Bipartisan lawmakers propose making FEMA a cabinet-level agency
The proposal, comes as the Trump administration weighs changes at or even abolishing the emergency management agency.
The new legislation from Reps. Sam Graves (R-Mo.), Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), Daniel Webster (R-Fla.) and Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.) would make FEMA directly answer to the president rather than keeping it under the Department of Homeland Security.
While the bipartisan legislation rejects calls to eliminate the agency, it does allow some responsibilities to be delegated to states, as the Trump administration has called for.
For example, states would be allowed in handling small disasters to request a lump-sum payment for estimated damages rather than going through a separate supplemental grant program.
The bill also has various other provisions including the creation of a single assistance application that lawmakers say will streamline the process and cut down on paperwork.
'This bill does more than any recent reforms to cut through the bureaucracy, streamline programs, provide flexibility, and return FEMA to its core purpose of empowering the states to lead and coordinating the federal response when it's needed,' Graves said in a written statement.
'The solution is not to tear FEMA down – it's to work across the aisle to build FEMA up,' said Stanton. 'This bipartisan bill takes common-sense steps to streamline the agency and make sure communities get disaster assistance quickly, efficiently and fairly.'
The bill's formal announcement comes one day after FEMA's acting head testified before Congress and did not say whether the administration wants to get rid of the agency.
It's not entirely clear whether the bill will ultimately be taken up by the House's GOP leadership or whether it would receive Senate support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Press
17 minutes ago
- American Press
UPDATE: D.C. mayor holds press conference after Trump announces police takeover
Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser is holding a press conference following President Donald Trump's announcement Monday that he's taking over Washington's police department and activating 800 members of the National Guard in the hopes of reducing crime, even as city officials stressed crime is already falling in the nation's capital. Trump has promised new steps to tackle homelessness and crime in Washington, prompting the city's mayor to voice concerns about the potential use of the National Guard to patrol the streets. Here's the latest: Bowser works to avoid fight with Trump, but can't disguise some anger D.C. Mayor Bowser fielded multiple questions Monday designed to get her to say something harsh about President Donald Trump. But the 3rd term mayor didn't take the bait, for the most part — calmly laying out the city's case that crime has been dropping steadily and Trump's perceived state of emergency simply doesn't match the numbers. She repeatedly acknowledged that Trump has 'broad authority' under the law and would be difficult to challenge. The composure slipped a bit toward the end, when she dropped a reference to Trump's 'so-called emergency.' Trump could extend takeover of DC police for 30 days, then he needs congressional approval President Donald Trump is invoking Section 740 of the DC Home Rule Act to take over control of the city's police department, saying in a letter to a congressional committee that the police force is needed for federal purposes. The Republican president says in the letter sent to the House Oversight Committee Monday that he is taking the action for the purpose of 'maintaining law and order in the nation's seat of government; protecting federal buildings, national monuments, and other federal property; and ensuring conditions necessary for the orderly functioning of the federal government.' By invoking the law, Trump is able to take over the police for more than 48 hours, but if he wants to continue for more than 30 days, both the House and Senate would need to give him a vote of approval.
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Millions will lose Medicaid under Trump's tax law. Here's the final tally.
About 10 million Americans are expected to lose health insurance under President Donald Trump's tax cut and spending law, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said. Over the next decade, 7.5 million people will lose Medicaid coverage due to changes under the law, the CBO said in an analysis released Monday, Aug. 11. Nondisabled adults on Medicaid will be required to get a job, volunteer or enroll in school to maintain their Medicaid coverage. And states must double Medicaid eligibility checks to twice a year. Another 2.1 million people will shed Affordable Care Act coverage over the next decade, the CBO said. And 400,000 more will lose coverage due to impacts of the law — nicknamed the One Big Beautiful Bill — which was backed by Congressional Republicans. The CBO earlier said the legislation, which Trump signed on July 4, would add $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit. The law extends the 2017 tax cuts, ends taxes on tips and overtime, and bolsters border security, among other things. The CBO also estimated low-income Americans will lose about $1,200 per year due to Medicaid changes and reductions in food assistance. Middle-income households are expected to gain $800 to $1,200. Meanwhile, the law's tax cuts will benefit wealthier Americans by about $13,600 per year, even though these households with pay about $190,000 in federal taxes annually, the CBO said. Millions more could lose their health insurance When the bill passed the Senate, the CBO estimated it would leave about 11.8 million Americans without health insurance through 2034. The law signed by Trump won't cut as deep because it excluded a provision that would've penalized states extending Medicaid to undocumented residents. Still, another 5 million could lose coverage if Congress doesn't extend the expiring COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made Affordable Care Act plans more affordable for consumers, according to earlier CBO estimates. Consumers who use those pandemic-era tax credits will see the amount they need to pay spike an average of more than 75%, according to KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The combination of the tax law, expiring tax credits and overall rising medical costs will make insurance premiums more expensive for everyone. Insurers plan a median premium increase of 18% for 2026 plans, which would be the largest ACA insurance price hike since 2018, according to a Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker report released Aug. 6.
Los Angeles Times
17 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump wants troops in D.C. But don't expect him to stop there
Well, at least they're not eating the cats and dogs. To hear President Trump tell it, Washington, D.C., has become a barbarous hellhole — worse even than Springfield, Ohio, it would seem, where he accused Black immigrants, many from Somalia, of barbecuing pets last year during the campaign. Back then, Trump was just a candidate. Now, he's the commander in chief of the U.S. military with a clear desire to use troops of war on American streets, whether it's for a fancy birthday parade, to enforce his immigration agenda in Los Angeles or to stop car thefts in the nation's capital. 'It's becoming a situation of complete and total lawlessness,' Trump said during a Monday news conference, announcing that he was calling up National Guard troops to help with domestic policing in D.C. 'We'll get rid of the slums, too. We have slums here. We'll get rid of them,' he said. 'I know it's not politically correct. You'll say, 'Oh, so terrible.' No, we're getting rid of the slums where they live.' Where 'they' live. While the use of the military on American streets is alarming, it should be just as scary how blatantly this president is tying race not just to crime, but to violence so uncontrollable it requires military troops to stop it. Tying race to criminality is nothing new, of course. It's a big part of American history and our justice system has unfortunately been steeped in it, from the Jim Crow era to the 1990s war on drugs, which targeted inner cities with the same rhetoric that Trump is recycling now. The difference between that last attack on minorities — started by President Nixon and lasting through Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, also under the guise of law and order — and our current circumstances is that in this instance, the notion of war isn't just hyperbole. We are literally talking about soldiers in the streets, targeting Black and brown people. Whether they are car wash employees in California or teenagers on school break in D.C., actual crimes don't seem to matter. Skin color is enough for law enforcement scrutiny, a sad and dangerous return to an era before civil rights. 'Certainly the language that President Trump is using with regard to D.C. has a message that's racially based,' said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. Chemerinsky pointed out that just a few days ago, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals called out the Trump administration for immigration raids that were unconstitutional because they were basically racial sweeps. But he is unabashed. His calls for violence against people of color are escalating. It increasingly appears that bringing troops to Los Angeles was a test case for a larger use of the military in civilian settings. 'This will go further,' Trump ominously said, making it clear he'd like to see soldiers policing across America. 'We have other cities also that are bad, very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is,' he went on. 'We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore, they're so, they're so far gone.' In reality, crime is dropping across the United States, including in Washington. As the Washington Post pointed out, violent crime rates, including murders, have for the most part been on a downward trend since 2023. But all it takes is a few explosive examples to banish truth from conscientiousness. Trump pointed out some tragic and horrific examples — including the beating of Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine, a former employee of the president's Department of Government Efficiency who was attacked after attempting to defend a woman during a carjacking recently, not far from the White House. These are crimes that should be punished, and certainly not tolerated. But the exploitation we are seeing from Trump is a dangerous precedent to justify military force for domestic law enforcement, which until now has been forbidden — or at least assumed forbidden — by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. This week, just how strong that prohibition is will be debated in a San Francisco courtroom, during the three-day trial over the deployment of troops in Los Angeles. While it's uncertain how that case will resolve, 'Los Angeles could provide a bit of a road map for any jurisdiction seeking to push back against the Trump administration when there's a potential threat of sending in federal troops,' Jessica Levinson, a constitutional legal scholar at Loyola Law School, told me. Again, California coming out as the biggest foil to a Trump autocracy. But while we wait in the hopes that the courts will catch up to Trump, we can't be blind to what is happening on our streets. Race and crime are not linked by anything other than racism. Allowing our military to terrorize Black and brown people under the guise of law and order is nothing more than a power grab based on the exploitation of our darkest natures. It's a tactic Trump has perfected, but one which will fundamentally change, and weaken, American justice if we do not stop it.
