logo
Warning issued over Red Sea dive boat holidays after Egypt boat disaster

Warning issued over Red Sea dive boat holidays after Egypt boat disaster

Yahoo07-02-2025

A safety bulletin for dive boat holidays in the Red Sea has been issued following the presumed deaths of several Brits who went missing after the boats capsized or caught fire.
The UK's Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) is warning prospective diving holidaymakers to book only through recognised and reputable companies and ensure they have been given a safety briefing before embarking on a diving excursion in the Red Sea.
The safety bulletin, released on Thursday, comes after MAIB found that over the last five years, there have been 16 accidents involving liveaboard dive vessels operating in the Red Sea.
Three boats have been 'lost' in the last 21 months, resulting in numerous deaths, including UK nationals.
On 24 April 2023 several people were injured after dive boat Carlton Queen capsized and started to fill with water near Hurghada, Egypt, MAIB said. All 33 passengers and crew were able to be rescued.
Later that year on 11 June, dive boat Hurricane caught fire and was abandoned near Elphinstone Reef in the Red Sea. There were 29 people onboard, yet three UK passengers remain unaccounted for and are believed to have died.
The third accident occurred in November 2024, when dive boat Sea Story capsized and filled with water south of Port Ghalib, Egypt with 45 people on board.
Four bodies were recovered, while seven people who were on board when the boat capsized are still missing, including British couple Jenny Cawson, 36, and her husband Tariq Sinada, 49.
MAIB believes that the dive boats involved in these incidents were poorly constructed and often 'substantially modified/extended' meaning some were inadequately stable.
Other safety issues included essential lifesaving and safety equipment being defective, out-of-date or missing, poor structural fire protection, emergency escape routes were via lockable doors, had no emergency lighting and were unmarked, crew members were poorly trained or unfamiliar with the boats, and safety briefings for passengers were either poor or not done at all.
The investigation branch also found that these holidays are often 'marketed using ratings and reviews posted online that are not necessarily accurate and do not assure safety standards'.
It added that some consumers have reported finding themselves switched to another boat on arrival in Egypt, invalidating their attempts to choose a safe holiday.
MAIB is therefore advising those looking to book a dive boat holiday in the Red Sea to do so through recognised vendors and once on board, should request the crew provide a thorough safety briefing before departure.
It said this should include the emergency warning signal, emergency exits, muster stations, the location and use of safety equipment, and abandon ship procedures.
Andrew Moll, chief inspector of marine accidents, said the various incidents on these vessels are 'deeply regrettable' especially because they resulted in the loss of life.
'Our thoughts are with all those affected,' he continued.
'While MAIB does not have the jurisdiction to investigate accidents involving non-UK flagged vessels operating within the territorial waters of another coastal state, we have made the appropriate authorities aware of our national interest and offered every assistance with any safety investigation they conduct.
'Our safety bulletin provides important guidance to those intending to stay on liveaboard vessels,' he added.
'It is important to remember that such vessels are unlikely to be built, maintained, equipped, and operated to the standard of similar vessels in the UK and we urge the exercise of extreme caution when choosing a boat.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Commuters who appeal penalty fares risk criminal record
Commuters who appeal penalty fares risk criminal record

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Commuters who appeal penalty fares risk criminal record

SCHEDULE FOR 6.30AM LIVE PRIORITY TAG Commuters who challenge train ticket inspectors now risk getting a criminal record, The Telegraph can reveal. Passengers who are handed penalty fares for making mistakes when buying their tickets can now be prosecuted as criminals if their appeals against those penalties are rejected. Rules have changed thanks to a judgment made by the Chief Magistrate earlier this year, the existence of which The Telegraph is revealing now. Penalty fares are given to train passengers who cannot produce a valid ticket when asked by an inspector. The rule change, likely to affect tens of millions of journeys per year, comes after the Office of Rail and Road warned train companies last week to stop punishing people who make 'seemingly unintentional or minor transgressions of fares and ticketing rules'. Public concern about fare-dodging has reached a high point after Robert Jenrick, the Conservative shadow justice secretary, was filmed challenging miscreants in London. Credit: X/@RobertJenrick Yet those who formally dispute an inspector's view of the notoriously complex web of British train ticketing rules could now find themselves with a criminal record if they stand up for what they believe is right. Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring said in a written ruling dated February 21, which has not previously been published: 'I rule that criminal prosecutions can be brought following a penalty fare appeal being dismissed…' The judge said he had been given 'an undertaking that all [Department for Transport Train Operating Companies] will follow the guidance given by the court'. Fines of up to £1,000 and, for repeat offenders, prison sentences of up to three months can result from a conviction for failing to produce a ticket or travelling with intent to avoid payment. A conviction under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 will appear on DBS background checks, potentially affecting someone's job prospects. Campaigners fear that Judge Goldspring's ruling has given train companies a green light to threaten honest but mistaken commuters with a criminal record as the price of challenging ticket inspectors. Christian Waters, 47, of Leeds, who was targeted for prosecution in 2022 after having his penalty fare appeal rejected, said: 'Why was this ruling not published, given it affects the protection that hundreds of thousands of passengers would assume they had from the regulations? Mr Waters, whose case was dropped after he realised that Government-owned rail company Northern had broken the rules by trying to haul him in front of a judge, said: 'I do feel like they are saying I got off on a technicality now. I still dispute that I did anything wrong; their machine was not working!' 'No one has any protection at all, a sham of an appeal system and then money [is] demanded backed up by criminal law,' he continued. Westminster magistrates' court's unpublicised ruling came about after another Government-owned train company, Southeastern, asked the court if a number of previous prosecutions it brought were lawful. The exact number was not revealed in the judgment. 'It is clearly irrational that a person who brought an unmeritorious appeal could not be prosecuted, whereas someone who did not appeal could be,' ruled Judge Goldspring. While an out-of-court appeals process exists for penalty fares, Parliament never intended for commuters to be criminalised when it created the scheme some 35 years ago. Introducing the 1988 law that created penalty fares, Tory peer Lord Marshall of Leeds told Parliament: 'If, however, a passenger on a train is not in possession of a ticket, he is not to be treated as a criminal under this Bill. He is simply asked to pay a penalty fare, which is a civil penalty and not a criminal one.' Today, Regulation 11(3) of the Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 2018 says that prosecution is only allowed where the penalty has been cancelled by the train company before the appeal panel has decided the outcome. Yet in his February 2025 ruling, Judge Goldspring said: 'The prosecutor obviously should not bring a prosecution if it is excluded,' but added: 'There is no obligation on the court to investigate whether the defendant has a defence.' Penalty fare appeals are decided on by a private company called Appeal Services, which is a contractor paid by train companies to decide penalty fare appeals. According to Appeal Services' website, in the last 28 days, its assessors rejected 80 per cent of first-stage appeals. Southeastern and the Department for Transport were contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

First troops arrive in LA before feared third day of rioting
First troops arrive in LA before feared third day of rioting

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

First troops arrive in LA before feared third day of rioting

National Guard troops have arrived in Los Angeles as the city braces for a potential third day of rioting over raids on undocumented migrants. Donald Trump has sent 2,000 members of the National Guard to the California city after two days of violent clashes between police and demonstrators. Protesters launched fireworks at police on Saturday as cars were set on fire and a gas station was looted. A van was attacked with rocks while being driven away by border officials from a demonstration in the Paramount area, according to footage posted by Fox News. On Sunday morning, Mr Trump said on his Truth Social platform: 'Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest…These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will not be tolerated.' Gavin Newsom, the California governor, said Mr Trump's decision to send in troops was 'unnecessary' and 'purposefully inflammatory', stressing that there was no shortage of law enforcement. 'The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles – not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle,' Mr Newsom added. 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully.' Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, later threatened to mobilise active duty marines, which Mr Newsom went on to describe as 'deranged'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

British soldier arrested in Kenya over what UK media report is a rape accusation
British soldier arrested in Kenya over what UK media report is a rape accusation

San Francisco Chronicle​

time18 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

British soldier arrested in Kenya over what UK media report is a rape accusation

LONDON (AP) — A member of Britain's armed forces has been arrested in Kenya and U.K. military police are investigating, the Ministry of Defense said Sunday. The BBC and other British media reported that a British Army soldier was accused of rape. 'We can confirm the arrest of a Service person in Kenya,' the defense ministry said in a statement. 'As the matter is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the Defence Serious Crime Command, we will not comment further.' A U.K.-Kenya defense cooperation agreement allows thousands of British soldiers to train in the East African country each year. About 200 U.K. troops are based there permanently to train Kenyan soldiers. Some Kenyans have long complained about the soldiers' behavior and the atmosphere around their training camp near the town of Nanyuki. There was an outcry over the 2012 death of 21-year-old Agnes Wanjiru, who was last seen alive leaving a bar with British troops near their training camp. Her body was later found in a septic tank. Wanjiru's family has campaigned for years for the suspected perpetrator, a serving British soldier at the time, to be charged. In April, U.K Defense Secretary John Healey met with Wanjiru's relatives in Kenya and vowed to 'help the family secure the justice they deserve.' The British Army has launched an inquiry into allegations of unacceptable behavior by U.K. personnel in Kenya. The Ministry of Defense said in a statement that all British personnel in the country 'have clear direction about how to behave, on and off duty, must complete mandatory training and attend compulsory briefings on conduct. We will have zero tolerance for unacceptable behavior.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store