Gifford fire burns 30,000 acres in Los Padres National Forest
Wildland firefighters were continuing to battle the blaze Saturday along Highway 166 in rural Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties, about 20 miles east of Santa Maria, according to the U.S. Forest Service and Cal Fire. But fire crews were faced with challenging conditions such as high temperatures, dry vegetation and rugged terrain.
As of Saturday evening, the fire was 5% contained and continuing to chew through the tall, dry grass and chaparral that covers the steep hills and mountains. Evacuation orders and warnings were issued for agricultural lands near the unincorporated community of Garey.
Although the fire is on federally managed land, Cal Fire crews joined the response to assist with more ground personnel and firefighting aircraft.
Criticized on the social media platform X for the fire's explosive growth, Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office reiterated that the fire was not on state land.
"The #GiffordFire started on Trump's federally managed land in the Los Padres NATIONAL Forest," read the post. "While Trump just gutted wildfire funding, @CAL_FIRE is now stepping in to clean up what federal mismanagement helped fuel."
Newsom has criticized President Trump for cutting funding for forest management, including activities such as prescribed burning, a process that reduces the risk of explosive fires by proactively burning vegetation in a controlled environment.
As of Saturday evening, a California Interagency Incident Management Team — composed of federal, state and county firefighters from various agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, National Park Service, Cal Fire, the state's Office of Emergency Services and county-level fire departments — was tasked with taking command of the incident.
The fire was first reported about 2 p.m. Friday near Los Padres National Forest's Gifford trailhead, not far from the perimeter of the recently extinguished Madre fire. According to Cal Fire, the blaze had multiple start points along Highway 166.
The cause of the fire remains under investigation.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
It's time for Newsom to pull the brake on California's $128 billion ghost train
Print Close By Joshua Thompson Published August 07, 2025 It's not every day a state manages to burn through billions and still ask for more. But California's high-speed rail project has always been exceptional in that way. Last month, the federal government finally said enough, scrapping $4 billion in funding after years of missed deadlines, ballooning budgets and political theatrics. You'd think that would halt the train. Instead, the state celebrated by tweeting about construction jobs and posting photos of rebar. Ten years ago, I did the math and showed that for the price of California's high-speed rail project, we could fly every Californian roundtrip to Tokyo, buy them a bullet train ticket to Kyoto and put them up for two nights at the Ritz-Carlton. And we'd still have money left over for sushi. A decade later, the bullet train still hasn't arrived. But the fantasy rolls on, powered by taxpayer dollars and bureaucratic inertia. HIGH-SPEED RAIL ISN'T CALIFORNIA'S ONLY EXPENSIVE BOONDOGGLE With the federal spigot finally turned off, the California High-Speed Rail Authority responded not with humility but with a victory lap: proudly tweeting that it had created "15,500 jobs" on what it still calls "America's only high-speed rail project." The image? A construction worker twisting rebar beside an American flag – an attempt to wrap a failed infrastructure project in patriotism. But no flag can cover what this really is: a taxpayer-funded monument to mismanagement. The promise that voters approved in 2008 was clear: a 220 mph electric train connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles for $33 billion. A transformative project that would rival the Shinkansen in Japan or the TGV in France. But since then, the cost has soared to $128 billion – and the finish line keeps receding into the future. The real project today? A partial rail segment between Merced and Bakersfield, two cities that were never at the heart of the project's original purpose. It's like building an airport shuttle that runs between a cornfield and a rest stop. No one asked for it. No one will ride it. 3 REASONS CALIFORNIA'S GREEN ENERGY CAMPAIGN IS DYING ON THE VINE The High-Speed Rail Authority now leans hard on "job creation" as the justification. Of course it does. When a project stops making sense as transportation, "jobs" becomes the political life raft. But as Milton Friedman famously said, if you just want to create jobs, you could hand workers spoons instead of shovels. Ten years later, the math still checks out. You could:Fly every Californian – roughly 39 million people – roundtrip to Tokyo in coach: $1,200 per personAdd a roundtrip Shinkansen bullet train ticket to Kyoto: $200Two nights at the Ritz-Carlton Kyoto: $1,400 Total: $2,800 per person × 39 million = $109 billion MORNING GLORY: DEFINING VULGARITY DOWNThat's still $19 billion cheaper than California's train to nowhere. Or put differently: for what we've spent on a train no one can ride, we could have given every person in the state a literal journey of a lifetime. And yet the project continues – because no one in Sacramento wants to be the one to stop it. Least of all, Gov. Gavin Newsom, who publicly "paused" the project in 2019, then quietly restarted it three years later. He now appears to be auditioning for national office. But if he runs, this project will run with him. It should. It deserves his name: The Newsom Line. A monument to ambition without competence. CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION If this were actually about transportation, the state would simply let Southwest Airlines continue doing what it does better, faster and cheaper than the state ever could. Instead, we're funding a jobs program disguised as a train. Gov. Newsom, pull the brake. If you want to be a national leader, show some leadership. End this. Or accept that your name will be forever welded to the most expensive ghost train in American history. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Print Close URL
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
It's time for Newsom to pull the brake on California's $128 billion ghost train
It's not every day a state manages to burn through billions and still ask for more. But California's high-speed rail project has always been exceptional in that way. Last month, the federal government finally said enough, scrapping $4 billion in funding after years of missed deadlines, ballooning budgets and political theatrics. You'd think that would halt the train. Instead, the state celebrated by tweeting about construction jobs and posting photos of years ago, I did the math and showed that for the price of California's high-speed rail project, we could fly every Californian roundtrip to Tokyo, buy them a bullet train ticket to Kyoto and put them up for two nights at the Ritz-Carlton. And we'd still have money left over for sushi. A decade later, the bullet train still hasn't arrived. But the fantasy rolls on, powered by taxpayer dollars and bureaucratic inertia. HIGH-SPEED RAIL ISN'T CALIFORNIA'S ONLY EXPENSIVE BOONDOGGLEWith the federal spigot finally turned off, the California High-Speed Rail Authority responded not with humility but with a victory lap: proudly tweeting that it had created "15,500 jobs" on what it still calls "America's only high-speed rail project." The image? A construction worker twisting rebar beside an American flag – an attempt to wrap a failed infrastructure project in patriotism. But no flag can cover what this really is: a taxpayer-funded monument to mismanagement. The promise that voters approved in 2008 was clear: a 220 mph electric train connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles for $33 billion. A transformative project that would rival the Shinkansen in Japan or the TGV in France. But since then, the cost has soared to $128 billion – and the finish line keeps receding into the future. The real project today? A partial rail segment between Merced and Bakersfield, two cities that were never at the heart of the project's original purpose. It's like building an airport shuttle that runs between a cornfield and a rest stop. No one asked for it. No one will ride it. 3 REASONS CALIFORNIA'S GREEN ENERGY CAMPAIGN IS DYING ON THE VINEThe High-Speed Rail Authority now leans hard on "job creation" as the justification. Of course it does. When a project stops making sense as transportation, "jobs" becomes the political life raft. But as Milton Friedman famously said, if you just want to create jobs, you could hand workers spoons instead of shovels. Ten years later, the math still checks out. You could:Fly every Californian – roughly 39 million people – roundtrip to Tokyo in coach: $1,200 per personAdd a roundtrip Shinkansen bullet train ticket to Kyoto: $200Two nights at the Ritz-Carlton Kyoto: $1,400Total: $2,800 per person × 39 million = $109 billion MORNING GLORY: DEFINING VULGARITY DOWNThat's still $19 billion cheaper than California's train to nowhere. Or put differently: for what we've spent on a train no one can ride, we could have given every person in the state a literal journey of a yet the project continues – because no one in Sacramento wants to be the one to stop it. Least of all, Gov. Gavin Newsom, who publicly "paused" the project in 2019, then quietly restarted it three years later. He now appears to be auditioning for national office. But if he runs, this project will run with him. It should. It deserves his name: The Newsom Line. A monument to ambition without competence. CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINIONIf this were actually about transportation, the state would simply let Southwest Airlines continue doing what it does better, faster and cheaper than the state ever could. Instead, we're funding a jobs program disguised as a Newsom, pull the brake. If you want to be a national leader, show some leadership. End this. Or accept that your name will be forever welded to the most expensive ghost train in American HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Millions of Californians may lose health coverage because of new Medicaid work requirements
The nation's first mandated work requirement for Medicaid recepients, approved by the Republican-led Congress and signed by President Trump, is expected to have a seismic effect in California. One estimate from state health officials suggests that as many as 3.4 million people could lose their insurance through what Gov. Gavin Newsom calls the 'labyrinth of manual verification,' which involves Medi-Cal recipients proving every six months that they are working, going to school or volunteering at least 80 hours per month. 'It's going to be much harder to stay insured,' said Martha Santana-Chin, the head of L.A. Care Health Plan, a publicly operated health plan that serves about 2.3 million Medi-Cal patients in Los Angeles County. She said that as many as 1 million people, or about 20% to 40% of its members, could lose their coverage. The work requirement will be the first imposed nationwide in the six-decade history of Medicaid, the program that provides free and subsidized health insurance to disabled and low-income Americans. It's relatively uncharted territory, and it's not yet clear how the rules will shake out for the 5.1 million people in California who will be required to prove that they are working in order to qualify for Medi-Cal, the state's version of Medicaid. After the 2026 midterm elections, millions of healthy adults will be required to prove every six months that they meet the work requirement in order to qualify for Medicaid. The new mandate spells out some exceptions, including for people who are pregnant, in addiction treatment or caring for children under age 14. Democrats have long argued that work requirements generally lead to eligible people l osing their health insurance due to bureaucratic hurdles. Republicans say that a work requirement will encourage healthy people to get jobs and preserve Medicaid for those who truly need it. 'If you clean that up and shore it up, you save a lot of money,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana. 'And you return the dignity of work to young men who need to be out working instead of playing video games all day.' Only three U.S. states have tried to implement work requirements for Medicaid recipients: New Hampshire, Arkansas and Georgia. One study found that in the first three months of the Arkansas program, more than 18,000 people lost health coverage. People can lose coverage a variety of ways, said Joan Alker, a Georgetown University professor who studies Medicaid. Some people hear that the rules have changed and assume they are no longer eligible. Others struggle to prove their eligibility because their income fluctuates, they are paid in cash or their jobs don't keep good payroll records. Some have problems with the technology or forms, she said, and others don't appeal their rejections. Of the 15 million people on Medi-Cal in California, about one-third will be required to prove they are working, the state said. Those people earn very little: less than $21,000 for a single person and less than $43,000 for a household of four. The state's estimate of 3.4 million people losing coverage is a projection based on what happened in Arkansas and New Hampshire. But those programs were brief, overturned by the courts and weren't 'a coordinated effort among the states to figure out what the best practices are,' said Ryan Long, the director of congressional relations at the Paragon Health Institute, a conservative think tank that has become influential among congressional Republicans. Long said advancements in technology and a national emphasis on work requirements should make work verification less of a barrier. The budget bill includes $200 million in grants for states to update their systems to prepare, he said. Arguments from liberal groups that people will lose healthcare are a 'straw man argument,' Long said: 'They know that the public supports work requirements for these benefits, so they can't come out and say, 'We don't support them.'' A poll by the health research group KFF found this year that 62% of American adults support tying Medicaid eligibility to work requirements. The poll also found that support for the policy drops to less than 1 in 3 people when respondents hear 'that most people on Medicaid are already working and many would risk losing coverage because of the burden of proving eligibility through paperwork.' In June, Newsom warned that some Californians could be forced to fill out 36 pages of paperwork to keep their insurance, showing reporters an image of a stack of forms with teal and gold accents that he described as 'an actual PDF example of the paperwork that people will have to submit to for their eligibility checks.' Many Californians already are required to fill out that 36-page form or its online equivalent to enroll in Medi-Cal and Covered California, the state's health insurance marketplace. Experts say it's too soon to say what system will be used for people to prove their work eligibility, because federal guidance won't be finalized for months. Newsom's office directed questions to the Department of Health Care Services, which runs Medi-Cal. A spokesperson there said officials are 'still reviewing the full operational impacts' of the work requirements. 'The idea that you are going to get a paper submission every six months, I'm not sure people have to do that,' Long said. Georgia is the only state that has implemented a lasting work requirement for Medicaid. Two years ago, the state made healthcare available to people who were working at least 80 hours per month and earned less than the federal poverty limit (about $15,000 for one person or $31,200 for a household of four). More than 100,000 people have applied for coverage since the program's launch in July of 2023. As of June of this year, more than 8,000 people were enrolled, according to the state's most recent data. The Medicaid program has cost more than $100 million so far, and of that, $26 million was spent on health benefits and more than $20 million was allocated to marketing contracts, KFF Health News reported. Democrats in Georgia have sought an investigation into the program. The Inland Empire agency that provides Medi-Cal coverage for about 1.5 million people in San Bernardino and Riverside counties estimated that 150,000 members could lose their insurance as a result of work requirements. Jarrod McNaughton, the chief executive of the Inland Empire Health Plan, said that California's 58 counties, which administer Medi-Cal, 'will be the ones at the precipice of piecing this together' but haven't yet received guidance on how the eligibility process will be set up or what information people will have to provide. Will it be done online? Will recipients be required to fill out a piece of paper that needs to be mailed in or dropped off? 'We don't really know the process yet, because all of this is so new,' Naughton said. In the meantime, he said, the health plan's foundation is working to make this 'as least burdensome as possible,' working to improve community outreach and connect people who receive Medi-Cal insurance to volunteer opportunities.
