
Prediction: PepsiCo's Dividend Yield Just Peaked at 4.4% Because the Dividend King Stock Is Too Cheap to Ignore
It's been a rough go of it for PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) investors lately. The stock is hovering around a five-year low and is down over 27% in the past year.
Despite the downward pressure on the stock price, Pepsi has continued to raise its dividend like clockwork. Earlier this month, it boosted its quarterly payout to $1.4225 per share or $5.69 per year -- marking the company's 53rd consecutive annual dividend increase.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Pepsi stock now sports a forward yield of 4.4% -- the highest ever. Here's why I think its yield just peaked and why the dividend stock is a no-brainer buy now.
Pepsi's dividend yield is on the rise
Pepsi is part of an elite group known as Dividend Kings -- companies that have increased their payouts for at least 50 consecutive years.
The yield will increase when a company's stock price grows more slowly than its dividend. Whereas if a stock price goes up faster than the dividend growth rate, the yield will go down. In this vein, dividend yield can be misleading. A company can have a steadily growing and dedicated dividend program, but a low yield because the stock price does well.
For example, Microsoft has increased its dividend every year for 15 consecutive years, and most of its recent raises have been about 10% per year. But its yield has gone down over time because the stock price has increased by several fold.
In contrast, Pepsi's dividend yield has gone up because the company continues to boost its payout and its stock price has gone down. It wasn't long ago that Pepsi sported a yield of around 2% to 3%. But over the last five years, Pepsi has increased its dividend by 39%, but the stock price is flat -- pushing the yield to where it is today at a record high.
I could see Pepsi's yield peaking here for the simple reason that its stock price will grow faster than its dividend growth rate, which should be about 5% to 7% per year based on the size of Pepsi's recent increases.
A slowdown in consumer spending has impacted Pepsi
Pepsi stock has fallen deeper and deeper into the bargain bin mostly because of sluggish sales growth and limited pricing power. Pepsi has a massively diversified business spanning beverages like flagship Pepsi and other soda brands, juices, water, sports drinks, energy drinks, and more. It also owns one of the largest snack brands in the world -- Frito-Lay -- and package food giant Quaker Oats.
The company was hit hard by inflation and supply chain costs. It has been promoting value-added products to boost volumes while limiting price increases. However, consumer spending is tight, so Pepsi is facing a Catch-22. It either has to cut prices to boost volume or keep prices higher and sell fewer products. Both outcomes lead to sluggish growth.
In terms of pricing power, Pepsi has proved arguably less elite than peers like Coca-Cola. However, that discrepancy is already reflected in Pepsi's valuation.
Pepsi's valuation is beyond cheap
Coke has higher margins than Pepsi due to its bottling partner network and pure-play focus on beverages. By contrast, Pepsi controls more of its operations and is more diversified. But historically, both stocks have fetched similar valuations -- as evidenced by their nearly identical five-year median price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios.
Coke's P/E is above its five-year median, whereas Pepsi's is far below. However, Coke's forward P/E is well below the median, so the stock is still a good value. It's just that Pepsi has become too cheap to ignore.
PEP PE Ratio (5y Median) data by YCharts
It would be one thing if Pepsi's dividend were out of control and its balance sheet were riddled with debt -- but that's hardly the case. Pepsi's payout ratio is 78% at present. It's not great, as 50% to 75% is typically considered healthy. But it's not bad considering Pepsi is still raking in the free cash flow.
Pepsi has a debt-to-capital (D/C) ratio of 72.5% compared to Coke's 65.2%. The higher the D/C ratio, the more a company relies on debt to finance its operations. So Pepsi is more dependent on debt than Coke, but its leverage is manageable.
Pepsi has been taking on debt for the right reasons. The company has made several savvy acquisitions, including Sabra and Obela snack and dip products, Mexican-American food brand Siete Foods, and prebiotic soda brand Poppi. These acquisitions help diversify its food and drink lineup and cater to mini-meal and health-conscious consumers.
A passive income powerhouse to buy on sale
Pepsi's declining stock price showcases investor frustration with the company's lack of growth. However, long-term investors who care more about where a stock will be years from now than where it is today can capitalize on Pepsi's out-of-favor status by buying the stock at its dirt-cheap valuation and getting a record dividend yield in the process.
If Pepsi shows signs of margin expansion and success with recent acquisitions, it wouldn't be surprising for the stock price to begin outpacing the dividend growth rate -- leading to a lower yield. However, that doesn't mean investors will get less passive income from buying the stock now.
For example, buying Pepsi at the current price of about $130 per share and a dividend per share of $5.69 presents a forward yield of 4.4%. If Pepsi were to go up to $150 per share, investors buying the stock for $150 would only get a yield of 3.8%. But the yield on cost for investors buying the stock now would still be 4.4%.
Add it all up, and Pepsi is a phenomenal opportunity for value investors looking for a stable source of passive income.
Should you invest $1,000 in PepsiCo right now?
Before you buy stock in PepsiCo, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and PepsiCo wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $620,719!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $829,511!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is962% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to170%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 12, 2025
Daniel Foelber has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
From bros to foes: How the unlikely Trump-Musk relationship imploded
Elon Musk, left, shakes hands with U.S. President Donald Trump at the finals for the NCAA wrestling championship, March 22, 2025, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke) WASHINGTON -- When Donald Trump met privately with White House officials on Wednesday, there was little to suggest that the U.S. president was close to a public break with Elon Musk, the billionaire businessman who helped him win a second term in office. Two White House officials familiar with the matter said Trump expressed confusion and frustration in the meeting about Musk's attacks on his sweeping tax and spending bill. But he held back, the officials said, because he wanted to preserve Musk's political and financial support ahead of the midterm elections. By Thursday afternoon, Trump's mood had shifted. He had not spoken to Musk since the attacks began and was fuming over what one White House aide described as a 'completely batshit' tirade by the Tesla CEO on X, his social media platform. Musk had blasted Trump's tax bill as fiscally reckless and a 'disgusting abomination.' He vowed to oppose any Republican lawmaker who supported it. The bill would fulfill many of Trump's priorities while adding, according to the Congressional Budget Office, US$2.4 trillion to the $36.2-trillion U.S. public debt. Privately, Trump had called Musk volatile. On Thursday, he told his team, it was time to take the gloves off. Sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in his former adviser. Musk quickly hit back on social media, and the back-and-forth devolved from there. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts,' Trump posted on Truth Social, his social media site. Within minutes, Musk said it might be time to create a new political party and endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a prominent Musk supporter and right-wing activist, calling for Trump's impeachment. The Trump-Musk relationship at its height was unprecedented in Washington - a sitting president granting a billionaire tech CEO access and influence inside the White House and throughout his government. Musk spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's campaign and other Republicans last year. For months, Musk played both insider and disruptor - shaping policy conversations behind the scenes, amplifying Trump's agenda to millions online, and attacking the bureaucracy and federal spending through his self-styled Department of Government Efficiency. Just last week, Trump hosted a farewell for Musk and declared that 'Elon is really not leaving.' Now he had not only left but had turned into a top critic. Hours after Trump's Oval Office remarks, a third White House official expressed surprise at Musk's turnaround. It 'caught the president and the entire West Wing off guard,' she said. Musk did not respond to emails seeking comment about the downturn in relations. His super PAC spending group, America PAC, and spokeswoman Katie Miller did not respond to calls and texts requesting comment. In a statement, the White House called the breakup an 'unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' From allies to adversaries The Musk-Trump breakup sent Tesla's stock price plunging 14% on Thursday and drove uncertainty among Trump's allies in Congress, who are working to pass the monumental spending package that Democrats and a small number of vocal Republicans oppose. The breakup could reshape both men's futures. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences, and younger male voters — key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also complicate fundraising ahead of next year's midterm elections. For Musk, the stakes are potentially even higher. The break risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardize government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might threaten his companies' profits. Some of Musk's friends and associates were stunned by the fallout, with a number of them only recently expressing confidence that the partnership would endure, according to two other sources familiar with the dynamics. The split had been simmering for weeks, said the first two White House officials, but the breaking point was over personnel: Trump's decision to pull his nomination of Jared Isaacman, Musk's hand-picked candidate to be NASA administrator. 'He was not happy' about Isaacman, one of the White House officials said of Musk. Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur and close Musk ally, was seen as key to advancing Musk's vision for space exploration and commercial space ventures. After his nomination was scuttled, Isaacman posted on X: 'I am incredibly grateful to President Trump, the Senate and all those who supported me.' The move was viewed within the administration as a direct snub to Musk, the two officials said, signaling a loss of political clout and deepening the rift between him and Trump's team. Before the Isaacman episode, top White House aides behind the scenes had already begun limiting Musk's influence — quietly walking back his authority over staffing and budget decisions. Trump himself reinforced that message in early March, telling his cabinet that department secretaries, not Musk, had the final say over agency operations. At the same time, Musk began to hint that his time in government would come to a close, while expressing frustration at times that he could not more aggressively cut spending. His threats and complaints about Trump's bill grew louder, but inside the White House, few believed they would seriously alter the course of the legislation — even as some worried about the fallout on the midterms from Musk's warnings to cut political spending, the first two White House officials said. Still, a fourth White House official dismissed the impact of Musk's words on the president's signature bill. 'We're very confident,' he said. 'No one has changed their minds.' But there was bafflement at the White House at how a relationship that only last week had been celebrated in the Oval Office had taken such a turn. Time will tell whether the rift can be repaired. A separate White House official said aides had scheduled a call between the two men on Friday. The official did not give a time for the call. By Nandita Bose and Jeff Mason, Reuters


Globe and Mail
30 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Intuit offers to pay interest, penalties for Ontario families affected by TurboTax snafu
Intuit Inc. INTU-Q is offering to reimburse Ontario families affected by an issue with its TurboTax software for interest and penalties imposed by the Canada Revenue Agency. Many working parents with young children in Ontario say they face thousands of dollars in overdue taxes and interest after they incorrectly claimed the province's child care tax credit using TurboTax, in some cases for several years. In e-mails sent to affected customers this week, U.S.-based Intuit said it would cover the cost of interest and penalties as a 'gesture of good will,' even though the problem isn't related to a tax calculation error by its software. The company also reiterated a previous offer to reimburse users for the cost of the tax-filing program. 'We value our customers, and we have listened carefully to the concerns expressed,' Rick Heineman, vice-president of communications at Intuit, said via e-mail. But some users wonder whether accepting the money will affect their ability to participate in a proposed class-action lawsuit against Intuit and its Canadian subsidiary. Andrew Van Vroenhoven, of Whitby, Ont., said his family is being asked to repay around $21,000 in taxes and interest. He called Intuit's decision 'a step in the right direction.' But also said he would need more information before deciding whether to take Intuit up on its offer. Mr. Van Vroenhoven, who has three children under the age of 13, including one with a severe disability, also said he wasn't sure whether he and his wife could or should take the cash since they have applied for interest relief from the CRA. At the centre of the controversy is a counterintuitive set of prompts in a desktop version of the TurboTax software meant for advanced users. According to materials reviewed by The Globe, the program is designed to apply by default for the Ontario tax credit based on the income of the lower-earning parent. But the software does not also automatically account for the income of the second parent, which users must type in manually, if applicable. Without adding the earnings of a second eligible parent, a family can receive amounts of the Ontario child care tax credit to which they aren't entitled. Until recently, the program also failed to alert users to the possible, costly mistake. TurboTax usually highlights potential issues that require additional review before customers file their tax returns. But for tax years prior to 2024, the advanced desktop version of the program didn't flag their Ontario child tax credit claim even if the users' combined income was higher than the maximum eligible for the credit. The Ontario tax credit allows families with a household income of up to $150,000 to claim part of their annual child care expenses. Eligible recipients can get up to $6,000 for each child under the age of seven, up to $3,750 per older child up to the age of 16, and up to $8,250 for a child with a severe disability. Many TurboTax users in Ontario said they recently received reassessments from the CRA related to the tax credit, including thousands of dollars in interest on their tax debt. Intuit had previously declined requests to pay for users' interest and penalty charges, saying they didn't qualify under its accuracy guarantee policy, which only covers issues caused by calculation errors. Mr. Heineman reiterated on Thursday that the child credit issue does not fall under the terms of that guarantee. However, he said, Intuit had decided to reimburse affected customers 'in recognition of the inconvenience this situation may have caused.' The move comes after London, Ont.-based law firm Foreman & Company filed a proposed class action lawsuit against Intuit over the child credit issue in Toronto on May 5. 'The concern is that when a company like Intuit goes out directly to consumers with what is effectively a legal offer, something that affects their legal and practical rights, there can be a lot of confusion and a lack of clarity around what it means for their rights,' Jonathan Foreman, founder and partner at the firm, said. Mr. Heineman said Intuit won't ask customers who accept the reimbursement to sign any releases related to the proposed class action. However, he added, the goodwill offer 'is not an admission of any fault, error, or liability on the part of Intuit.'


National Post
32 minutes ago
- National Post
Roots Announces Details of its Fiscal 2025 First Quarter Results Conference Call
Article content Article content Company to issue its Fiscal 2025 first quarter results press release on Friday, June 13, 2025 at 7:00 a.m. ET with a conference call to follow at 8:00 a.m. ET Article content Article content TORONTO — Roots Corporation ('Roots' or the 'Company') (TSX: ROOT), the premium outdoor-lifestyle brand, today announced that the Company will host a conference call to discuss its Fiscal 2025 first quarter results on Friday, June 13, 2025. Ms. Meghan Roach, President & Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Leon Wu, Chief Financial Officer, will host the call. Article content About Roots Article content Established in 1973, Roots is a global lifestyle brand. Starting from a small cabin in northern Canada, Roots has become a global brand with over 100 corporate retail stores in Canada, two stores in the United States, and an eCommerce platform, We have more than 100 partner-operated stores in Asia, and we also operate a dedicated Roots-branded storefront on in China. We design, market, and sell a broad selection of products in different departments, including women's men's, children's, and gender-free apparel, leather goods, footwear, and accessories. Our products are built with uncompromising comfort, quality, and style that allows you to feel At Home With Nature™. We offer products designed to meet life's everyday adventures and provide you with the versatility to live your life to the fullest. We also wholesale through business-to-business channels and license the brand to a select group of licensees selling products to major retailers. Roots Corporation is a Canadian corporation doing business as 'Roots' and 'Roots Canada'. Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content For further information, please contact: Article content Article content Article content Article content