logo
High-performing teams all have this one thing in common

High-performing teams all have this one thing in common

Fast Company02-06-2025
As a manager, it's easy to get caught up in the day-to-day grind of fixing processes, eliminating bottlenecks, and streamlining workflows. We focus on reducing friction—the things that get in the way of people doing their best work. And sure, that's important. But here's the thing: Reducing fear is just as, if not more, important.
A comprehensive two-year study by Google identified psychological safety as the most important factor in high-performing teams. This environment allows team members to take risks and be vulnerable without fear of negative consequences. Harvard Business School professor Amy C. Edmondson emphasizes that psychological safety enables employees to speak up, make mistakes, and learn from them, which is essential for innovation and growth.
Let's face it. The best processes in the world won't help much if your team is afraid to speak up, take risks, or challenge the status quo. Fear can stunt creativity, shut down communication, and make people avoid the very risks that lead to growth. So, as leaders, we need to think beyond just fixing processes. We need to also focus on creating an environment where people feel safe and confident enough to act—even if it means making a mistake along the way.
Why Fear Matters More Than You Think
Fear is a powerful force. It can make people double-check their work, avoid taking risks, and be extra cautious. But when fear becomes the driving force behind decisions, it also leads to silence. When people are afraid to speak up, they hold back good ideas, overlook problems, and avoid making necessary changes.
Neuroscience backs this up. When we experience fear, our brains go into 'fight or flight' mode, which limits our ability to think clearly and make rational decisions. When we're scared, we become reactive instead of proactive. This is why a culture of fear isn't just uncomfortable—it's downright unproductive.
As a leader, it's your job to create a culture where people feel safe to speak up, ask questions, and challenge the status quo. That's why reducing fear should go hand in hand with reducing friction.
Fixing Processes Doesn't Fix Everything
Let's look at a real-world example: the United States Postal Service. In the early 2000s, the USPS faced a significant drop in productivity, rising operational costs, and declining employee morale. To address these issues, management introduced new technology, upgraded processes, and streamlined workflows to improve efficiency and reduce errors. They invested in automated sorting systems and revamped scheduling to make operations run more smoothly.
However, despite these process improvements, the results weren't as dramatic as expected. Productivity wasn't increasing, and employees still seemed disengaged. The reason? Fear was still very much present in the workplace. Employees were afraid to speak up or share concerns about the new processes. If workers noticed something wrong with the new systems or had ideas to improve efficiency, they didn't feel comfortable offering suggestions or challenging the way things were done.
This is a perfect example of how reducing friction—by fixing processes—didn't have the full impact it could have had because fear was still holding back the team.
How could USPS have tackled both issues at once? They could have started by actively working to reduce fear within the organization. Management needed to create an environment where employees felt safe to make mistakes, raise issues, and offer constructive feedback. Employees who feel safe and supported are more likely to speak up when something's not working and more likely to suggest creative solutions. They become partners in progress rather than passive participants.
Balancing Both: Reducing Friction and Fear
SEB, a Nordic financial services group, implemented a five-month training program focusing on psychological safety and perspective-taking for its investment banking leadership team. This initiative aimed to overcome transformation challenges and foster open communication. As a result, the team achieved revenues 25% above their annual targets in a strategically important market segment.
A multi-industry case study followed businesses whose team members were hesitant to voice concerns. All participants implemented psychological safety workshops emphasizing active listening and constructive feedback. This initiative led to improved conflict resolution, enhanced communication, and increased productivity, positively impacting the company's bottom line.
To be an effective leader, you can't just focus on fixing processes. That's a quick fix, but it doesn't address the deeper issues that impact team dynamics. Reducing friction is important, yes. But reducing fear is essential if you want to create a truly high-performing, innovative, and engaged team.
Simon Brown, global learning and development leader at EY, has spent years building critical skills and behaviors in high-performing teams. He shares: 'You can't automate courage. While systems help things run smoothly, it's the culture that inspires people to run toward challenges instead of away from them.'
Real-world application
So, what does this balance look like in practice?
• Reduce friction: Simplify workflows, cut out unnecessary steps, and ensure your team has the tools and resources they need to do their jobs efficiently.
• Reduce fear: Foster a culture of psychological safety, where mistakes are treated as learning opportunities, where feedback is welcomed (not feared), and where team members feel confident enough to take risks and innovate.
• You/me/we: Adopt a decision-making framework that defines what decisions employees can make on their own without fear or reprisal. This cuts down on back-and-forth decision-making bottlenecks and helps people feel more empowered in their roles.
• Model a hands-off approach: Is your leadership decreasing the number of mandatory meetings but still attending themselves? Making outdated rules 'optional' instead of obsolete? Without buy-in from the top, team members will be too afraid to take action on simplification initiatives that can free up time and decrease unnecessary mental distress.
Leadership isn't just about improving processes—it's about improving people's ability to act within those processes. If you want your team to truly thrive, you've got to focus on both reducing friction and reducing fear. When you do, you'll create an environment where people feel empowered to make decisions, try new things, and speak up when something's not working. That's when the real magic happens.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Investing in the Nasdaq-100 a No-Brainer Move?
Is Investing in the Nasdaq-100 a No-Brainer Move?

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Investing in the Nasdaq-100 a No-Brainer Move?

Key Points The Nasdaq-100 index features the top growth stocks in the world, and tracking it has resulted in significant returns for long-term investors. Since the tariff pause back in April, both the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 have soared more than 25%. Heightened valuations, however, could mean more limited returns in the short term. 10 stocks we like better than Invesco QQQ Trust › Investing in the top growth stocks on the Nasdaq stock exchange has generally been a good move for investors. And by tracking the Nasdaq-100, an index of the most valuable nonfinancial stocks on the exchange, investors can easily get exposure to the best and brightest growth stocks. But with valuations soaring this year and the Nasdaq Composite and S&P 500 index hitting record levels, is it still a no-brainer option to invest in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the Nasdaq-100? Or is now the time to shift away from the index and perhaps pivot into safer investments? Why investing in the Nasdaq-100 makes sense for long-term investors If you're a long-term investor who just wants to add an ETF to your portfolio that you can forget about, the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) can be a compelling option. It tracks the Nasdaq-100, and in just the past five years it has more than doubled in value and outperformed the overall market. Since the ETF tracks an index of top stocks, it means that you don't have to worry about keeping tabs on how individual stocks are doing; the Nasdaq-100 will automatically adjust and add companies that are rising in value while also dropping ones which are no longer among the top 100. This strategy can make the ETF a good no-nonsense means of investing in many of the best growth stocks in the world. There's simply not much of a substitute for investing in growth stocks. While safer options can result in less volatility in a given year, you're likely to perform far better by targeting the fastest-growing companies in the world. Over the past decade, the S&P 500 has generated total returns (including dividends) of more than 260%. While that's impressive, the Invesco QQQ Trust is up by over 450% over that same period. It has been the better investment by far. Should you be worried about the market being at record levels? One reason you might be thinking twice about investing in growth stocks or tracking the Nasdaq-100 index right now is that stocks are around record levels. Both the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 have hit record highs this year, despite question marks looming about what's ahead for the economy. Since April 8, which is around the time "reciprocal tariffs" were paused, the S&P 500 has rallied by nearly 30% while the Nasdaq is up close to 40%. There has been a lot of economic volatility, and there is definitely the danger that if investors become concerned about tariffs, stocks could be headed back to the lows they reached in April. I certainly wouldn't rule out a potential decline in the market in the near future, and this is a risk for investors to consider, especially in light of how hot stocks have been in recent months. Is it still a good time to invest in the Nasdaq-100? If you're investing for the long term, i.e., five years or more, then it can still be a good option to invest in a fund such as the Invesco QQQ Trust. There is always going to be risk and uncertainty when you have exposure to growth stocks, particularly tech growth stocks, where valuations can become enormous. However, even if there is a bad year for the markets in the near future, it's likely to recover, just as it always has. As long as the U.S. economy continues to grow, the S&P 500 is likely to rise in value as well. And with the Nasdaq-100 focused on growth, it may continue to outperform. If your investing time frame is shorter than five years, then it may be a good idea to focus on safer stocks to preserve your capital or even to put money into bonds. But if you're in it for the long haul, then it can still be a no-brainer move to invest in the Nasdaq-100. Should you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust right now? Before you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Invesco QQQ Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Investing in the Nasdaq-100 a No-Brainer Move? was originally published by The Motley Fool

Altria Has a Big Dividend Yield, but Is It Sustainable?
Altria Has a Big Dividend Yield, but Is It Sustainable?

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Altria Has a Big Dividend Yield, but Is It Sustainable?

Key Points Altria Group's earnings rose, but its core cigarette business continues to see large volume declines. At this point, the dividend looks safe. However, investors need to be wary of when price hikes stop working. 10 stocks we like better than Altria Group › With Altria Group's (NYSE: MO) forward dividend yield at 6.6%, investors tend to be more concerned about the company's dividend than its earnings momentum. The company has increased its payout every year since 2009, but with cigarette volumes continuing to decline, the question on many investors' minds is whether the dividend and its increased payouts are sustainable. Let's look at the company's recent results to find out. Raised guidance, but questions remain In the second quarter, Altria saw solid adjusted earnings per share (EPS) growth and raised its earnings guidance, although it is still facing headwinds. Overall revenue net of excise taxes fell 1.7% to $5.29 billion, while adjusted EPS climbed 8.3% to $1.44. That was above analyst expectations for revenue of $5.19 billion and EPS of $1.39, as compiled by FactSet. Altria's on! nicotine pouches, which compete with Philip Morris International's Zyn, saw strong growth, with shipment volumes climbing 26.5% to 52.1 million cans. Revenue net of excise taxes in the oral products segment that houses on! rose 6% to $728 million. Segment shipment volumes fell 1% to 198.6 million units. Adjusted operating income for the segment rose 10.9% to $500 million. The company's cigarette business continues to experience large shipment declines, with overall shipment volumes down 10.2%. Its leading Marlboro brand saw shipments fall 11.4% in the quarter, while other premium brand shipments sank 13%. Discount brand shipments jumped 17.6%, while cigar volumes rose 3.7%. For its smokeable segment, revenue net of excise taxes fell 0.4% to $4.6 billion. Adjusted operating income for the segment increased 4.2% to $2.95 billion. Altria's Njoy e-vapor business is currently in a patent dispute with Juul, in which it previously had a large stake. It lost the trial and subsequent appeal, and it just recently completed a new product design for its Njoy Ace solution in an effort to work around the patents it violated. Looking ahead, the company raised the low end of its full-year adjusted EPS outlook to $5.35 to $5.45, representing 3% to 5% growth. That's up from a prior range of $5.30 to $5.45. Is the dividend safe? Altria currently pays a dividend of $1.02 a quarter, or an annual rate of $4.08. The company generated $2.9 billion in both operating cash flow and free cash flow through the first six months of the year. Meanwhile, it paid $3.5 billion in dividends over the same period. Through the first six months of the year, its cash flows are not covering its dividend payout, which can be a red flag. However, last year it covered the $6.8 billion in dividends it paid out with free cash flows of $8.6 billion, and it tends to generate much more cash flow in the second half of the year. Looking at its balance sheet, Altria ended the quarter with debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 2 times, which is reasonable. As such, the dividend looks sustainable for the foreseeable future. The big concern for investors is the steady, large drop in cigarette volumes. At some point, price hikes stop working, and that's a real risk. Tobacco companies have strong pricing power, but there's only so much Altria can do when fewer people are buying its products each year. And while on! is showing solid growth, it's still a small piece of the overall revenue puzzle. From a valuation perspective, the company trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 11.5 based on the analyst consensus for 2025. That's much cheaper than its former unit, Philip Morris International, but I much prefer its international counterpart given its strong growth drivers. Overall, Altria is a solid dividend play. But with the stock at a six-year high and its core business continuing to see big volume declines, I wouldn't be a buyer of Atria at current levels. Should you invest $1,000 in Altria Group right now? Before you buy stock in Altria Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Altria Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Philip Morris International. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends FactSet Research Systems. The Motley Fool recommends Philip Morris International. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Altria Has a Big Dividend Yield, but Is It Sustainable? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink
AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink

Generative artificial intelligence assistants like ChatGPT are cutting into traditional online search traffic, depriving news sites of visitors and impacting the advertising revenue they desperately need, in a crushing blow to an industry already fighting for survival. "The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere. No one is immune from the AI summaries storm gathering on the horizon," warned Matt Karolian, vice president of research and development at Boston Globe Media. "Publishers need to build their own shelters or risk being swept away." While data remains limited, a recent Pew Research Center study reveals that AI-generated summaries now appearing regularly in Google searches discourage users from clicking through to source articles. When AI summaries are present, users click on suggested links half as often compared to traditional searches. This represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions. According to Northeastern University professor John Wihbey, these trends "will accelerate, and pretty soon we will have an entirely different web." The dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta had already slashed online media advertising revenue, forcing publishers to pivot toward paid subscriptions. But Wihbey noted that subscriptions also depend on traffic, and paying subscribers alone aren't sufficient to support major media organizations. - Limited lifelines - The Boston Globe group has begun seeing subscribers sign up through ChatGPT, offering a new touchpoint with potential readers, Karolian said. However, "these remain incredibly modest compared to other platforms, including even smaller search engines." Other AI-powered tools like Perplexity are generating even fewer new subscriptions, he added. To survive what many see as an inevitable shift, media companies are increasingly adopting GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) -- a technique that replaces traditional SEO (Search Engine Optimization). This involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, comprehensible text, and strong presence on social networks and forums like Reddit that get crawled by AI companies. But a fundamental question remains: "Should you allow OpenAI crawlers to basically crawl your website and your content?" asks Thomas Peham, CEO of optimization startup OtterlyAI. Burned by aggressive data collection from major AI companies, many news publishers have chosen to fight back by blocking AI crawlers from accessing their content. "We just need to ensure that companies using our content are paying fair market value," argued Danielle Coffey, who heads the News/Media Alliance trade organization. Some progress has been made on this front. Licensing agreements have emerged between major players, such as the New York Times and Amazon, Google and Associated Press, and Mistral and Agence France-Presse, among others. But the issue is far from resolved, as several major legal battles are underway, most notably the New York Times' blockbuster lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. - Let them crawl - Publishers face a dilemma: blocking AI crawlers protects their content but reduces exposure to potential new readers. Faced with this challenge, "media leaders are increasingly choosing to reopen access," Peham observed. Yet even with open access, success isn't guaranteed. According to OtterlyAI data, media outlets represent just 29 percent of citations offered by ChatGPT, trailing corporate websites at 36 percent. And while Google search has traditionally privileged sources recognized as reliable, "we don't see this with ChatGPT," Peham noted. The stakes extend beyond business models. According to the Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report, about 15 percent of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news. Given ongoing questions about AI sourcing and reliability, this trend risks confusing readers about information origins and credibility -- much like social media did before it. "At some point, someone has to do the reporting," Karolian said. "Without original journalism, none of these AI platforms would have anything to summarize." Perhaps with this in mind, Google is already developing partnerships with news organizations to feed its generative AI features, suggesting potential paths forward. "I think the platforms will realize how much they need the press," predicted Wihbey -- though whether that realization comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question. tu/arp/jgc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store