
DOJ investigating California over transgender athletes law
The Justice Department on Wednesday said it is investigating whether a near-decade-old law in California violates federal laws against sex discrimination by allowing transgender student-athletes to participate in sports consistent with their gender identity.
In a news release, the department said it had launched an inquiry into whether a 2013 state law, A.B. 1266, conflicts with Title IX, the landmark civil rights law prohibiting sex discrimination in education programs that receive government funding.
President Trump and administration officials have argued the law bars transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) said Wednesday that it had sent letters of legal notice to California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D), State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF), which governs high school sports in the state and the Jurupa Unified School District, where a 16-year-old transgender track-and-field athlete has for months been the target of protests.
Representatives for Bonta, CIF and the Jurupa Unified School District did not immediately return a request for comment. A spokesperson for the state education department said it cannot comment on a pending investigation.
The inquiry, DOJ said, will establish 'whether California, its senior legal, educational, and athletic organizations, and the school district are engaging in a pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of sex.'
'Title IX exists to protect women and girls in education. It is perverse to allow males to compete against girls, invade their private spaces, and take their trophies,' said Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet K. Dhillon. 'This Division will aggressively defend women's hard-fought rights to equal educational opportunities.'
DOJ's announcement comes one day after Trump publicly threatened to withhold federal funding from California if it continued allowing transgender girls to play on girls' sports teams in defiance of his February executive order proclaiming the government opposes 'male competitive participation in women's sports.'
In a post on Truth Social Tuesday morning, Trump railed against AB Hernandez, a junior at Jurupa Valley High School in Southern California who qualified for three state championship events at the CIF's Southern Section Masters meet on May 24.
'THIS IS NOT FAIR, AND TOTALLY DEMEANING TO WOMEN AND GIRLS,' Trump wrote in the post, which does not refer to Hernandez by name. He ordered local authorities to block the student from competing in the state finals this weekend and said he planned to speak with California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) about the issue, which he made central to his campaign's closing arguments last year.
A spokesperson for Newsom said the governor received a call Tuesday afternoon from Trump but could not take it because he was attending another event.
'He hopes to speak with him soon,' the spokesperson said. They declined to comment on DOJ's investigation.
Newsom, a likely contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, has voiced some openness to limiting transgender athletes' participation in the state.
He said in the debut episode of his podcast, 'This is Gavin Newsom,' in March that he believes transgender girls in girls' sports are 'deeply unfair.' The following month, speaking to reporters in Modesto, Calif., Newsom said he would be 'open' to a conversation about eligibility restrictions for transgender student-athletes if it were conducted 'in a way that's respectful and responsible and could find a kind of balance.'
Newsom's office said the governor was 'encouraged' by a new CIF policy announced Tuesday that would allow more girls to compete in the state's high school track-and-field championships this month.
In a news release, CIF said it decided over the weekend to temporarily alter its competition rules to extend entry to 'any biological female student-athlete' who would have 'earned the next qualifying mark' in their event for the state finals in Clovis on May 30–31.
'The CIF believes this pilot entry process achieves the participation opportunities we seek to afford our student-athletes,' the group said. A spokesperson for the organization did not return a request for clarification about whether the policy change applies to all events or only to ones where a transgender girl qualified.
'CIF's proposed pilot is a reasonable, respectful way to navigate a complex issue without compromising competitive fairness — a model worth pursuing,' said Izzy Gardon, Newsom's communications director.
Tuesday's announcement from DOJ also comes as the department submitted a statement of interest in a lawsuit challenging AB 1266, signed by former California Gov. Jerry Brown (D).
Two teenage girls and their families sued California officials and their local school district last year after they were reprimanded for wearing shirts to school that read 'Save Girls' Sports' and 'It's Common Sense. XX ≠ XY' to protest the state's inclusion of transgender athletes.
The girls, who compete for their schools' girls' cross-country team and are represented by Advocates for Faith & Freedom, amended their complaint in January to challenge the law itself.
'At the core of the Title IX regulations is an abiding interest in creating opportunities for women and girls to enjoy equal athletic opportunities on a level playing,' the Justice Department wrote in its statement to the court on Wednesday. 'Allowing a biological male-transgender female to compete on a girls' cross-country team upsets that level playing field and interferes with the opportunity for girls to compete in a sport where mere seconds can mean the difference between wins and losses.'
Roughly half the country prohibits transgender athletes from competing on school sports teams that match their gender identity, though court rulings have blocked enforcement of laws in Montana, Idaho, Utah, Arizona and West Virginia.
New transgender girls in New Hampshire expanded their legal challenge to the state's restrictions on trans athletes in February to include the Trump administration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin. cancels Moderna bird fu vaccine contract
The Trump administration has canceled a contract with Moderna (MRNA) worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The contract was supposed to help Moderna develop a vaccine for humans to defend against bird flu. Yahoo Finance Senior Health Care Reporter Anjalee Khemlani reports the details in the video above. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Trump administration canceling more than $700 million awarded to drug maker Moderna to develop the vaccine against potential pandemic viruses. For more we're bringing in here Yahoo Finance Senior Health Reporter, Angeli Kamani. Ange. Yeah, like you mentioned, the NIH canceled more than $750, a million dollars, rather, in funding for Moderna. And this is something that the company found out just based on a notification to themselves, even though they were really expecting that to get into late stage development. They said in a statement, Moderna received notice that the Health and Human Services Department, remember led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy will terminate the award for the late stage development and rights to purchase the pre-pandemic influenza vaccines. Now, we went out to HHS to understand what their rationale was behind this. And among other things they mentioned that the MRNA technology remains quote, "under tested" and we are not going to spend taxpayer dollars repeating the mistakes of the last administration which concealed legitimate safety concerns from the public. And in that they're referring to the myocarditis that was evident in some males and some younger individuals. So, this is really just the latest setback for the company. We know it's been pummeled, the stock is down more than 30% on the year. This is one of the latest. So, we know that they pulled their filing of a combination flu and COVID vaccine earlier last week. Then we've got the NIH funding that's cutting the pandemic and bird flu. And then we've also got missing the Q1 estimates earlier this year. So, just really telling a really hard story for this company. We know it's been under pressure because of the waning COVID revenues, and these are just some of those areas that were supposed to sort of plug that hole. And now, without those in the way, it's a question on what Moderna's viability is. Now, on the flip side, you do have some good news, right? The company's still working on a number of clinical trials with Merck on cancer vaccine. It also has a partnership with Vertex on cystic fibrosis. So, they do have a few other things going for them, but this is really a longer play for the company rather than any near term that they would have otherwise been able to take advantage of. All right. Thanks, Angeli. Appreciate it. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Slams Trump's Spending Bill: ‘A Disgusting Abomination'
A serious rift has erupted between Elon Musk and President Trump over the massive government spending bill the president has urged Congress to pass. Musk, who donated nearly $275 million toward Trump's 2024 election campaign, on Tuesday posted on X an unambiguous denunciation of the bill, which is called the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act. More from Variety London Mayor Sadiq Khan Hails 'Adolescence' for Having 'Mainstreamed' Conversation About 'Epidemic' of Violence Against Women Jon Stewart Tackles Elon Musk's Exit From the Trump Administration: 'This Guy Has Seen Some S--' Elon Musk Says New York Times Is 'Lying Their Ass Off' About His Alleged Drug Use; Newspaper Defends Coverage 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The tech mogul wrote that the bill 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Musk, the world's richest person, also posted a warning that voters would 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' in the 2026 midterm elections. On May 28, Musk announced the he would end his tenure as a 'special government employee' — leading the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE — after 128 days. Per the U.S. Department of the Interior, a person cannot serve in such a role for more than 130 days in a consecutive year. Sen. Ran Paul (R-Kentucky) was among those chiming in to agree with Musk. 'We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better,' he wrote, quoting Musk's post. Trump, on Truth Social, earlier in the day slammed Paul, writing 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' At a White House press briefing, Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked press secretary Karoline Leavitt 'how mad do you think President Trump is going to be' about Musk's comments? Leavitt responded that Trump 'already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act passed the Republican-controlled House but has yet to clear the Senate. The legislation would make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent (with wealthy Americans benefiting the most) and increase funding for the U.S. military and immigration enforcement. In addition, the version that passed the House cuts funding for health, nutrition, education and clean energy programs. Musk has criticized the 'Big Beautiful Bill' before, but using tamer terminology. Last week, for example, Musk criticized Trump's 'massive spending bill' in an interview with CBS's 'Sunday Morning,' saying the legislation 'undermines the work' of DOGE. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?


New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
There Are Limits to Republican Lawmakers' Reach, Even in Texas
For weeks, Republicans lawmakers in Texas had promised that they would require proof of citizenship to vote in most elections, hoping the 2025 Legislature would be a vanguard for other conservative states considering similar measures. Voting rights groups cried foul. An analysis showed that the bill could disproportionately harm Republicans, who were less likely than Democrats to have the required documents. Then, as the Texas legislative session ended on Monday, the bill died. Its failure was one of the many surprising results of this year's legislative session, which was among the most conservative in recent memory. The Legislature passed measures requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom and creating publicly funded vouchers for private-school tuition. But the session also revealed the limits of right-wing governance, even in a state that President Trump won decisively and that is controlled by Republicans at every level of power. Lawmakers failed to pass strict curbs on wind and solar energy, and a tightened ban on abortion pills from out of state. Texas was a particularly good test case for the G.O.P.'s reach because for the first time in years, Republicans in the Legislature were not actively warring. Gone were the internal fights between House and Senate Republicans that had marred the last several sessions, which occur every two years. Instead, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who controls the State Senate with a firm hand, got mostly what he wanted, a more compliant Texas House. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.