States by hordes of foreign criminals.
Among other measures, he invoked an obscure wartime law to fly more than 200 alleged Venezuelan gang members to a prison in El Salvador.
But his program of mass deportations has been thwarted or restricted by numerous court rulings, including from the Supreme Court and notably on the grounds that those targeted should be able to assert their due process rights.
And the administration has been berated over its efforts to restrict immigration from poor countries with human rights concerns like Afghanistan and Haiti, while accepting white South African refugees amid baseless claims that they face "genocide."
The Trump administration systematically accuses judges who oppose his immigration decisions of plundering his presidential national security powers.
sst-ft/sst
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Proposed Section 899 Of Big Beautiful Bill Challenges Global Investors
T WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to the media after the ... More House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Donald Trump's agenda at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. The tax and spending legislation, in what has been called the "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" Act, redirects money to the military and border security and includes cuts to Medicaid, education and other domestic programs. Johnson was flanked by House Committee Chairmen who helped craft the legislation. (Photo by) he United States has been a major destination for foreign direct investment for years. In 2022, foreign firms invested over $177 billion in the country. In May 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Tax Act (OBB). Beyond the potential impact on foreign direct investment in the U.S. overall, certain provision of the OBB may have a broader impact, especially affecting common asset protection and wealth planning strategies. The increased rate on withholding, investments, corporate holdings, and more, is designed as a retaliatory measure on taxes, especially digital taxes, imposed by other countries which the U.S. describes as discriminatory foreign countries. The broader application of Section 899 would create additional reporting obligations, complicate foreign asset protection trust holdings, and subject investors to penalties and taxes that were previously unexpected. Foreign individuals or entities that own at least 25% of a U.S. corporation or foreign corporations engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. are subject to reporting requirements under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6038A. The IRS requires filing Form 5472 to disclose transactions between the implicated corporations and its holders accordingly. Failure to file Form 5472 accurately and timely can result in significant and repeated penalties of $25,000 in each instance and more. Corporations may be subject to the filing requirement regardless of its level of activity. Oftentimes, U.S. investments, whether in real estate, private equity, intellectual property, or otherwise, are held in U.S. Corporations and foreign asset protection vehicles are used in conjunction with such entities to further tax-efficiency, privacy, and creditor protection. These layered wealth protection structures may face additional tax burdens if proposed Section 899 becomes final. Foreign asset protection trusts (FAPTs) often hold U.S. entities with U.S. investments. This structure presents additional challenges with compliance and reporting. Unless structured otherwise, the transfer of assets by a U.S. person to a foreign trust is treated as a grantor trust where the U.S. person is taxed on the trust's income. Distributions by the foreign trust, especially to U.S. beneficiaries subjects the beneficiaries to tax also and additional foreign trust reporting requirements, including filing Forms 3520 and 3520-A. Substantial penalties of $10,000 or 35% of the gross value of any property transferred to the foreign trust, and more may apply for noncompliance. Wealth planning incorporating ownership and transfer of business interests to multinational beneficiaries, and investors abroad or considered foreigners even if located in the U.S. may be impacted by the legislation. The underlying investment in U.S. companies or assets where potential beneficiaries or other investors may be foreign and from the list of discriminatory countries would be subject to the additional tax rates that range from 5% to 20%. Restructuring investments and ownerships to mitigate any potential tax exposure in light of proposed Section 899 would be prudent. Additionally, in conjunction with enforcing the increased rates and compliance obligations under proposed Section 899, increased enforcement of penalties for noncompliance on foreign trust reporting and foreign corporate holdings can be expected if Section 899 is passed and impacted taxpayers would be prudent in ensuring that all prior reporting obligations have been met. For foreign investors and global families with U.S. investments and connections, ensuring comprehensive review of their existing investment and asset protection structures along with ensuring full compliance with U.S. tax reporting requirements is critical. Proactively filing any required returns that may have been inadvertently delayed or omitted will start applicable statutes of limitations on audits and provide potential relief from some penalties where a reasonable cause of noncompliance failure exists. Additionally, preparing for potential legislative changes, including the implementation of proposed Section 899 by restructuring investments, ownerships, and transfers, can prevent additional tax exposure before it is too late.
Fox News
36 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump warns Rand Paul he's playing into 'hands of the Democrats' with 'Big, Beautiful Bill' opposition
President Donald Trump on Saturday warned Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., he would be "playing right into the hands of the Democrats" if he votes against Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill." "If Senator Rand Paul votes against our Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, he is voting for, along with the Radical Left Democrats, a 68% Tax Increase and, perhaps even more importantly, a first time ever default on U.S. Debt," Trump wrote on Truth Social Saturday afternoon. "Rand will be playing right into the hands of the Democrats, and the GREAT people of Kentucky will never forgive him! The GROWTH we are experiencing, plus some cost cutting later on, will solve ALL problems. America will be greater than ever before!" Paul told "Fox News Sunday" last weekend he supports the tax and spending cuts in the bill, which he still slammed as "wimpy and anemic, but I still would support the bill, even with wimpy and anemic cuts if they weren't going to explode the debt. The problem is the math doesn't add up. They're going to explode the debt by, the House says, $4 trillion. The Senate's actually been talking about exploding the debt $5 trillion." The bill narrowly passed the House May 22 and will soon be voted on in the Senate, where Republicans can only afford to lose three votes. Others, like Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., have also expressed concerns about the bill. Last weekend, Trump told reporters he was open to changes in the bill. "I want the Senate and the senators to make the changes they want," he said. "It will go back to the House, and we'll see if we can get them. In some cases, the changes may be something I'd agree with, to be honest." Along with tax cuts, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act also includes stricter requirements for accessing Medicaid, changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) program and no taxes on overtime or tips. Democrats have slammed the Medicaid reform section of the bill, mentioning possible cuts as a driving issue ahead of competitive midterm elections in 2026. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan analyst for the U.S. Congress, estimates that 8.6 million people in the United States will lose health insurance by 2034 through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's Medicaid reform. "The Democrats have been focusing on this specific line of attack that 13.7 million Americans are going to lose their health care, and that's just blatantly false," Rep. Erin Houchin, R-Ind., told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview this week. "Five million of those people are receiving a tax credit under the Affordable Care Act that was passed by the Democrats with a sunset date that was implemented by the Democrats. We're simply allowing the sunset date to expire as the Democrats originally intended," Houchin said. CBO estimates that 13.7 million Americans will lose coverage by 2034, which also includes the 5 million Americans who were already about to lose coverage. A number of Democrats have already deployed the figure in campaign messages rejecting Trump's bill passing in the House. "I don't trust the CBO score, nor should the American people, because it's been proven again and again to be wildly off," added Houchin, who served on three major committees leading budget markup, including the House Rules, Budget and Energy and Commerce committees.
CNBC
36 minutes ago
- CNBC
South Korea exports fall as tariffs hit U.S., China shipments
South Korea's exports fell in May for the first time in four months, as shipments to the United States and China dropped on global trade conflict triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. Exports from Asia's fourth-largest economy, an early bellwether for global trade, declined 1.3% from the same month last year to $57.27 billion, government data showed on Sunday. "Declines in exports to both the United States and China, the two biggest markets, suggest U.S. tariff measures are having an impact on the global economy as well as our exports," said South Korean Industry and Trade Minister Ahn Duk-geun. The first decline since January followed rises as strong chip sales had offset downward pressure from Trump's tariff threats. The May decline, however, was milder than the 2.7% fall forecast in a Reuters poll of economists. On a working-day adjusted basis, exports in fact rose 1.0%. China and the United States agreed in mid-May to a 90-day truce, significantly unwinding their tariffs on each other, after months of back-and-forth retaliatory measures, but Trump on Friday accused Beijing of violating the agreement and threatened to take tougher action. He also said he would double global tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50%. Trump's "reciprocal tariffs", including 25% duties on South Korea, are on a 90-day pause for negotiations. South Korea's May shipments to the United States fell 8.1% and those to China fell 8.4%. Exports to the European Union rose 4.0%, those to Southeast Asian countries fell 1.3%, while those to Taiwan surged 49.6%. Exports of semiconductors jumped 21.2%, thanks to robust demand for advanced memory chips, but car exports fell 4.4% due to U.S. tariffs and production at Hyundai Motor's new factory in the U.S. state of Georgia, according to the ministry. South Korea's imports fell 5.3% to $50.33 billion, bringing the monthly trade balance to a surplus of $6.94 billion, the biggest since June 2024.
