logo
The good news on trade will bring new market highs. Eventually.

The good news on trade will bring new market highs. Eventually.

Mint13-05-2025

News that the U.S. and China are reducing tariffs that were choking off trade between the countries sent stocks sharply higher on Monday. Above, a scene from the trading floor at the New York Stock Exchange.
Wall Street is rejoicing to start the week, yet investors looking for the S&P 500 to recover levels from just three months ago will need patience.
Stocks are soaring after weekend talks in Switzerland ended with the U.S. and China agreeing to reduce their so-called reciprocal tariffs by 115 percentage points for 90 days. President Donald Trump touted the move as a win for the U.S., although China was quick to claim victory, too.
That enormous reduction is definitely good news. China was the main target of Trump's April 2 tariffs, so any reduction in tension over trade, or progress toward a deal, diminishes the likelihood that the worst-case scenario—a rapid delinking of the countries' economies, with an economic slowdown and increased inflation—will play out.
Still, nothing has returned to normal. The U.S. is still moving forward on sectoral tariffs in areas such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. Reciprocal tariffs on Chinese goods of 10%, plus a 20% levy related to fentanyl, sound great compared with the 80% the president had previously suggested, but the levies are still higher than they were at the start of the year.
That goes some way to explain why, even with the Dow Jones Industrial Average surging 1000 points at the open and the Nasdaq Composite poised to enter a new bull market, investors are still nursing year-to- date losses. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq are still down about 5% and 7%, respectively, since their 2025 highs, hit Feb. 19.
Nonetheless, with hopes running high that tariffs will remain in manageable territory, the market seems poised to keep rising. UBS strategist Andrew Garthwaite believes that markets look increasingly likely to price in a blue-sky scenario, for a number of reasons, even if the good times don't last.
The first is the administration's 'significant climbdown on tariffs," he wrote on Friday. 'It's becoming clear that President Trump perhaps has less leverage than he initially thought."
With Trump's approval ratings down and the stock market still recovering from the damage his tariffs inflicted, Garthwaite believes that Trump could feel compelled to declare victory. That could mean citing the 17 countries that have offered to reduce trade barriers and the $1.9 trillion of investments in the U.S. that domestic and foreign companies have promised—and moving on.
Then there is the idea that lower wage growth, plus a reduced risk of inflation as a result of this weekend's news, 'potentially allows the Federal Reserve to cut [interest rates] proactively from midyear," Garthwaite wrote. 'A proactive Fed potentially allows the market to look through any V-shaped fall in earnings per share."
In addition, he believes that the argument for American exceptionalism—in investing terms, the idea that U.S. markets are the best place to be—isn't dead as long as Silicon Valley keeps reaching milestones in the artificial intelligence race.
While there are reasons the market's momentum may falter, he said, investors may feel more inclined to make more optimistic bets. The S&P 500 could be fairly valued at 6164, surpassing its previous high of 6144, Garthwaite wrote.
Evercore ISI senior managing director Julian Emanuel agrees that AI will remain a pillar of the market, though he is less upbeat about rapid gains. He wrote on Sunday that his base case for '2025's evolving Bull Market is a 'Process' where new all-time highs will be part of 2026's story rather than a 'Moonshot' like 1998 where new all-time highs were seen less than three months after the 10/1998 Bear Market bottom."
His year-end target for the S&P 500 is 5600, compared with 5831 early Monday afternoon. That is because there are constraining factors. At 2.6%, inflation is still above the Fed's 2% target and could climb as even reduced tariffs take hold. Evercore estimates that corporations will be able to pass along about 50% of tariff costs to U.S. shoppers, enough inflationary pressure to keep the central bank from cutting rates.
Then add in the fact that his firm forecasts the U.S. economy will grow 0.9% in 2025— 'not a recession, but not far off," he wrote. 'And the biggest constraint could be the U.S. budget deficit, projected to increase despite DOGE."
Still, he believes that as the bull market does gain momentum over time, sectors like communication services, consumer discretionary, and tech are likely to be the leaders once again. That is where investors should look to buy when prices dip, he says.
22V Research's Dennis DeBusschere is in a similar camp. He wrote Monday that he was expecting a U.S.-China trade deal to include higher tariffs than those that were announced, meaning the 'short-term risk-on factor rally" he thought would happen now has even longer to play out. He is putting the quality stocks with sustainable dividends that looked attractive when the tariff uncertainty was at its worst on the back burner. Instead, he favors growth and momentum names.
'The Consumer services and Tech sectors don't face a macro constraint like the housing and durable goods sector faces," he said.
With Monday's stock gains, it's worth remembering a bull market doesn't have to be loved to be profitable. The picture may not be as bright as it was at the start of the year, but it is getting clearer.
That means it is just a matter of time before stocks retake their former highs.
Write to Teresa Rivas at teresa.rivas@barrons.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stocks, Bonds & Correlation Chaos: Rethinking the 60/40 strategy
Stocks, Bonds & Correlation Chaos: Rethinking the 60/40 strategy

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Stocks, Bonds & Correlation Chaos: Rethinking the 60/40 strategy

The concept of the 60/40 investment portfolio , which typically refers to an allocation of 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds, has long been the cornerstone of investing by retail and institutional investors. It offered a simple and effective way to manage risk and return. However, there has been considerable debate about the effectiveness of this approach in the current economic environment, and whether it is 'dead' or still relevant. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo Traditionally, stocks and bonds have exhibited negative correlation. However, this correlation has fluctuated in recent years owing to various factors such as geopolitical events, inflation, and interest rates. When stock prices rise (indicating a healthy economy), bond prices often fall (as interest rates might rise in response to inflation concerns). Conversely, when stocks decline, bonds typically perform better as investors seek safety. We first saw this positive correlation in early 2020, when markets faced the uncertainty of the Covid-19 pandemic, and both stocks and bonds fell. Live Events From 2021 to 2022, the US Federal Reserve and other central banks began to raise interest rates aggressively to combat rising inflation. As rates increased, bond prices fell, and the stock market experienced volatility. This period saw periods of increased correlation, as both equities and bonds faced downward pressure from rising interest rates. Additionally, during times of geopolitical tensions (the Russia-Ukraine war, for example) stocks have often reacted negatively. Bonds, however, did not always act as a safe haven during these times, leading to instances of positive correlation. A perfect example of this correlation was in 2022 when both bonds and stocks posted significant losses. The S&P 500 (a common proxy for equities) was down 18%, and the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index was down 13%. The combination of falling stock prices and rising interest rates resulted in a significant drawdown for the 60/40 strategy, an unusual deviation for this strategy. Many financial analysts and investors have begun to reassess the 60/40 approach due to its underperformance in recent years. The strategy's reliance on traditional asset classes has prompted discussions about diversifying into alternative asset classes such as real estate, commodities, hedge funds and private market investments. Alternative investments can provide exposure to asset classes that may not correlate with traditional investments like stocks and bonds, helping to mitigate overall portfolio risk. For instance, real estate, commodities, or infrastructure assets can serve as a hedge against inflation. While some argue that the traditional 60/40 portfolio is 'dead', it is perhaps more accurate to say that it may be less effective in an era marked by persistent inflation, geopolitical fragmentation, and policy uncertainty. Alternative strategies, revaluating asset classes, or shifting allocations based on economic indicators may be necessary going forward. Investors should regularly review their portfolios and potentially adapt to current and evolving market realities. Ultimately, the choice of investments will depend on individual risk tolerance, investment goals, and market conditions, making it essential to approach diversification with a well- considered strategy. (The author is Managing Director, International Business, LGT Wealth India)

Stocks, Bonds & Correlation Chaos: Rethinking the 60/40 strategy
Stocks, Bonds & Correlation Chaos: Rethinking the 60/40 strategy

Economic Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Stocks, Bonds & Correlation Chaos: Rethinking the 60/40 strategy

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel The concept of the 60/40 investment portfolio , which typically refers to an allocation of 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds, has long been the cornerstone of investing by retail and institutional offered a simple and effective way to manage risk and return. However, there has been considerable debate about the effectiveness of this approach in the current economic environment, and whether it is 'dead' or still stocks and bonds have exhibited negative correlation. However, this correlation has fluctuated in recent years owing to various factors such as geopolitical events, inflation, and interest stock prices rise (indicating a healthy economy), bond prices often fall (as interest rates might rise in response to inflation concerns).Conversely, when stocks decline, bonds typically perform better as investors seek safety. We first saw this positive correlation in early 2020, when markets faced the uncertainty of the Covid-19 pandemic, and both stocks and bonds 2021 to 2022, the US Federal Reserve and other central banks began to raise interest rates aggressively to combat rising inflation. As rates increased, bond prices fell, and the stock market experienced period saw periods of increased correlation, as both equities and bonds faced downward pressure from rising interest rates. Additionally, during times of geopolitical tensions (the Russia-Ukraine war, for example) stocks have often reacted however, did not always act as a safe haven during these times, leading to instances of positive correlation.A perfect example of this correlation was in 2022 when both bonds and stocks posted significant losses. The S&P 500 (a common proxy for equities) was down 18%, and the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index was down 13%.The combination of falling stock prices and rising interest rates resulted in a significant drawdown for the 60/40 strategy, an unusual deviation for this financial analysts and investors have begun to reassess the 60/40 approach due to its underperformance in recent years. The strategy's reliance on traditional asset classes has prompted discussions about diversifying into alternative asset classes such as real estate, commodities, hedge funds and private market investments can provide exposure to asset classes that may not correlate with traditional investments like stocks and bonds, helping to mitigate overall portfolio risk. For instance, real estate, commodities, or infrastructure assets can serve as a hedge against some argue that the traditional 60/40 portfolio is 'dead', it is perhaps more accurate to say that it may be less effective in an era marked by persistent inflation, geopolitical fragmentation, and policy strategies, revaluating asset classes, or shifting allocations based on economic indicators may be necessary going should regularly review their portfolios and potentially adapt to current and evolving market the choice of investments will depend on individual risk tolerance, investment goals, and market conditions, making it essential to approach diversification with a well- considered strategy.(The author is Managing Director, International Business, LGT Wealth India)(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)

Number of Companies Awaiting Licences From China For Importing Rare-Earth Magnets Double in Two Weeks
Number of Companies Awaiting Licences From China For Importing Rare-Earth Magnets Double in Two Weeks

The Wire

timean hour ago

  • The Wire

Number of Companies Awaiting Licences From China For Importing Rare-Earth Magnets Double in Two Weeks

Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Top Stories Number of Companies Awaiting Licences From China For Importing Rare-Earth Magnets Double in Two Weeks The Wire Staff 1 minute ago In FY 25, India imported around $200 million worth of rare-earth magnets. A majority of these imports were used in automotive and industrial applications. Electric vehicle. Representative image. Photo: Michael Marais/Unsplash Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: In a matter of two weeks, the number of companies which are awaiting licences from China's Commerce Ministry to procure rare-earth magnets has nearly doubled. While the number of such companies was 11 earlier, it has now increased to 21, with new companies joining the list including Bosch India, Marelli Powertrain India, Mahle Electric Drives India, TVS Motor and Uno Minda, reported The Economic Times. 'These companies have duly filled in and got endorsed the end-user certificate and shipped the requisite documents to their suppliers for procuring rare earth magnets from China, but licences are yet to be awarded by the government there,' a senior industry executive told ET. On April 4, China had issued orders mandating exporters that ship medium and heavy rare earth magnets to seek a licence from its commerce department after getting an end-user certificate from the buyer. The certificate requires buyers to make certain guarantees including the guarantee that these items will not be used for storing, manufacturing, producing or processing weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems. According to data from the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, 52 companies based in India source magnets from China to supply to automobile manufacturers across India. At present, stakeholders in the electric vehicle (EV) industry are concerned about the fact that inventories of rare-earth magnets used in EV traction motors and power steering systems could run dry by mid-July this year. Rating agency Icra has said that in wake of the depleting inventory, there is a need for urgent contingency planning. In FY 25, India imported around $200 million worth of rare-earth magnets. A majority of these imports were used in automotive and industrial applications. In electric two-wheelers, motors cost between Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 15,000, with rare earth magnets accounting for around 30 per cent of the motor cost. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Depleting Inventory of Imported Rare-Earth Magnets a Concern For EV Industry China Agrees to Supply US With Rare Earths: Trump Weakened Russia, Rising China and an Unsteady US: A Strategic Triangle That India Must Navigate Two Systems, Two Spheres: The Slow, Painful Divorce of the US and China US-China Trade Talks to Move Forward After Trump-Xi Call Chinese Vice FM to Visit Delhi for First High-Level Talks Since India-Pakistan Clashes Tesla 'Not Interested' in Manufacturing in India: Heavy Industries Minister What Do These Six Indicators Tell Us of India's Diplomacy after Operation Sindoor? Operation Sindoor: How India's Gamble Backfired and Made It More Vulnerable About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store