
Luxury Home Rentals Surge As Wealthy North Americans Queue For NZ Investor Visas
A surge in wealthy North American investors anticipating changes to New Zealand's foreign buyer rules is fuelling a sharp rise in off-market luxury home rental demand, according to property experts.
Real estate agent Caleb Paterson says the country is seeing increased interest from ultra-high-net-worth individuals, particularly from the United States and Canada, who are looking to secure short-term leases in multimillion-dollar homes, while they wait for clarity around new investor visa pathways and possible amendments to the foreign buyer ban.
According to latest REINZ data, there is a growing glut of premium homes languishing on the market, with median days to sell in Auckland of properties valued at $3.5 million rising from 42 days in March 2024 to 64 days in March 2025 listings. In Queenstown, days to sell for luxury listings have climbed even higher, reaching 95.
'These are clients who could buy a home tomorrow if they were allowed,' says Paterson, founder of Paterson Luxury Real Estate. 'They're testing the waters, sometimes paying $20,000 to $30,000 a week to rent properties that fit their lifestyle and long-term ambitions.'
Paterson says the dynamic is reshaping how vendors approach the luxury market, with many now embracing a 'try-before-you-buy' model as a way to attract offshore tenants and potentially convert them into future buyers.
He says New Zealand Trade and Enterprise has reported a 700% increase in the number of people visiting the Active Investor Plus Visa application page, compared to the older version of the visa at the same time last year.
Paterson says he was approached by a premium rental firm wanting to match investors with properties after being unable to meet demand.
'While there is a surplus of rental properties at the lower end of the market, high net worth individuals have very specific accommodation requirements, and there is not enough suitable rental stock in the traditional market. This unmet demand has led to the development of a hybrid model, which is injecting hundreds of thousands of dollars into the economy each week.
'Traditionally, these homes would be listed for sale and sit idle while owners waited for the right buyer. But with the market stagnating in recent months we're now seeing more owners open to short-term rental agreements, particularly as these international clients are happy to pay well above local market rates.
'We've got vendors who previously would never have considered renting their home now proactively asking us to place it with international clients for six to 12 months. If the foreign buyer ban is lifted, we expect many of these tenants will put in an immediate purchase offer on these homes,' he says.
Paterson says the shift comes amid rising uncertainty in key offshore markets.
He says many of his Canadian clients are seeking to exit due to proposed wealth taxes and capital gains reforms, while American buyers are increasingly motivated by political instability and upcoming elections.
'Some are saying they just don't want to live under another Trump presidency. Others have had New Zealand on their radar for a while and the current visa discussions have reignited that interest,' he says.
Half of Paterson's current listings – which include homes valued between $8 million and $20 million – are now available for rent, and many are receiving multiple enquiries before even hitting the open market.
'The demand is there, but the ability to purchase still isn't and that's what is driving this surge in ultra-luxury rentals.
'We're also seeing foreign exchange rates playing a role – with the NZD falling to its lowest point against the greenback in the past decade early this month, it's extremely favourable for these buyers, so what looks expensive locally can actually feel like a bargain to someone arriving from California or Toronto,' he says.
Paterson says some owners have seen rental returns more than triple what the domestic market would offer, particularly when facilitated through high-end rental agencies.
He says while one home might fetch $2,000 a week in the traditional market, it could rent for $6,000–$7,000 through private arrangements with vetted international tenants.
'There's a lot of wealth sitting in our homes that isn't being unlocked because we've frozen out foreign investment. Opening a pathway for buyers at the $5 million-plus level could drive a major reinvestment cycle and ease pressure across the market,' says Paterson.
Paterson believes now is the perfect time for the Government to remove the current uncertainty preventing downsizers from moving to the next stage in their life.
'We're coming into winter, which is typically a quiet time, and without clarity, we're seeing people sit on their hands. I've had Kiwi clients walk away from retirement village agreements because they can't sell their homes, and that's clogging up movement across every tier of the market.
'A typical high net worth downsizer will reinvest most of the proceeds from the sale of a $5m plus home in local businesses as they look to build their retirement incomes.
'Letting high-value buyers into the country not only stimulates the property sector it also brings in capital, supports tradespeople and helps unlock the next stage of the housing cycle. If this is done right there will be a transfer of wealth that benefits New Zealand down the track,' he says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
The Inevitable Souring: Elon Musk Falls Out With Donald Trump
Trumps response to Musks latest gobbet of accusation proved almost melancholic. I dont mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. He went on to praise one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. Sandpit politics is rarely edifying and grown toddlers taking their fists to each other is unlikely to interest. But when they feature US President Donald Trump and the world's wealthiest man, the picture alters. Disputes are bound to be on scale, rippling in their consequences. No crystal ball was required regarding the eventual sundering of the relationship between Trump and Elon Musk. Here were noisy, brash egos who had formed a rancid union in American politics, with Musk lending his resources and public machinery to The Donald knowing he could also have sway in the Trump administration as a 'special government employee'. That sway took the form of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), a crude attempt to right the wrongs of misspending in government while politicising the public service. Awaking from a narcotised daze, Musk decided to focus on his floundering companies, notably Tesla, and step back from the inferno. In doing so, he expected 'to remain a friend and adviser, and if there's anything the president wants me to do, I'm at this service.' Gazing at the raging inferno that is Trumpian policy, that convivial attitude has all but evaporated. For one thing, Trump's proposed tax breaks and increases in defence spending, espoused in his One Big Beautiful Bill Act, seemed to undermine the very premise of DOGE and its zealous mission of reducing government spending. The legislation promises to slash $1.5 trillion in government spending but increase the debt limit by $4 trillion. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly,' Musk said in an interview with CBS Sunday Morning last month. Such a plan merely inflated, not reduced, the budget deficit. 'I think a bill can be big or beautiful. I don't know if it can be both.' This month, Musk got even tetchier. His temper had frayed. 'I'm sorry, I just can't stand it anymore,' he barked on his X platform on June 3. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' He continued to heap shame on members of Congress 'who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' On June 5, Trump expressed his disappointment 'because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill', leaving open the possibility that the billionaire might be suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Musk had 'only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the [electric vehicle] mandate.' A blow was in the offing, coming in the form of a post on Truth Social: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised Biden didn't do it!' Musk's embittered retort: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' He also proposed, in light of the President's announcement, the decommissioning of Space X's Dragon spacecraft, vehicles used by NASA to transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The ripples were finally getting violent. Musk then decided to do what he called dropping 'the really big bomb'. Trump, he revealed, 'is in the Epstein files. This is the real reason they have not been made public.' Given Musk's estranged relationship with reality and its facets, this can only be taken at face value. It's a matter of record that Trump, along with a fat who's who of power, knew the late Jeffrey Epstein, financier and convicted sex offender, for many years. The trove of government documents known as The Epstein Files has offered the easily titillated some manna but, thus far, few bombs. On February 27, US Attorney General Pamela Bondi released what were described as the 'first phase' of files relating to the financier and 'his exploitation of over 250 underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida, among other locations.' In an interview with Fox News on February 21, Bondi revealed that Epstein's client list lay 'on my desk right now.' Trump's response to Musk's latest gobbet of accusation proved almost melancholic. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' He went on to praise 'one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' In characteristically bratty fashion, Musk went on to share a post agreeing with the proposition that Trump be impeached and replaced by the Vice President, J.D. Vance, advocate 'a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle' (a touching billionaire's wish), and predict 'a recession in the second half of this year' caused by Trump's global tariff regime. In the scheme of things, Trump has survived impeachments, prosecutions, litigation, crowned by a divided US electorate that gave him a majority in both the Electoral College and the popular vote. Like a Teflon coated mafia don, he has made compromising people a minor art. Musk, compromised in his support and having second thoughts, can only go noisily into the confused night.


Scoop
18 hours ago
- Scoop
The Inevitable Souring: Elon Musk Falls Out With Donald Trump
Sandpit politics is rarely edifying and grown toddlers taking their fists to each other is unlikely to interest. But when they feature US President Donald Trump and the world's wealthiest man, the picture alters. Disputes are bound to be on scale, rippling in their consequences. No crystal ball was required regarding the eventual sundering of the relationship between Trump and Elon Musk. Here were noisy, brash egos who had formed a rancid union in American politics, with Musk lending his resources and public machinery to The Donald knowing he could also have sway in the Trump administration as a 'special government employee'. That sway took the form of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), a crude attempt to right the wrongs of misspending in government while politicising the public service. Awaking from a narcotised daze, Musk decided to focus on his floundering companies, notably Tesla, and step back from the inferno. In doing so, he expected 'to remain a friend and adviser, and if there's anything the president wants me to do, I'm at this service.' Gazing at the raging inferno that is Trumpian policy, that convivial attitude has all but evaporated. For one thing, Trump's proposed tax breaks and increases in defence spending, espoused in his One Big Beautiful Bill Act, seemed to undermine the very premise of DOGE and its zealous mission of reducing government spending. The legislation promises to slash $1.5 trillion in government spending but increase the debt limit by $4 trillion. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly,' Musk said in an interview with CBS Sunday Morning last month. Such a plan merely inflated, not reduced, the budget deficit. 'I think a bill can be big or beautiful. I don't know if it can be both.' This month, Musk got even tetchier. His temper had frayed. 'I'm sorry, I just can't stand it anymore,' he barked on his X platform on June 3. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' He continued to heap shame on members of Congress 'who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' On June 5, Trump expressed his disappointment 'because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill', leaving open the possibility that the billionaire might be suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Musk had 'only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the [electric vehicle] mandate.' A blow was in the offing, coming in the form of a post on Truth Social: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised Biden didn't do it!' Musk's embittered retort: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' He also proposed, in light of the President's announcement, the decommissioning of Space X's Dragon spacecraft, vehicles used by NASA to transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The ripples were finally getting violent. Musk then decided to do what he called dropping 'the really big bomb'. Trump, he revealed, 'is in the Epstein files. This is the real reason they have not been made public.' Given Musk's estranged relationship with reality and its facets, this can only be taken at face value. It's a matter of record that Trump, along with a fat who's who of power, knew the late Jeffrey Epstein, financier and convicted sex offender, for many years. The trove of government documents known as The Epstein Files has offered the easily titillated some manna but, thus far, few bombs. On February 27, US Attorney General Pamela Bondi released what were described as the 'first phase' of files relating to the financier and 'his exploitation of over 250 underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida, among other locations.' In an interview with Fox News on February 21, Bondi revealed that Epstein's client list lay 'on my desk right now.' Trump's response to Musk's latest gobbet of accusation proved almost melancholic. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' He went on to praise 'one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' In characteristically bratty fashion, Musk went on to share a post agreeing with the proposition that Trump be impeached and replaced by the Vice President, J.D. Vance, advocate 'a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle' (a touching billionaire's wish), and predict 'a recession in the second half of this year' caused by Trump's global tariff regime. In the scheme of things, Trump has survived impeachments, prosecutions, litigation, crowned by a divided US electorate that gave him a majority in both the Electoral College and the popular vote. Like a Teflon coated mafia don, he has made compromising people a minor art. Musk, compromised in his support and having second thoughts, can only go noisily into the confused night.


National Business Review
a day ago
- National Business Review
NZME reJoyce, RNZ dividends, Polk folklore, Metroglass on blast
NZME's AGM has long been circled on Private Bin's calendar. Apart from the elite shithousery of Stuff and Trade Me announcing a deal on the morning of a rival's meeting, the main event was all a bit, well, boring. Canadian agitator and 13% shareholder Jim Grenon last month struck a deal which Want to read more? It's easy. Choose your best value subscription option Student Exclusive FREE offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499). View terms and conditions. Individual Group membership NBR Marketplace Smartphone Only Subscription NZ$29.95 / monthly Monthly Premium Online Subscription NZ$49.95 / monthly Smartphone Only Annual Subscription NZ$299.00 / yearly Yearly Premium Online Subscription NZ$499.00 / yearly Premium Group Membership 10 Users NZ$385 +GST / monthly $38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Premium Group Membership 20 Users NZ$660 +GST / monthly $33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Premium Group Membership 50 Users NZ$1375 +GST / monthly $27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Premium Group Membership 100 Users NZ$2100 +GST / monthly $21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace NZ$999.00 / yearly Already have an account? Login