logo
Lime bikes to be banned in London borough - with rival companies handed rental e-bike firm's contract

Lime bikes to be banned in London borough - with rival companies handed rental e-bike firm's contract

Daily Mail​5 hours ago
A west London borough is set to ban Lime bikes following complaints of 'anti-social' parking on pavements and hand over contracts to a rival e-bike rental firm instead
Hounslow Council terminated its two-year agreement with Lime due to riders blocking pavements and the high price.
It comes as a victory to competing e-bike companies Forest and Voi who have both been given contracts to set up their bikes in the borough instead.
Lime have the monopoly on e-bikes across London, owning most of the estimated 30,000 in the city.
Companies submitted their bids for the highly-desirable contracts during a competitive procurement process.
A council spokesperson said the decision was 'shaped by widespread community feedback' which found residents wanted 'stronger parking compliance, faster response times to resident concerns, and more tailored and affordable pricing'.
A spokesperson for Lime told The Telegraph: 'Despite acknowledging the quality of our service was higher in our bid, Hounslow council selected another provider because it offered them more money.
'This is a really disappointing outcome for the thousands of Hounslow residents that rely on our bikes daily to connect to other areas of London.'
The City of London seized more than 100 e-bikes in February amid a clampdown on pavement parking and dangerously dumped e-bikes.
James Bolton, Voi's UK general manager, said: 'We're delighted to win this contract and extend our London e-bike pilot to Hounslow.
'We will work responsibly and closely with the council to ensure our scheme works for everyone in the borough, stretching from Bedfont Lakes Country Park in the west to Chiswick House Gardens in the east.
A Forest spokesperson said: 'The Hounslow tender was a highly competitive process and we're delighted our bid stood out.'
Lime bikes have become a nuisance for people who find them stacked up outside their homes, blocking walkways or abandoned in the road.
Charities including the Sight Loss Council and the National Federation of the Blind of the UK have repeatedly warned councils about the bikes posing a trip hazard or unnecessary obstacles for blind people.
Last month actor Robert Powell, 81, revealed he 'sent 570 photographs' to Camden Council showing the bikes taking over his doorstep.
The Bafta-nominated actor urged the council to take action, saying that he and his wife, Barbara Lord, once counted at least 100 bikes in a parking bay in front of their Highgate home.
'You've got two octogenarians here who are in danger of being killed,' Powell said.
'The entire pavement has been blocked by bikes. Camden say they prioritise safety and safer travel, so do they know that allowing bikes on pavements is not safe for anyone?
'Last year we called the police about the bikes, they just laughed.'
Riders can rent e-bikes on the street in London by picking them up with a mobile phone app, but they are often not required to put them in a designated area after use.
This has led to them blocking pavements across the capital - with councils receiving thousands of complaints and some even threatening to ban hire firms altogether.
Mr Powell admitted that he was 'terrified' of having a heart attack due to having to move 10 to 12 heavy bikes from the area each day.
He said his GP has even written a letter to the council explaining how stressful the situation is for him and his wife.
The spot is particularly busy as it is close to Hampstead Heath, the actor told the Camden New Journal.
Camden Council responded by saying it is working to relocate the bay and has marked out a new bay further up the road.
Last December, new powers to crack down on the scourge of e-bikes and e-scooters being dumped on pavements were hailed as the 'beginning of the end for the Wild West model'.
Enforcement has however, become increasingly complex, although the new powers mean Mayor Sadiq Khan will able to fine users and operators who dump their devices in dangerous locations.
It comes after Transport for London (TfL) warned rental e-bike operators could be fined as part of measures to tackle 'significant safety issues' around poor parking.
In September, Brent Council threatened that Lime would have to remove its e-bikes from the borough by October 31 for allegedly ignoring its safety concerns amid 'havoc' caused by the cycles.
But the council agreed to allow Lime to continue operating after the company addressed these concerns.
In Hammersmith and Fulham, more than 100 e-bikes were seized by the council in August last year after complaints from residents that they were blocking roads and pavements.
TfL revealed last November that rental e-bike operators could be fined as part of measures to fight back against poor parking in London.
It published a new 'enforcement policy' in response to widespread concerns about e-bikes blocking pavements and said it will take action over dockless e-bikes being left on its red route road network outside designated places, and on its land such as station forecourts and bus garages.
This brings e-bike regulations closer into line with those for rental e-scooters, which are already required to be parked in bays.
It added that responses may include warning letters, fixed penalty notices (FPNs) to operators, prosecutions and removal of vehicles.
FPNs would be £100 each, reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investors ‘in limbo' over proposed share tax hikes, claim Tories
Investors ‘in limbo' over proposed share tax hikes, claim Tories

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Investors ‘in limbo' over proposed share tax hikes, claim Tories

The Conservatives are urging Chancellor Rachel Reeves to urgently rule out increasing share taxes in the upcoming autumn budget. This pressure follows a leaked memo from Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, reportedly proposing several tax hikes. Proposed measures in the memo include removing the £500 dividend allowance, axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares, and increasing dividend tax rates. The Tories argue investors are 'in limbo' over the changes, which would pull millions more into paying investment levies. Labour responded by criticising the Conservatives' economic record and highlighting their own efforts to support businesses.

Guinness is helping Wetherspoons thrive — so why is its own parent company struggling?
Guinness is helping Wetherspoons thrive — so why is its own parent company struggling?

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Guinness is helping Wetherspoons thrive — so why is its own parent company struggling?

Changing consumer tastes are nothing new – especially when it comes to food and drink – but if you've been out in pubs or bars around the UK over the past couple of years, it's likely you'll have noticed a pint of the black stuff being a favourite again for many. In short, Guinness sales are soaring. In fact, Wetherspoons cited the Irish stout as a 'standout performer' allowing the pub chain to continue to open new branches and bringing in surging revenue that draught beer sales have notably contributed to. With a world-famous brand performing so well you'd be forgiven for thinking the company which owns it would be smiling. But the complete opposite is true. Diageo is the third-worst performer, in share price terms, in 2025 to date – down a whopping 29 per cent. Its chief executive left suddenly a few weeks ago. And there are further uncertainties ahead for an incoming CEO to deal with. So what gives, and what's stopping Guinness propel its parent company to growth in the way its doing so for some of the pubs which pour it? The star among power brands and rapidly changing tastes First, it's useful to know the wider background of Diageo – a £40bn drinks giant that, even after a plummeting share price, still ranks inside the top 20 biggest UK firms on the London Stock Exchange. In terms of size, it's around the same as NatWest, or twice the size of BT or Vodafone. While it's UK based in headquarters terms, it's very much a global firm. It owns hundreds of alcoholic brands like Johnnie Walker scotch, Smirnoff vodka, Captain Morgan rum and Baileys liqueur. Those are the ones you might be familiar with from these shores, while in Asia, Latin America and other parts of the world, other brand names are just as big, just as important to the parent company's bottom line. Several years ago the company went big on 'premium' brands, in line with customer tastes and trends, exacerbated during lockdown when people spent a bit more on a nice drink at home. The first problem was that post-Covid, tastes and behaviours changed. We've known for some time that younger people in the UK have stopped drinking anywhere near as much alcohol as previous generations didhat's. T mimicked in many parts of the world where either alcohol isn't the go-to for drinks or else new types of beverages are in fashion. Add in the fact that there have been recession fears and lower consumer spending in many nations and those premium drinks have been swapped by many for cheaper alternatives. Tariffs and tablets Those are ongoing problems for the alcoholic drinks industry, but 2025 seems to have brought another level or two of issues to deal with. Firstly, Donald Trump's tariffs in April caused chaos for everybody. But given many types of drinks can specifically be produced only in certain parts of the world, the vague notion of 'produce your goods in America instead' simply isn't feasible for, say, champagne makers. After those first announcements, Diageo estimated tariffs would cost them $150m (£112m) but the company saw it as a 'manageable challenge, anticipating that half of the impact can be absorbed without price increases,' said Chris Beckett, head of equity research at Quilter said at the time. Months later, there still remains uncertainty about which nations are paying exactly what tariffs on individual prices – the EU, for example, still hope to get an exemption for spirits exports to the US included beyond their 15 per cent basic deal. Even more caution is noted by some due to an issue Diageo can have zero control over: weight-loss pills and injections. One of the UK's leading fund managers, Terry Smith, said earlier this year he sold his entire stake in the company over fears the 'entire drinks sector is in the early stages of being impacted negatively by weightloss drugs', as well as concerns over management. On the other hand, another star name in the industry, Nick Train, told ii he felt it 'implausible' that it would be the case worldwide to such an extent that a company the size of Diageo ultimately lost out. First of all, a new chief executive is required. Debra Crew was one of just 13 female CEOs of FTSE 100 firms but she faced an uphill battle all the way after taking over from the late Sir Ivan Menezes in 2023. Verushka Shetty, equity analyst at Morningstar cited 'mismanaged inventory in Latin America, missed targets and tariff headwinds' as three key issues which need overcoming, while Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell, says a new chief executive 'will have to bring new energy to the company'. Until that happens, interim boss Nik Jhangiani faces the task of cutting costs and potentially offloading a few parts of the business to reduce the debt load, until a path back to growth can be mapped out. One thing though is for sure: while pints of Guinness might be being bought more than ever before, the brand itself absolutely will not be for sale as Diageo bid to halt a three-year slump in fortunes.

UK's Smith+Nephew first-half profit jumps 11.2%, launches $500 million buyback
UK's Smith+Nephew first-half profit jumps 11.2%, launches $500 million buyback

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK's Smith+Nephew first-half profit jumps 11.2%, launches $500 million buyback

Aug 5 (Reuters) - British medical products maker Smith+Nephew (SN.L), opens new tab posted an 11.2% jump in first-half profit on Tuesday, helped by cost cuts and a recovery in its U.S. markets which offset weaker demand in China. The London-based company also announced a new $500 million share buyback for the second half of the year. It posted a trading profit of $523 million for the six months ended June 28, beating analyst estimates of $496 million, according to a company-compiled consensus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store