Court blocks Trump's tariffs and says president ‘exceeded his authority'
The court found that Trump 's tariffs exceeded the authority granted to presidents under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and that they did not address a specific national emergency as required by law.
The judges ruled the tariffs would be "vacated" and permanently blocked the government from enforcing them, granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs, which included attorneys general from twelve states and several small American companies.
Kris Mayes, the attorney general of Arizona, celebrated the ruling, stating that the President does not have the authority to implement tariffs unilaterally.
A White House spokesperson criticized the ruling, claiming the court had not disputed that foreign countries' nonreciprocal treatment fueled America's trade deficits, which created a national emergency, and that the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address the crisis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Protest held outside Canary Wharf hotel housing asylum seekers
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sydney Sweeney's voter registration emerges amid uproar over controversial American Eagle jeans ad
Sydney Sweeney registered as a Republican in Florida several months before President Donald Trump won his second term, it has been revealed, as the actor faces backlash over her provocative American Eagle campaign, which some critics have deemed 'racist.' The 27-year-old Euphoria actress has been a registered voter with the Republican Party in Florida since June 2024, according to public voting records. Sweeney's party affiliation was first confirmed by Buzzfeed News on Saturday, after a post on X claiming she was 'an actual registered member of the republican party' went viral. The post quickly gained traction as critics were already piling on the White Lotus and Madame Web actress for her American Eagle Outfitters campaign, which came with the tagline: ' Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' The ad starts with Sweeney saying, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color' before she adds: 'My jeans are blue.' While the ad appeared to be making a pun about denim – changing the word 'genes' to 'jeans' – it sparked outrage online over the phrases 'good genes' and 'great genes.' Critics say the two phrases, paired with Sweeney's references to her hair and eye color, echo the sentiments of eugenics, the discredited, racist belief once popularized by the Nazis that the human race can be improved genetically by selective breeding. In a statement, American Eagle spoke out about the campaign and defended Sweeney. ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans,' the company wrote in a statement on Instagram. 'Her jeans. Her story.' 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way,' the statement continued. 'Great jeans look good on everyone.' Meanwhile, the White House and conservative media jumped to Sweeney's defense, with President Trump's communications director Steven Cheung calling the negative reaction to the ad 'cancel culture run amok.' The controversy surrounding the advertisement has also been featured on Fox News 28 more times than the Jeffrey Epstein saga this past week. According to a study by liberal media watchdog Media Matters for America, the network has spent over 85 minutes across at least 20 segments through Thursday afternoon discussing the commercial and the discourse surrounding it. After right-wing media came to Sweeney's defense, Daily Show correspondent and guest host Desi Lydic called out conservatives for their apparent hypocrisy in gushing over the campaign. 'This is such bulls***. Blond women have had constant representation, OK? In entertainment, in fashion, in letter-turning,' Lydic said. 'It's not that they want to see more white women, it's that they want to see none of anyone else. For a story about boobs, it sure has a hell of a lot of assholes.' Lydic specifically called out former Fox News host Megyn Kelly for her sudden switch-up in attitude toward Sweeney, after Kelly suggested a month ago that Sweeney was the 'new toast of the town' only because of her 'amazing breasts,' HuffPost reported. 'Yeah, yeah! That's right, women, you listen to Megyn Kelly and hide your sexuality unless your body makes liberals mad, in which case it's a kickass body! Hell, yeah! Go, girl!' Lydic joked. 'You motorboat those liberals here but not so much that it threatens Megyn or, so help me God, she will destroy you, ho bags!'
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Zillow CEO reveals what he thinks caused America's 'housing crisis'
Americans everywhere are struggling to purchase homes, with sales reaching a 30 year low in 2024. Despite the tribulations of the housing market itself, the number one real estate site in the country - Zillow - is thriving. CEO Jeremy Wacksman sat down with The New York Times to discuss what may be causing the dip in the housing market and what keeps Zillow afloat amidst it all. The Seattle resident was appointed as CEO a year ago, but has been with the company since 2009. Wacksman added that the major issue with homebuying in the United States is that there is an availability problem. 'We have an affordability crisis, which is driven by an availability crisis. It is a supply-side problem,' he said. While many complain about increasing mortgage rates, he said that it's only a small factor. 'The real problem for a home buyer is home prices are up 30, 50, 70, 100 percent, depending on the market, from pre-pandemic levels. Incomes are not up that much.' According to the US Social Security Office , the average yearly income in 2023 was $66,621, only increasing 4 percent from the year prior. Wacksman noted that if the housing industry had continued to build new properties to keep up with buyer demand, it may not have become the 'crisis' it is today. 'We have been chronically under-building since, really, the global financial crisis,' he said. 'Less supply and a lot of demand is going to keep home prices elevated.' According to Zillow , the average home value is almost $370,000 with just 1.3 million homes in the for-sale inventory. Despite the dip in purchasing and sky-high prices, Zillow is seeing hundreds of millions of unique visitors every month. The company has seen a jump in revenue and its stock is up more than 60 percent. The top site for real-estate listings in the country attracts what the internet has dubbed 'Zillow Surfers.' Those with little to no intention of purchasing a home browse on the website everyday. Wacksman welcomes such browsers. ''Zillow Surfing' is pretty pervasive, regardless of if it's a buyer's market or a seller's market,' he said. 'You spend all this time window shopping and escaping and dreaming. You are getting a little smarter about what you might want, and then something happens and you pull the trigger. 'As a marketer, I don't think you could have a stronger brand endorsement than all of the usage you get from people escaping on your platform.' The way Zillow makes money is by selling ads to real estate companies who want to reach those endlessly scrolling Zillow-surfers. The company requires agents to post listings within 24 hours of being on the market . If not, it's never allowed on the site at all. Real estate companies like Compass have grown wary of Zillow, and even filed a lawsuit claiming they maintain a monopoly, calling it a 'Zillow ban.' But Wacksman said that the lawsuit itself speaks to the larger issues of seller transparency within the United States housing market. 'The heart of the issue is the U.S. real estate market currently exists with a unique amount of transparency,' he said. 'So you and I, as a buyer and seller, can see all available listings, and that empowers us to shop on our own. There are a few companies that are looking to put the internet back in a box and hide inventory and force you to pay them. 'The lawsuit is about challenging that consumer benefit and that transparency.' Now, Zillow is trying to shift toward a 'super app' structure that allows buyers to be connected with any resources that they may need. That includes mortgage providers and rental properties as well as any other related services.
