logo
The controversial legal tactic The Trump Organization is using to take down fake merch

The controversial legal tactic The Trump Organization is using to take down fake merch

The Verge6 days ago
Unauthorized merch promoting Donald Trump — from hats and mugs to signs and T-shirts — is everywhere online. Go to a Trump rally or other MAGA political event and you're bound to find people hawking their DIY Trump wares.
The Trump Organization apparently isn't too pleased.
A lawsuit filed last week claims online sellers on platforms like eBay, Amazon, and Walmart are hawking goods that infringe on the Trump Organization's trademarks.
'Defendants design the online marketplace accounts to appear to be selling genuine TRUMP Products while selling inferior imitations of such products,' the suit, filed in US District Court in Florida, reads.
But The Trump Organization's lawsuit isn't your run-of-the-mill trademark case — look at the filing and you won't find a list of sellers the firm is going after. Instead, there's a vague stand-in for the defendants: 'The individuals, corporations, limited liability companies … identified on Schedule A.'
The Trump Organization is jumping on a relatively recent legal trend that has swamped certain corners of intellectual property law. I wrote about Schedule A cases in a feature published last week on dupes, as well as a Vergecast segment featuring law professor (and Schedule A expert) Sarah Fackrell.
These lawsuits are a way to go after dozens, hundreds, or even upwards of a thousand online storefronts all at once, making it much cheaper for plaintiffs. Schedule A suits are regularly filed under seal, meaning there isn't the same level of public transparency. At times, plaintiffs have been able to get extraordinary remedies in court, like getting defendants' assets frozen — including in a case I wrote about where an Amazon seller was unable to withdraw $50,000 in earnings.
These types of lawsuits get their name from the separate 'Schedule A' form that's filed to court — often under seal — listing all the online storefronts being sued. While it's true that the web is filled with knockoffs, some experts have argued that Schedule A suits at times go overboard and raise due process concerns for the entities being accused of selling infringing products.
I'm not a judge or a trademark expert, so I will make no judgment on the merits of The Trump Organization's claims. But it's fascinating to see the president's private business take up the same legal tactic that's used by brands like Nike. Fake (or, to be more precise, unauthorized) Trump merch feels part and parcel with the MAGA ecosystem, whether it's a homemade Trump yard sign or bloody post-assassination attempt pictures being plastered on T-shirts for sale on Etsy.
Then again, perhaps it's no surprise The Trump Organization would want to consolidate where its MAGA merch is being sold: hawking Trump-themed products is just part of being president now.
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All by Mia Sato
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Analysis
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Creators
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Law
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Online Shopping
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Policy
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Politics
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Tech
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Abandons Maglev Train Plans as China Rapidly Develops Technology
US Abandons Maglev Train Plans as China Rapidly Develops Technology

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

US Abandons Maglev Train Plans as China Rapidly Develops Technology

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's administration pulled funding this week for a proposed high-speed magnetic levitation (Maglev) rail line connecting Washington D.C. and Baltimore. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy told The Baltimore Sun on Friday that he couldn't "in good conscience keep taxpayers on the hook" for the 26.6-mile line and cancelled over $26 million in funding. Newsweek called the Department of Transportation on Saturday outside of regular office hours for comment. Why It Matters The United States doesn't currently have any operational high speed rail lines as defined by the International Union of Railways (UIC), but two are currently under construction in California and other projects have been proposed across the nation. However, supporters of high-speed rail are nervous about the Trump administration's attitude after it revoked $4 billion in federal funding for an under-construction line intended to connect San Francisco and Los Angeles as well as a $63.9 million grant for a project in Texas. What To Know The Maglev line was planned to connect Baltimore to Washington D.C. with a journey time of less than 15 minutes using magnetic levitation, a technique that sees trains held above the track by electromagnets removing the friction associated with traditional wheels. On Friday Secretary Duffy told The Sun that federal funding for the project had been scrapped, commenting: "This project lacked everything needed to be a success from planning to execution. This project did not have the means to go the distance, and I can't in good conscience keep taxpayers on the hook for it." Stock photograph showing a Maglev line being tested in Japan during 2000. Stock photograph showing a Maglev line being tested in Japan during 2000. Noboru Hashimoto/Corbis/GETTY Two federal grants totaling over $26 million for the project were cancelled, while support was also pulled for an environmental study needed to acquire a construction permit. Maglev technology has been developed in Japan since 2002 and testing has also taken place in China where one line achieved speeds of over 620 miles per hour, faster than many commercial aircraft. Maryland Governor Wes Moore was an enthusiastic backer of the project, and in April visited a team working on the technology in Japan where he said: "You have in me, and you have in our team, very excited partners to be able to continue to push forward... We like moving fast, and 315 miles per hour feels about right." Federal figures show nearly $27 million had been spent on the Maglev project in Maryland. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek Professor R. Richard Geddes, a transportation infrastructure specialist at Cornell University, said: "Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy announced that the federal government will cancel $26 million in funds for Baltimore to DC maglev project. This is welcome news. The extremely expensive maglev train project between Baltimore and Washington D.C. has faced significant delays, cost overruns, and local opposition. "The passenger rail route from Baltimore to Washington is already well served by both Amtrak and MARC trains. There are also several major highways serving the same route. It is unlikely that, even if completed, that revenue from ridership would be sufficient ridership to even cover that line's operational costs, much less its capital cost. "There are higher-value passenger rail projects on which this money could be spent to improve Amtrak's service in the Northeast Corridor. That includes increasing track capacity to accommodate more trains and reduce congestion, as well as upgrading tracks to allow higher speeds." What Happens Next Work on Maglev technology will continue in Japan and China and other U.S. projects could be proposed at a later date.

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' ex Gina Hyunh — who dropped out of his case as ‘Victim 3' — writes letter to judge pushing for his release
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' ex Gina Hyunh — who dropped out of his case as ‘Victim 3' — writes letter to judge pushing for his release

CNN

time14 minutes ago

  • CNN

Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' ex Gina Hyunh — who dropped out of his case as ‘Victim 3' — writes letter to judge pushing for his release

An ex-girlfriend of Sean 'Diddy' Combs who was supposed to testify against him in his criminal case, but mysteriously dropped out days before the trial began has written a letter to the judge pushing for Combs' release on bail. Virginia Huynh, who goes by 'Gina,' was part of the prosecution's case against Combs, initially anonymously referred to as 'Victim-3.' Before the trial began, prosecutors alerted the court they could no longer locate 'Victim-3' and they had lost touch with her and her attorney. Now, in their latest attempt to get Combs released on bail ahead of his sentencing, Combs' defense has included a letter from 'Victim-3,' who for the first time has identified herself by name. In the letter, Huynh wrote to the judge she does not believe Combs is a danger to the community and he is a committed family man 'who has not been violent in many years.' Huynh's letter was included as an exhibit in the defense's latest filing, their reply to the prosecution's opposition to releasing Combs on bail ahead of his sentencing, which is set for October 3. Combs was convicted by a jury last month on two charges of transpiration to engage in prostitution but acquitted on more serious charges which would have put him behind bars for decades or for life: racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. In the letter, Huynh said she has known Combs for years, both professionally and personally. She acknowledged her relationship with the disgraced mogul 'was not always perfect,' but 'he was willing to acknowledge his mistakes and make betterdecisions in the future.' 'By the time our relationship ended, he embodied an energy of love, patience and gentleness that was markedly different from his past behavior. To my knowledge, he has not been violent for many years, and he has been committed to being a father first,' the letter stated. 'I am writing because I do not view Mr. Combs as a danger to me or to the community.' CNN has reached out to Huynh and to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York for comment. Combs' defense has asked the court to release him on bail on a $50 million bond. They have argued he is not a danger to the community and is not a flight risk. Last week, they also filed a motion, asking the judge to completely acquit him or give him a new trial, arguing he was unfairly prosecuted based on the Mann Act, calling his conviction 'unconstitutional.' 'This conviction stands alone, but it should not stand at all,' Combs' attorney Alexandra Shapiro wrote in the 62-page memorandum. Other witnesses in the case, including star witness, Cassie Ventura, previously wrote letters to the judge, pleading for him to remain incarcerated, telling the court they would fear for their safety if he were released from jail ahead of his sentencing. Combs was physically violent on numerous occasions with Ventura, and photographic and video evidence of her being assaulted was shown to the jury throughout the trial, including 2016 hotel surveillance footage of Combs beating Ventura, which was first released by CNN. In his decision to deny Combs bail immediately after the verdict, the judge cited Combs' admitted pattern of violence in his relationships.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store