
Police watchdog to investigate mother's claim she was unlawfully strip-searched by Greater Manchester Police
A mother's complaint she was unlawfully strip-searched by Greater Manchester Police (GMP) will be investigated by the police watchdog.
It follows a "lonely, exhausting and distressing" battle by Dannika Stewart, who was featured in a Sky News investigation after she was arrested and allegedly forced to strip at Pendleton Police Station in October 2022.
Ms Stewart claimed she was being punished for complaining about police failures over a crime she had reported. She was asked to come to the police station and on arriving was told the man she'd accused had made an accusation against her of blackmail.
She told Sky News she was arrested and told to strip naked.
She said: "I took my tracksuit bottoms off, which I knew they were going to take away from me anyway. I took my leggings off and then took my knickers off and I'm just sat there naked."
She said she was left naked while officers walked in and out of the cell.
"It's all about power," she said. "Because when I left the police station that day the sergeant on the desk said, 'you need to drop all your complaints against the police'."
Our investigation into the treatment of several women prompted Manchester mayor Andy Burnham to call an inquiry into the custody practices of GMP which was conducted by Dame Vera Baird.
Dame Vera's report into allegations by several women found officers were "using their power unwisely, unnecessarily, and sometimes unlawfully".
Turned 'from a victim into a suspect'
After publication she told Sky News "based on almost nothing, GMP turned Ms Stewart from a victim into a suspect".
Dame Vera said Ms Stewart remained on bail with the threat of being charged with blackmail for months without any apparent evidence to support the allegations against her.
She added: "I think she was, in truth, bullied. The strip search is denied, but she is so clear and so humiliated when she repeats what happened that I'm inclined very much to believe her."
Ms Stewart described this period on bail as "very lonely, exhausting, empty and distressing".
She said: "It was hard for my mind to consider anything alternative every day over and over, wondering if I was about to go to jail for something I didn't do. I constantly thought of potential solutions to free myself from the nightmare the police projected onto me. My brain never went offline at night, and the longer it has gone on."
'A disputed set of facts'
However, following the inquiry, Chief Constable Stephen Watson told Sky News he didn't know if Ms Stewart was strip-searched because "there is a disputed set of facts".
Responding, Ms Stewart said: "If you are still denying something after an independent investigation, you are in denial, aren't you, as a force?"
Now the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has decided her complaints relating to her interactions with officers while in custody, including how she was searched, should be independently investigated.
In response a GMP spokesperson said: "We have apologised unreservedly to Ms Stewart for the matters where the service we provided her was not acceptable, and for the distress caused by her experiences with the police.
"Our Professional Standards Directorate thoroughly investigated all allegations made and will now fully assist the IOPC with their enquiries.
"In implementing all the recommendations of Dame Vera Baird's report in the past year, we have significantly improved provisions for those in our custody - particularly women and girls - by ending the use of strip search for welfare purposes and by ensuring all female detainees are assigned a dedicated welfare officer."
'Apology is not enough'
Ms Stewart doesn't feel like the apology she received in a letter from the police standards department last year is enough.
She said: "How is this an adequate or appropriate apology after three to four years fighting and the endless failings. Really, how many times do we have to ask them to treat us like humans and take accountability for the actions of officers?
"I am losing the ability to reason with such stupidity and ignorance from GMP. The police not taking accountability feels like a constant attack. No growth can occur until they accept what happened."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
West Mercia Police officer banned for 'vulgar' comments
A gross misconduct hearing has upheld allegations that a male police officer engaged in inappropriate behaviour repeatedly towards female colleagues. PC Nathan Rogers would have been dismissed from West Mercia Police if he had not already resigned, the force said after the hearing on Tuesday. Mr Rogers made "highly offensive" and "vulgar" comments as well as initiating unwanted contact through social media - with his behaviour deemed "derogatory" and "harassing in nature". The former officer, who was based in the Operations and Communications Centre in Worcestershire, will be banned from working for a UK police service in the future. The hearing upheld an allegation that his behaviour, between June 2023 and May 2025, amounted to gross Mercia Police said his conduct was first formally addressed in June 2023, when he was sanctioned with a written warning. The force said despite both informal and formal interventions he continued to breach policing standards of professional behaviour. It said: "Despite prior disciplinary measures, Rogers repeatedly failed to uphold professional standards, showing a blatant disregard for his colleagues and for the values of the force. "The hearing found his actions breached the standards of authority, respect, and courtesy, and amounted to discreditable conduct."Mr Rogers resigned from the force in April Chief Constable Rachel Jones said: "Nathan Rogers was given opportunities to learn and change his behaviour, but he continued to act in a wholly unacceptable and unprofessional manner."His actions were highly unprofessional and undoubtedly made his female colleagues feel deeply uncomfortable and such behaviour will not be tolerated."He will now be added to the College of Policing's barred list, banning him from working for a UK police service in the future. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ryanair introduces £500 fines for disruptive passengers
Disruptive Ryanair passengers removed from planes will be fined £500, the airline has announced. The carrier said this will be the 'minimum' punishment, and it will continue to pursue passengers for civil damages. Ryanair expressed hope the new policy will 'act as a deterrent to eliminate this unacceptable behaviour'. A spokesperson for the airline said: 'It is unacceptable that passengers are made to suffer unnecessary disruption because of one unruly passenger's behaviour. 'To help ensure that our passengers and crew travel in a comfortable and stress-free environment, without unnecessary disruption caused by a tiny number of unruly passengers, we have introduced a £500 fine, which will be issued to any passengers offloaded from aircraft as a result of their misconduct. 'While these are isolated events which happen across all airlines, disruptive behaviour in such a confined shared space is unacceptable.'


BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
M18 mound of earth could be removed after fatal crash
A coroner has called for National Highways to take action to prevent future deaths on a stretch of motorway after a teenager was killed in a Mongan, 18, was a passenger in an Audi being driven by his brother John, 19, when it left the M18 between Doncaster and Rotherham last inquest previously heard the car hit a mound of grass on the central reservation which caused it to become "airborne" before it landed in woodland some 42 metres its conclusion, senior coroner Nicola Mundy said the presence of the mound placed "road users at risk". National Highways said it would be providing a "comprehensive response" to her concerns. The inquest, which was held at Doncaster Coroner's Court last week, heard the Audi was travelling at about 100mph when the crash happened and that both men were thrown from the hearing was told Patrick died instantly while John remained in a serious condition in hospital and had not yet been told of Patrick's brothers, from Cottenham, Cambridgeshire, had been at a pub in the Doncaster area. 'Catastrophic effect' South Yorkshire Police forensic collision investigator Steven Gardner told the inquest the manner of driving was the "sole causation" of the crash, although the mound has also posed a Mundy's call for National Highways to take action was raised in a prevention of future deaths it, she said the forensic collision investigator had advised the "mound of earth creates a continuing hazard to motorway users and any vehicle which might have legitimate cause to veer to the central reservation and in doing so strikes the mound".She said even if a vehicle was travelling within the speed limit "it would be subjected to the same effect on the vehicle (in that control of the vehicle would be lost) with potentially catastrophic effects". The coroner added: "The continued presence of this hazard (the mound of earth) places road users at risk of death."A spokesperson for National Highways said: "Any death on our roads is one too many and our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Patrick Mongan."We are reviewing the coroner's comments and will provide a comprehensive response to the report."The report said National Highways had 56 days to respond to its stated: "Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. "Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North