Man ran ‘Europe's cheapest car park' in scam on school grounds
Jason Walsh (36) was caught several times charging up to 150 vehicles to park in the school after breaking the locks and getting in
An intruder broke into a Dublin secondary school and turned the grounds into an unauthorised paid car park in a money-making scam.
Jason Walsh (36) was caught several times charging up to 150 vehicles to park in the school after breaking the locks and getting in.
Judge John Hughes said it must have been the 'cheapest car park in Europe' when Walsh maintained he only made €200 himself after donating half the proceeds to charity.
Dublin District Court heard students' events had to be scaled back or cancelled to pay for the €1,000 of damage Walsh caused, and the judge told him to repay this or face jail.
Walsh, of The Willows, Finglas Road, Glasnevin, pleaded guilty to trespassing, criminal damage and deception by inducing the public to pay for car parking on private property without permission.
The court heard the caretaker at St Vincent's Secondary School, Finglas Road, Glasnevin, called gardaí after the locks on the front gates were broken and two men were parking cars on the grounds in exchange for unknown sums of money.
The same thing happened again on two other days.
Walsh had 181 previous convictions for offences including burglary.
The accused apologised and indicated he was going to pay for the damage, his solicitor said.
Walsh was trying to 'make a few extra quid' when he got involved in the offence with two other people. Judge Hughes told Walsh he had a 'good oul run of it' and when asked how much he had got from it, Walsh replied €200.
The judge said with 150 cars, it was 'the cheapest car park in Europe, I'd say'.
The court heard to pay for the damage, the school had to redirect funds from student events.
Walsh said he was a recovering drug addict, rebuilding his life.
The court heard he had suffered a lot of personal trauma, including the loss of a partner who was murdered.
'There's kids who didn't get to go on school tours because yourself and your buddies were running a scam,' the judge said.
'You are going to have to pony up the cash or you're going to jail.'
Jason Walsh said he made €200. Photo: Collins Courts
News in 90 Seconds - 3rd June 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
15 hours ago
- The Journal
Rogue gardener pleads guilty to conning woman out of €2,000 for work he never carried out
A ROGUE GARDENER in Dublin conned a woman online out of €2,000 for work he never carried out, a court has heard. Father of two, Gavin Smith, 35, of Huntstown Wood, Dublin 15, pleaded guilty to deception today. Dublin District Court heard that Smith, a convicted money launderer, was contacted by the unsuspecting victim through the website on 3 September 2021. She asked him to work on her back garden, was quoted a fee and paid a €2,000 deposit, but Judge Michele Finan heard Smith 'failed to carry out the work'. After several weeks, he refunded her half the money, but never paid the rest back. Advertisement Smith, with 18 prior criminal convictions, including money laundering, was jailed last year and will remain in custody until next year. He was not charged with the offence until May this year. Defence solicitor Daniel Hanahoe told Judge Finan his client's mother had died shortly beforehand. He also began using cocaine. Hanahoe submitted a letter from his client about his progress since the offence. The judge described it as 'excellent', adding that it should be forwarded to the victim, who did not have to attend the hearing. Judge Finan said the offence was at the more serious end of the scale and noted Smith 'interacted with someone, made a promise and took money'. Noting his guilty plea and efforts at rehabilitation, she imposed a five-month sentence backdated to 2 May, when he was charged, sparing him additional prison time.
The Journal
19 hours ago
- The Journal
Grandmother handed three-year restraining order over online abuse of daughter and grandchildren
A JUDGE HAS imposed a three-year restraining order on a Dublin grandmother, barring her from posting online about her daughter after she allegedly harassed her and wished death on her grandchildren. The young woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, resorted to using anti-stalking laws and applied for the order at Dublin District Court. However, her estranged mother did not attend the scheduled hearing to contest the claims against her. 'My mother is harassing me,' her adult daughter told Judge Anthony Halpin, adding that she had been subjected to online abuse, including 'she hopes my kids die'. Asked why this happened, the woman, in her twenties, explained that she had been taken into care when she was young and there had been a fractured relationship since. She told the court that the posts started nine weeks ago after five years of no contact. Advertisement The woman believed her mother was 'retaliating for having no contact with or access to her grandchildren'. On reviewing printouts of the posts, Judge Halpin stated he was satisfied the woman had made a reasonable case for a civil restraining order barring unwanted contact and online posts about the applicant. He held that it was appropriate to compel the respondent from harassing or placing her daughter in fear. Judge Halpin said gardaí would serve the order on the grandmother, and the court had a wide range of sanctions available if she broke the terms. Breaching them can result in the subject of the order being brought to court, jailed for up to a year and a maximum €4,000 fine. The restraining orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 as a remedy for people seeking protection. The District Court may issue an order to prevent the respondent from violence or threats, stalking, harassing or approaching the applicant's home, work, or school. It can run for up to five years, but may be shorter depending on the presiding judge's assessment.
Sunday World
a day ago
- Sunday World
Dublin granny handed restraining order after wishing death on her grandchildren
"My mother is harassing me," her daughter told the judge, adding she had been subjected to online abuse, including "she hopes my kids die". A judge imposed a three-year restraining order on a Dublin grandmother, barring her from posting online about her daughter after allegedly harassing her and wishing death on her grandchildren. The young woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, resorted to using anti-stalking laws and applied for the order at Dublin District Court. However, her estranged mother did not attend the scheduled hearing to contest the claims against her. "My mother is harassing me," her adult daughter told Judge Anthony Halpin, adding that she had been subjected to online abuse, including "she hopes my kids die". Dublin District Court News in 90 Seconds - 6th June 2025 Asked why this happened, the woman, in her twenties, explained that she had been taken into care when she was young and there had been a fractured relationship since. She told the court that the posts started nine weeks ago after five years of no contact. The woman believed her mother was "retaliating for having no contact with or access to her grandchildren". On reviewing printouts of the posts, Judge Halpin stated he was satisfied the woman had made a reasonable case for a civil restraining order barring unwanted contact and online posts about the applicant. He held that it was appropriate to compel the respondent from harassing or placing her daughter in fear. Judge Halpin said gardai would serve the order on the grandmother, and the court had a wide range of sanctions available if she broke the terms. Breaching them can result in the subject of the order being brought to court, jailed for up to a year and a maximum €4,000 fine. The restraining orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 as a remedy for people seeking protection. The District Court may issue an order to prevent the respondent from violence or threats, stalking, harassing or approaching the applicant's home, work, or school. It can run for up to five years but may be shorter depending on the presiding judge's assessment.
