Major blast at south Iran port kills four, injures hundreds
A powerful explosion ripped through a key port in southern Iran yesterday, killing four people and injuring more than 500, state media said. Although the cause of the blast was not immediately clear, the customs office at the port said in a statement carried by state TV that it probably resulted from a fire that broke out at the hazmat and chemical materials storage depot.
State media reported a 'massive explosion' at Shahid Rajaee, the country's largest commercial port, located in Hormozgan province on Iran's southern coast. Footage broadcast on state TV showed thick columns of black smoke billowing from the port area, where many containers are stored, with helicopters deployed to fight the fire.
Citing local emergency services, state TV reported that at least 516 people were injured and 'hundreds have been transferred to nearby medical centres'. 'Unfortunately, at least four deaths have been confirmed by rescuers,' the head of the Red Crescent Society's Relief and Rescue Organisation, Babak Mahmoudi, later told the broadcaster. State TV had quoted Esmaeil Malekizadeh, a regional port official, as saying authorities were working to put out a fire at the facility.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed sympathy for the victims of the deadly blast, adding he had 'issued an order to investigate the situation and the causes', dispatching Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni to the area to look into the incident. Shahid Rajaee, more than 1,000 kilometres (620 miles) south of the capital Tehran, is the most advanced container port in Iran, according to the official IRNA news agency. It is located 23 kilometres west of Bandar Abbas, the Hormozgan provincial capital, and north of the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of world oil output passes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
Iran Extends Ban on Dog-walking for ‘public Order
Iranian authorities have expanded a ban on walking dogs in public to many cities nationwide, citing public health, social order and safety concerns, domestic media have reported. The ban, which echoes a 2019 police directive that barred walking dogs in Tehran, was expanded to Ilam city in the west on Sunday, according to reports. At least 17 other cities have introduced similar bans in recent days, including Isfahan in the centre and Kerman in the south. Owning and walking dogs has been a contentious subject since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, though there is no law banning dog ownership outright. Many religious scholars, however, consider petting dogs or coming into contact with their saliva as najis , or ritually impure, while some officials view pet dogs as a symbol of western cultural influence. Local authorities have periodically introduced bans on walking dogs in public spaces or carrying them in vehicles as part of a wider campaign to discourage their ownership. Enforcing the restrictions has been inconsistent, as many owners continue to walk their dogs in Tehran and elsewhere across Iran. On Sunday, the reformist Etemad newspaper quoted an official from Ilam city as saying 'legal action will be taken against violators', without elaborating. On Saturday, the state newspaper Iran said the latest measures were aimed at 'maintaining public order, ensuring safety and protecting public health'. Abbas Najafi, the prosecutor of the western city of Hamedan, was quoted by the Iran newspaper, as saying: 'Dog walking is a threat to public health, peace and comfort.' In 2021, 75 lawmakers condemned pet ownership as a 'destructive social problem', saying it could 'gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life'. In 2017, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said: 'Keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guard dogs is considered reprehensible.' According to Tasnim news agency, Khamenei added: 'If this practice resembles that of non-Muslims, promotes their culture or causes harm and disturbance to neighbours, it is deemed forbidden.' Also read: Iran Furious At 'Racist' US Travel Ban Targeting Muslim Nations
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Iran authorities expand dog walking ban
AFP | Iranian authorities have expanded a ban on walking dogs in public to multiple cities nationwide, citing public health, social order and safety concerns, domestic media reported Sunday. The ban -- which echoes a 2019 police directive that barred walking dogs in Tehran -- was expanded to Ilam city in the west on Sunday, according to reports. At least 17 other cities introduced similar bans in recent days, including Isfahan in the centre and Kerman in the south. Owning and walking dogs has been a contentious topic since the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, though there is no law outrightly banning dog ownership. Many religious scholars however consider petting dogs or coming into contact with their saliva as "najis" or ritually impure, while some officials view them as a symbol of Western cultural influence. Local authorities have periodically introduced bans on walking dogs in public spaces or carrying them in vehicles as part of a wider campaign to discourage their ownership. Enforcing the restrictions has been largely inconsistent, as many owners continue to walk their dogs in Tehran and elsewhere across Iran. On Sunday, the reformist Etemad newspaper quoted an official from Ilam city as saying that "legal action will be taken against violators", without elaborating. On Saturday, the state newspaper Iran said the latest measures are aimed at "maintaining public order, ensuring safety and protecting public health". "Dog walking is a threat to public health, peace and comfort," said Abbas Najafi, prosecutor of the western city of Hamedan, as quoted by Iran newspaper. In 2021, some 75 lawmakers condemned pet ownership as a "destructive social problem", saying it could "gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life". In 2017, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that "keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guard dogs is considered reprehensible".
Gulf Insider
2 days ago
- Gulf Insider
Iran Furious At 'Racist' US Travel Ban Targeting Muslim Nations
At a moment both sides are still engaged in highly sensitive nuclear negotiations, Iran has strongly condemned US President Donald Trump's new travel ban, blasting it as 'racist' and indicative of Washington's deep hostility toward Iranians and Muslims. The executive order restricts travel from 19 countries, primarily in Africa and the Middle East, in a new 'Muslim travel ban' of sorts – given it mirrors similar policies from Trump's first term in office, and will take effect Monday. There are outright bans imposed on a dozen of the nations. Iranian official Alireza Hashemi-Raja criticized the move as reflecting a 'supremacist and racist mentality' among American policymakers. According to more via Al Jazeera: Hashemi-Raja argued that the policy breaches international legal norms and denies millions the basic right to travel, based solely on nationality or faith. He said the ban would 'entail international responsibility for the US government', without elaborating. The ban heavily features Mideast and North African countries like Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and others – but is not limited to countries with Muslim majority populations. Among the countries listed are also Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti. There are 'partial bans' and some new visa restrictions for Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. President Trump had explained this week in a statement posted to the White House: 'The United States must ensure that admitted aliens and aliens otherwise already present in the United States do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles, and do not advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists or other threats to our national security.' And further: I directed the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, to identify countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a full or partial suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries pursuant to section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f). After completing that process, the Secretary of State determined that a number of countries remain deficient with regards to screening and vetting. Many of these countries have also taken advantage of the United States in their exploitation of our visa system and their historic failure to accept back their removable nationals. Source: NBC News Interestingly, Syria was on the controversial ban during Trump's first term, but is notably absent this time around – despite the fact that the decade-plus long proxy war saw foreign jihadists flow there from around the world. There are even foreign jihadists who hold government positions in the Jolani (Sharaa) regime, in the wake of Assad's December ouster.
