The Irish Times view on the European dash to Wahington: pulling the emergency cord
The source of alarm is obvious. Trump reversed his recent insistence that any peace process must begin with a ceasefire. He also appeared willing to entertain Putin's demand that Kyiv surrender territory it currently controls. To many, this looked like capitulation to Russian aggression and a betrayal of Ukraine.
Monday's emergency transatlantic mission brought Volodymyr Zelenskiy to Washington flanked by some of the most senior figures in European politics. Their presence was designed both to bolster the Ukrainian president and press Trump to reaffirm positions that had been cast aside in Anchorage. Chief among these was the need for credible and durable security guarantees for Ukraine, without which any settlement would simply invite future Russian aggression.
European leaders who reconvened again yesterday will have been aware that the vague Anerican assurances they received are not worth very much. But they will have been somewhat reassured that principles so recklessly discarded were at least partially restored. The price for this modest success was an unedifying spectacle of European politicians flattering and fawning over a president who appears to relish the rituals of deference more than the responsibilities of leadership.
READ MORE
All the same concerns remain, though. Trump had, in recent months, inched towards a more considered stance on Ukraine. That he could be swayed so abruptly by Putin confirms European fears about his longstanding admiration – bordering on obsequiousness – for the Russian leader.
The path ahead is now uncertain. The Kremlin responded to the Washington meeting with a position paper that repeated the aggressive demands that accompanied the full-scale invasion in 2022. Trump believes he can engineer a direct meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. Perhaps he can, though it is far from clear that the Russian would countenance such optics with a man he has so persistently sought to delegitimise.
For now, the war grinds on with contining airstrikes on civilian targets, and Kyiv's stretched resources facing a slow but relentless Russian advance in the east. By drawing Trump into his worldview, Putin has deflected pressure for harsher sanctions, unsetttled European capitals and undermined Ukrainian morale. He has reason to view the week's work as a strategic success.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a few seconds ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the presidential race: contortions and expediency
Less than a week after Mairead McGuinness's shock withdrawal from the presidential election, Fine Gael appears already well on its way to settling on a replacement. Heather Humphreys has established such a commanding lead over Seán Kelly in pledged parliamentary support that the race may effectively be over before a single vote is cast. Kelly, however, may be less inclined to bow out gracefully this time. After all, had he stayed in the contest earlier in the summer, rather than stepping aside for McGuinness, he would by now be the party's standard-bearer. What has followed since McGuinness's announcement has been a study in political flexibility, not to say expediency. Both contenders have been obliged to explain why they now covet a role they had so recently declined. In June, Kelly reflected aloud that he was content in Brussels, invoking John B Keane as he wondered whether he truly wanted to trade Kerry for seven years in the Áras. His conclusion was no. Humphreys, for her part, told RTÉ in May that she had no interest in returning to public life, having retired from frontline politics to spend time with her family. All, it seems, has now changed utterly. READ MORE Fine Gael, which carefully stage-managed McGuinness's uncontested nomination, now benefits once again from having a bench of plausible successors to choose from. The same cannot be said for its rivals. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin continue to deliberate, with little sign of consensus around a credible nominee. Their reluctance reflects a more basic problem: neither party has a clear candidate who could avoid the fate of the also-ran. Sinn Féin is reported this week to be edging towards endorsing Catherine Connolly. Should that materialise, and with the route for an Independent nominee narrowing by the day, attention will turn squarely to Fianna Fáil. It has been more than 50 years since the presidency was last contested in a straight two-way contest. It may fall to Micheál Martin to avoid such a narrow choice being presented to the electorate. There are strong arguments for Fianna Fáil to enter the fray. First, it would signal confidence from the State's largest party, which has not contested a presidential election this century. Second, neither Connolly nor Humphreys (assuming she is the Fine Gael nominee) are unbeatable. Neither has been tested in the uniquely unforgiving environment of a presidential campaign. Each is perfectly capable of the sort of verbal slips or missteps that have derailed hopefuls before. If, as some in Leinster House suspect, Martin already has a name in his pocket, the only question now is when he chooses to reveal it.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Europe settles on its team of ‘Trump-whisperers' as Ukraine peace talks near
Finland's president, Alexander Stubb, can play a tidy round of golf, something that has suddenly become very useful in a world where everything can turn on a leader's rapport with Donald Trump . Stubb, an unknown entity on the world stage, struck up a good relationship with the US president when the pair played a round together at his Florida golf club in March. Republican senator Lindsey Graham reportedly lined up the game, where Stubb had an opportunity to chat with Trump about the Ukraine war among other things. Given Finland shares a 1,340km border with Russia , Stubb can speak with authority about Russian president Vladimir Putin . READ MORE The Finnish politician stayed in regular contact with Trump afterwards, which has seen Stubb emerge as an unlikely back channel from Europe to Washington. So Stubb found himself sitting around the table with Trump this week in the White House, alongside the leaders of France, Germany, the UK, Italy, along with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy , Nato secretary general Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen . We are seven months into Trump's second term and European leaders may be starting to feel like they are getting a slightly better handle on how to work the US president. Trump's thinking on the Ukraine war – sometimes influenced by the last person he discusses the subject with – has swung back one way and then another in that time. Europe remains anxious about the terms of any potential settlement in the full-scale conflict, which started more than three years ago when Russia invaded Ukraine. Fears Putin would use a summit in Alaska to manoeuvre Trump into supporting a peace deal that favoured Russia, as the price of a quick win, did not come to pass. However, Trump came out of the face-to-face with Putin colder on previous threats of further sanctions on Russia and his demands for an unconditional temporary ceasefire to let peace negotiations begin. There was a feeling Zelenskiy and the accompanying delegation of European leaders came away from their own sit-down with Trump this week relatively happy. The feedback during 'debrief' video calls with a much wider group of European leaders the day after was that the White House visit went well, according to one source with knowledge of what was said. In what could prove to be an important shift in position, Trump signalled support for Ukraine's future security being guaranteed by European allies in 'co-ordination' with the US. Ukraine has long sought commitments that the US and other allies would provide security guarantees to put Putin off the idea of any future attack in the event of a long-term truce. The Baltics and others close to Russia view any deal that undermines Ukraine's sovereignty as an invitation to Putin to make another attempt on Kyiv a few years down the line, then possibly attack an EU state. One Kyiv-based diplomat said the idea of Ukraine conceding some eastern territory held by Russian forces was not as controversial domestically as before, but should only happen as part of a final deal rather than a condition to open talks. Europe seems to have settled on its team of Trump-whisperers, tasked with nudging the US president to come down on the side of Ukraine's view of the conflict. Stubb is in there. UK prime minister Keir Starmer and Nato chief Rutte as well, having both been very careful to stay on Trump's good side. Rutte got on well with Trump during the US president's first term, when Rutte was Dutch prime minister. French president Emmanuel Macron has done a good job of maintaining a decent relationship, while at times criticising the new US administration. Trump clearly has a soft spot for Italy's hard-right prime minister Giorgia Meloni , who is the closest of the bunch to himself ideologically. A few months ago the head of the EU's executive arm, Von der Leyen, seemingly couldn't get a phone call with Trump, never mind a meeting. The rapport between the two seemed warmer this week. Trump enjoyed referring to the EU-US tariff agreement the pair struck as the 'largest trade deal in history'. Mind you, he should be happy about it, given how favourable it is to the US. The European strategy is to paint Putin as the real obstacle to Trump getting his desired peace deal. That would hopefully lock in vital US support for Ukraine, should Russia not take current talks seriously and the war rages on. High-stakes negotiations between Putin and Zelenskiy, and perhaps Trump, about a possible end to the fighting suddenly look a lot more likely. Should they happen then Europe will need to lean heavily on its leaders who have managed to establish a direct line to Trump to make sure what emerges is not peace on the Kremlin's terms.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Israel calls up 60,000 reservists as it plans Gaza City takeover
Israel is pushing ahead with plans for a military takeover of Gaza City despite Hamas this week accepting a proposal for a 60-day ceasefire to end the 22-month war . After defence minister Israel Katz approved the plans drawn up by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for the attack on Gaza City, call-up orders were sent to 60,000 reservists. More will be drafted in the coming months, bringing a total of up to 130,000. 'Once the operation is completed, Gaza will change its face and will no longer look as it did in the past,' Mr Katz said. READ MORE He said the attack on the last significant bastion of Hamas control in Gaza would take 'months'. The plan to assault Gaza City has been met with international criticism. More than 800,000 residents will be forced from their homes during the operation which will be carried out by six IDF divisions. Most Gazans have been displaced multiple times and forced into densely packed areas along the Mediterranean coast, including in Gaza City. Israel said it was in contact with international organisations to establish more field hospitals in southern Gaza. [ Israel approves settlement plan to 'erase' idea of Palestinian state Opens in new window ] TOPSHOT - Palestinians watch as a rocket fired by an Israeli war plane targets a building in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on August 20, 2025. Israel's defence minister approved a plan on August 20, for the conquest of Gaza City and authorised the call-up of around 60,000 reservists, piling pressure on Hamas as mediators push for a ceasefire. (Photo by BASHAR TALEB / AFP) (Photo by BASHAR TALEB/AFP via Getty Images) The attack is expected to begin next month once the expulsion of civilians is complete and the required number of soldiers are in place, but Israeli forces have already begun operating in and around Gaza City. Attacks have taken place in the city's Zeitoun neighbourhood and in Jabalia, north of Gaza City, in recent days and residents of Jabalia have already been told to leave their homes. The International Red Cross Committee warned against Israel's escalation on Wednesday, saying the transfer of civilians from Gaza City to the territory's south would risk 'worsening an already catastrophic situation'. 'The civilian population in Gaza is living in abhorrent conditions,' the committee said. 'With more than 80 per cent of Gaza already impacted by evacuation orders, it is unimaginable that civilians could be compelled to move to an even smaller area.' Israel is expected to formally respond before the weekend to the Gaza ceasefire proposal drawn up by Egyptian and Qatari mediators, which is almost identical to the draft presented by US mediator Steve Witkoff, earlier this year. The majority of Israelis support a ceasefire that would bring about the return of the remaining 50 hostages, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. [ UN Security Council urged to renew Unifil's mandate in south Lebanon Opens in new window ] But prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has set a number of conditions for a deal, including the release of all the hostages in a single exchange, the disarming of Hamas and guarantees that both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority will not be part of post-war Gaza. The two far-right parties in Mr Netanyahu's coalition oppose stopping the war, arguing that Israel must 'destroy' Hamas militarily. More than 62,000 have been killed in Gaza during the 22-month war according to the Hamas-run Gazan health ministry. Israel says 1,200 people were killed and 250 kidnapped and taken to Gaza in the Hamas-led October 7th, 2023 attack on southern Israel. – Additional reporting: Reuters
