Demand for J1 visas to work in US remains high despite concerns about Trump border controls
Trump administration's
new hardline immigration policies.
In April, the
Union of Students in Ireland (USI)
urged caution
for those who would be travelling to the US on J1 visas this summer.
Following the US administration's decision last month to begin screening the social media accounts of immigrants, visa applicants and foreign students for what it has called 'anti-Semitic activity', the union said it was important that those travelling 'fully understand' the possible consequences for their visa status, including the risk of deportation.
USI president Chris Clifford said students have 'safety concerns' about the current situation in the US.
READ MORE
'There's always concern but it has increased significantly this year. There has been more [concern] this year, more conversations around it, with the student unions and USI ... they [students] have concerns about arriving, having their phone searched, being detained or being deported,' he said.
Ellen Clusker, a final-year UCD English and history student from Dublin, will travel to Maine in three weeks where she has secured work at a summer camp.
'I never debated not going but I have worries,' said Ms Clusker, who has been hearing recently how people 'going over are having their phone searched'.
'It's quite invasive but I'm not sure how true those concerns are ... I only have Instagram and it's private. Some friends have deleted Twitter [X] or some tweets that they are worried about, but I personally won't be.
'Even some friends are saying: 'Oh have you seen this?' and I'm like: 'Stop panicking me,'' she said.
While her father has been 'encouraging', Ms Clusker says her mother is worried about her upcoming travel plans – 'she keeps sending me news articles.'
Other students chose not to give their real names, feeling it may jeopardise any future plans to visit the US.
One such student from Munster Technological University in Cork, Sarah* (21), and two friends have decided to forgo their J1 plans this summer amid growing safety concerns.
'We all started the application process and we all paid just under €1,000, but with everything that happened with tariffs, seeing stories of ICE [the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement] taking people into custody and also people being denied entry, it made us a bit nervous," she said.
'So we said we wouldn't go ahead with it. It's a real shame and we're all really disappointed but it just isn't safe.'
For Sarah, the decision is 'about freedom of speech ... we wouldn't want to go and feel like we couldn't post something on our Instagram story that wouldn't align with Trump's ideals'.
'If that was taken and used against me and there was a mark on my record that I was denied entry or if I was deported, that would ruin any chance of going to the States again.'
Laura*, a second-year Irish and translation student from University of Galway, is getting ready to travel to Ohio this week where she will work as a camp instructor for three months.
This will be Laura's first visit to the States – 'I have always wanted to go to America' – and she is feeling uneasy after reading recent news stories and USI's statement last month.
'By the time that came out, I felt I was already too far in with the application process. I do worry, hearing all the stories of protests being shut down in the US.'
Laura has been involved in student activism but doesn't 'plan on doing that in the States because it's too risky'.
Offering advice to those who may be feeling concerned in advance of travelling to the US, Clifford said students should 'proceed with caution' when it comes to what they post online.
'The digital footprint goes a long way,' he said.
'Keep communicating with your family, tell them where you are and what you are doing, that's big ... Keep informed and most importantly prioritise the safety of you and your friends if you are travelling together.'
Work-abroad organisation Usit said there were just over 5,500 J1 visas issued last year, with numbers for 2025 expected to be similar.
Although figures have not yet been released for this year, Sheelagh Daly, director of sales in Ireland with the Council on International Educational Exchange said it had not seen any decline in demand for this summer's working visas.
Figures provided by the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs at the US Department of State, which oversees the J1 programme, show 3,722 students travelled from Ireland to the US in 2024. Similar uptake was seen in 2023, when 3,673 travelled, and 2022 when 3,660 participants were recorded.
These figures represent the amount of BridgeUSA J1 Summer Work and Travel programme participants, not including participants in the US Summer Camp or Internship programmes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, August14th: On MetroLink arguments, calling time on the Angelus, and immigrants and jobs
Sir, – In response to Michael O'Leary's letter (August 13th) he makes very valid points about cost- analysis when progressing with a substantial investment such as MetroLink. However, using his own logic on the unsuitability of Irish Times columnists to comment on transport projects, I would posit it's unlikely he's speaking from personal experience about public transport. His assertion that the airport is 'well served' by bus connections is simply not true. Passengers often have to wait and queue for long periods of time to access services into the city centre at peak times. Several times I have tried to board connections in the city centre to take me to the airport only to be told by the drivers that their buses are full – try explaining the lack of transport options to German or French travellers similarly marooned at Customs House Quay, worried that they may miss their flights. READ MORE The truth is that the travel connections to and from Dublin Airport fall woefully short of that which is available in most other European cities. Shovelling a few million more passengers through the airport, as Mr O'Leary also suggests, without tackling this key issue first, will only exacerbate this national embarrassment. – Yours, etc, DAVID CLARKE, Edinburgh, Scotland. Sir, – Michael O'Leary paints MetroLink as an overpriced airport shuttle (Letters, April 13th). It's not. It will link 15 stations, 127 schools, three universities, five hospitals, and put over 175,000 people and 250,000 jobs within walking distance of a stop. With only about 18 per cent of passengers expected to use the airport station, its real value lies in serving as a clean and efficient transport backbone for Dublin's growing population. – Yours, etc, Dr CIARÁN O'CARROLL, Lecturer in Sustainability, TU Dublin. Sir, – Yes. We do not need a metro to the airport. I travel to Dublin by train, get the Luas into town and get the 16 or 41 bus to the airport from the city centre. Great service. I could also get the airport bus from Heuston Station to the airport every 15 minutes or so. Possibly the bus service could be expanded with better buses and with more frequency. Of course, Paddy wants to drive to the airport, and would drive into the bag drop area if allowed. Maybe better links to Cork and Shannon should be considered, possibly a train or metro directly to these airports as it would be easier to build. Imagine trying to build a metro to Dublin Airport now that the area is fully built up. Even upgrading the existing rail network across Ireland to the cities would make sense. Why does the world evolve around Dublin people? The rest of the country deserves the same attention. Michael O'Leary is correct. – Yours, etc, TREVOR MOORE, Co Carlow. Sir, – Michael O'Leary does not have 'humble' opinions. In fact, his opinions are quite the opposite. – Yours, etc, SHEA CARROLL , Dublin 8. Sir, – Regarding Justine McCartney's support for building the MetroLink ('Michael O'Leary and Dermot Desmond's MetroLink comments show you can be rich and wrong,' August 8th), may I suggest that criticism of this stance by multimillionaire airline chiefs currently desperate to abolish passenger caps, increasing fossil fuel consumption, is a great compliment? – Yours, etc, ROBERT WALSH, Fulham, London. Sir, – I read a letter in today's Irish Times by a certain Michael O'Leary. I simply thought if only more could think like that, we might be in a better place. – Yours, etc, ANTAINE O'DUIBHIR, Ranelagh, Dublin 6. Sir, – Michael O'Leary's letter was an entertaining read. Please give him his own column. – Yours, etc, SADHBH NÍ SEACHNASAIGH, Galway. Is time up for the Angelus? Sir, – Isn't it time to remove the Angelus from RTÉ's airwaves? Friday is the 75th anniversary of the first broadcast on Radio Éireann. A lot has changed in Ireland since 1950, and the Angelus has run its course. It may have been revamped a few times in recent years, but these efforts have been the last sting of a dying wasp. At its best the Angelus is one minute less advertising. At its worst it is 60 seconds of repetitive sound. Ultimately, though, the Angelus is a throwback to a bygone era, to the stern religious society of the past. It does not ring true in the Ireland of 2025. The removal of the Angelus may be denounced as 'cancel culture' by some. But many others wouldn't even notice its absence. And that speaks volumes. – Yours, etc, WILLIAM BURKE, Blackrock, Cork. Reporting Gaza death tolls Sir, – A recent letter (August 12th) questioning why CNN and Channel 4 no longer add 'Hamas-controlled' to mentions of the health ministry in Gaza does itself a disservice in raising misdirected concerns. It notes 'it is a matter of established fact' that the health ministry is run by Hamas officials, but it too is an established fact that the figures they present are reliable. Gaza's health ministry – which is part of the Palestinian Ministry of Health, encompassing both Gaza and the Palestinian Authority (PA) – has proven largely accurate in tallying Palestinian death tolls in conflicts over the past 17 years, and its data is used by the UN and others, including both the US and Israel. Throughout the current Israeli bombardment, the health ministry has regularly released lists of the full names (which include both the deceased's father and grandfather's names), ID numbers and addresses of the victims of the conflict. However, the letter writer is correct in questioning the acceptance of these figures as the 'full and unvarnished truth' in light of the several studies showing that they are likely a gross undercount. The Lancet estimated in February 70,000 deaths from traumatic injuries in the first year of the conflict alone, and a June study by researchers from the University of London, Princeton and Stanford estimated 75,200 war-related deaths up to January 2025. It is also worth noting that the health ministry figures count only those killed by bombs or bullets who are registered in hospitals, and not those under the rubble, or cut off from emergency services, nor those who have died and will die from other causes related to Israel's blockade of food and medical supplies, and its destruction of the health system. On the subject of clarifications, it may be more pertinent to call for prefixing the pronouncements of the Israeli government with a descriptor such as 'war-crimes accused', or a caveat that human rights groups, from Amnesty to Israel's B'Tselem, UN experts, lawyers and genocide scholars have determined it is likely conducting a genocide. Noting the Israeli government's record of false statements about its killing of journalists, emergency workers, or its bombing of hospitals could also be useful when featuring its quotes. And rather than worrying about the accuracy of these figures, one should perhaps wonder in what other conflict in which a side has killed more than 60,000 people – including over 230 journalists, 400 aid workers and 18,000 children, and 168 people have died of malnutrition as a result of the purposeful starving of the trapped population – would a person be more concerned with casting doubt on death tolls than putting a stop to them. – Yours, etc, CHRISTINE MAGUIRE, Whitehall, Dublin 9. School holidays Sir, – Having read 'The Debate: Are school holidays too long?' (August 12th), it crossed my mind that it is always teachers who think that the school holidays are not too long. I wonder why? – Yours, etc, JOHN WALSH, Shannon, Co Clare. Immigrants and jobs Sir, – Fintan O'Toole reminds us of where we were as emigrants and where we are today as an immigrant nation (' We in Ireland forget how recently we were the 'crap-job' migrants ', August 12th). We should treat immigrants in Ireland with the protections we hope for Irish emigrants wherever. Is there no intergenerational memory? – Yours, etc, BOBBY GILMORE SSC, (Director of Irish Emigrant Chaplaincy 1978-92), Navan, Co Meath. Sir, – Each morning on my daily walk I meet an elderly Irish man with a walking stick being led by his carer from Peru. They strike me as having a respectful and caring relationship and without the carer he could not take a walk. Fintan O'Toole refers to this job as 'crap'. Meaning worthless. While I do agree with most of his views and consider him a gifted writer with an extensive vocabulary, I am greatly disappointed with his choice of the word crap. I agree that these jobs are low paid and mostly done by foreigners, but it is an insult to refer to them in this way. I do hope none of these foreigners read The Irish Times to discover how 'worthless' their jobs are. If this were a report card. I would say 'could do better'. – Yours, etc, KATHLEEN FORDE, Whitehall, Dublin 9. Sir, – Fintan O'Toole brilliantly summarises the immigrant dilemma. I look forward to seeing Conor McGregor and his friends serving me my burgers and delivering my next pizza when they fulfil their 'Ireland for the Irish'. In the meantime, I appreciate all the contributions of those who have chosen to make Ireland their home. – Yours, etc, TONY HAMILL, Stillorgan, Co Dublin. Camogie bogey Sir, – Having spent last Sunday at Croke Park, I agree with Dermot Ashmore's complimentary observations on the merits of camogie (Letters, August 12th). However, the referee's insistence on whistling when the sliotar crosses the endline, sideline and then blowing again to restart play was infuriating. Let them play. – Yours, etc, DENISE McCARTHY, Drumcondra, Dublin 9. Horse show coverage Sir, – The coverage in your paper, and indeed other Irish media outlets, of the Irish Horse Show is disproportionately small compared with that given to English sporting events. This is despite the fact that we have the best riders, the finest horses, and host one of the most prestigious competitions in the world. The Irish Horse Show warrants far more coverage in Ireland befitting its international standing. – Yours, etc, FIONA ANDERSON, Blackrock, Dublin. SUV survey Sir, – The debate about SUVs in the media, including in your Letters page, never tackles the definition of an SUV. I drive a modest car similar in size to many Nissans, Renaults and Volkswagens. It burns 4.5l/100 km (63mpg) which is half the fuel consumption of a 1950s Morris Minor. It fits into a standard parking space and its weight is about half that of a Range Rover. Finally, its height is only about 18cm more than the saloon equivalent. Yet my car is classified as an SUV alongside very large cars such as Range Rovers, Volvos and Porsches simply because it is a little higher than the saloon. Few people mention the advantage of an SUV which is that older people like me with mobility problems find entry and exit easier with a higher vehicle. I would wholeheartedly welcome an accurate and scientific means of determining whether a car is an SUV, and I would also welcome a taxation system for cars based on a combination of dimensions, weight, fuel consumption and pollution. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL HARRINGTON, Beara, Co Cork. Stalling infrastructure Sir, – Your editorial ('The Irish Times view on infrastructure delivery: radical solutions are needed,' August 11th) rightly highlights dysfunction in Ireland's infrastructure delivery, but its roots lie in a relentless focus on economic gains at the expense of social, environmental and legal commitments. Judicial reviews are not the problem; they are a symptom of this imbalance. Renewable energy policy is a case in point. Low ambition, weak policy, and disregard for best practice have made Ireland the slowest in the EU for project consents. Offshore wind has been stalled by departmental inefficiencies and failure to engage with legal and public concerns, ensuring years of further delay. This is not the fault of 'objectors' but of poor governance. It is time to move beyond the narrow economic mindset, stop pandering to foreign direct investment (FDI) interests, and deliver competent, lawful planning in the true national interest. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL O'MEARA, Fenor, Co Waterford. Is this a record? Sir – Your excellent world weather summary (August 12th) shows that 10 cities reached 100 degrees Fahrenheit or higher yesterday. This must (unquestionably) be a record! Don't tell Mr Trump. – Yours, etc, BRENDAN CASHELL, Co Louth. Sir, – Allow me to wade in. I have a yellow-skinned fleshy tuber in my possession. Is this a Record? – Yours, etc, JAMES KINSELLA, Arklow, Co Wicklow. Sir, – I note the current run of letters on records has been continuing for quite a while, perhaps longer than any previous times. If this is in fact the case, would that be a 'broken' record? – Yours, etc, DAVID DORAN, Bagenalstown, Co Carlow. Bowel screening Sir, – Reading the letter from Michael Gleeson on bowel screening (August 12th) reminds me that there is equality legislation in this country (Equal Status Act), the purpose of which is to prevent discrimination in the provision of goods and services against nine categories of people in our society. One of these categories is discrimination on the grounds of age . – Yours, etc, MARY DALY, Rathfarnham, Dublin.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on climate policy: Government must avoid backsliding
Methane arising from agriculture and the fossil fuel industry is a notorious greenhouse gas, contributing significantly to global warming. While it breaks down relatively quickly in the atmosphere – unlike carbon dioxide – it is a serious threat to climate stabilisation. The quicker it is reduced, the more global average temperatures can be cut. Much can be done to reduce methane releases in oil and gas production, but it is much more challenging in agriculture. Livestock exporting countries like Ireland and New Zealand are supporting a new approach to classifying methane which is gaining political traction. This is based around achieving national 'temperature neutrality', also known as 'no additional warming'. The Government has yet to take a formal position on the concept. Significantly it got the backing of the Climate Change Advisory Council, its key advisory body. It chose to interpret Ireland's legally-binding climate neutrality obligations in terms of temperature neutrality – rather than the more onerous target of 'net zero emissions'. An international study , published in the Environmental Research Letters journal this week, has questioned this approach. It says that it 'grandfathers high emissions from wealthy, livestock-exporting nations', shifts the burden of cutting emissions to others, and limits space for lower-income countries to grow food systems. The approach fails on food security grounds, with trade data showing most exports serve high-income markets. This risks locking in inequality and misses 'a critical opportunity to reduce peak warming'. READ MORE The most concerning finding was highlighted by lead researcher Dr Colm Duffy of the University of Galway: 'If every country adopted a temperature neutrality target, we'd seriously jeopardise the Paris agreement's goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees.' The Government is in a bind on this. How methane is regarded in policy terms has big implications for carbon budgets up to 2040, which must be signed off on soon. Climatologist Prof John Sweeney has argued that the shift, which reduces the required emissions reduction target, is not aligned with scientific recommendations and could hinder Ireland's ability to meet its climate goals. The study emphasises that governments must set targets that are internationally credible and farmers need to be supported within a national framework, rather than targeted for blame. The bottom line is that Ireland will not meet the global climate challenge by redefining climate targets. Ireland has yet to deliver an honest appraisal of what a genuinely climate-neutral, sustainable and resilient agricultural sector could look like in coming decades. Avoiding this issue would amount to backsliding on vital climate action.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Fáilte Ireland appoints Caroline Bocquel as new CEO
Fáilte Ireland has appointed Caroline Bocquel as its new chief executive. Ms Bocquel, the first woman to led the State tourism agency, will step into the role in November. Paul Kelly , who had led Fáilte Ireland for eight years, stepped down in March to take over as chief executive of the Royal Dublin Society (RDS) . Ms Bocquel, an executive with 20 years' experience, most recently served as chief executive of Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM), the State agency responsible for the development of the Irish seafood sector. She has been in that position since January 2023, having previously served as BIM's director of corporate services. She is the chairwoman of the audit and risk committee at the Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and formerly served as the chief financial officer of aid agency, Goal Global. READ MORE Ms Bocquel said she was honoured to be appointed to the position, describing Fáilte Ireland as 'central to one of Ireland's most vital industries'. 'Tourism supports hundreds of thousands of jobs in communities nationwide, and its sustainable growth is essential to our economic and cultural future,' the incoming chief executive said. She outlined her aim of working to 'ensure Ireland continues to offer world-class experiences while building a resilient, innovative and inclusive tourism sector'. Minister for Enterprise, Peter Burke , said he was 'happy' to approve Ms Bocquel's appointment, adding that 'tourism is of critical importance to the Irish economy'. Mr Burke said Ms Bocquel 'has the strategic skills, development mindset and governance experience needed to support the sustainable growth of our tourism economy into the future'. 'I am confident that Caroline and her team will work closely with the industry and my officials as we develop and support the Irish tourism sector together,' the minister said. Ruth Andrews , chairwoman of the Fáilte Ireland, said the appointment came following 'a highly competitive recruitment process'. Before Ms Bocquel formally assumes the role in November, Paul Keeley, the director of regional development, will serve as interim chief executive.
