New evidence suggests Russian forces shot down Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243
Azerbaijani news outlet Minval claims it received an 'anonymous letter ... containing testimonies, audio clips, and technical details' pointing to 'technical deficiencies in the communications equipment used at the time.
Minval claims the letter includes a written statement 'allegedly signed by Captain Dmitry Sergeyevich Paladichuk, a Russian air defence officer (who) was acting under direct orders from Russia's Ministry of Defence when he authorised the missile strike.'
Euronews cannot independently verify the authenticity of the claims in the Azerbaijani news outlet's report.
Minval's news report on Tuesday quoted the letter claiming that 'Captain Paladichuk was stationed near Grozny on duty from 24 to 25 December. At 05:40 on the day of the incident, his unit was ordered to enter full combat readiness."
"Due to poor mobile reception and a lack of functional wired communication, coordination relied heavily on unstable mobile connections," the letter added.
"A potential target was detected at 08:11 and tracked using radar. Two missiles were reportedly fired at the object after Paladichuk was instructed via phone to destroy it — despite heavy fog obscuring optical confirmation.'
According to the letter, 'the coordinates, speeds, and directions of the target at the time of both missile launches were provided in detail in the written explanation. The first missile is said to have missed, while the second one allegedly detonated close enough for shrapnel to strike the aircraft.'
Minval also claimed that it reviewed "three voice messages" believed to support the claims made in the letter. The voices reportedly confirm that operational orders were given, two missiles were fired, and shrapnel from the explosion struck the aircraft, according to the outlet.
The outlet has released one audio recording purporting to depict the sequence in which a voice in Russian gives military directions, orders a missile to be fired, followed by the sound of what appears to be a firing sequence, the same voice saying 'target missed', and allegedly ordering another missile to be fired.
On the day of the tragedy, Azerbaijani government sources told Euronews that a Russian surface-to-air missile was fired at Flight 8243 during drone air activity above Grozny, the flight's destination. The same sources said that the shrapnel hit the passengers and cabin crew as the missile exploded next to the aircraft mid-flight, disabling it.
Related
Azerbaijan Airlines crash caused by foreign object damage, official report shows
Russian air defence missile incident emerges as likely cause of Azerbaijan Airlines crash
The damaged aircraft was not allowed to land at any Russian airports despite the pilots' requests for an emergency landing, the same sources said, and it was ordered to fly across the Caspian Sea towards Aktau in Kazakhstan, where it crashed while attempting an emergency landing, killing 38 and injuring 29.
Subsequent reports after the tragedy claimed that Flight 8243 was downed by a missile from a Russian Pantsir-S1 system.
Three days after the crash, in an address to the nation, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said, "we can say with complete clarity that the plane was shot down by Russia (...) We are not saying that it was done intentionally, but it was done.'
At that time, on 29 December, Aliyev stated that Baku had made three demands to Russia in connection with the crash.
'First, the Russian side must apologise to Azerbaijan. Second, it must admit its guilt. Third, punish the guilty, bring them to criminal responsibility and pay compensation to the Azerbaijani state, the injured passengers and crew members,' Aliyev outlined.
Aliyev noted that the first demand was 'already fulfilled' when Russian President Vladimir Putin apologised to him on 28 December. Putin called the crash a 'tragic incident," though he stopped short of acknowledging Moscow's responsibility.
The Kremlin said at the time that air defence systems were firing near Grozny, where the plane attempted to land, to deflect Ukrainian drone strikes.
In the days following the tragedy, Russian military bloggers claimed that the said explosion happened over the Naursky District of Chechnya, where several Russian military units were posted at the time, including those with air defence systems, basing their conclusions on open-source data.
The new claims linking the Russian military to the Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243 tragedy appear at a time of a fast-moving escalation of judicial measures between Russia and Azerbaijan, as relations between the two countries reach a new low.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
40 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC's UK Exchange newsletter: UK's millionaire exodus spells more trouble for Labour
For most of this century, the U.K. — and London in particular — has been one of the most popular destinations for the world's super rich to live, work and play in. The U.K.'s approach in this period was best summed-up by Peter Mandelson, a senior minister in Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's Labour governments and now U.K. ambassador to the United States. In 1998 he told a group of Silicon Valley business leaders: "We are intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich as long as they pay their taxes." However, that is now changing as the wealthy flee a punitive new tax regime, with potentially severe consequences for the country. Arguably this began when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 and hundreds of Russian oligarchs left the U.K. after being sanctioned. This in itself was meaningful; the upmarket estate agent Aston Chase estimated that, at the time of the invasion, some 150,000 Russians were living in 'Londongrad' owning £1.1 billion ($1.5 billion) worth of residential property. But that was a specific Russian issue and apart from those who had profited from Russian activity, few mourned their departure. Things began to change more broadly during the run-up to last year's general election, when Jeremy Hunt, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, sought to steal the clothes of his Labour rivals in his March 2024 Budget. He announced that, as of April 2025, the U.K. would abolish so-called 'non-dom' status — a quirk of the tax system dating back to 1799, that allowed wealthy people living in Britain but who did not consider it to be their permanent home, or 'domicile,' to pay U.K. tax only on income earned in, or transferred to, the country. This had been a flagship Labour policy and Labour had made hay from the fact that Akshata Murty, the Indian-born wife of Rishi Sunak, the former prime minister, was one of around 74,000 people who had enjoyed non-dom status in 2022-23 (the latest tax year for which figures are available). Hunt claimed replacing non-dom status with his "simpler, residency-based system" would raise £2.7 billion annually. Crucially, though, he chose not to subject overseas assets placed in offshore trusts by non-doms to U.K. inheritance tax. When Labour won the election, in July last year, newly-appointed Chancellor Rachel Reeves, decided she needed to maintain the party's leadership on the issue. So she abolished the exemption on offshore trusts — potentially exposing the entire global wealth of these individuals to the 40% levy. Overnight it turned the U.K. from one of the most attractive destinations for the world's wealthiest people into one of the most expensive places in the world to die. The upshot has been an exodus of the super rich. It is hard to know precisely how many people have left. The analytics firm New World Wealth and the investment migration advisers Henley & Partners suggested in March this year that Britain had lost a net 10,800 millionaires to migration in 2024, up 157% on 2023 and more than any other country except China. Some dispute those figures, among them Stephen Kinsella, a legal advisor and member of Patriotic Millionaires U.K., a nonpartisan network of British millionaires calling for a wealth tax. He told me recently the numbers were an extrapolation based on the number of people on LinkedIn who had said they had left. He added: "There are about 3 million millionaires in Britain so, even if 10,000 had left, that would be about 0.3% of millionaires." Henley & Partners and New World Wealth published a new report last week predicting that 16,500 millionaires would leave the U.K. this year, more than twice as many had been expected, representing the highest net outflow of high-net-worth individuals from any country since they began tracking millionaire migration 10 years ago. Although the actual numbers will not be known until the U.K. tax authorities crunch the numbers some years hence, there have been plenty of straws in the wind. LonRes, which tracks activity in London's prime property markets, estimates there were 36% fewer transactions involving such homes in May this year than in the same month last year. Meanwhile, Companies House data suggests more than 4,400 directors have left the U.K. in the last year, with departures accelerating in recent months. Among those leaving have been some very high-profile individuals, including Richard Gnodde, the South African-born vice chairman of Goldman Sachs; Nassef Sawiris, Egypt's richest man and co-owner of Aston Villa FC co-owner and John Fredriksen, the Norwegian-born shipping magnate. Lakshmi Mittal, the Indian-born steel billionaire who regularly tops the rankings of Britain's richest people, is said to be weighing up his options and is widely expected to give up his U.K. tax residency. Compounding the problem is that other countries are currently welcoming the rich with open arms. They include Italy, where Gnodde has relocated, which allows wealthy foreigners to pay an annual fee of up to 200,000 euros to exempt their overseas assets and income from tax. The top destination for migrating millionaires though, is the United Arab Emirates, now home to Sawiris and Fredriksen. The latest Henley & Partners/New World Wealth report predicts it will attract a net 9,800 millionaires this year. None of this has yet appeared in the U.K.'s fiscal forecasts. Indeed, the independent Office for Budget Responsibility still assumes Reeves' move will raise £2.7 billion in extra taxes a year by 2028-29. It assumes that between 12%-25% of non-doms would go, which now looks an underestimate. Research published by the consultancy Oxford Economics in September last year, based on a survey of non-doms and their advisors, suggested 63% would leave within two years of the measure being implemented. Survey aside, Oxford Economics expects up to 32% of non-doms to leave and under that scenario, with non-doms having paid £8.9 billion in taxes in 2022-23, the policy would start costing the Treasury money. It is not just the foregone taxes such people would have paid that will hurt. Thousands of jobs in sectors like retail, hospitality, legal services and luxury goods depend on the continued presence in the U.K. of the former non-doms. Scores of charities, cultural and sporting institutions depend on their patronage and philanthropy. There would therefore be a much broader impact than just the fiscal one. Belatedly, the government has realized it has a problem. Unfortunately, it is probably too late to lure back those non-doms who have already gone, along with others who have left due to the imposition of VAT on school fees and changes in agricultural property relief and business property relief that exposed previously exempt estates and businesses to inheritance tax for the first time. However, the government can still act to stop further departures. The most effective thing to do would be to restore the exemption from inheritance tax granted to offshore trusts. This would be problematic for Reeves, since taxing the wealthy more is highly popular among Labour voters, even when — as one poll last weekend suggested — it hurts the public finances. But the Chancellor needs to find some way of backing down without it looking too much like a U-turn. And, with many wealthy people looking to relocate in time for the start of the new school year in September, she should probably not leave it until her autumn of England governor: Businesses tell me they are putting off investment decisions Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, discusses the U.K.'s economic and macro outlook at the ECB's Forum in Sintra. Europe's big defense push is putting supply chains in a chokepoint. Here's how they aim to break through European defense stocks have become a favorite play among investors, but extra demand has also put supply chains under strain. The CEOs of Thales, Leonardo and Saab told CNBC how they are tackling those challenges. 'F1' producer Jerry Bruckheimer on strong box office debut, impact of streaming and AI on Hollywood Jerry Bruckheimer, 'F1 the Movie' producer, talks to CNBC about the film's strong box office debut, working with Apple, whether a sequel is in the works and the impact of streaming and AI on autos spared under U.S. tariff cut but steel still in question. The U.K.'s trade deal with the U.S. gives British cars a preferential tariff rate over those imported from other parts of the world. But questions over a reduction in tariffs on U.K. metals remain. How BP became a potential takeover target. Market tongues have been wagging for weeks about a potential merger between Britain's oil giants until Shell denied reports that it's in talks to acquire its rival. Here's how BP became a takeover target. Bank of England chief sees downward interest rate trend as UK hunts for growth. BOE Governor Andrew Bailey told CNBC that interest rates should come down gradually as central banks juggle taming inflation and stoking elusive economic U.K.'s FTSE 100 has resumed its march upwards by rising around 0.3% over the past week, but is still 1.2% off from the record high reached in June. In case you missed it, U.K. vehicle manufacturing fell sharply for a fifth straight month in May as headwinds, including U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policy, hit the automotive industry hard. In addition, thieves are also doing their best to make sure there are fewer cars on the road in the U.K. A new study by the Royal United Services Institute said organized criminal gangs are driving the surge in car thefts — where vehicles are being stolen and shipped from the U.K. within 24 hours.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Siberian Jesus' sentenced to Russian prison after harming followers in bizarre cult
A Siberian cult leader who claims to be the reincarnation of Jesus Christ was sentenced to 12 years in a Russian prison camp after his conviction for physically and financially harming his followers. Sergei Torop, a former traffic policeman known to his followers as 'Vissarion,' meaning 'he who gives new life,' and two aides used psychological pressure to extract money from his followers and cause serious harm to their mental and physical health, Reuters reported. Torop, 64, set up the Church of the Last Testament in a remote part of Siberia's Krasnoyarsk region in 1991, the year the Soviet Union broke up. He was one of three men convicted Monday in the Siberian city of Novosibirsk. Torop and Vladimir Vedernikov were sentenced to 12 years, and Vadim Redkin was sentenced to 11 years in a maximum-security prison camp. 4 Vissarion, who has proclaimed himself a new Christ, conducts a service during the 'Holiday of Good Fruit' feast in a village southeast of Russia's Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk, August 18, 2010. Picture taken August 18, 2010. REUTERS 4 A man looks at a portrait of Vissarion, who has proclaimed himself a new Christ, at its church in the village of Petropavlovka, 580 km (360 miles) southeast of Russia's Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk, August 16, 2010. REUTERS All three men were arrested in 2020 in a helicopter raid that involved the FSB security service, the successor agency to the Soviet KGB. A bearded self-styled mystic with long hair, Torop claimed to have been 'reborn' to convey the word of God. He attracted thousands of followers, some of whom flocked to live in a settlement known as the 'Abode of Dawn' or 'Sun City' at a time when Russia was battling poverty and lawlessness, according to Reuters. 4 Children of Vissarion community sing during the morning religious service in Petropavlovka village, some 700 kms southeast of Krasnoyarsk, August 18, 2003. REUTERS 4 Vissarion, who has proclaimed himself a new Christ, leads a mass prayer in the village of Petropavlovka, about 580 km (360 miles) southeast of the Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk August 17, 2007. REUTERS He told his followers not to eat meat, smoke, drink alcohol or swear and to stop using money. Investigators said the men brought 'moral harm' to 16 people, damage to the physical health of six people and moderate damage to another person's health. Vedernikov had also been accused of committing fraud, the RIA state news agency reported.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Russia jails senior defence official for 13 years in corruption trial
By Mark Trevelyan (Reuters) -Russian former deputy defence minister Timur Ivanov was found guilty of corruption and condemned to 13 years in a penal colony on Tuesday, the harshest sentence yet in a series of graft cases against defence officials. Ivanov was arrested in April 2024 on suspicion of taking bribes, and investigators added new embezzlement charges in October. More than a dozen people, including two other former deputy ministers, have been arrested in investigations into separate cases. The trial was closed on grounds of state secrecy. Anton Filatov, a former logistics company boss on trial with Ivanov, received a 12-1/2 year sentence. State media reported that the total sum embezzled was 4.1 billion roubles ($48.8 million), mostly in the form of bank transfers to two foreign accounts. Ivanov, who pleaded not guilty, was stripped of all state awards and the court confiscated 2.5 billion roubles worth of property, cars and cash from him. Russian media said he and his wife owned a luxury apartment in central Moscow, a three-storey English-style mansion on the outskirts of the capital and an extensive collection of classic cars including a Bentley and an Aston Martin. Russia's "Z-bloggers", an influential group of war correspondents, have voiced outrage at the scale of corruption reported in the defence establishment while young Russians are dying fighting in Ukraine. One blogger, Alexander Kots, said 13 years was a long sentence but corrupt defence officials should be put on trial in wartime as "traitors to the Motherland". SHOIGU DEPUTIES Ivanov had since 2016 been responsible at the defence ministry for big logistics contracts including those related to property management, housing and medical care. He was a deputy to Sergei Shoigu, who was replaced as defence minister last year but retains an important role as secretary of President Vladimir Putin's Security Council. Two of Shoigu's other former deputies have been arrested in separate investigations. In April, the former deputy head of the army's general staff, Lieutenant-General Vadim Shamarin, was sentenced to seven years in a penal colony for taking hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes. The prosecutions signal a drive by Putin to clamp down on graft, inefficiency and waste in Russia's huge military budget as it wages war in Ukraine. Defence spending accounts for 32% of the federal budget this year. Ukraine has also moved to clamp down on military corruption. A deputy defence minister in charge of weapons purchases was sacked in January, while in April authorities accused five suspects of involvement in a procurement scandal.
