'A UFC fight': Tensions rise in Stanley Cup Final as the Panthers get the upper hand on the Oilers
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Things got chippy in the Stanley Cup Final late in Game 3 when the Florida Panthers were well on their way to blowing out the Edmonton Oilers.
Brawls ensued, Darnell Nurse and Jonah Gadjovich dropped the gloves, and eight guys got sent to the showers early with misconduct penalties.
'When we get into garbage time, those things happen, and I don't mind when those things happen,' Oilers captain Connor McDavid said. 'It's what good teams do: fight your way out of the rink. I don't mind that in garbage time.'
Long before garbage time, Florida took it to Edmonton, with the defending champions dictating their style of play and knocking their opponents off kilter to take a 2-1 series lead with a 6-1 laugher. If more of that continues in Game 4 on Thursday night, it's advantage Panthers because they thrive on making other teams feel uncomfortable.
'We played our game, our style, stuck up for each other when we needed to,' Panthers winger Matthew Tkachuk said. 'If you have to take a punch, take a punch. If you have to take a cross-check, take a cross-check - a spear, a slash, whatever the case is, you've got to take it.'
It should not be surprising that tensions boiled over given the lopsided score in the 10th game in the Cup final between these two teams over the past year. The Oilers and Panthers have grown a healthy distaste for each other with all that familiarity.
With that comes plenty of hits, shoves and jabs that lead to slashes, punches and gear strewn all over the ice. The 140 combined penalty minutes in Game 3 were the most in a final since Game 4 between Montreal and Calgary in 1986.
'The game's over with 11 minutes left,' Oilers star Leon Draisaitl said Tuesday after practice. 'Then all hell breaks loose. It's a UFC fight.'
The penalties that mattered to the result came early. The Oilers were not shy about criticizing the officiating and the Panthers for allegedly influencing it. Goaltender Stuart Skinner said, 'Some guys are flaking and going down trying to cause penalties,' and Evander Kane questioned some of the calls.
'There seems to be a little bit more attention on our group,' said Kane, who took two minor penalties in the first period alone. 'They seem to get away with it more than we do. It's tough to find the line.'
Toeing that line is what the Panthers do best, and it is a recipe that has them in the final for a third consecutive year under coach Paul Maurice, who credited Tkachuk for having 'a little bit more impact on the tenacity of the team than the guy who wears a suit behind the bench and never takes a shift.'
Florida's roster is full of truculence with talent to match. Sam Bennett delivered a big, open-ice hit that led to his breakaway and playoff-leading 14th goal, and finishing checks on John Klingberg has hampered the veteran defenseman's play in the series compared to the first three rounds.
'That's part of their DNA, that's what they do,' Draisaitl said. 'It's an emotional time. It's two teams that want to win, two teams of doing it their own way, but I don't think anybody is going crazy here. They're good at what they do.'
Maurice did not buy into the idea that Game 3 was the Panthers showing what they can do at their best. The opener went to overtime and Florida needed double OT to win Game 2.
'I think the first two games are indicative of what Game 4 is going to look like,' Maurice said. 'We're not going to look at (Game 3) and say, 'That's the way it should look if we play our game.''
The Oilers certainly look at it as the opposite, discombobulated and nothing resembling the group that had gone 12-2 since a couple of losses to open the first round. They've dropped two in a row for the first time since.
'We just got to play our game,' Nurse said. 'We got guys that can do all that kind of stuff. But is that our game? So I think we just got to stick to play the way that we play. We're such a good hockey team when we just play hockey, and we just got to do that.:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
Which 2025 NHL Draft prospects can help Buffalo Sabres find more toughness?
BUFFALO, N.Y. — Everybody wants what the Florida Panthers have. In Game 3 of the Stanley Cup Final against the Edmonton Oilers, Sam Bennett made two effective body checks in the defensive zone before springing loose for a breakaway, which he finished with a goal. His career high regular season point total came this season with 51, but in the playoffs, Bennett is a difference-maker. This year, he leads all players with 14 playoff goals and has recorded a point per game. But it's his tenacity, physicality and abrasive nature that have made him one of the Panthers' most valuable players while they try to repeat as Stanley Cup champions. Advertisement And yet, 11 years ago, Bennett couldn't do a single pull-up during the physical testing portion of the NHL Scouting Combine before the draft. Two things are true: 1) Most NHL teams would love to have more players who have competitiveness and toughness. 2) Drafting and developing those players organically is tricky. That's the problem NHL teams are trying to solve. Even as the game has become faster and more skilled than ever, the physical element of the sport hasn't gone away. If anything, the Panthers' run has amplified the value of that playing style. Bennett, Matthew Tkachuk and Aleksander Barkov set the tone for a lineup full of gnarly competitors. The night before media and testing day at the 2025 NHL Scouting Combine, the Panthers and Oilers played a double-overtime classic in Game 2 of the final. Connor McDavid's show-stopping move on his assist was a highlight, but Bennett, Tkachuk and Brad Marchand, players who combine skill with truculence, also made a big difference in the game. The Panthers don't get to the Stanley Cup Final three years in a row without a few players who are miserable for opponents to play against. Not only are other teams around the league starting to recognize that, but the prospects themselves are gravitating to that style of play. Maybe it's just the particular batch of prospects available in the draft this year, but these players are modeling their game after different types of players. When players fielded questions about who they try to emulate, the Tkachuk brothers came up often. So did Bennett, Capitals forward Tom Wilson, Jets captain Adam Lowry, Flyers forward Travis Konecny and Lightning forward Brandon Hagel. In their own way, each of those players brings a nastiness to the game. What those players all have in common is that they aren't bottom-of-the-lineup players. They are tough but skilled enough to play in the top six. Advertisement 'I think it's how hockey should be played,' said Sault Ste. Marie Greyhounds center Brady Martin, a projected top-10 pick. 'Nowadays, that's what wins championships. It's not always the most skilled players. It's the guys that want it the most. That style of play is coming back.' Martin is one of the heaviest hitters available in the 2025 NHL Draft. That he can combine that with scoring ability is why he's likely getting picked in the top 10. You don't have to watch Martin for long to recognize his toughness. But it's not always easiest to spot which 17- and 18-year-olds will bring a hard-nosed playing style when they get to the NHL. 'You can get tendencies on players in terms of their ability to play a tough or aggressive style of hockey,' Sabres associate general manager Jason Karmanos said. 'Of course, we look for players with those elements. Depending on what level they're playing at, it's not as easily detectable. Some players that are physically underdeveloped may have it come a little later in that regard. Especially if they're playing in a league against men but they have a boy's body.' The Sabres are a team that has lacked the hard edge the Panthers have in their game. They tried to address that by adding Beck Malenstyn, Sam Lafferty and Nicolas Aube-Kubel to their roster last summer. But it helps to have some of these players coming through the prospect pipeline, too. These 17- and 18-year-olds won't make the Sabres a harder team to play against tomorrow. Still, the process needs to start somewhere. The players who are capable of playing high up in a lineup and have toughness aren't easy to acquire in trades and free agency, either. That's why the draft can be a useful mechanism for finding these types of players. Since Kevyn Adams became the Sabres' general manager, there has been some criticism that they've been drafting too many smaller skill players, particularly at forward. Of the forwards the Sabres have drafted in the top two rounds under Adams, only Anton Wahlberg was bigger than 6-feet tall. Prokhor Poltapov, Zach Benson and Konsta Helenius all have a competitive playing style, but until the Sabres are playing in bigger games and those players physically mature, it will be tough to gauge what type of jam they really have. Advertisement 'If people think that it's easy to detect who is going to be a tough or physical player at the NHL level when they're 17 or 18, they haven't been too involved in the NHL Draft,' Karmanos said. 'We try to project all kinds of attributes. Sometimes in the draft, you're just trying to find NHL players. I think the success rates will tell you that's what you should focus on, and not focus on player types, especially when it takes so long to develop them. If we have too many of a certain type, I hope they all play, and then we can trade them for other assets that maybe look a little different.' The problem is that if too many players project for similar roles, there won't be enough room to develop them all. Only so many players can get the valuable development minutes on the top line and power play in the AHL. Balancing out the prospect pool with different skill sets is part of building a pipeline. Of course, if you overcompensate for physicality at the expense of skill, you end up with a prospect pool full of bottom-six players. The rare find is a player who can play high up the lineup and has the 'hardness' to his game. This class has a few candidates. Martin is one such player in the top 10, but he's not the only one. Brampton winger Porter Marton plays a rugged style but has the hands and goal-scoring touch to be a top-line player. He's already been forced to learn the balance that the Tkachuk brothers deal with regularly when it comes to being an agitator. 'It's on my time,' Martone said. 'I don't let other people take me off my game. I don't need to be doing that every single time. You see Tkachuk in the playoffs. He chooses when he does create that stuff. For myself, I'm a very offensive player and like to create plays, so I can't spend all of my time in the penalty box.' Further down the board, you have a player like Windsor's Jack Nesbitt, a 6-foot-4 forward who likes to model his game after Lowry, Winnipeg's captain. He doesn't have the offensive upside of Martin or Martone, but he's a strong net-front player. He also fought seven times in the OHL last season, taking after his uncle, Brandon Biggers, who had a productive junior career. Nesbitt also took boxing lessons last summer. 'He would always show me videos of him fighting on YouTube and stuff like that, and it got me hyped up,' Nesbitt said. 'I'd always want to be like that a little bit and be a bit like him. 'Every team loves a good goal scorer and playmaker and stuff like that, but I feel like I have that asset to my game, and I also have the gritty part of my game,' Nesbitt said. 'I'm always trying to hit guys, I'll fight if I have to, and I can put the puck in the net.' Advertisement Everett's Carter Bear would also fall into the category of a competitive player, even if he's not as physically imposing as Martin and Nesbitt. He's recovering from a partial Achilles tear but is already back on the ice. He might be the best forechecker in the draft and has the offensive ability to match. Without the injury, would Bear be a top-10 pick? Then there's Justin Carbonneau, a winger who played in the QMJHL last season. At 6-foot-1 and just over 200 pounds, he has the look of a power forward. But will he be able to raise his level of physicality to match the higher levels? Among the defensemen, Barrie's Kashawn Aitcheson, who is 6-foot-1 and right around 200 pounds, looks like the toughest of the bunch. He racked up over 200 penalty minutes over the last two seasons in the OHL. 'You see a guy with his head down, and you want to make a big play on him,' Aitcheson said of his style of play. 'It's obviously more of an energy boost for your team. Give your team some juice, get them fired up.' What will be worth watching is how much these players get boosted by the way the Panthers have dominated the last few years. The way every player on that roster is committed to playing a competitive style of game all over the ice is the biggest thing separating them from the rest of the league. And there's no question the Sabres need more of that if they're going to become a team that is consistently playing in the postseason. Nobody in this draft is necessarily going to help the Sabres end the drought next season, but building that attitude has to start somewhere. (Photo of Michael Misa and Brady Martin at 2025 NHL Scouting Combine: Bill Wippert / NHLI via Getty Images)
New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
Should Maple Leafs pursue Sam Bennett in NHL free agency? Weighing the pros and cons
The Toronto Maple Leafs need a centre and playoff performer, and Sam Bennett, the Florida Panthers' Conn Smythe Trophy contender, just might become available in the coming weeks. If Bennett decides to leave the Panthers and test free agency, and, crucially, is willing to spend the rest of his career in Toronto (which may be unlikely), should the Maple Leafs put in a bid? Advertisement Let's weigh the pros and cons. Bruce Banner in the regular season, Bennett morphs into the Hulk every postseason. Bennett is having the playoff of his life this spring, scoring in what seems like every game for the Panthers. The moment never seems too big for him. Or maybe a better way of putting it is that he consistently meets the moment with the goal, hit or play (legal or otherwise) that his team needs. The Leafs clearly could use a guy like that. Unlike most of the Leafs' core players during this playoff-stumbling era, Bennett produces a lot more in the playoffs than he does in the regular season. Bennett's per-82 regular-season production: 19 goals and 40 points Bennett's per-82 playoff production: 31 goals and 60 points Even in Calgary, where his role never quite seemed secure, Bennett put a dent on the scoresheet in the postseason: He had six goals and 13 points in 15 games in his final two playoffs as a Flame. It's not just the production either. Bennett makes his presence felt in other ways. Nobody has accumulated more hits in the last four postseasons than Bennett, and it's not even close. Bennett's last deal, which expires after this season, was for four years and came with a cap hit of $4.4 million. That cap hit ranked 233rd in the NHL this past season, which is obviously incredible value. The Panthers have done a lot right and it's not just the big, bold swings. It's stuff like that, signing good players before they pop. A deal that more than doubles Bennett's cap hit, even with the salary cap rising and rising some more after that? That's the opposite of value. A cap hit of more than $10 million, for instance, would have Bennett leaping from the 233rd-highest cap hit into the top 20 next season. Is Bennett one of the 20 best players in the league? Obviously not — though in the playoffs, maybe? The definition of a $10 million player may be changing, but that's still a lot of coin for a player who has never scored 30 goals or hit even 60 points and has no elite skill. How much is a good regular-season player, great playoff performer worth? I can't recall a potential free agent whose value was tied up so much in the postseason. What if he isn't quite as impactful in the playoffs as a Leaf, and is still drawing one of the largest cap hits in the league? The Leafs would be betting a lot that his playoff performances translate, and for a long time. Advertisement Bennett will also be 29 when next season begins. How will age impact his performance, playoffs or otherwise? How long will he remain a quality No. 2 centre? The Leafs won't want to be paying a third-line centre $10 million-ish annually a season or two from now. The Leafs have a huge need in the middle, whether John Tavares re-signs or not. Though there may be centres who could be had in a trade, the Leafs may lack the assets to acquire them. Sign Bennett and the Leafs can hang onto the remaining stuff they have — namely, Easton Cowan and the best of the leftover draft picks. Pay up for Bennett now and the Leafs, even with the cap projected to rise again to $104 million for the 2026-27 season, could price themselves out of the summer of 2026 when the pool of free agents could be much glitzier and more appealing. It's not just Connor McDavid. Jack Eichel, Kirill Kaprizov, Artemi Panarin and Kyle Connor could all become available (though their respective teams may not let that happen). These are the players, heading into Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Final, with more playoff goals than Bennett since 2022: Leon Draisaitl (40), Zach Hyman (35), McDavid (32) and Carter Verhaeghe (31). That's it. That's the list. Bennett has 27 goals and counting over those four postseasons, which includes this spring's incredible run of 14 goals in 20 games so far. One more goal for the Panthers in the Stanley Cup Final and Bennett will match Sidney Crosby's and Alex Ovechkin's largest goal totals in a single postseason. It's unlikely, but also not out of the realm of possibility, that he makes a run for the all-time mark of 19 goals, held by Reggie Leach and Jari Kurri. Among players who have played in at least 30 games over that run of four playoffs, Bennett's 0.39 goals per game ranks 16th in the NHL — just in front of Auston Matthews (0.36), Sam Reinhart (0.36), Tavares (0.34) and Matthew Tkachuk (0.34). What have the Leafs been lacking each and every spring? Players who will reliably put the puck in the net. This is what makes the playoff production so remarkable: Bennett is a fairly ordinary scorer in the regular season. His career high for goals through nine NHL regular seasons: 28. He has three 20-goal seasons, all of which have come as a Panther. Bennett's career high for points in a single season: 51, which came in 76 games in a contract year this past season. Advertisement His totals in the two previous regular seasons: 40 points in 63 games and 41 points in 69 games, respectively. And that was in Florida, through his mid to late 20s, with a usually superb set of linemates. In his last four seasons, Bennett has produced 181 points in 279 games, the same total as Tyler Bertuzzi. None of it would matter quite as much were the contract not so large (presumably). If the Leafs add Bennett, they might only reasonably expect 20 goals and 40-50 points in the regular season from the third-highest-paid player on the team and one of the highest-paid players in the league, period. It's easy to see that production, because of the contract, attracting a whole lot of scrutiny in Toronto — which would only drive up the pressure on Bennett to be a rock star once again in the playoffs. Sign with the Leafs and Bennett would be granted first-unit power-play opportunity, the kind of opportunity he isn't getting right now in Florida. (He still drew nearly 2.5 minutes per game during the regular season.) Bennett had only seven goals and 11 points on the power play this past regular season, playing on the Panthers' second unit. Double that output with a regular PP1 gig (with at least one spot likely to become open), and suddenly Bennett could become a 30-goal, 70-point regular-season guy. Couple that guy with the playoff performance and intangible qualities, and suddenly that contract might not look quite as bloated. This is a big one, with so many layers. To start, how will Bennett perform without Tkachuk — and one of Verhaeghe and Evan Rodrigues — by his side? Bennett has spent so much time with Tkachuk over the past few seasons (almost 1,800 five-on-five minutes) that there isn't a huge sample size of his effectiveness without him (just under 600 minutes). But here's what we've got over the last three regular seasons: Bennett may get William Nylander on his wing in Toronto, though it's not clear if their games would mesh quite the same way. And it's unlikely that the second winger on the line, if the first one is Nylander, will have Verhaeghe's abilities. There's also Bennett's slotting with the Panthers. Because Florida has Aleksander Barkov and the rising Anton Lundell, Bennett's line tends to draw somewhat lesser competition; often third lines. Bennett's most frequent forward opponent from the Leafs in this spring's second-round series was Max Domi, followed by Scott Laughton and Bobby McMann. Advertisement It's unlikely he would draw such cozy slotting in Toronto. The Leafs would need him, as their clear-cut No. 2, to square off against stiffer competition. His importance to the team would be much higher in Toronto, too, where the talent isn't quite as wide-ranging as in Florida. Will Bennett feel comfortable playing in Canada again? He didn't have the most pleasant experience in Calgary, where, as a first-round Flames pick drafted (and then traded) by current Leafs general manager Brad Treliving, he struggled and found himself constantly in trade rumours. It's what may lead him to stick with the Panthers. Treliving, who used his first draft pick as Flames GM in 2014 on Bennett, once talked about the Leafs needing more 'snot' (which led to the Leafs signing Bertuzzi, Domi and Ryan Reaves). This past spring, he spoke about the need for change in the team's DNA at playoff time. Bennett is what the Leafs GM was — is — looking for. He's a pain in the butt to play against. He straddles and, occasionally, crosses lines. The Leafs witnessed that firsthand in this year's playoffs when Bennett knocked out Anthony Stolarz for what ended up being the entire series. (Stolarz returned as a backup in Game 7.) While they were mad about what happened and believed a suspension was warranted, they were also likely envious of Bennett's if-you're-not-cheating-you're-not-trying mentality, his willingness to play in and around the edge. Bennett would give the Leafs that dimension, an effective agitator in the mould of Darcy Tucker; one they don't have otherwise. Every indication is that Bennett is unlikely to leave Florida, especially for Toronto. But what if Bennett — via his agent, Darren Ferris — is willing to at least consider the Leafs on the premise of a huge offer? Advertisement It's a tough call. Bennett would solve a present-day need (when few other paths are available) and could give the Leafs the boost they've been looking for in the playoffs. But the risk would be massive, given the likely stakes of the contract, with huge downside. I wouldn't do it, but I can see how the Leafs might convince themselves that they have to. — Stats and research courtesy of Natural Stat Trick, Hockey Reference, Puck Pedia
New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
Should Ottawa target Marco Rossi this offseason? Senators mailbag, Part 1
We are weeks away from the 2025 NHL Draft and the free-agent market opening. The rumour mill is churning as we wait for the Ottawa Senators to handle contract negotiations with their remaining pending free agents. Those deals will shape how active they'll be in free agency. Let's take your questions on whether the Sens could offer a performance bonus-laden contract to Claude Giroux, whether Marco Rossi is a fit for the Senators and which prospects could challenge for an NHL roster spot next year. Note: Questions have been lightly edited for length and clarity. We've seen the need for truly top-end talent AND depth in these playoffs. With that in mind, do you think a perennial playoff team, but a first-round or second-round exit, is the Sens' ceiling? Or do they have what it takes to make a deep run as currently constructed (including prospects in the system)? — Mike M. Advertisement I think the Senators are good enough to make the playoffs and could win a round depending on their opponent. They have a No. 1 goalie, a No. 1 defenceman and a No. 1 centre. They have an impact first-liner in Brady Tkachuk, who has proven he can play in the playoffs. Their supporting cast is decent. They have a game plan that involves committing to playing defence. There's work to be done, but the Sens have a good foundation. The Senators are counting on that internal growth to take that next step. But what about filling holes in the roster, such as a need for scoring and potentially another defenceman to offset Nick Jensen's recovery from a nagging hip injury? That question will only be resolved once we know what Ottawa is doing with its remaining free agents before July 1. Finally, what about the other teams in the Atlantic? The Florida Panthers are two wins away from a Cup. Barring serious regression and/or injuries, the Tampa Bay Lightning still look like a playoff team. The Toronto Maple Leafs should be, too. The Montreal Canadiens became a playoff team last year and the Detroit Red Wings continue to knock on the door as well. And maybe the Buffalo Sabres will be one day, too. I think the Senators need to show that they're more impressive than other teams in the Atlantic. It's possible. But they need to prove it wasn't a fluke. Of course, projections for any team go out the window because of the magic of the playoffs. All it takes is one run, and how you play after that run, for your perception to change. I think Ottawa's good enough to be a playoff team right now. But expectations need to be higher than that. Would love a one-year assessment of the (Carter) Yakemchuk pick given it's this window's last top 10 pick (hopefully) and chance to get a star, his progression being hard to judge by box score stats alone, and the glut of other D prospects picked in that range that tempt 'what if' thinking. — Alexei K. Advertisement It's a bit too early to tell with Yakemchuk, I think. He experienced some injury trouble during the second half of his WHL season and wasn't as much of a factor as he should have been during the playoffs. The one game I watched in full last December was his last game before the Christmas holidays. The offensive instincts were there, but he needed to work on gap control, having an active stick and positioning at the time. But until we see him up close at the pro level, I'm going to consider any real assessment of Yakemchuk to be premature. I think the Senators still got a high-end prospect with size and offensive ability, but I'm not comfortable saying the Sens got a better prospect than guys like Zeev Buium, Zayne Parekh and the like. Yakemchuk should be at the Ottawa development camp next month after the draft, and he'll likely head back to Calgary after that to get himself in shape for a training camp battle. The Sens continue to monitor his progress with help from development coach Wade Redden. My impression is that the Senators will give Yakemchuk every opportunity to make the team, as questions surround Jensen's health. My colleague Scott Wheeler thinks Yakemchuk could play in the NHL this fall, too. Are there any players from Belleville that you can see pushing for an NHL roster spot next year? — Keith C. Leevi Merilainen could have the best odds of that, but it doesn't appear to be a slam dunk as of now. It has everything to do with whether Anton Forsberg remains in the organization. Up to now, I haven't heard any confirmation that his time in Ottawa is done. We'll see. Something else to consider: Ottawa's goaltending depth across the organization looks pretty thin if it lets Forsberg go. We know Linus Ullmark is the No. 1 guy. But in a world where Merilainen is No. 2, that leaves Mads Sogaard as their No. 3. Even if Forsberg goes, I'm inclined to think the Senators will vie for a veteran goalie in free agency. Advertisement Stephen Halliday showed some promise at the AHL level with 19 goals and 51 points in 71 games. Depending on what the Sens do with their pending free agents, maybe he gives himself a chance to play on the fourth line with a good showing at training camp. In addition to Yakemchuk battling for a roster spot, I'd look at Donovan Sebrango as a possibility for the seventh defenceman. He played two games last year. It only makes sense that he gets a good look in the fall. It seems like this is the perfect opportunity to pay Claude Giroux via performance bonus, which is allowed on contracts for players aged 35 and above. I'm thinking he could count for a league-minimum cap hit this year and give him $4-5 million in easily achievable performance bonuses, which, from my understanding, would count next year. But with the cap going up, and Nick Jensen and David Perron off the books, they might be OK with it? Can you do a deep dive on this? I don't see this strategy used by teams very often. — Matthieu K. On this week's Ask CJ on the Chris Johnston Show, Johnston tackled a similar question about Brad Marchand. I'd recommend checking that out if you want an in-depth explanation from him. Anyway, yes, the Senators could tender a one-year contract with those performance bonuses that can carry into the next season. For those wanting an update on Giroux, senior vice president Dave Poulin said negotiations are ongoing on Tuesday at a season-ticket-holder event. Joe Pavelski is a notable example of this strategy. He signed a one-year deal in 2023-24 with a $3.5 million cap hit and $2 million in performance bonuses. Combined with bonuses for Thomas Harley, that went up to about $2.6 million in performance overage bonuses carried over into 2024-25, according to PuckPedia. But some money was saved because the Stars were under the cap. That could work as some comparison for Giroux in this case. Are the Senators willing to live with having four or five million on their books in bonuses on their cap? Depends on how much space they'll have. The Sens are currently projected to have $35 million in cap space in 2026, but what does that look like with a new Shane Pinto contract? What about other players they acquire through trade or free agency? Jensen and Perron look like cap casualties in 2026, but is it a guarantee that they both leave? Those are some of the factors the Sens would have to consider. Of course, Giroux has to want that contract, too. What if he wants two years instead of one, for example? Anyway, it's a good idea worth considering. I wouldn't be surprised if the Sens tried to pitch that idea already. I feel that the Sens have too many top-nine forwards but not enough top-six. With that in mind, do you think Marco Rossi could be an interesting option for the Sens? Would Ridly Greig and a second-round pick be enough to make a trade? Thanks! — Olivier N. I get teams and fans being interested in Marco Rossi, a 60-point centre who can score from high-danger areas and looks to be on the outs in Minnesota before his prime. But here's why your trade proposal might not work. My understanding is that the Wild would rather have players in exchange for Rossi instead of draft picks. The Wild probably won't need that 2026 second the Sens could offer (Ottawa doesn't have a second-rounder in this month's draft). Secondly, if the Wild want players, Greig doesn't fit the bill. His snarl and grit make him an excellent middle-of-the-lineup player, but it remains to be seen if he's a top-six player. I think Shane Pinto would be a more intriguing piece for Minnesota than Grieg. His ceiling is higher, and he's a centre with some size who can play well defensively while providing offence in your middle six. Secondly, is Rossi a veritable top-six player on this team, especially in the playoffs? It's worth asking. This spring in the playoffs, Rossi's ice time was limited between 9:27 and 12:10 in the six games he played against Vegas. He did have a multi-point outing in the series in Game 3, but played just 10:52 — and that was two-thirds of his points production in that series. Rossi had a 40.74 Corsi rating at five-on-five in the postseason and a 28.57 percent high-danger chances rate, according to Natural Stat Trick. That's not good enough, in my eyes. I think Rossi is a talented player who could benefit in an environment where he doesn't have to worry about being out of a team's middle six. I'm just not completely sure he would be a top-six player for Ottawa. (Top photo of Marco Rossi: Robert Edwards / Imagn Images)
