South Korea exports fall as tariffs hit U.S., China shipments
South Korea's exports fell in May for the first time in four months, as shipments to the United States and China dropped on global trade conflict triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs.
Exports from Asia's fourth-largest economy, an early bellwether for global trade, declined 1.3% from the same month last year to $57.27 billion, government data showed on Sunday.
"Declines in exports to both the United States and China, the two biggest markets, suggest U.S. tariff measures are having an impact on the global economy as well as our exports," said South Korean Industry and Trade Minister Ahn Duk-geun.
The first decline since January followed rises as strong chip sales had offset downward pressure from Trump's tariff threats.
The May decline, however, was milder than the 2.7% fall forecast in a Reuters poll of economists. On a working-day adjusted basis, exports in fact rose 1.0%.
China and the United States agreed in mid-May to a 90-day truce, significantly unwinding their tariffs on each other, after months of back-and-forth retaliatory measures, but Trump on Friday accused Beijing of violating the agreement and threatened to take tougher action. He also said he would double global tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50%.
Trump's "reciprocal tariffs", including 25% duties on South Korea, are on a 90-day pause for negotiations.
South Korea's May shipments to the United States fell 8.1% and those to China fell 8.4%. Exports to the European Union rose 4.0%, those to Southeast Asian countries fell 1.3%, while those to Taiwan surged 49.6%.
Exports of semiconductors jumped 21.2%, thanks to robust demand for advanced memory chips, but car exports fell 4.4% due to U.S. tariffs and production at Hyundai Motor's new factory in the U.S. state of Georgia, according to the ministry.
South Korea's imports fell 5.3% to $50.33 billion, bringing the monthly trade balance to a surplus of $6.94 billion, the biggest since June 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
7 minutes ago
- Axios
Phoenix to announce police chief finalists soon
Phoenix expects to name finalists for the city's next police chief next week. Why it matters: Phoenix's next police chief will oversee a department that is now free of the threat of federal oversight following a damning U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) report that had highlighted violations of civil and constitutional rights, but has still publicly committed to following through on reforms. Catch up quick: The city named four finalists for the position in March, but restarted its search in early April after Michael Sullivan, who'd served as interim chief since 2022, withdrew from consideration. City officials expected to get additional candidates who didn't previously apply because of a perception that Sullivan was a likely shoo-in. Sullivan's last day on the job was in late April, and acting chief Dennis Orender has led the department since. State of play: Phoenix received 39 applicants by its May 5 deadline, per spokesperson Dan Wilson, but the city won't release names until after the Police Executive Research Forum, a firm hired to assist with its search, reviews the candidates. The city expects to name finalists the week of June 9, Wilson said. A public candidate forum will be held June 16. The public can submit feedback and questions for the finalists though the city's community survey. The city expects to announce its new chief sometime in July. Flashback: The DOJ under the Biden administration issued a report last year following a three-year investigation that found a pattern of discriminatory enforcement and violations of constitutional rights by Phoenix police. Those patterns and practices included: Using excessive force, including unnecessary deadly force. Arresting people experiencing homelessness without reasonable suspicion of crimes and improperly seizing or destroying their property. Engaging in discriminatory enforcement against Black, Latino and Native American people. Violating the rights of protesters engaging in constitutionally protected speech. Discriminatory enforcement against people with behavioral health problems. Yes, but: Now-President Trump's election in November, which occurred before Phoenix began its search for a police chief, was widely expected to end any chance of federal oversight, including a potential consent decree opposed by most of the City Council. Trump's DOJ last month ended its investigation and retracted the report, taking similar steps in several other cities where the feds had investigated police departments and scrapping proposed consent decrees in Louisville, Kentucky, and Minneapolis. What's next: City officials after the election committed to moving forward with reforms, regardless of what happened with the investigation under the Trump administration.
Business Insider
7 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Rwanda nears migrant hosting agreement with U.S.
As part of President Donald Trump's escalating efforts to curb illegal migration, the United States is reportedly in final talks to designate Rwanda as a potential host nation for asylum seekers and migrants turned away at the U.S. border. The United States is considering a partnership with Rwanda to host asylum seekers and migrants rejected at the U.S. border. Concerns have arisen regarding Rwanda's ability to manage the asylum seeker population and potential issues with human rights adherence. The U.S. has reportedly already tested Rwanda as a deportation destination, citing an incident involving the deportation of an Iraqi national. The Trump administration appears to be positioning Rwanda as the latest addition to a growing list of partner nations—including El Salvador, Mexico, and most recently, South Sudan—willing to accept deportees as part of its intensified migration crackdown. The US appears to be adopting a version of the UK's previously discarded plan to deport asylum-seekers to certain countries. San Diego-based immigration lawyer, Jacob Sapochnick notes that space in U.S. detention centers is not only running out but also driving up costs as per Bloomberg. In response, the State Department is seeking to establish 'transfer agreements' with more countries to alleviate the strain on domestic facilities. UK's botched Rwanda deportation scheme The UK's "Rwanda scheme," introduced by the Conservative government in 2022, was met with controversy and ultimately scrapped by new Prime Minister Keir Starmer shortly after taking office, with him labeling it a "gimmick" that was ineffective. Despite spending approximately £715 million—including £290 million paid directly to Rwanda, £50 million on flights that never took off, and £95 million on detention centers—The plan had only resulted in a few voluntary removals. In 2024, the newly elected Labour government terminated the scheme, labeling it a costly failure. Rwanda has since demanded an additional £50 million, claiming unmet obligations. Around 280 contractors were laid off as operations wound down. US moves to adopt similar template The US now seems to be following a similar approach, looking to partner with Rwanda to accept deportees. Bloomberg reports that the U.S. administration appears to have already tested Rwanda as a deportation destination. Earlier this year, reports emerged that the U.S. deported an Iraqi national, Omar Abdulsattar Ameen, to Rwanda, paying $100,000 to cover relocation costs. Ameen has long been a controversial figure, having drawn attention since the Trump administration's earlier attempt to extradite him to Iraq. Despite these developments, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has not been briefed on any formal U.S.-Rwanda agreement. UNHCR spokeswoman Kathryn Mahoney stated that while no proposal has been presented, ' any transfer arrangement should ensure access to asylum and due process.' According to Bloomberg, Rwanda's Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe revealed earlier this month that the country is ' in talks with the United States about a deal on migration. ' While a State Department spokesperson declined to confirm the discussions, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly stated that the U.S. is 'actively searching for other countries to take people'—preferably, he added, 'the further away from America, the better, so they can't come back across the border.'
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Supreme Court to decide if challenge to Illinois' grace period for mail-in ballots can proceed
Supreme Court to decide if challenge to Illinois' grace period for mail-in ballots can proceed Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump's federal elections executive order President Donald Trump's latest executive order is remaking federal elections. Here's five things to know. WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court will decide whether a GOP congressman can challenge Illinois' decision to count mail-in ballots that are cast, but not received, before the end of Election Day. Republicans have been trying to end that practice − adopted by many states − through lawsuits and a March executive order from President Donald Trump that is being litigated. They argue states are illegally extending the election beyond the date set by federal law. But when Rep. Michael Bost, R-Ill., and two presidential electors tried to make that case, lower courts said they hadn't been sufficiently harmed by the policy so couldn't sue. The Supreme Court on June 2 said it will decide if the lawsuit can move forward. Bost's attorneys said the Supreme Court needs to stop a growing trend of courts limiting candidates' ability to challenge electoral rules. 'He has now been denied the opportunity to have this challenge heard over the course of two reelection campaigns,' they told the Supreme Court. The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2024 dismissed Bost's argument that he has to spend campaign funds to contest any objectionable ballots that come in after Election Day. Judge John Lee called it 'speculative at best' that later ballots could cause him to lose an election, noting he won by 75% in the 2022 election. One of the three appeals court judges to rule on the lawsuit said he would have let it proceed. More: Donald Trump signs executive order requiring proof of citizenship in federal elections Illinois allows mail-in ballots to be counted if they are postmarked on or before the day of the election and received with two weeks. Illinois and other states with grace periods say they prevent postal delivery issues and give people who vote by mail more time to make up their mind.
