Israel Says It Hit Syria's Military HQ in Damascus on Day 3 of Strikes
Reuters news agency reported, citing Syrian security sources, that at least two drone strikes hit the Syrian defence ministry building in the first attack.
The reported attacks come after Israel vowed to step up its strikes in Syria unless the government pulls its forces from southern areas where there were recent deadly clashes between Druze and Bedouin tribes.
'The IDF [Israel Defence Forces] struck the entrance of the Syrian regime's military headquarters in the area of Damascus in Syria," the IDF said in a statement.
The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which monitors events amid the recent conflicts in Syria, said two people were injured in two successive airstrikes near the General Staff Headquarters.
Third day of Israeli strikes
Israel has now struck Syria for a third day in a row, saying its attacks aim to protect the Druze minority after Syrian government troops dispatched to quell fighting between Druze and Bedouin fighters ended up clashing with the Druze militias themselves.
Syria's state media and witnesses said there had also been Israeli strikes throughout Wednesday on the predominantly Druze city of Sweida, where fighting continues after the collapse of a ceasefire.
Israeli defence minister Israel Katz warned on X that "The warnings to Damascus have ended — now painful blows will come," saying that he and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had committed to protecting the Druze community in Syria.
Netanyahu called in February for southern Syria to be completely demilitarised and warned that Israel would not tolerate the presence of Syrian government forces near territory it controls.
As fighting continues in Sweida, members of the Druze community from Israel have been entering Syria to support Druze armed groups, while people from the Syrian Druze community, in their turn, have been trying to enter Israel.
Israeli soldiers have been firing teargas in an attempt to keep order on the heavily fortified frontier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
19 minutes ago
- First Post
'Actively involved' in India-US BTA talks: Govt tells Parliament amid spat with Trump over tariff
Regarding the efforts being taken by the government to protect critical industries such as agriculture, Prasada stated that international trade agreements allow for the inclusion of sensitive, negative, or exclusion lists - groupings of commodities that get restricted or no tariff concessions read more President Trump has threatened to hike tariffs on India 'substantially' for importing Russian oil, accusing New Delhi of benefitting from Moscow's fuel during the continuing war in Ukraine. File image/Reuters India is 'actively involved' in discussions for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) with the United States, with the goal of expanding trade and investment and deepening the commercial relationship to promote growth, national security, and job creation, said Jitin Prasada, Minister of Commerce, in a written response to the Lok Sabha on August 5. The answer came only hours after India issued a strong statement in response to US President Donald Trump's social media post threatening New Delhi with extra tariffs on its oil trade with Moscow. President Trump has threatened to hike tariffs on India 'substantially' for importing Russian oil, accusing New Delhi of benefitting from Moscow's fuel during the continuing war in Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Trump administration has yet to elaborate on the extra taxes. Negotiations for a trade agreement between India and the United States began in March 2025, and five rounds of discussions have been place thus far, the most recent in July. Talks for a mini-version of a deal before August 1 appear to have failed, as divergences continued, particularly on agriculture. Regarding the efforts being taken by the government to protect critical industries such as agriculture, Prasada stated that international trade agreements allow for the inclusion of sensitive, negative, or exclusion lists - groupings of commodities that get restricted or no tariff concessions. On August 5, Prasada said, 'In addition, in case of surge in imports and injury to the domestic industry, a country is allowed to take recourse to trade remedial measures such as anti-dumping and safeguards on imports within the periods as mutually agreed to by the parties under FTAs.' On July 30, Trump declared a 25 percent tax and an undisclosed fine on India for acquiring Russian energy supplies and defence equipment. Responding to the ongoing trade discussions with the United States, MoS for Agriculture Ramnath Thakur stated that the government has always prioritised farmers' livelihoods and interests, as well as food security concerns, while negotiating deals with international partners, including the United States.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
NASA to build Moon reactor by 2030, outpacing China-Russia lunar ambitions with a 100-kilowatt power system
Source: New York Times / BBC The United States is accelerating its space ambitions with a bold plan to construct a nuclear reactor on the Moon by 2030, according to the reports. This move, championed by Transportation Secretary and interim NASA chief Sean Duffy, signals a significant shift toward energy independence and strategic dominance in lunar exploration. The directive aims to outpace China and Russia's joint lunar base efforts while ensuring sustainable power for future Moon habitats and research facilities. With a 100-kilowatt power system in focus and contracts for ISS replacement on the horizon, this strategy could reshape the future of space exploration and energy innovation. Why the Moon needs a nuclear reactor Solar power, though efficient in low-Earth orbit, is unreliable on the Moon due to two-week-long lunar nights. A nuclear reactor ensures continuous, high-output power for critical systems like habitats, life support, and mining equipment. NASA's earlier 40-kilowatt system design now expands to a 100-kilowatt model, enabling long-term settlements and deep-space missions. Experts note that nuclear power could support resource extraction, like oxygen and water from lunar regolith, which is crucial for producing rocket fuel and sustaining human life far from Earth. This capability would reduce dependency on Earth-based resupply missions, making lunar bases more economically and operationally viable. Space race 2.0: US reacts to China-Russia lunar base plans with a 100-kilowatt power strategy China and Russia's International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) poses a direct challenge to US leadership in space. Their collaboration aims to establish a permanently crewed lunar facility, backed by advanced robotics and resource utilization programs. Duffy's directive reflects a 'space race 2.0' mindset, emphasizing energy independence and infrastructure as strategic levers. Analysts say the nuclear reactor isn't just about science; it's a symbol of geopolitical power projection. By achieving reliable energy on the Moon, the US can support military, scientific, and commercial activities, ensuring it remains ahead in a future where lunar resources could influence global energy and technology markets. The directive significantly upsizes previous NASA designs, calling for a 100-kilowatt fission surface power system capable of running multiple habitats and industrial-scale facilities. The plan involves a 60-day window to gather input from private space and energy companies and appointing a NASA official to spearhead the project. This power scale is intended not only for lunar missions but also to serve as a blueprint for Mars and deep-space exploration. Unlike solar arrays, nuclear reactors can withstand lunar dust, extreme temperatures, and long nights, making them a game-changer for permanent extraterrestrial settlements and advanced resource processing facilities on the Moon. NASA's new vision under Duffy: Hard-power technologies and commercial space growth Sean Duffy's appointment as interim NASA chief, while also serving as Transportation Secretary, sparked debate in Congress. Critics question his ability to manage two high-profile federal roles simultaneously. However, this lunar reactor initiative shows Duffy's intent to leave a strong mark on US space policy, focusing on hard-power technologies rather than purely scientific exploration. His directive aligns with the White House's push for increased crewed spaceflight funding, even while cutting some research programs. The move highlights a shift in NASA priorities, emphasising infrastructure and power generation as key pillars for maintaining US dominance in an increasingly contested space environment. Alongside the Moon reactor plan, NASA aims to accelerate the replacement of the ageing International Space Station (ISS). The agency will award contracts to at least two private companies within six months, with a goal of deploying a commercially operated station by 2030. Leading contenders include Axiom Space, Vast, and Blue Origin. This transition reflects NASA's procurement shift toward private-sector partnerships, ensuring a continued human presence in low-Earth orbit while freeing up resources for deep-space missions. Critics have raised concerns about funding delays, but Duffy's directive is expected to fast-track development and synchronize with national space security strategies. Why the Moon nuclear reactor is important for Mars and asteroid missions The Moon nuclear reactor initiative signals more than just energy innovation; it represents a paradigm shift in space exploration. By coupling lunar nuclear energy infrastructure with a commercial space station ecosystem, the US positions itself to dominate both cislunar space and planetary exploration. Experts believe this could lead to permanent Moon settlements, asteroid mining, and Mars missions becoming practical within the next decade. Furthermore, the initiative reinforces US competitiveness in a world where space resources and technologies may define future economic and military power. The outcome of these programs could reshape the global balance of power beyond Earth. Also Read | NASA astronaut recalls awe-inspiring view of Mumbai and Delhi's night lights from space: 'India looks magical'
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Kremlin slams Trump tariff pressure on India over Russian oil as illegal
Russia accused the United States on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) of exerting illegal trade pressure on India after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened again to raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil. "We hear many statements that are in fact threats, attempts to force countries to cut trade relations with Russia. We do not consider such statements to be legal," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "We believe that sovereign countries should have and do have the right to choose their own trading partners, partners for trade and economic cooperation, and to choose for themselves the forms of trade and economic cooperation that are in the interests of a particular country." Mr. Trump has said that from Friday (August 8, 2025) he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end its 3-1/2 year conflict with Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin has signalled no change in Russia's stance on the war, despite the looming deadline. India has called Mr. Trump's threats "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two major economies. Two Indian government sources told Reuters on the weekend that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Mr. Trump's threats.
